Biodom
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3892
Merit: 4332
|
|
January 27, 2022, 09:12:22 PM |
|
On the subject of doomsday TA, at least ImThour puts some effort into it unlike some llama-shaped trolls here.
I would prefer Llama and Banana shaped trolls rather than getting attacked for trying to do TA You can deem what you are doing as "trying to do TA" but it hardly seems genuine, even though a few guys seem to be fooled by your holding yourself out as supposed "genuine." Your historical posts defy such claims to actual genuineness.Unbiased Price Prediction on the basis of Previous Chart ActionBullish in the Long run. Whoaza!!!!!! That appears to be a pretty BIG drop to around $36k-ish by the end of the year ImThour, and I suppose such a scenario is not completely unreasonable - even though it does have elements that are seeming to fail/refuse to account for what bitcoin actually is, so in that regard questionableness in the arena of supposed unbiasedness. I would consider that part of its possible biasness comes from its showing BTC price performances that only go back to about April 2021.. and thus measuring from right around the $64,895 top in April 2021.. That is a similar kind of mistake that a lot of historical Bitcoin bearish dweebs have made in the past, even though you have couched your prediction in terms of your supposedly being "long-term bullish" (so I am not going to automatically characterize you as a dweeb.. but still starting from the top to make your BTC price prediction remains a wee bit problematic).
Alright, I made a TA stating we will be at 36k back in Sept 2021 and you wrote a lot of shit and here we are, at 36k. You called me a dweeb lmao.
I do it for myself and for anyone who gives a shit, if you don't ignore it.
Just stop it with your hatred towards me in every post I do in this thread. Enough mate.
I repeat, I do it for myself, I post it for those who cares. If you don't, ignore it and move ahead.
Cheers.he/she meant it "lovingly"...if you did not notice, anyone with any kind of prediction is a "dweeb" to him/her. sure..post 'em (i like looking at TA, but almost never believe any of TA "predictions"), just don't do a random assortment (between 1k and 36K), stick to a particular theme.
|
|
|
|
|
JayJuanGee
Legendary
Online
Activity: 3850
Merit: 10872
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
|
|
January 27, 2022, 09:33:35 PM Last edit: January 27, 2022, 09:45:27 PM by JayJuanGee |
|
On the subject of doomsday TA, at least ImThour puts some effort into it unlike some llama-shaped trolls here.
I would prefer Llama and Banana shaped trolls rather than getting attacked for trying to do TA You can deem what you are doing as "trying to do TA" but it hardly seems genuine, even though a few guys seem to be fooled by your holding yourself out as supposed "genuine." Your historical posts defy such claims to actual genuineness.Unbiased Price Prediction on the basis of Previous Chart ActionBullish in the Long run. Whoaza!!!!!! That appears to be a pretty BIG drop to around $36k-ish by the end of the year ImThour, and I suppose such a scenario is not completely unreasonable - even though it does have elements that are seeming to fail/refuse to account for what bitcoin actually is, so in that regard questionableness in the arena of supposed unbiasedness. I would consider that part of its possible biasness comes from its showing BTC price performances that only go back to about April 2021.. and thus measuring from right around the $64,895 top in April 2021.. That is a similar kind of mistake that a lot of historical Bitcoin bearish dweebs have made in the past, even though you have couched your prediction in terms of your supposedly being "long-term bullish" (so I am not going to automatically characterize you as a dweeb.. but still starting from the top to make your BTC price prediction remains a wee bit problematic).
Alright, I made a TA stating we will be at 36k back in Sept 2021 and you wrote a lot of shit and here we are, at 36k. You called me a dweeb lmao. First I removed the bold from your response post in my response because it seems to have no purpose, except to show your emotionalisms regarding the topic. Second, a discussion of my post and/or my bet proposal in September 2021 would have been appropriate, but instead you ignored and/or ran away like the disingenuine dweeb that you seem to be. By the way, we have had a lot of interactions, and you have been filled with a lot of disingenuineness - but only recently getting more emboldened, no? here's one of our interactions from August 2021.Third, if you want to attempt to redeem yourself, you should attempt to do that in a timely manner rather than engaging in self-serving selective spins 5 months later.. or whatever other of your previous supposed prophecies that you would like to highlight. I do it for myself and for anyone who gives a shit, if you don't ignore it.
