Bitcoin Forum
April 25, 2026, 04:48:51 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 30.2 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: How far will this leg take us?
$110K - 9 (8.3%)
$120K - 19 (17.6%)
$130K - 17 (15.7%)
$140K - 9 (8.3%)
$150K - 19 (17.6%)
$160K - 2 (1.9%)
$170K+ - 33 (30.6%)
Total Voters: 108

Pages: « 1 ... 17533 17534 17535 17536 17537 17538 17539 17540 17541 17542 17543 17544 17545 17546 17547 17548 17549 17550 17551 17552 17553 17554 17555 17556 17557 17558 17559 17560 17561 17562 17563 17564 17565 17566 17567 17568 17569 17570 17571 17572 17573 17574 17575 17576 17577 17578 17579 17580 17581 17582 [17583] 17584 17585 17586 17587 17588 17589 17590 17591 17592 17593 17594 17595 17596 17597 17598 17599 17600 17601 17602 17603 17604 17605 17606 17607 17608 17609 17610 17611 17612 17613 17614 17615 17616 17617 17618 17619 17620 17621 17622 17623 17624 17625 17626 17627 17628 17629 17630 17631 17632 17633 ... 35727 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 26963440 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (174 posts by 1 users with 9 merit deleted.)
DonQuijote
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1551
Merit: 1002


♠ ♥ ♣ ♦ < ♛♚&#


View Profile
August 26, 2017, 02:57:49 PM

Poll is clear this time:
Quote
Question:   On Aug. 31 BTC Will Be:
$3,500+   - 90 (26%)
$3,250+   - 25 (7.2%)
$3,000+   - 38 (11%)
$2,750+   - 13 (3.8%)
$2,500+   - 7 (2%)
$2,250+   - 4 (1.2%)
$2,000+   - 3 (0.9%)
Under $2,000   - 15 (4.3%)
At Parity with BCH   - 13 (3.8%)
$4,000+   - 68 (19.7%)
$5,000+   - 70 (20.2%)
Total Voters: 346
BlindMayorBitcorn
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1116



View Profile
August 26, 2017, 03:02:34 PM


We need a proof of work change. How low do you think that will drop us?
d_eddie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3206
Merit: 5403



View Profile
August 26, 2017, 03:26:23 PM

We need a proof of work change. How low do you think that will drop us?
Something less drastic could also work. Something that wouldn't fck up the "good guys" as much. I'm thinking along the lines of a coinbase penalty depending on mempool size - or something proportional to the average fee of transactions left in the mempool. The main problem I see with such a fix is that it would require a fork. Would a soft fork do? I doubt it, mainly because of the problems with non-upgraded clients.
BlindMayorBitcorn
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1116



View Profile
August 26, 2017, 03:40:38 PM

We need a proof of work change. How low do you think that will drop us?
Something less drastic could also work. Something that wouldn't fck up the "good guys" as much. I'm thinking along the lines of a coinbase penalty depending on mempool size - or something proportional to the average fee of transactions left in the mempool. The main problem I see with such a fix is that it would require a fork. Would a soft fork do? I doubt it, mainly because of the problems with non-upgraded clients.


Won't we have to hard fork for replay protection anyway? (Total noob question.)
notme
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1904
Merit: 1002


View Profile
August 26, 2017, 03:48:52 PM

We need a proof of work change. How low do you think that will drop us?
Something less drastic could also work. Something that wouldn't fck up the "good guys" as much. I'm thinking along the lines of a coinbase penalty depending on mempool size - or something proportional to the average fee of transactions left in the mempool. The main problem I see with such a fix is that it would require a fork. Would a soft fork do? I doubt it, mainly because of the problems with non-upgraded clients.


Won't we have to hard fork for replay protection anyway? (Total noob question.)

