trinhdinhthang20007
Member
Offline
Activity: 266
Merit: 10
|
|
February 25, 2018, 02:17:26 PM |
|
This coin is going to explode soon! Any reason why you think this? I'm certainly hopeful as I'm mining it (and have been for sometime) with my balance slowly accumulating. I found it to be fairly stable throughout the last few months of volatility which was a nice change from most of the alts! The only reason I think this, is the current valuation doesn't make sense to me. How can an established old coin with an active developer have the same marketcap as total shitcoins that haven't had development in months? Either the market expects bushstar to go work for another coin again, or I'm missing a piece of the puzzle. Where will the market go this year?
|
|
|
|
Alexthesalamander
|
|
February 28, 2018, 05:57:49 PM |
|
Segwit in 9 days, guys =)
|
Buy high and sell low
|
|
|
AltMiner.net
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
AltMiner.Net | Low-Fee Pool | 2hr Payout
|
|
March 01, 2018, 10:47:02 AM |
|
Making all in src make[1]: Entering directory '/home/ftc/source/Feathercoin/src' cd .. && /bin/bash /home/ftc/source/Feathercoin/build-aux/missing automake-1.15 --foreign src/Makefile cd .. && /bin/bash ./config.status src/Makefile depfiles config.status: creating src/Makefile config.status: executing depfiles commands make[2]: Entering directory '/home/ftc/source/Feathercoin/src' make[3]: Entering directory '/home/ftc/source/Feathercoin/src/secp256k1' make[3]: Leaving directory '/home/ftc/source/Feathercoin/src/secp256k1' CXXLD feathercoind /usr/bin/ld: crypto/libbitcoin_crypto.a(crypto_libbitcoin_crypto_a-neoscrypt.o): relocation R_X86_64_32S against `.rodata' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC crypto/libbitcoin_crypto.a: error adding symbols: Bad value collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status Makefile:3428: recipe for target 'feathercoind' failed make[2]: *** [feathercoind] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/ftc/source/Feathercoin/src' Makefile:8650: recipe for target 'all-recursive' failed make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/ftc/source/Feathercoin/src' Makefile:689: recipe for target 'all-recursive' failed make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
|
|
|
|
aciddude
|
|
March 01, 2018, 02:39:32 PM |
|
Making all in src make[1]: Entering directory '/home/ftc/source/Feathercoin/src' cd .. && /bin/bash /home/ftc/source/Feathercoin/build-aux/missing automake-1.15 --foreign src/Makefile cd .. && /bin/bash ./config.status src/Makefile depfiles config.status: creating src/Makefile config.status: executing depfiles commands make[2]: Entering directory '/home/ftc/source/Feathercoin/src' make[3]: Entering directory '/home/ftc/source/Feathercoin/src/secp256k1' make[3]: Leaving directory '/home/ftc/source/Feathercoin/src/secp256k1' CXXLD feathercoind /usr/bin/ld: crypto/libbitcoin_crypto.a(crypto_libbitcoin_crypto_a-neoscrypt.o): relocation R_X86_64_32S against `.rodata' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC crypto/libbitcoin_crypto.a: error adding symbols: Bad value collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status Makefile:3428: recipe for target 'feathercoind' failed make[2]: *** [feathercoind] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/ftc/source/Feathercoin/src' Makefile:8650: recipe for target 'all-recursive' failed make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/ftc/source/Feathercoin/src' Makefile:689: recipe for target 'all-recursive' failed make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
try it like this please ./configure CFLAGS=-fPIC CXXFLAGS=-fPIC --enable-shared
|
|
|
|
GoldBuffalo
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 71
Merit: 5
|
|
March 02, 2018, 11:57:31 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Neu_Cinetico
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 46
Merit: 0
|
|
March 03, 2018, 12:08:35 PM |
|
Heelloooo
just starting. Whats the better pool for mine??
|
|
|
|
marecek666
Member
Offline
Activity: 236
Merit: 12
|
|
March 03, 2018, 01:48:23 PM |
|
Heelloooo
just starting. Whats the better pool for mine??
If you have a decent hashpower the best way is to use official: pool.feathercoin.com if your miner is weak, choose bigger pool where rounds are faster: give-me-coins.com feathercoin.miningpoolhub.com
|
|
|
|
Neu_Cinetico
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 46
Merit: 0
|
|
March 03, 2018, 03:48:22 PM |
|
Heelloooo
just starting. Whats the better pool for mine??
