Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion

[ChartBuddy]

Coin



Explanation

[pinger]

is crypto done?? 

well we're definitely not rich yet

Is just banks and government winning some time to get your coins. HODL! Or best, BUY, BUY, BUY!

Crypto is done, because a few developers wants to sell XT. I will have both coins, so what's the fu***** problem?

[peonminer]

http://www.coindesk.com/blockstream-ceo-bitcoin-industry-creating-toxic-environment-for-developers/

Thoughts?

[tomothy]

http://www.coindesk.com/blockstream-ceo-bitcoin-industry-creating-toxic-environment-for-developers/

Thoughts?

Yeah... your post is saying, I don't know how to read or think or to provide any information.... therefore, I would like you guys to read it for me and to tell me what you think.  


Don't you have any thoughts? or are you just trying to get others to do all of the work for you?

Oh, I've got lots of thoughts! I just didn't want to sway anyone's unbiased opinion's with my firm support of a 2mb increase asap.
I think Hill has grave concerns that bitcoin is not doing what he wants it to. I think he has a lot of eggs in one basket and it seems like he believed he had spent enough money to ensure that his vision of bitcoin would be achieved. It seems as if he is now realizing that he 'made a huge mistake' think arrested development phrase.

I recognize that the article was published by coindesk which was recently acquired by barry silbert and that these two parties may have conflicting interests. However, to me, he came off as desperate. I say desperate, as compared to other notable figures in the bitcoin space, most still talk about how everything is great, things will work out, bitcoin will be scale, and the block size will increase. Hill didn't come off that way. I don't want to be dark, but I laughed when I finished the article.

However, with confirmation bias and the like, I wanted to see what others thought as I assume this is just my interpretation and not universally shared.

[Arcteryx]

^Some folks r slow 2 catch on.

No, just wanting to know is the price so boring and in between of rises and falls of it, they need to entertain themselves with accusing each other of wearing tin foil toques that all 

[Fatman3001]

http://www.coindesk.com/blockstream-ceo-bitcoin-industry-creating-toxic-environment-for-developers/

Thoughts?

Yeah... your post is saying, I don't know how to read or think or to provide any information.... therefore, I would like you guys to read it for me and to tell me what you think.   


Don't you have any thoughts? or are you just trying to get others to do all of the work for you?

stop being an asswipe

[ChartBuddy]

Coin



Explanation

[ChartBuddy]

Coin



Explanation

[blunderer]

Ouch. 373? Yup, 373 ... nope, 372

[BlindMayorBitcorn]

Ouch. 373? Yup, 373 ... nope, 372

Only down 8%. Hmm.

[r0ach]

Read the Communist Manifesto if you want to know what Communism is.

Read Industrial Society and It's Future if you want to know about socialism/communism and why leftism is a mental disorder:

http://cyber.eserver.org/unabom.txt

[pianomasta]

the price is dropping hard once again i think that it means that after some time it will reach huge heights

[r0ach]

It's dumping till hard fork issue is resolved.  Looks like Bitfury is back on-board the fork train, and the Chinese are still discussing it.

[Teppino]

the price is dropping hard once again i think that it means that after some time it will reach huge heights

Great logic!

[mOgliE]

the price is dropping hard once again i think that it means that after some time it will reach huge heights

Wow dude, what a reasonning! "After the rain comes the sun".

Thanks M. Lapalisse xD

Anyway, time to buy is near!

[Karpeles]

the price is dropping hard once again i think that it means that after some time it will reach huge heights

After some time it will reach huge heights, but after how much time? Weeks, months, decades? And after how much falling?

If it is related in any way to future highs, is by testing the 350 floor level

[mOgliE]

http://www.coindesk.com/blockstream-ceo-bitcoin-industry-creating-toxic-environment-for-developers/

Thoughts?

Yeah... your post is saying, I don't know how to read or think or to provide any information.... therefore, I would like you guys to read it for me and to tell me what you think.  


Don't you have any thoughts? or are you just trying to get others to do all of the work for you?

Oh, I've got lots of thoughts! I just didn't want to sway anyone's unbiased opinion's with my firm support of a 2mb increase asap.
I think Hill has grave concerns that bitcoin is not doing what he wants it to. I think he has a lot of eggs in one basket and it seems like he believed he had spent enough money to ensure that his vision of bitcoin would be achieved. It seems as if he is now realizing that he 'made a huge mistake' think arrested development phrase.

I recognize that the article was published by coindesk which was recently acquired by barry silbert and that these two parties may have conflicting interests. However, to me, he came off as desperate. I say desperate, as compared to other notable figures in the bitcoin space, most still talk about how everything is great, things will work out, bitcoin will be scale, and the block size will increase. Hill didn't come off that way. I don't want to be dark, but I laughed when I finished the article.

However, with confirmation bias and the like, I wanted to see what others thought as I assume this is just my interpretation and not universally shared.

Don't worry, JayJuanGee doesn't know how to be polite ^^

[skylighters]

Coin



Explanation

does that 50 per cent thing means that the block size issue was solved as its not filled?

[ChartBuddy]

Coin



Explanation

[JayJuanGee]

http://www.coindesk.com/blockstream-ceo-bitcoin-industry-creating-toxic-environment-for-developers/

Thoughts?

Yeah... your post is saying, I don't know how to read or think or to provide any information.... therefore, I would like you guys to read it for me and to tell me what you think.  


Don't you have any thoughts? or are you just trying to get others to do all of the work for you?

Oh, I've got lots of thoughts! I just didn't want to sway anyone's unbiased opinion's with my firm support of a 2mb increase asap.
I think Hill has grave concerns that bitcoin is not doing what he wants it to. I think he has a lot of eggs in one basket and it seems like he believed he had spent enough money to ensure that his vision of bitcoin would be achieved. It seems as if he is now realizing that he 'made a huge mistake' think arrested development phrase.

I recognize that the article was published by coindesk which was recently acquired by barry silbert and that these two parties may have conflicting interests. However, to me, he came off as desperate. I say desperate, as compared to other notable figures in the bitcoin space, most still talk about how everything is great, things will work out, bitcoin will be scale, and the block size will increase. Hill didn't come off that way. I don't want to be dark, but I laughed when I finished the article.

However, with confirmation bias and the like, I wanted to see what others thought as I assume this is just my interpretation and not universally shared.

Well one thing is sharing an opinion about the significance of an article, but another thing is asking for thoughts.  Maybe i am just a bit irked stylistically when posters put a link and don't say anything.

In order to get the opinions of others, you do not necessarily need to provide your own opinion, but give a quick objective description of the link that you are posting. 

Anyhow, maybe i was a bit too harsh in my suggestion that you may not have any thoughts... but I do stand by my irkness regarding when a variety of posters put up links without any description whatsoever.