Bitcoin Forum
May 12, 2024, 07:08:28 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: What happens first:
New ATH - 43 (69.4%)
<$60,000 - 19 (30.6%)
Total Voters: 62

Pages: « 1 ... 30880 30881 30882 30883 30884 30885 30886 30887 30888 30889 30890 30891 30892 30893 30894 30895 30896 30897 30898 30899 30900 30901 30902 30903 30904 30905 30906 30907 30908 30909 30910 30911 30912 30913 30914 30915 30916 30917 30918 30919 30920 30921 30922 30923 30924 30925 30926 30927 30928 30929 [30930] 30931 30932 30933 30934 30935 30936 30937 30938 30939 30940 30941 30942 30943 30944 30945 30946 30947 30948 30949 30950 30951 30952 30953 30954 30955 30956 30957 30958 30959 30960 30961 30962 30963 30964 30965 30966 30967 30968 30969 30970 30971 30972 30973 30974 30975 30976 30977 30978 30979 30980 ... 33344 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 26382351 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (174 posts by 3 users with 9 merit deleted.)
heslo
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1162
Merit: 943


View Profile
July 08, 2022, 12:10:47 AM



Sad, true legend of his craft
1715540908
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715540908

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715540908
Reply with quote  #2

1715540908
Report to moderator
You can see the statistics of your reports to moderators on the "Report to moderator" pages.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715540908
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715540908

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715540908
Reply with quote  #2

1715540908
Report to moderator
1715540908
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715540908

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715540908
Reply with quote  #2

1715540908
Report to moderator
1715540908
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715540908

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715540908
Reply with quote  #2

1715540908
Report to moderator
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2170
Merit: 1776


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
July 08, 2022, 01:04:53 AM


Explanation
BobLawblaw
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1826
Merit: 5551


Neighborhood Shenanigans Dispenser


View Profile
July 08, 2022, 01:55:33 AM

🍆 $22k
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2170
Merit: 1776


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
July 08, 2022, 02:03:29 AM


Explanation
bitcoinPsycho
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2478
Merit: 2092


$120000 in 2024 Confirmed


View Profile
July 08, 2022, 02:23:04 AM

🍆 $22k



Yay
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2170
Merit: 1776


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
July 08, 2022, 03:01:25 AM


Explanation
Richy_T
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2436
Merit: 2121


1RichyTrEwPYjZSeAYxeiFBNnKC9UjC5k


View Profile
July 08, 2022, 03:05:04 AM
Merited by nanobtc (1)

The classic Dyson sphere with 100% efficiency would only be detectable by observing objects orbiting the star. Basically like a black hole. Inefficient sphere would radiate heat (infrared) and be detectable by JWST.

My thoughts too. Though there would surely be diminishing returns and you'd have some emissions at a very low frequency.

But a Dyson sphere can also be built as a ring or rings around a star. Let's say a strip with solar panels going around the star. This could be detectable because the ring could cause fluctuations in the light emitted by the star.

No one mentioning Larry Niven's Ringworld?
Hueristic
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3808
Merit: 4904


Doomed to see the future and unable to prevent it


View Profile
July 08, 2022, 03:24:13 AM


No one mentioning Larry Niven's Ringworld?


First read it at 13 and its still a favorite.
Biodom
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3752
Merit: 3869



View Profile
July 08, 2022, 03:26:28 AM

The classic Dyson sphere with 100% efficiency would only be detectable by observing objects orbiting the star. Basically like a black hole. Inefficient sphere would radiate heat (infrared) and be detectable by JWST.

My thoughts too. Though there would surely be diminishing returns and you'd have some emissions at a very low frequency.

But a Dyson sphere can also be built as a ring or rings around a star. Let's say a strip with solar panels going around the star. This could be detectable because the ring could cause fluctuations in the light emitted by the star.

No one mentioning Larry Niven's Ringworld?


