VB1001
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 938
Merit: 2540
<<CypherPunkCat>>
|
 |
November 17, 2019, 10:11:16 AM Merited by JayJuanGee (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
Phil_S
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2157
Merit: 1677
We choose to go to the moon
|
I don't have much hopes for the rest of 2019, but maybe we'll get out of that cursed range by January. 
|
|
|
|
VB1001
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 938
Merit: 2540
<<CypherPunkCat>>
|
 |
November 17, 2019, 10:54:55 AM |
|
^ This would be the rational way to do it.
|
|
|
|
Last of the V8s
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1652
Merit: 4393
Be a bank
|
 |
November 17, 2019, 11:32:05 AM |
|
Thanks JSRAW nice to see you make an effort  pretty interesting too. sorry out of merits,  maybe someone will help you out... 
|
|
|
|
afbitcoins
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2101
Merit: 1061
|
 |
November 17, 2019, 12:12:09 PM |
|
Bitcoin can't even agree a block size modification without splitting into multiple parts. In fact BCH and BSV are bitcion. Your idea makes no sense. Sell, wait for 3200 and then buy bitcoins. In altcoins there is no sense at all, bitcoin will screw everything if necessary: masternodes and instantsend from DASH, side chains and DEX from Komodo, a large block from BSV, smart contracts from BCH, etc. Altcoins are only needed for testing new technologies
|
|
|
|
serveria.com
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2618
Merit: 1349
Privacy Servers. Since 2009.
|
 |
November 17, 2019, 01:00:29 PM |
|
^ This would be the rational way to do it.
As you know, BTC is not always rational... 
|
|
|
|
LFC_Bitcoin
Diamond Hands
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3948
Merit: 11638
#1 VIP Crypto Casino
|
 |
November 17, 2019, 02:26:52 PM |
|
finally there is some volume. big pump incoming.
 Bitcoin can't even agree a block size modification without splitting into multiple parts. In fact BCH and BSV are bitcion. Your idea makes no sense. Sell, wait for 3200 and then buy bitcoins. In altcoins there is no sense at all, bitcoin will screw everything if necessary: masternodes and instantsend from DASH, side chains and DEX from Komodo, a large block from BSV, smart contracts from BCH, etc. Altcoins are only needed for testing new technologies

|
|
|
|
Arriemoller
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2352
Merit: 1827
Cлaвa Укpaїнi!
|
 |
November 17, 2019, 03:00:53 PM |
|
^ That’s a wine dumbass  No, it's a white russian with a glass of champagne.
|
|
|
|
Negotiation
Sr. Member
  
Offline
Activity: 1414
Merit: 284
Reality is that 1 BTC = Billionaire.
|
 |
November 17, 2019, 03:05:07 PM |
|
finally there is some volume. big pump incoming.
Waiting for big pump $100k soon same to hoping that follow with 4hour candle.
|
|
|
|
Negotiation
Sr. Member
  