If you have a decent hashpower the best way is to use official: pool.feathercoin.com if your miner is weak, choose bigger pool where rounds are faster: give-me-coins.com feathercoin.miningpoolhub.com nice, thanks alot. Testing with very low hash but if it work nice i will change for my rigs. So perfect answer
|
|
|
|
Atrax
Member
Offline
Activity: 133
Merit: 34
|
|
March 04, 2018, 12:18:05 AM |
|
Hi all,
am I the only one who has the impression that all known pools are currently "out of luck"?
Could it be that some pretty big player has started to hash with his own pool without anybody knowing it? Or why else seem most pools currently not finding any block?
|
|
|
|
O$IRIS
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 136
Merit: 0
|
|
March 04, 2018, 12:23:56 AM |
|
What is the unique value proposition of Feathercoin>
|
|
|
|
aciddude
|
|
March 04, 2018, 11:30:33 AM |
|
Hi all,
am I the only one who has the impression that all known pools are currently "out of luck"?
Could it be that some pretty big player has started to hash with his own pool without anybody knowing it? Or why else seem most pools currently not finding any block?
the official pool that I run pool.feathercoin.com mined a block around an hour ago....i've had no reported errors. We find blocks fine we just have a low hash rate because we only brought the pool up a few weeks ago.
|
|
|
|
aciddude
|
|
March 04, 2018, 11:37:01 AM |
|
:-) ! 24 hr Volume has gone past $ 6.5 million or 604 BTC. Upbit seems to be leading the way this time which is interesting because Bittrex for the longest time has usually been the leader with the most volume.
|
|
|
|
marecek666
Member
Offline
Activity: 236
Merit: 12
|
|
March 04, 2018, 12:24:52 PM Last edit: March 04, 2018, 12:54:04 PM by marecek666 |
|
Hi all,
am I the only one who has the impression that all known pools are currently "out of luck"?
Could it be that some pretty big player has started to hash with his own pool without anybody knowing it? Or why else seem most pools currently not finding any block?
Miningpoolhub is doing well, there is a block every several minutes. Currently round estimate 3,5 min with around 40% of whole FTC network. But this is not very good for FTC. Hashrate should be more distributed to other pools. others: Theblocksfactory has only about 40MH/s with rounds in several hours. You can see that they reduced fee to 0% from the moment when miners gone. They had 2% fee before. Give-Me-Coins has longer constant rate in the range 100-200MH/s with estimated rounds about 1-2 hour. They apply 1% fee but only 30 confirmations to payout (the best value among other FTC pools). Their luck is weak last days. And in general, yes there is "somebody" with stronger hashrate who sometimes run in the FTC network. It was visible last days, when network diff was higher than ussual. Maybe it is the load from a multipool or a private bigger pool, who knows... the official pool that I run pool.feathercoin.com mined a block around an hour ago....i've had no reported errors. We find blocks fine we just have a low hash rate because we only brought the pool up a few weeks ago.
could you tell me why do you apply 125 confirmations for payout? Official pool should have better conditions. Why do we have 6 confirmations for the blocks to be accepted and irreversible and some pools still work with 100+ confirmations?
|
|
|
|
aciddude
|
|
March 04, 2018, 01:00:19 PM |
|
the official pool that I run pool.feathercoin.com mined a block around an hour ago....i've had no reported errors. We find blocks fine we just have a low hash rate because we only brought the pool up a few weeks ago.
could you tell me why do you apply 125 confirmations for payout? Official pool should have better conditions. Why do we have 6 confirmations for the blocks to be accepted and irreversible and some pools still work with 100+ confirmations? We can lower it at any time. I'll make it a little better than give-me-coins at 25 confirms before payout.
|
|
|
|
marecek666
Member
Offline
Activity: 236
Merit: 12
|
|
March 04, 2018, 02:04:58 PM Last edit: March 04, 2018, 10:26:03 PM by marecek666 |
|
the official pool that I run pool.feathercoin.com mined a block around an hour ago....i've had no reported errors. We find blocks fine we just have a low hash rate because we only brought the pool up a few weeks ago.
could you tell me why do you apply 125 confirmations for payout? Official pool should have better conditions. Why do we have 6 confirmations for the blocks to be accepted and irreversible and some pools still work with 100+ confirmations? We can lower it at any time. I'll make it a little better than give-me-coins at 25 confirms before payout. sounds good, I will try to promote this official pool around "my people" and moving 1 of my miner to it for the test how stable will the mining be here. edit1: could you explain how the payout is working here? I can see mined block 2113227, confirmed, but in the statistics there is PPLNS Shares 0, Actual Shares 0, Percentage 0 and there is no payout for it (in the dashboard there is confirmed / unconfirmed - 0 too). How long does it take to your pool to distribute block reward among the miners? edit2: and is there everything set well? I can see that your pool mined more blocks in the real than it is in the blocks section on its webpage. Currently can see that blocks 2099990, 2111177, 2113284 were mined by your pool but they are not visible and were not payed out to miners. You can see pool blocks from the pool page and compare it with the pool wallet where generated blocks are payed out (in chain explorer). https://imgur.com/a/XcIGPcompare blocks with this https://chainz.cryptoid.info/ftc/address.dws?6h6DfhjXWCnioT5kg5xgKkduhDfV3HNbJ8.htm
|
|
|
|
marinabushneva
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 140
Merit: 0
|
|
March 05, 2018, 06:29:29 AM |
|
Hello everybody! I don't really understand - is the road map going right or will it change now?