Only those with 100% efficiency would be undetectable in infrared, but 95% efficient would still be visible, apparently.
Dyson himself thought that it would radiate, but there is a lot of discussion back and forth.
See discussion of params here:
https://canmom.art/physics/dyson-spheres
and/or
https://www.tillett.info/2016/08/03/carnot-efficient-dyson-spheres-are-undetectable-by-infrared-surveys/
and
https://www.quora.com/If-a-star-were-fully-enclosed-in-a-Dyson-sphere-would-the-ambient-temperature-inside-increase-significantly-over-time
https://www.quora.com/Why-wouldnt-a-Dyson-sphere-eventually-just-melt-from-the-trapped-heat-of-the-star

Re ringworld-awesome sci-fi, not sure it could be detected with JWST, though...if it exists.
Generally, no systems are 100% efficient and heat radiation occurs.
philipma1957
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4116
Merit: 7872


'The right to privacy matters'


View Profile WWW
July 08, 2022, 03:28:00 AM
Merited by Hueristic (1)


No one mentioning Larry Niven's Ringworld?


First read it at 13 and its still a favorite.

Old memory read it a long time ago.
Hueristic
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3808
Merit: 4904


Doomed to see the future and unable to prevent it


View Profile
July 08, 2022, 03:29:13 AM

Quote
Transnational Repression Scheme to Silence Critics of the People's Republic of China Residing in the United States
Quote
Defendants Include Federal Law Enforcement Officer and Private Investigator Who Lied to FBI Agents and Obstructed Justice
Quote
“As alleged, this case involves a multifaceted campaign to silence, harass, discredit and spy on U.S. residents for exercising their freedom of speech – aided by a current federal law enforcement officer and a private investigator who provided confidential information about U.S. residents from a restricted law enforcement database, and when confronted about their improper conduct, lied and destroyed evidence,”

https://www.justice.gov/usao-edny/pr/five-individuals-indicted-crimes-related-transnational-repression-scheme-silence
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2170
Merit: 1776


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
July 08, 2022, 04:03:27 AM


Explanation
jojo69
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3164
Merit: 4345


diamond-handed zealot


View Profile
July 08, 2022, 04:49:28 AM

ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2170
Merit: 1776


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
July 08, 2022, 05:03:28 AM


Explanation
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3710
Merit: 10241


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"


View Profile
July 08, 2022, 05:37:47 AM

With Celsius having paid off their debt and FTX saying they have billions of dollars to backstop the crypto industry, you might say this liquidity crunch is on the way to being behind us.  The market is celebrating this news.  Another development in the market is that mtgox sent out another update about funds being distributed to owners.  While no date has been set, it is clear progress is being made towards distribution.  ETH2 also completed another merge test yesterday, signaling those locked funds may be released by the end of the year.  You can see the stage is set for the next major rally.  We just have to wait for the pieces to fall into place.  I'd urge caution until mtgox and eth2 are in the rearview, but then I'd say you'll want to be one of the first through the door (if you're a market timer, always buy if you're a sat stacker).  

I won't be too optimistic if i was in your case, I mean july 28th is right around the corner when the bureau of economic analysis  will release their "Advance Estimate"  of the 2nd quarter of 2022 and it will most likely show that we are oficially in a recession, Which is... you know not good especially for BTC

So i would probably want to hold off and wait for this storm to pass before dumping my life savings on bitcoin.

Oh? Shocked Shocked

I did not realize that you were such a bear Hamich124D.  Hopefully you realize where we are at in terms of the 200-week moving average and also other BTC price dynamic understandings whether considering 1) stock to flow, 2) four year fractal and/or 3) exponential s-curve adoption based on Metcalfe principles and networking effects, and you are not sufficiently/adequately failing/refusing to pee pare ur lil selfie for UP in case your lil correlation theory does not play out exactly (or even close) to how you seem to be expecting.

Nah mate i'am bullish and currently holding bitcoin myself, I just shared that because i thought WO would be interested to see another "POV".

Any extra info is usefull in my opinion, Even if you may not like it.

I put your quote back in (above) for convenience (and clarity) regarding what we are talking about.

First of all, in your first response, it appears that you are making your own opinion, and you are not citing someone else's opinion.

