Re: Updated Overview of Bitcointalk Signature-Ad Campaigns

[abyrnes81]

You have fortunejack listed as PNYC (payment not yet confirmed) however I understand that they had a long standing signature deal not long ago that paid out on time for several months. Is there a reason why it is not listed as "A" (active)?

FortuneJack previous campaign has ended, what you saw on the OP is a new campaign with 0.04 weekly and a bonus of 0.04 for bonus if you join up for 4 weeks period, and this campaign hasnt really payout yet so it is right to list them as PYNC although today is their payday, if they pay then they will be moved to active

Starting 'new' campaign doesn't mean you're not trustworthy anymore. If FJ have a long history of running the campaign without any payment issues, then it should be marked as 'active'.

They could have just used phrase 'new rules' instead of 'new campaign' and they would've be shown as 'active'.

did they ever actually ever close their campaign? Looking through the change log the last mention of them is from January when they were "updated". I am fairly certain that they just created a new thread (with different rules?). I understand that if a campaign were to have closed, then the company potentially chsnged ownership it is possible that the new owners could run away with free advertising but I don't think that would really apply if only a new thread was made.

By the new thread logic, bitstars should always be in PNYC.

No I don't think you are right, because the new signature campaign is always managed by the same "team" so there will not exist any type of problem (if they will stay honest).

[1715460161]

1715460161

[1715460161]

1715460161

[pawel7777]

You have fortunejack listed as PNYC (payment not yet confirmed) however I understand that they had a long standing signature deal not long ago that paid out on time for several months. Is there a reason why it is not listed as "A" (active)?

FortuneJack previous campaign has ended, what you saw on the OP is a new campaign with 0.04 weekly and a bonus of 0.04 for bonus if you join up for 4 weeks period, and this campaign hasnt really payout yet so it is right to list them as PYNC although today is their payday, if they pay then they will be moved to active

Starting 'new' campaign doesn't mean you're not trustworthy anymore. If FJ have a long history of running the campaign without any payment issues, then it should be marked as 'active'.

They could have just used phrase 'new rules' instead of 'new campaign' and they would've be shown as 'active'.

did they ever actually ever close their campaign? Looking through the change log the last mention of them is from January when they were "updated". I am fairly certain that they just created a new thread (with different rules?). I understand that if a campaign were to have closed, then the company potentially chsnged ownership it is possible that the new owners could run away with free advertising but I don't think that would really apply if only a new thread was made.

By the new thread logic, bitstars should always be in PNYC.

Exactly.

I believe mitchell doesnt list it as active was because it is based on this reason ,although FortuneJack never had any issue with sig campaign payment but it is still a fact that this "new campaign" hasnt paid out yet, so PYNC is a correct term for this
BUt there is no point in debating this further, because as I said, today is their payday, so it they pay it out today, they will be move to Active, so no biggies for this

As Quickseller wrote, it's not actually new campaign. They just called it 'new campaign' and got somewhat penalised with 'PNYC' mark.
Would it really make any difference trust-wise if they change the wording to 'new thread' (instead of 'new campaign')?

[arallmuus]

I believe mitchell doesnt list it as active was because it is based on this reason ,although FortuneJack never had any issue with sig campaign payment but it is still a fact that this "new campaign" hasnt paid out yet, so PYNC is a correct term for this
BUt there is no point in debating this further, because as I said, today is their payday, so it they pay it out today, they will be move to Active, so no biggies for this

As Quickseller wrote, it's not actually new campaign. They just called it 'new campaign' and got somewhat penalised with 'PNYC' mark.
Would it really make any difference trust-wise if they change the wording to 'new thread' (instead of 'new campaign')?

penalize? not really as FortuneJack doesnt get any disadvantage due to being put in the PYNC for 1 week IMO, as they only accepts Sr. Member and upper rank, and their campaign have been around for quite some time, people should already knew their campaign are trusted, and Personally I dont even realize that they are in PYNC until you bring this up so yeah

and also as I have stated, today is their payday, they will be move back to active sig campaign soon after they pay

