If you did not continuously admit to bcash shilling, ...
I have never admitted to 'Bcash shilling'. You need -- once again -- to check your definitions.
I have admitted to advocating for Bitcoin Cash. I will admit to advocate for Bitcoin SV.
But the universally recognized definition for 'shilling' is predicated upon renumeration for advocacy of some thing that one would not advocate for if the payment was not made.
I have never shilled for any crypto.
Your insistence in misapplying such charged language only marks you as disingenuous. And is evidence of the
actual hostility in this conversation.
Rubbish. You constantly talk your book.
As do you. As do most here. Such is not 'shilling', by the universally recognized definition.
And you carefully provide misleading information when you do so.
Bullshit. Only in using precise terms can information be not misleading. Intentional misuse of terms is inherently misleading.
Most of the time, what you say may not be technically wrong,
IOW, it is precisely correct.but invariably amounts to a misrepresentation in the broader context.
Nonsense.
And some of the time it is outright fabrication.
Examples would buttress your argument. None provided.
This discussion is a case in point. You are relying on a historic definition of the term shill.
The most widely accepted, in fact. Both historic and current.
We both know that is not how the word is used in 2018 in the crypto community.
Perhaps in portions thereof. The ignorant, cavalier, imprecise sub-communities maybe. Most, however, apply the proper definition to the term. For to do otherwise inserts ambiguity and misunderstanding into the conversation.
Note that, should one hew to the proper definition, one arrives at an understanding of the nature of my advocacy. But misapplying the word, one is left not knowing whether my advocacy is paid or unpaid. Misusing the term thusly only weakens discourse.
But you think yourself marvelously clever for having made the distinction.
Not 'marvelously clever'; just commonly correct in the face of stupidity.
It would be most accurate to say you are a fraud
Fraud? I am a fraud? Are you claiming that I assert myself to be human when I am not? Or what?
and petty conman.
Again, a misuse of a term with an accepted definition. In this case, 'conman' being defined as one who exudes a soothing manner applied to lies in order to gain the confidence of another, such confidence to be abused to have said other entrust the conman with actions that result in the conman stealing from the other.
Your misapplication of the term is again a perfidious misrepresentation, and amounts -- in and of itself -- to fraudulent behavior on your part.
Poll