Fair enough... but if you are publishing in this thread, then you have opened up your lil selfie (and your self-pleasures) to public commentary, whether from yours truly or anyone else. Yes, each of us have a right to ignore your masterbatory nonsense, but if you are engaging in such behaviors in this thread, I don't see what good purpose would be served to just allow you to post without commentary.. especially when you are frequently wrong, misleading and really seeming to want go beyond just the accomplishment of self-pleasures in your contents. Just stop it with your hatred towards me in every post I do in this thread. Enough mate.
I doubt anyone is hating you, and also I doubt that your commanding of the stoppenings of others is going to have much of an effect in terms of accomplishing your goals to be able to post your nonsense without push back - especially from others who seem to have way more knowledge, insight and appreciation of bitcoin fundamentals and price dynamics than you. I repeat, I do it for myself, I post it for those who cares. If you don't, ignore it and move ahead.
Cheers.
Yes.. you are repeating.. and I already addressed these points. Ok. In regards to your present predictions about the BTC price meeting the 200-week moving average in the $24k territory... you should be attempting to respond to my earlier bet proposal post, so we are able to see the extent to which you stand behind your seemingly nonsensical and disingenuine claims... I can already see that you are attempting to weasel out of the whole matter by avoiding the topic.
|
|
|
|
El duderino_
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2646
Merit: 12948
BTC + Crossfit, living life.
|
|
|
|
|
ImThour
Copper Member
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1527
Bitcoin Bottom was at $15.4k
|
|
January 27, 2022, 09:56:58 PM |
|
Mark Twain said it best: Never argue with an idiot. You'll never convince the idiot that you're correct, and bystanders won't be able to tell who's who. Peace. I would love to know from out experts here if this is bullish or bullish. 🤨
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Online
Activity: 2310
Merit: 1801
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
January 27, 2022, 10:01:25 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
marcus_of_augustus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3920
Merit: 2349
Eadem mutata resurgo
|
|
January 27, 2022, 10:03:43 PM |
|
... let's go Bandon!!
... CIA and psycho-spooks wants to steal a fatter share of crypto gains, covert war on bitcoin by DeepStateSwampGovCreatureUSA is declared
... fake jabs for all and health security facist swamp state not enough apparently?
|
|
|
|
marcus_of_augustus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3920
Merit: 2349
Eadem mutata resurgo
|
|
January 27, 2022, 10:05:01 PM Merited by JayJuanGee (1) |
|
Mark Twain said it best: Never argue with an idiot. You'll never convince the idiot that you're correct, and bystanders won't be able to tell who's who. Peace.
... you're much worse than an idiot, but let's leave at that shall we chump?
|
|
|
|
Biodom
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3892
Merit: 4332
|
|
January 27, 2022, 10:05:55 PM |
|
From Barrons: https://www.barrons.com/articles/kb-home-toll-lennar-analyst-ratings-51643309493 (mostly paid content) "The national security memorandum, expected to come in the next few weeks, would task parts of the government with analyzing digital assets and assembling a regulatory framework that covers cryptos, stablecoins, and NFTs, or non-fungible tokens.." NFTs? hehe
|
|
|
|
marcus_of_augustus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3920
Merit: 2349
Eadem mutata resurgo
|
|
January 27, 2022, 10:07:39 PM |
|
it is good news. it means along with LN and trezor swiss protocol btc will be more and more co opted into the banking system kyc will rule with in ten years. no such thing as new hidden coins. ... have you always been an anti-privacy gubmint snoop toady? or is that something that comes with the later years in life?
