crumbcake
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
June 04, 2013, 01:03:25 PM |
|
Trendlines tend to be broken on the fourth touch. I've seen trend lines drawn on log scales, this is linear scale. Which one's right?
|
|
|
|
Miz4r
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 04, 2013, 01:05:20 PM |
|
I've seen trend lines drawn on log scales, this is linear scale. Which one's right? At this scale it doesn't really matter I think.
|
|
|
|
niothor
|
|
June 04, 2013, 01:07:13 PM |
|
All the former bulls who turned bears yesterday reverted back to bulls now and shout cho cho.... Expect a price drop
|
|
|
|
bito
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 57
Merit: 0
|
|
June 04, 2013, 01:12:57 PM |
|
What's happening is all these companies are realizing it's dangerous to do business with bitcoin exchanges or any online payment system. Technocash probably looked at the Dwolla seizure, Liberty Reserve, Perfect Money's recent actions - and was like FUCK THAT. We ain't gettin our hands dirty. So we are seeing fewer and fewer funding and withdrawal methods. According to the logic of some, price should have tanked already, each time news like that came out and the effect hit. Wouldn't a series of such stories potentially have a cumulative effect? What if a major bank decided to refuse MtGox transactions too? Tin foil hat and cheap coin collection tin on standby... From some comments on the MtGox facebook wall http://www.smh.com.au/business/austrac-eyes-6b-money-laundering-case-20130529-2nbfl.htmlMaybe MtGox are being proactive and don't want to associate themselves with a business linked to LR? Technocash were not good value anyway, 4% fee. Wire transfers are a fixed fee and arrive in the same time.
|
|
|
|
crumbcake
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
June 04, 2013, 01:15:09 PM |
|
I've seen trend lines drawn on log scales, this is linear scale. Which one's right? At this scale it doesn't really matter I think. Not sure if i was totally clear: If Y is a log instead of linear scale, the second "dip" will be above the line, so no longer a part of it. If you mean the slope's too insignificant to make a difference, just change the time scale.
|
|
|
|
rezurect
|
|
June 04, 2013, 01:17:43 PM |
|
EMAs crossing My Inference: Downward trend could continue.
|
|
|
|
sarc
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
June 04, 2013, 01:18:37 PM |
|
I've seen trend lines drawn on log scales, this is linear scale. Which one's right? At this scale it doesn't really matter I think. Not sure if i was totally clear: If Y is a log instead of linear scale, the second "dip" will be above the line, so no longer a part of it. If you mean the slope's too insignificant to make a difference, just change the time scale. educated guess: depends on whether the trend is exponential or not.
|
|
|
|
Miz4r
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 04, 2013, 01:27:55 PM |
|
I've seen trend lines drawn on log scales, this is linear scale. Which one's right? At this scale it doesn't really matter I think. Not sure if i was totally clear: If Y is a log instead of linear scale, the second "dip" will be above the line, so no longer a part of it. If you mean the slope's too insignificant to make a difference, just change the time scale. I don't know, I'm not really educated in these matters. It just makes more sense to me to look at a linear scale in these short time frames, and log scales for long term trends. I don't have anything really to back that up, I just wanted to draw a nice line with the available tools I have.
|
|
|
|
|
prof7bit
|
|
June 04, 2013, 01:35:18 PM |
|
I drew a nice line, not sure if anyone posted something similar yet in here. Your line is wrong, its already broken. Next target: $50. And soon after that: $30.
|
|
|
|
IG0BR0KE
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
June 04, 2013, 01:43:08 PM |
|
Your line is wrong, its already broken. Next target: $50. And soon after that: $30. the support is still usable and if we broke it the next target will be $110-$111 and not at all 50
|
|
|
|
Miz4r
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 04, 2013, 01:43:16 PM |
|
I drew a nice line, not sure if anyone posted something similar yet in here. Your line is wrong, its already broken. Next target: $50. And soon after that: $30. Ah I see, you've completely convinced me with your compelling arguments.
|
|
|
|
prof7bit
|
|
June 04, 2013, 01:49:13 PM |
|
I drew a nice line, not sure if anyone posted something similar yet in here. Your line is wrong, its already broken. Next target: $50. And soon after that: $30. Ah I see, you've completely convinced me with your compelling arguments. YOU have drawn the line intentionally wrong (you just choose some arbitrary point on the left side instead of anchoring it at the low), so you know EXACTLY what I mean:
|
|
|
|
prof7bit
|
|
June 04, 2013, 01:57:29 PM |
|
And on the log chart its even more obvious:
|
|
|
|
lucas.sev
|
|
June 04, 2013, 02:01:45 PM |
|
And on the log chart its even more obvious: Why your first two lows touch the trendline but not the last one? It seems to me that line should look more like this:
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2352
Merit: 1802
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
June 04, 2013, 02:02:07 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
IG0BR0KE
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
June 04, 2013, 02:03:09 PM |
|
the support isn't broken.. (yet^^) i think you should go back to economic school or if you didn't studied that you should check how support/resistance works...
|
|
|
|
prof7bit
|
|
June 04, 2013, 02:04:56 PM |
|
Why your first two lows touch the trendline but not the last one?
Because the last one breaks it.
|
|
|
|
Miz4r
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 04, 2013, 02:06:41 PM |
|
Right, even with your line I still don't consider the support line invalidated. It doesn't look like a convincing break out (yet). Anyway, don't take this all too seriously I'm just having some fun in here. I don't believe these lines say all that much about the bigger picture. It can go up or down from here, that's all I can say about it for sure.
|
|
|
|
|
|