[pawel7777]

penalize? not really as FortuneJack doesnt get any disadvantage due to being put in the PYNC for 1 week IMO, as they only accepts Sr. Member and upper rank, and their campaign have been around for quite some time, people should already knew their campaign are trusted, and Personally I dont even realize that they are in PYNC until you bring this up so yeah

and also as I have stated, today is their payday, they will be move back to active sig campaign soon after they pay

Yes, penalised. It's not severe disadvantage, but anyone new, without much experience with sig campaigns could see it as untrusted and risky.

And it's not solely about FJ but about principle. Bit-x is about to start 'new campaign' in mid April, possibly with monthly payments, so if the same logic is applied they'll stuck with 'PNYC' badge for the whole month.

[ticoti]

You have fortunejack listed as PNYC (payment not yet confirmed) however I understand that they had a long standing signature deal not long ago that paid out on time for several months. Is there a reason why it is not listed as "A" (active)?

FortuneJack previous campaign has ended, what you saw on the OP is a new campaign with 0.04 weekly and a bonus of 0.04 for bonus if you join up for 4 weeks period, and this campaign hasnt really payout yet so it is right to list them as PYNC although today is their payday, if they pay then they will be moved to active

Starting 'new' campaign doesn't mean you're not trustworthy anymore. If FJ have a long history of running the campaign without any payment issues, then it should be marked as 'active'.

They could have just used phrase 'new rules' instead of 'new campaign' and they would've be shown as 'active'.

I believe mitchell doesnt list it as active was because it is based on this reason ,although FortuneJack never had any issue with sig campaign payment but it is still a fact that this "new campaign" hasnt paid out yet, so PYNC is a correct term for this
BUt there is no point in debating this further, because as I said, today is their payday, so it they pay it out today, they will be move to Active, so no biggies for this

I didn't know why it was set as an untrusted, as it only had increased the payment rates, but I can confirm now I have received the payment

[marcotheminer]

Code:

[b]BitcoinPoker[/b] ([url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1018585.0]Thread[/url])
[i]Payment period:[/i] BiWeekly
[i]Minimum posts:[/i] 30
[i]Payments:[/i] FM: 0.04 SM: 0.065 HM: 0.08
[u][i]Escrow[/i][/u]: Yes, Quickseller (well, it depends if Quickseller is making payouts too)
[i]Miscellaneous:[/i] Other information that might be important

[fox19891989]

I didn't know why it was set as an untrusted, as it only had increased the payment rates, but I can confirm now I have received the payment

"payment not yet confirmed" is not equal to "untrusted", so you guys don't need to argue here, and when you guys get first payment of the new Fj campaign, OP will move it to Payment confirmed.

Although we all know FJ sig campaign pays well, michell has his own estimation.

[BitcoinINV]

is there any signature campaign that allow negative trust user with senior rank
i want to join a signature campaign and make few bucks

[arallmuus]

is there any signature campaign that allow negative trust user with senior rank
i want to join a signature campaign and make few bucks

No there is none.

One new Campaign

AllInCrypto (AllInCrypto Sig Campaign)
Payment period: BiWeekly
Minimum posts: 30 posts
Payments: FM: 0.04 SM BTC: 0.06 BTC HM: 0.075 BTC
Escrow: Yes, Blazedout419

[hilariousandco]

is there any signature campaign that allow negative trust user with senior rank
i want to join a signature campaign and make few bucks

Does the one you're in now not? Think I saw some people with neg trust say they still get paid from it. I think Luckybit might take them on a case by case basis but there other rules can be strict.

[Searing]

CryptoVPN campaign is only 60/30m posts now needed. No longer 80/40m.  If you do 30/m you get 1/2 the full monthly payment. The classifications and the amounts are still the same thou.
If you want to change the table on the 1st page with this new info...