|
|
|
|
savetherainforest
|
|
January 27, 2022, 10:07:55 PM |
|
Mark Twain said it best: Never argue with an idiot. You'll never convince the idiot that you're correct, and bystanders won't be able to tell who's who. Peace. I would love to know from out experts here if this is bullish or bullish. 🤨 Probably it is the next dip that I'm expecting to happen. I have cash prepared for this last dip. My last 20% of cash for scooping some more stuff and maybe some BTCiTcoin as well, but I'm not a big believer in BTCiTcoin gains anymore. Another 10x is meh for those like me with 2000x .... GO F^CKING BANANAS ON SH!TCOINS !!! BUY ALL THE SH!TCOINS!!! ... (before bankers do ofc.. )
|
|
|
|
marcus_of_augustus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3920
Merit: 2349
Eadem mutata resurgo
|
|
January 27, 2022, 10:19:04 PM Last edit: January 28, 2022, 01:35:08 AM by marcus_of_augustus |
|
21 Analytics CEO Lucas Betschart ... Lucas Betschart is possibly a CIA asset, worked for Swiss firm Crypto AG https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crypto_AG in Zug-Steinhausen before bitcoin ~2009-2013, and travelled regularly to the US, began embedding himself in cryptocurrency activities and social circles around 2013-14 The company was secretly purchased for US $5.75 million and jointly owned by the American Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and West German Federal Intelligence Service (BND) from 1970 until about 1993, with CIA continuing as sole owner until about 2018.[1][2] The mission of breaking encrypted communication using a secretly owned company was known as "Operation Rubikon". With headquarters in Steinhausen, the company was a long-established manufacturer of encryption machines and a wide variety of cipher devices.[2]
The company has been criticised for selling backdoored products to benefit the American, British and German national signals intelligence agencies, the National Security Agency (NSA), the Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ), and the BND, respectively.[5][6][7] On 11 February 2020, The Washington Post, ZDF and SRF revealed that Crypto AG was secretly owned by the CIA in a highly classified partnership with West German intelligence, and the spy agencies could easily break the codes used to send encrypted messages. The operation was known first by the code name "Thesaurus" and later "Rubicon".[1] According to a Swiss parliamentary investigation, "Swiss intelligence service were aware of and benefited from the Zug-based firm Crypto AG’s involvement in the US-led spying".[8]
|
|
|
|
Hueristic
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3948
Merit: 5330
Doomed to see the future and unable to prevent it
|
|
January 27, 2022, 10:41:51 PM |
|
The Swiss, from the best most private banking system to the worst nanny state oversight in the world in one generation. How sad.
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Online
Activity: 2310
Merit: 1801
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
January 27, 2022, 11:01:24 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
psycodad
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1637
Merit: 1747
精神分析的爸
|
<snip> ... Lucas Betschart is likely CIA asset, worked for Swiss firm Crypto AG https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crypto_AG in Zug-Steinhausen before bitcoin ~2009-2013, and travelled regularly to the US, began embedding himself in cryptocurrency activities and social circles around 2013-24 <snip> Nice find! One might suspect this company has at least some involvement with the intelligence community. At the same address there is a company called Bitcoin Core Code Signing Association (the links gives a warning as they seem to use a certificate for github.com): Bitcoin Core signs its Windows and macOS binaries with code signing certificates. Those certificates either need to be bound to an individual or a company organization. Bitcoin Core is purely an open source project and has no legal entity, thus, some of the Core Developers have founded an association with the single purpose of registering for code signing certificates.
I currently don't know what to make out of this coincidence, but I find it mildly interesting.
|
|
|
|
icopress
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1778
Merit: 8911
light_warrior ... 🕯️
|
|
January 27, 2022, 11:33:39 PM |
|
Am I the only one with a screenshot of El duderino_'s four sevens?
|
|
|
|
El duderino_
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2646
Merit: 12948
BTC + Crossfit, living life.
|
|
January 27, 2022, 11:54:24 PM |
|
Am I the only one with a screenshot of El duderino_'s four sevens? I guess so…. Didn’t saw them myself
|
|
|
|
icopress
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1778
Merit: 8911
light_warrior ... 🕯️
|
|
January 27, 2022, 11:58:56 PM |
|
I guess so…. Didn’t saw them myself Check ...maybe this iconic screenshot has already been posted in [Save your nice merit records here] threads
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Online
Activity: 2310
Merit: 1801
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
January 28, 2022, 12:01:33 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Online
Activity: 2310
Merit: 1801
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
January 28, 2022, 01:01:25 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|