Such a coinbase penalty would be messing with the inflation schedule.  Also, the mempool is not consistent across nodes.  A freshly broadcast transaction may not be visible to everyone.  So, we would need mempool commitments.  Something like a blockchain could work for that Wink.
GreekGeek
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 579
Merit: 502


Jesus was a (Goddamn) hippy socialist


View Profile
August 26, 2017, 03:54:14 PM

wtf is going on with Monero?
 Huh Huh
xhomerx10
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4550
Merit: 11008



View Profile
August 26, 2017, 03:54:37 PM


We need a proof of work change. How low do you think that will drop us?

 I think some Bitcoin proponents have entered the 3rd phase of obsession:

3. Aggressive Stage: This stage typically starts when either previously “successful” attempts at controlling you have failed; or you end the relationship. At this point, the perpetrator ups the ante. They may threaten suicide if you don’t acquiesce to their demands. They may disrupt your life by calling your home, boss, or friends. They may suddenly show up uninvited. They may alternate between pleas to reunite and vows of vengeance. For some desperate or disturbed individuals, the behavior can escalate to stalking, threats, or physical violence.

exerpt from: If I can't have you, no one can.
Psychology Today © 1991-2017 Sussex Publishers, LLC

Torque
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3822
Merit: 5504



View Profile
August 26, 2017, 03:55:15 PM

We need a proof of work change. How low do you think that will drop us?
Something less drastic could also work. Something that wouldn't fck up the "good guys" as much. I'm thinking along the lines of a coinbase penalty depending on mempool size - or something proportional to the average fee of transactions left in the mempool. The main problem I see with such a fix is that it would require a fork. Would a soft fork do? I doubt it, mainly because of the problems with non-upgraded clients.


Won't we have to hard fork for replay protection anyway? (Total noob question.)

Such a coinbase penalty would be messing with the inflation schedule.  Also, the mempool is not consistent across nodes.  A freshly broadcast transaction may not be visible to everyone.  So, we would need mempool commitments.  Something like a blockchain could work for that Wink.

You guys really crack me up with these "we need to do this or that" pontifications. As if anyone here is even remotely involved in the development of Bitcoin.

But by all means, go forth and make it happen!  Cheesy
becoin
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3431
Merit: 1233



View Profile
August 26, 2017, 04:04:12 PM
Last edit: August 26, 2017, 04:20:36 PM by becoin

I think some Bitcoin proponents have entered the 3rd phase of obsession:

After 9 years of obsession all Bitcoin proponents are doing quite well while altcoin proponents are living under exceptional stress do to some miscalculations.
Last of the V8s
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1652
Merit: 4402


Be a bank


View Profile
August 26, 2017, 04:19:10 PM

You guys really crack me up with these "we need to do this or that" pontifications. As if anyone here is even remotely involved in the development of Bitcoin.

But by all means, go forth and make it happen!  Cheesy

how.dare.you. we are vital to the entire ecosystem, i tell you. vital
Ibian
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2268
Merit: 1278



View Profile
August 26, 2017, 04:20:33 PM

We don't need shit. The split happened and nobody likes it but it is what it is. If they manage to outperform us with the current rules then FUCKING DEAL WITH IT. Sink or swim.
becoin
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3431
Merit: 1233



View Profile
August 26, 2017, 04:22:51 PM

If they manage to outperform us

Ver and Wu to outperform Bitcoin?!... Are you nuts?
Ibian
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2268
Merit: 1278



View Profile
August 26, 2017, 04:24:48 PM

If they manage to outperform us

Ver and Wu to outperform Bitcoin?!... Are you nuts?
Then where is the major crisis that prompts a we need...
becoin
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3431
Merit: 1233



View Profile
August 26, 2017, 04:28:00 PM

If they manage to outperform us

Ver and Wu to outperform Bitcoin?!... Are you nuts?
Then where is the major crisis that prompts a we need...

What crisis? Ver and Wu decided to give some free money. They are most welcome. That is all. Next fork, please!
JimboToronto
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4690
Merit: 6165


You're never too old to think young.


View Profile
August 26, 2017, 04:29:04 PM

Good morning Bitcoinland.