[fox19891989]

Find a new Campaign

BitcoinPoker.gg   link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1018585.0
Payment period: BiWeekly
Minimum posts: 30 posts
Payments: FM: 0.04BTC(10 slots)  SM BTC: 0.065 BTC(10 slots) HM: 0.08 BTC(5 slots)
Escrow: Quickseller

[marcotheminer]

Find a new Campaign

BitcoinPoker.gg   link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1018585.0
Payment period: BiWeekly
Minimum posts: 30 posts
Payments: FM: 0.04BTC(10 slots)  SM BTC: 0.065 BTC(10 slots) HM: 0.08 BTC(5 slots)
Escrow: Quickseller

I have the code up there ^.

[secondstrade.com]

www.secondstrade.com raised signature rate as of 04/13.

below is a new signature rate.

★★★ Signature Rate ★★★
 JR Member :   0.0001 BTC per constructive post.              - payout increased as of 04/13
 Member :       0.0002 BTC per constructive post.                   - payout increased as of 04/13
 Full Member :  0.00027 BTC per constructive post.             - payout increased as of 04/13  
 Senior :          0.0003 BTC per constructive post.                     - payout increased as of 04/13
 Hero / Legendary : 0.00035 BTC per constructive post.      - payout decreased as of 02/23
 No limited.


thank you.

[Quickseller]

There is no reason to update the OP however cryptosplit has started a campaign and scammed its investors/customers. As a result I (as escrow) has offered partial payments to participants if they wish to remove their signature.

[shorena]

Update for dadice.

Highlighted the changes.

Da Dice (Thread)
Payment period: Weekly
Minimum posts: 20 posts/week
Payments: F: 0.0009BTC per post, S: 0.0013BTC per post, H/L: 0.0015BTC per post.
Escrow: No
Miscellaneous: Maximum 100 posts per week will be paid. There is a bonus of 0.4BTC for the top ten constructive posters each week. There is also a bonus programm that allows long term participants to get a bonus every 4 weeks.

posted here -> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=973949.msg11087932#msg11087932

copy pasta:

Code:

[b]Da Dice[/b] ([url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=973949.0]Thread[/url])
[i]Payment period:[/i] Weekly
[i]Minimum posts:[/i] 20 posts/week
[i]Payments:[/i] F: 0.0009BTC per post, S: 0.0013BTC per post, H/L: 0.0015BTC per post.
[u][i]Escrow[/i][/u]: No
[i]Miscellaneous:[/i] Maximum 100 posts per week will be paid. There is a bonus of 0.4BTC for the top ten constructive posters each week. There is also a bonus programm that allows long term participants to get a bonus every 4 weeks.

[arallmuus]

64 Blocks (64 Blocks Signature Campaign)
Payment period: Weekly
Minimum posts: 10 posts/week
Payments: N : 0.000047 BTC per post ; Jr. M : 0.000065 BTC per post ; 0.00015 BTC per post ; FM : 0.00045 BTC per post, Sr. M: 0.00073 BTC per post ;  H/L: 0.00073 BTC per post.
Escrow: Dabs, but since Dabs is a co-owner of the project, so No escrow in this case
Miscellaneous: Maximum 50 posts per week will be paid. For FM, Sr. M and H/L there will only be 3 spots each, along with avatar campaign gains 6.4 % more and post in gambling section gains 5 % more

[teamcorona]

Corona's signature campaign is launched

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1026177

Come and join!

[hilariousandco]

Corona's signature campaign is launched

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1026177

Come and join!

If you're just paid in alt coins it doesn't belong in Services nor will it be included on this list as it's for bitcoin deals only.

[teamcorona]

Corona's signature campaign is launched

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1026177

Come and join!

If you're just paid in alt coins it doesn't belong in Services nor will it be included on this list as it's for bitcoin deals only.

Understood