Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion

[El duderino_]

Morning guys, beautiful day where I am today. Hope you’re all happy & healthy on this fine morning. Hopefully the price picks up a little, I don’t want to see sub 9k.

Everything is running along nicely and bang on schedule for where we need to be at this point though.

HODL on & keep smiling

It would be awesome to have A big green Dildo and +10K prices when we are having dinner

[LFC_Bitcoin]

Morning guys, beautiful day where I am today. Hope you’re all happy & healthy on this fine morning. Hopefully the price picks up a little, I don’t want to see sub 9k.

Everything is running along nicely and bang on schedule for where we need to be at this point though.

HODL on & keep smiling

It would be awesome to have A big green Dildo and +10K prices when we are having dinner

In Amsterdam?

Who knows, we could be at $11,000+ by then
I looked at the menu of that place, looks nice. They have wine to accompany each course. Perfect material to piss r0ach off with in this thread

[makrospex]

Plus,here is Walter Isaacson telling us that we are about to split into subspecies and it would be difficult to impossible to stop it:
https://airmail.news/issues/2019-7-27/should-the-rich-be-allowed-to-buy-the-best-genes

If you were to use the same criteria for classifying animals as humans, blacks and whites would already be a different species or subspecies because they do classify animals that can interbred as different species.  At the very least humans would probably be at least 3 DIFFERENT subspecies of North Eurasian, Southeast Asian, and African.  Or maybe even Africans as an entirely different species closer related to Homo Erectus and then Homo Sapiens with North Eurasian and Southeast Asian subspecies.

R U serious?
"Homo Sapiens" is a latin insider joke by evolutionary biologists.
We're clearly "Pan Narrans", and the only proof i need is the "content" you are posting 

[realr0ach]

R U serious?
"Homo Sapiens" is a latin insider joke by evolutionary biologists.

Some people would claim haplogroup M and N (all humans that aren't Africans) are a subspecies of L (Africans), but I would say there's a clear species divergence and M and N are not a subspecies but new species in their own right. Instead of admitting a new species has formed with vastly different traits where one can travel into space while the other is still building mud huts, they try to hand wave it away with SJW nonsense like "guns germs and steel".

[Amateur_]

R U serious?
"Homo Sapiens" is a latin insider joke by evolutionary biologists.

Some people would claim haplogroup M and N (all humans that aren't Africans) are a subspecies of L (Africans), but I would say there's a clear species divergence and M and N are not a subspecies but new species in their own right. Instead of admitting a new species has formed with vastly different traits where one can travel into space while the other is still building mud huts, they try to hand wave it away with SJW nonsense like "guns germs and steel".

Off topic but Alternative Hypothesis has an excellent breakdown of Guns, Germs and Steel on YouTube.

[realr0ach]

My main problem is that calling white people and Asians (haplogroup N + M) a subspecies of Africans (L) makes zero sense when left to their own devices, most African activity (building mud huts and cannibalism) is virtually identical to thousands of other animals from birds to alligators.  You can't be some revolutionary, breaking the mold creature that does things no other animal does like building nuclear reactors and spaceships while being a lowly 'subspecies'. It would need to be a new species.  The physiological traits also support this idea with things like large difference in bone density, cranium size, reproductive strategy, etc, etc.

[El duderino_]

Dammit page 24666 

[Amateur_]

Observing BTC @ 9,499 USD

[HairyMaclairy]

Blocks are nice and empty at the moment if anyone wants to consolidate.  Just had a 20 sat transaction clear in first block I think.

20 sat/b is way too high for next block inclusion.
Thinking about a post on how to calculate optimal fees and stuff.
Every sat count!
Keeping stacking Satoshi!

I think he meant 20 sat total fee. Mempool is being nearly cleared each block recently.

There is no thing like a 20 sat total fee. Transactions are at least 226 bytes long: at 1 sat/byte this means 226 Satoshi.

EDIT FOR CLARITY: This is not a protocol level limit. 0 sat/tx fees are protocol level valid so actually possible. But as there's no incentive for miners to mine them, I hardly doubt it will be ever mined. Sub 1 sat/byte are also possible, but i THINK many miners set lower bound at 1 sat/byte (coincidentally equal to minimum relay fee): this is to avoid inserting "dust transactions" on their blocks.
So yes, sub 226 satoshi transactions are valid and possible, but very likely not to be mined even with almost empty mempool.
Happy to be proved wrong.

Oh goodness.  I am being shamed for spending $2.65 to send $9,500 half way around the world  


Yes I meant 20/sat per byte.  However I failed to realise that my transaction was 1,400 bytes....  Apparently I have been doing some sweeping of my own.  Still a good deal, but perhaps not as good as it could have been.  

Edit:  forgot to account for blockweight as it was a segwit transaction.  So only cost $1.50 fee.

[fillippone]

Blocks are nice and empty at the moment if anyone wants to consolidate.  Just had a 20 sat transaction clear in first block I think.