Offline
Activity: 1414
Merit: 284
Reality is that 1 BTC = Billionaire.
|
This article mentioned only one name and left out other Main conspirators. One "collaborator" was Mir Jafar who was the key person. just to give you example how important this details is, if you want to piss any one from Indian subcontinent (Indian, Paki, Bangladeshi) just say " you are Mir Jafar" they would lose their shit. But History is game of Narrative so not surprised how he left other names and connected the dot from Banker to corporate etc.
If "Mir Jafar" were alive today, he would have given you a Nobel by seeing this post  very historically added new one "Ghaseti Begum"
|
|
|
|
El duderino_
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 14382
“They have no clue”
|
Not being to much on the forum, but having an very nice day hanging around with Globb0 and his better half in Holland 
|
|
|
|
|
JayJuanGee
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4130
Merit: 12474
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to "non-custodial"
|
 |
November 17, 2019, 03:30:09 PM Last edit: November 17, 2019, 03:41:05 PM by JayJuanGee |
|
Whats up Cryptotourist.
Can we have the old Lambie back now? Yep... it can be a bit strange that some of the down-caller wanna be sorcerers come in to this thread and amp up their BTC DOWN calling after there has already been a considerable correction, as if they were trying to get others to sell at the bottom, and surely they could end up being correct (but not high odds of such like they are trying to proclaim "inevitable down"), but they seem to be trying to get the BTC price to go down rather than really making any kind of meaningful accurate and/or objective BTC price prediction as they are trying to portray. And, part of the problem is that the BTC price may or may not go down further, but if anyone was going to sell some or all (never go full fiat), they should have done so before the then current correction location, which was already considerably down. In this case, we had an upsurge from $7,300 to $10,300, so if there is a lot of calling of down in the price range of $8,450, then there has already been a short term BTC price correction, from that spot of 18%, and if we are looking at the other more recent tops of $13,880 and $19,666 then we are seeing correction ranges of 40% and 67% respectively, which should cause inspiration to act upon or create BTC buying plans (even at the then current price) rather than any kind of thoughts about selling BTC or waiting to buy. Anyhow, TLDR, if they are effectives in their bullshit convincing of others to either sell BTC or wait to buy BTC at a lower price (that never comes), they are seemingly more likely to cause scared peeps to sell at the bottom or to fail to buy a sufficient amount of BTC rather than causing those same scared peeps to be able to buy BTC lower, as they fantasize about both not losing more value and trying to make some more BTC (which has decent chances of the opposite results).
|
|
|
|
JayJuanGee
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4130
Merit: 12474
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to "non-custodial"
|
 |
November 17, 2019, 03:49:51 PM |
|
Bitcoin can't even agree a block size modification without splitting into multiple parts. In fact BCH and BSV are bitcion. Your idea makes no sense. Sell, wait for 3200 and then buy bitcoins. In altcoins there is no sense at all, bitcoin will screw everything if necessary: masternodes and instantsend from DASH, side chains and DEX from Komodo, a large block from BSV, smart contracts from BCH, etc. Altcoins are only needed for testing new technologies
There is no need for unity. That was the great forkening of 2017. Old news, and the dumbass forkers lost, which largely demonstrated that no such blocksize modification was necessary, beyond what was achieved. Remember segwit? That ended up facilitating a decent amount of block size modification, amiNOTrite? [edited out]
 What LFC said.
|
|
|
|
gembitz
|
 |
November 17, 2019, 04:14:07 PM |
|
Whats up Cryptotourist.
Can we have the old Lambie back now? Yep... it can be a bit strange that some of the down-caller wanna be sorcerers come in to this thread and amp up their BTC DOWN calling after there has already been a considerable correction, as if they were trying to get others to sell at the bottom, and surely they could end up being correct (but not high odds of such like they are trying to proclaim "inevitable down"), but they seem to be trying to get the BTC price to go down rather than really making any kind of meaningful accurate and/or objective BTC price prediction as they are trying to portray. And, part of the problem is that the BTC price may or may not go down further, but if anyone was going to sell some or all (never go full fiat), they should have done so before the then current correction location, which was already considerably down. In this case, we had an upsurge from $7,300 to $10,300, so if there is a lot of calling of down in the price range of $8,450, then there has already been a short term BTC price correction, from that spot of 18%, and if we are looking at the other more recent tops of $13,880 and $19,666 then we are seeing correction ranges of 40% and 67% respectively, which should cause inspiration to act upon or create BTC buying plans (even at the then current price) rather than any kind of thoughts about selling BTC or waiting to buy. Anyhow, TLDR, if they are effectives in their bullshit convincing of others to either sell BTC or wait to buy BTC at a lower price (that never comes), they are seemingly more likely to cause scared peeps to sell at the bottom or to fail to buy a sufficient amount of BTC rather than causing those same scared peeps to be able to buy BTC lower, as they fantasize about both not losing more value and trying to make some more BTC (which has decent chances of the opposite results). rebuy under 1k  reeee
|
|
|
|
Negotiation
Sr. Member
  
Offline
Activity: 1414
Merit: 284
Reality is that 1 BTC = Billionaire.
|
 |
November 17, 2019, 04:38:55 PM |
|
Yaeh i also recommended store bitcoin ignored Tax  No Tax, No fees used bitcoin . 1Bitcoin=1Bitcoin
|
|
|
|
OROBTC
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3108
Merit: 2040
|
 |
November 17, 2019, 05:09:05 PM |
|
For years I have had the highest respect for N. N. Taleb. He was the guy who wrote the book ( The Black Swan), as well as some others on finance and how so many "experts" are complete phonies. Fooled by Randomness (I would start with this one if interested in his ideas) and Antifragile are also extremely good reads of his. A "Black Swan" is an unexpected, low probability event (usually negative) that has a large impact. Think 9/11... Unexpected. "Low Probability" (impossible to predict). HUGE impact.
|
|
|
|
Negotiation
Sr. Member
  
Offline
Activity: 1414
Merit: 284
Reality is that 1 BTC = Billionaire.
|
 |
November 17, 2019, 05:20:58 PM |
|
Bitcoin miners don't "solve complicated math problems." They make 100,000,000,000,000,000,000 guesses per second @ permutations of an 80 byte block header until they find one with a hash that has enough leading zeroes. Not complicated. Not a math problem. Just a lot of hard work. Source: https://twitter.com/lopp/status/1196061031979765761any one explain me '80 byte block' means?
|
|
|
|
fillippone
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2576
Merit: 18569
Duelbits.com - Rewarding, beyond limits.
|
 |
November 17, 2019, 05:33:58 PM Last edit: May 16, 2023, 07:03:41 AM by fillippone Merited by vapourminer (1), JayJuanGee (1) |
|
Bitcoin miners don't "solve complicated math problems." They make 100,000,000,000,000,000,000 guesses per second @ permutations of an 80 byte block header until they find one with a hash that has enough leading zeroes. Not complicated. Not a math problem. Just a lot of hard work. Source: https://twitter.com/lopp/status/1196061031979765761any one explain me '80 byte block' means? The block header is made of 80 bytes.  The miner can change a few things in that header (version, time, nonce and a few other things) so they can get the hash with enough leading zeroes. https://bitcoin.org/en/developer-reference
|
|
|
|
Globb0
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2702
Merit: 2053
Free spirit
|
 |
November 17, 2019, 05:43:04 PM |
|
Saturday food’Booz But what for Sunday let see.... Probably Haarlem!
Fishy behaviour  xxxx Gooed 
|
|
|
|
|