ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2352
Merit: 1803
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
March 07, 2016, 07:00:36 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2352
Merit: 1803
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
March 07, 2016, 08:00:36 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2352
Merit: 1803
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
March 07, 2016, 09:00:38 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
valta4065
|
|
March 07, 2016, 09:43:07 AM |
|
wow that's actually pretty good, especially the pleading parts lol at the end of the day its the miners that will decide,,, just "fork" it lol, fuck ya buddy! JUST FORK IT
Late IMHO. BTC boat is taking the water. Good time to get out. Just sell everything and come back once they understood that it can't wait.
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2352
Merit: 1803
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
March 07, 2016, 10:00:37 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Oblodo
|
|
March 07, 2016, 10:20:17 AM |
|
The forking or not stalemate....
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2352
Merit: 1803
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
March 07, 2016, 11:00:39 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
marcus_of_augustus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3920
Merit: 2349
Eadem mutata resurgo
|
|
March 07, 2016, 11:06:54 AM |
|
china's gonna light yer ass up
|
|
|
|
2015Bubble
|
|
March 07, 2016, 11:08:04 AM |
|
Der huobi moonshot. Must be some eth millions floating back in to btc ^^
|
|
|
|
valta4065
|
|
March 07, 2016, 11:08:50 AM |
|
china's gonna light yer ass up
My sells weren't done, coins in transfer to the exchange plateform... But I'm maybe going to wait a bit in case you're right
|
|
|
|
AlexGR
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1049
|
|
March 07, 2016, 11:26:17 AM |
|
He writes at one point: Over the last year of trying, and failing, to reach a reasonable compromise, it has become clear to me that some developers don’t want any on-chain scaling solution any time soon.
That's so blatant, as a lie, it's not even funny. Andersen's credibility tends to zero. Core's roadmap has a Segwit rollout in a few months, increasing tx/s and effective block size by ~70%. How can he pretend like there is absolutely nothing?
|
|
|
|
yugo23
|
|
March 07, 2016, 11:27:38 AM |
|
china's gonna light yer ass up
My sells weren't done, coins in transfer to the exchange plateform... But I'm maybe going to wait a bit in case you're right Ah! last time I had problems with txs times it was because of Primedice, couldn't withdraw 2 btc I put here. It took 7 days. They gave me 5% to apologize. Meanwhile the price was up to 450 whereas I wanted to sell at 300 ^^ Sometimes waiting is good. And with btc it's rather often.
|
|
|
|
Ibian
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1278
|
|
March 07, 2016, 11:33:07 AM |
|
He writes at one point: Over the last year of trying, and failing, to reach a reasonable compromise, it has become clear to me that some developers don’t want any on-chain scaling solution any time soon.
That's so blatant, as a lie, it's not even funny. Andersen's credibility tends to zero. Core's roadmap has a Segwit rollout in a few months, increasing tx/s and effective block size by ~70%. How can he pretend like there is absolutely nothing? He said some devs, as in individuals. And it is completely reasonable. There will always be people trying to hold things back in any large enough organization.
|
|
|
|
bitebits
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2258
Merit: 3632
Flippin' burgers since 1163.
|
|
March 07, 2016, 11:38:59 AM |
|
He writes at one point: Over the last year of trying, and failing, to reach a reasonable compromise, it has become clear to me that some developers don’t want any on-chain scaling solution any time soon.
That's so blatant, as a lie, it's not even funny. Andersen's credibility tends to zero. Core's roadmap has a Segwit rollout in a few months, increasing tx/s and effective block size by ~70%. How can he pretend like there is absolutely nothing? He said some devs, as in individuals. And it is completely reasonable. There will always be people trying to hold things back in any large enough organization. On top of that, Segwit is not a scaling solution. Neither is the raise to 2MB blocks. Both do temporarily fix the current full blocks issue though.
|
|
|
|
ImI
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1019
|
|
March 07, 2016, 11:42:42 AM |
|
He writes at one point: Over the last year of trying, and failing, to reach a reasonable compromise, it has become clear to me that some developers don’t want any on-chain scaling solution any time soon.
That's so blatant, as a lie, it's not even funny. Andersen's credibility tends to zero. Core's roadmap has a Segwit rollout in a few months, increasing tx/s and effective block size by ~70%. How can he pretend like there is absolutely nothing? He said some devs, as in individuals. And it is completely reasonable. There will always be people trying to hold things back in any large enough organization. On top of that, Segwit is not a scaling solution. Neither is the raise to 2MB blocks. Both do temporarily fix the current full blocks issue though. also SW brings more size just as a sideeffect, other advantages are dominating. especially some work that is done for LN.
|
|
|
|
AlexGR
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1049
|
|
March 07, 2016, 11:49:26 AM |
|
He writes at one point: Over the last year of trying, and failing, to reach a reasonable compromise, it has become clear to me that some developers don’t want any on-chain scaling solution any time soon.
That's so blatant, as a lie, it's not even funny. Andersen's credibility tends to zero. Core's roadmap has a Segwit rollout in a few months, increasing tx/s and effective block size by ~70%. How can he pretend like there is absolutely nothing? He said some devs, as in individuals. And it is completely reasonable. There will always be people trying to hold things back in any large enough organization. Who cares about "some devs" when Core has an official roadmap with segwit up ahead. The criticism, if you look at the expanded paragraph, is aimed directly at core for supporting things like LN instead of ever-ending block increases, all the while pretending they offer zero on-scaling solutions.
|
|
|
|
Ibian
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1278
|
|
March 07, 2016, 11:50:21 AM |
|
He writes at one point: Over the last year of trying, and failing, to reach a reasonable compromise, it has become clear to me that some developers don’t want any on-chain scaling solution any time soon.
That's so blatant, as a lie, it's not even funny. Andersen's credibility tends to zero. Core's roadmap has a Segwit rollout in a few months, increasing tx/s and effective block size by ~70%. How can he pretend like there is absolutely nothing? He said some devs, as in individuals. And it is completely reasonable. There will always be people trying to hold things back in any large enough organization. Who cares about "some devs" when Core has an official roadmap with segwit up ahead. The criticism, if you look at the expanded paragraph, is aimed directly at core for supporting things like LN instead of ever-ending block increases, all the while pretending they offer zero on-scaling solutions. The point is that the guy you just called a liar is correct. It's about you.
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2352
Merit: 1803
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
March 07, 2016, 12:00:37 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
lottery248
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1582
Merit: 1006
beware of your keys.
|
|
March 07, 2016, 12:34:00 PM |
|
seems chartbuddy isn't been updated for a long time except for thr graphical change below. the only 3 exchange cannot inecate the main price of bitcoin.
|
|
|
|
|