|
|
|
|
aciddude
|
|
March 05, 2018, 08:01:37 AM |
|
the official pool that I run pool.feathercoin.com mined a block around an hour ago....i've had no reported errors. We find blocks fine we just have a low hash rate because we only brought the pool up a few weeks ago.
could you tell me why do you apply 125 confirmations for payout? Official pool should have better conditions. Why do we have 6 confirmations for the blocks to be accepted and irreversible and some pools still work with 100+ confirmations? We can lower it at any time. I'll make it a little better than give-me-coins at 25 confirms before payout. sounds good, I will try to promote this official pool around "my people" and moving 1 of my miner to it for the test how stable will the mining be here. edit1: could you explain how the payout is working here? I can see mined block 2113227, confirmed, but in the statistics there is PPLNS Shares 0, Actual Shares 0, Percentage 0 and there is no payout for it (in the dashboard there is confirmed / unconfirmed - 0 too). How long does it take to your pool to distribute block reward among the miners? edit2: and is there everything set well? I can see that your pool mined more blocks in the real than it is in the blocks section on its webpage. Currently can see that blocks 2099990, 2111177, 2113284 were mined by your pool but they are not visible and were not payed out to miners. You can see pool blocks from the pool page and compare it with the pool wallet where generated blocks are payed out (in chain explorer). https://imgur.com/a/XcIGPcompare blocks with this https://chainz.cryptoid.info/ftc/address.dws?6h6DfhjXWCnioT5kg5xgKkduhDfV3HNbJ8.htmthe cron job for payouts and finding blocks is a bit tricky. Once we find more blocks at a consistent rate the scripts perform better. I have alerts on the pool so usually get to it within a few hours if the cron job fails. If it does fail it doesnt affect payouts or shares as it's only for the 1 block it failed on. If you check the pool blocks page now you'll see it's all running as normal now and matches with the block explorer.
|
|
|
|
marecek666
Member
Offline
Activity: 236
Merit: 12
|
|
March 05, 2018, 11:00:27 AM |
|
the cron job for payouts and finding blocks is a bit tricky. Once we find more blocks at a consistent rate the scripts perform better. I have alerts on the pool so usually get to it within a few hours if the cron job fails.
If it does fail it doesnt affect payouts or shares as it's only for the 1 block it failed on.
If you check the pool blocks page now you'll see it's all running as normal now and matches with the block explorer.
thanks for the explanation, so pool needs more hashpower. But blocks 2099990 and 2111177 are still missing in the blocks pool page. And I apologize for annoyance, but really want to have fully trustworthy pool for FTC (especially if it is official coin pool), so please make sure that everything is working great.
|
|
|
|
MiBambino
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 644
Merit: 252
IMUSIFY - Award Winning Blockchain Music Tech
|
|
March 05, 2018, 08:29:09 PM |
|
I still expect this badboy to go up x10 this year. Litecoin is set to do the same so its fork should be able to achieve the same if the development doesn't stall
|
|
|
|
marecek666
Member
Offline
Activity: 236
Merit: 12
|
|
March 07, 2018, 11:04:22 AM |
|
the cron job for payouts and finding blocks is a bit tricky. Once we find more blocks at a consistent rate the scripts perform better. I have alerts on the pool so usually get to it within a few hours if the cron job fails.
If it does fail it doesnt affect payouts or shares as it's only for the 1 block it failed on.
If you check the pool blocks page now you'll see it's all running as normal now and matches with the block explorer.
I am sorry but have to move my test miner somewhere to other pool. Connection is very stable, my rejected shares are deeply under 0,5% which is well. But there is still problem with blocks. Blocks 2099990 and 2111177 are still missing in the blocks pool page and it is more than 3 days and your pool still have not listed them. Today last statistics: your pool reports these last blocks mined: 2116337, 2116246 and 2115464 but compare to the public FTC chain explorer the wallet which receives rewards from this pool mined 1 more: 2116293 which is not listed in the blocks pool page and should be if there is another newer which is listed. So there is something really not fully configured or something other is happening here.
|
|
|
|
|