20 sat/b is way too high for next block inclusion.
Thinking about a post on how to calculate optimal fees and stuff.
Every sat count!
Keeping stacking Satoshi!

I think he meant 20 sat total fee. Mempool is being nearly cleared each block recently.

There is no thing like a 20 sat total fee. Transactions are at least 226 bytes long: at 1 sat/byte this means 226 Satoshi.

EDIT FOR CLARITY: This is not a protocol level limit. 0 sat/tx fees are protocol level valid so actually possible. But as there's no incentive for miners to mine them, I hardly doubt it will be ever mined. Sub 1 sat/byte are also possible, but i THINK many miners set lower bound at 1 sat/byte (coincidentally equal to minimum relay fee): this is to avoid inserting "dust transactions" on their blocks.
So yes, sub 226 satoshi transactions are valid and possible, but very likely not to be mined even with almost empty mempool.
Happy to be proved wrong.

Oh goodness.  I am being shamed for spending $2.65 to send $9,500 half way around the world  


Yes I meant 20/sat per byte.  However I failed to realise that my transaction was 1,400 bytes....  Apparently I have been doing some sweeping of my own.  Still a good deal, but perhaps not as good as it could have been.  

When bitcoin will be in the millions, you'll deeply regret not optimising your fees.
Every sat counts!

Anyway, not shaming, just making sure everyone is doing conscious choices!

[realr0ach]

Off topic but Alternative Hypothesis has an excellent breakdown of Guns, Germs and Steel on YouTube.

His channel probably has the best video on the internet (no, the video content is absolutely nothing like the title)

A Celebration of the Jewish People

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ljMPafQpfDU

Can't wait till they all roast.  It's 100% inevitable now no matter what they do.  Far too many people know.

[HairyMaclairy]

Anyway, not shaming, just making sure everyone is doing conscious choices!

Thank you.  You have made me reconsider my fee practices.

If you want to make that post about how to choose fees, please go ahead because I am obviously not following best practice. 

[fillippone]

Anyway, not shaming, just making sure everyone is doing conscious choices!

Thank you.  You have made me reconsider my fee practices.

If you want to make that post about how to choose fees, please go ahead because I am obviously not following best practice. 

I found this post:
Bitcoin Transaction Fees - Everything in one

This is pretty good,actually very similar to what I had in mind.
So probably not worth the effort to write a completely new one only to cross some t's and dot some i's.

So, spreading it here as it might be useful to someone!

[makrospex]

R U serious?
"Homo Sapiens" is a latin insider joke by evolutionary biologists.

Some people would claim haplogroup M and N (all humans that aren't Africans) are a subspecies of L (Africans), but I would say there's a clear species divergence and M and N are not a subspecies but new species in their own right. Instead of admitting a new species has formed with vastly different traits where one can travel into space while the other is still building mud huts, they try to hand wave it away with SJW nonsense like "guns germs and steel".

I mean the term "sapiens", translated as "wise" (sapient).
This must be a joke and 99,99999% of people on this planet, regardless of genetic origin or "race", are prove enough that this name must be a joke.
If you ever came across "Pan Narrans", which would describe the current development state of humanity most correctly, ihmo.

[Woodie]

Seriously, what the hell is this ? Who would even buy them?

It pains me to say this but believe it or not so many people buy this stuff, possible reason why BTC hasn't gone to the moon!

With so many of these bitcoin copy cats(altcoins) it's likely that people who have never used the real bitcoin(BTC) and just hear about it could be the most likely to buy because they will be blinded by the ridiculous low prices or the manner all the bitcoin are indexed.

[realr0ach]

"Pan Narrans"

There was some guy on Zerohedge posting that claimed the gorillas they taught sign language too were scoring higher in intelligence tests than Africans.  Sounds plausible.

https://skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/32155/does-the-gorilla-koko-have-an-iq-in-the-range-70-95

[Febo]

Dammit page 24666  

Observing BTC @ 9,499 USD

Lets hope soon this two numbers will match.

[_javi_]

Are those huge candles up and down caused by some institution testing the market and their tools?

bakkt, is that you?? 

[_javi_]

Dammit page 24666 

Observing BTC @ 9,499 USD

Lets hope soon this two numbers will match.

As soon as i checked WO, I had a deja-vu with the price at parity too.
I still remember the 10.000 pages fiasco. Dunno who was deleting posts to move the page counter. What a mess it was!


24k USD would be good, but dunno why i rised the bar and the number that would make me smile now is +50k

[AlcoHoDL]

Alone at home today...

Just served my lunch in front of the PC and eating while reading WO...

Lots of pages to read, and boy it feels sooo fcuking cool!

Missing r0ach... I absolutely need to have a dose of Schelling Point, Exter's Pyramid, Nash Equilibrium, Kalergi Plan, Daily Stormer... And, oh man, how I really, REALLY need to hear the "designed to centralize" line... Gets me all worked up inside...down there...you know...

Must be the beer...

Sorry guys... HoDL!