Second.. who gives any shits if I like your opinion or not.  You have a right to have (and express) whatever opinion that you like to have. whether dumb or smart.  I was merely trying to figure out what the fuck you are talking about.

Third:  for clarification this is my understanding about what happened.  You posted some kind of bearish assertion (your post referenced above) regarding the bitcoin price being correlated to current negative macro circumstances.  I then asked you why are you so bearish and I hope that you are prepared for UP.   Then you responded that you really did not mean what you said in your post, you were merely providing an alternative perspective (implying that you are so wonderful to be able to provide that alternative perspective that is not your own and suggesting that I don't like your contents).

Yeah... I don't like your contents:  not because it is predicting negative BTC price moves because I could give few shits if you want to predict negative BTC price moves based on dumb reasonings.. I have seen plenty of lame-ass dumbness through the years, but instead I don't like your contents: because I don't know what the fuck you are talking about, and when I tried to get a wee bit of clarification from uie-pooie, instead of clarifying you waffled, deflected and refused to take responsibility for the assertion that you had made in your initial post..
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2170
Merit: 1776


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
July 08, 2022, 06:03:31 AM


Explanation
WatChe
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 910
Merit: 543


View Profile WWW
July 08, 2022, 06:16:04 AM

🍆 $22k

I am not buying.



26k is another new price prediction this time by Lark Davis


OutOfMemory
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1540
Merit: 3009


Man who stares at charts


View Profile
July 08, 2022, 06:25:42 AM
Last edit: July 08, 2022, 06:58:07 AM by OutOfMemory
Merited by JayJuanGee (1)

Oh my fucking Gox  Shocked
I consider the odds that "repaid" Gox Users will keep most of their coins in this bottomy times to be quite high, but i'd not be surprised about a steep rise, followed by a 2017/18 like blow-off top. Strange, but i am kind of awaiting a double top like this since the beginning of 2022, and so far everything fell in place. On the other hand, i wouldn't be surprised much more if King Daddy will be choosing a (very?) different route.

 Cool

EDIT: Fuck Brexit! On every second item i order from the UK, shipment gets halted at customs office because of "missing import license". Fuck you, Boris!
Rockbox1
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 14
Merit: 3


View Profile
July 08, 2022, 06:49:08 AM


Here’s a few I’ve read/watched recently, more cholesterol focused than diabetes but I believe they are related.

https://peterattiamd.com/the-straight-dope-on-cholesterol-part-i/ - A pretty detailed guide on all aspects cholesterol. Referencing could be better, but still not bad.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32653422/- Review and Meta-Analysis on egg consumption and  cardiovascular disease.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-38461-y – an interesting one, specifically figure 2.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DXKJaQeteE0 – a nice easy to understand video, no real detail though.

To me it all just kind of makes sense. Carbs trigger an insulin response, today’s carbs are supercharged, therefore pancreas gets worn out. In addition, to that the carbs affect the cholesterol, 2 birds with one stone.

Having said all that, just cutting out majority processed foods would probably be enough. But low carb, with lots of vegetables IMO would probably be best.
 


good stuff
thanks for sharing

ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2170
Merit: 1776


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
July 08, 2022, 07:04:54 AM


Explanation
Pages: « 1 ... 30880 30881 30882 30883 30884 30885 30886 30887 30888 30889 30890 30891 30892 30893 30894 30895 30896 30897 30898 30899 30900 30901 30902 30903 30904 30905 30906 30907 30908 30909 30910 30911 30912 30913 30914 30915 30916 30917 30918 30919 30920 30921 30922 30923 30924 30925 30926 30927 30928 30929 [30930] 30931 30932 30933 30934 30935 30936 30937 30938 30939 30940 30941 30942 30943 30944 30945 30946 30947 30948 30949 30950 30951 30952 30953 30954 30955 30956 30957 30958 30959 30960 30961 30962 30963 30964 30965 30966 30967 30968 30969 30970 30971 30972 30973 30974 30975 30976 30977 30978 30979 30980 ... 33344 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!