Down slightly but still basically sideways... currently $4308USD/$5377CAD (Bitcoinaverage).

AltcoinCash also down a smidgen... $626USD/$781CAD (Coinmarketcap).

Ho hum. Yawn.
gentlemand
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2604
Merit: 3090


Welt Am Draht


View Profile
August 26, 2017, 05:01:17 PM

wtf is going on with Monero?
 Huh Huh

It's about to be listed in Korea. They're the new king of degenerate pumps. Expect a fine fall once they've had their fun.
Last of the V8s
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1652
Merit: 4402


Be a bank


View Profile
August 26, 2017, 05:41:12 PM

wtf is going on with Monero?
 Huh Huh

It's about to be listed in Korea. They're the new king of degenerate pumps. Expect a fine fall once they've had their fun.

Your insolence toward Comrade Kim has been #noted. Expect a fine. And no fun. Ever.
Ludwig Von
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 854
Merit: 307



View Profile
August 26, 2017, 05:51:52 PM

wtf is going on with Monero?
 Huh Huh

It's about to be listed in Korea. They're the new king of degenerate pumps. Expect a fine fall once they've had their fun.

Your insolence toward Comrade Kim has been #noted. Expect a fine. And no fun. Ever.

Kim has rocket tech! Not shouting to the moon, but shooting to the moon! (it most probably will miss)
BlindMayorBitcorn
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1116



View Profile
August 26, 2017, 05:56:05 PM

We need a proof of work change. How low do you think that will drop us?
Something less drastic could also work. Something that wouldn't fck up the "good guys" as much. I'm thinking along the lines of a coinbase penalty depending on mempool size - or something proportional to the average fee of transactions left in the mempool. The main problem I see with such a fix is that it would require a fork. Would a soft fork do? I doubt it, mainly because of the problems with non-upgraded clients.


Won't we have to hard fork for replay protection anyway? (Total noob question.)

Such a coinbase penalty would be messing with the inflation schedule.  Also, the mempool is not consistent across nodes.  A freshly broadcast transaction may not be visible to everyone.  So, we would need mempool commitments.  Something like a blockchain could work for that Wink.

You guys really crack me up with these "we need to do this or that" pontifications. As if anyone here is even remotely involved in the development of Bitcoin.

But by all means, go forth and make it happen!  Cheesy

That's it!

*storms off, codes better bitcoin, adds blackjack and hookers*
Last of the V8s
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1652
Merit: 4402


Be a bank


View Profile
August 26, 2017, 06:02:17 PM
Last edit: August 26, 2017, 09:02:46 PM by Last of the V8s

missed this from last year https://medium.com/ill-ixi-lli/-da9326e97d1f
Bitcoin = Death Processors
What we call money is largely just cached murder. Bitcoin takes this lethal abstraction into direct competition with our own lives… by creating a makework network that sinks resources and electricity into pushing computers to their limits—for no actual purpose.

this guy may be particularly dotty, but i suppose it's a reminder that we'll get a lot of criticism in years to come from envirowhiners
(if we tune in to the masses' opinions at all as we sip our boat drinks on our superyachts surrounded by supermodels)


edit/add https://digiconomist.net/bitcoin-energy-consumption
Pages: « 1 ... 17533 17534 17535 17536 17537 17538 17539 17540 17541 17542 17543 17544 17545 17546 17547 17548 17549 17550 17551 17552 17553 17554 17555 17556 17557 17558 17559 17560 17561 17562 17563 17564 17565 17566 17567 17568 17569 17570 17571 17572 17573 17574 17575 17576 17577 17578 17579 17580 17581 17582 [17583] 17584 17585 17586 17587 17588 17589 17590 17591 17592 17593 17594 17595 17596 17597 17598 17599 17600 17601 17602 17603 17604 17605 17606 17607 17608 17609 17610 17611 17612 17613 17614 17615 17616 17617 17618 17619 17620 17621 17622 17623 17624 17625 17626 17627 17628 17629 17630 17631 17632 17633 ... 35727 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!