pjviitas
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 13, 2014, 06:34:17 PM |
|
Today something dawned on me:
We can actually start seeing signs of "sellers' exhaustion" in volume and price action, but what is fascinating is that, different from the previous cycle, there is no sign yet of "buyers' appetite" re-appearing correspondingly.
Despair Don't think so. "Apathy" is more like it, imo. I think a lot of people are getting tired of the bullshit... and probably thinking that BTC prices should be more in line with the fundamentals.. in the $750-$850 arena. $750 valuation based on what? Ya based on what? For me everything seems to be pointed toward $9.99 I already addressed this value basis question in another post. But if you think the current value is $9.99-ish, then you seem to really be living in a fantasy land world, and possibly, you do NOT understand various bitcoin fundamentals. I do NOT claim to be nearly an expert on everything about bitcoin, but there is a lot of upward potential that may or may not be realized.. depending upon how world events play out. I am betting on BTC prices going up, though, and I believe the odds are pretty good... that we are going to be seeing upward price momentum rather than downward momentum - even though it is possible that we will continue to see downward price momentum for a couple of more months... Does your valuation take into account the fact that Bitcoin mining as we know it will collapse very soon? NO it does NOT. I did NOT know that interesting "fact." Can you explain when and how and why? And, what are your sources for your information - b/c I have NOT seen any news about this happening. A TH/s miner pretty well uses up an entire 15A circuit breaker in your home. How many spare 15A breakers do you think there are in a home with a 100A service?
|
|
|
|
slapper
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2044
Merit: 1102
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 13, 2014, 06:34:46 PM |
|
The altruistic used-bitcoin salesmen asking us to buy these "cheap coins" is what turns more people off than FUDsters. I don't want a job where I buy a used bitcoin for $x, and then I need to start brainwashing other customers that they can sell it for $x+y. At some point the customer down the road is going to question the product and ask if there a cheaper way to do things that you want to do via bitcoin.
Fundamentals? Where is the balance sheet of Bitcoin Inc? Income statement, cash flow statement? Is there a P/E ratio I can go by? No it is entirely propaganda and media driven. These are the same salesmen who get pissed of when the very media has a different point of view on another given day.
Simply asking to go by scarcity of a commodity that can easily be replaced by another commodity with no tangible differences is not a sustainable.
|
|
|
|
roslinpl
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1199
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 13, 2014, 06:35:12 PM |
|
a little drop but still very promising before this great bitcoin week ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) I can't wait for tomorrow! ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) and for another Sunday too!
|
|
|
|
JayJuanGee
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3836
Merit: 10829
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 13, 2014, 06:35:30 PM |
|
Today something dawned on me:
We can actually start seeing signs of "sellers' exhaustion" in volume and price action, but what is fascinating is that, different from the previous cycle, there is no sign yet of "buyers' appetite" re-appearing correspondingly.
Despair Don't think so. "Apathy" is more like it, imo. I think a lot of people are getting tired of the bullshit... and probably thinking that BTC prices should be more in line with the fundamentals.. in the $750-$850 arena. $750 valuation based on what? Ya based on what? For me everything seems to be pointed toward $9.99 Based on the fact he's a permanent uber-bull troll! Yeah.. get your unsubstantiated digs in - and certainly, you are out of context, here, which seems to be your M.O. to spout out a bunch of shit, out of context. Don't care to carry on a conversation with a delusional extremist. I can't think of an opposing bear that would balance your strange and frankly outlandish claims. The nearest reverse mirror image might be Igorr. But igorr backs his claims up with some TA that does justify his point of view. You just talk rubbish, over, and over again, a constant stream of verbal diarrhea. The reason? I can only hazard a guess. So maybe you will put me on ignore, then? You seem to be resorting to name calling, again, without any real basis. I sense that it is much easier for you to stick with easy terms and conclusions rather than responding to logic or reason or good faith attempts at communicating substance. I cannot summarize what i do in this thread as succinctly as your conclusory assertions, but sometimes I am responding to other posts, such as yours, sometimes I am talking about my own personal decision-making process when trying to decide whether to buy or sell BTC and sometimes I am trying to predict the direction of BTC prices. Generally, I am NOT trying to persuade others whether they should buy or sell or hodl, even though sometimes those words are in my vocabulary and i do use them from time to time to asssert a sort of prediction of the best strategy at the moment. I have no problem with bearish predictions, except to the extent that there may be some disinformation contained within some of the bearish posts (sometimes the disinformation seems purposeful and other times such disinformation may NOT have been purposefully propagated), especially in these last several months the bearish predictions seem to have been correct b/c there has been a downward price trend, as we all know. Really few of us can really predict the direction of BTC prices, yet some of us just do our best to attempt to decide what to do personally to account for the risk within our own investment priorities. This thread can be helpful to get current and historical information - if one can get passed some of the FUD information - which generally seems a lot more prevalent on the long-term bear-side of the camp. Short-term bear may be a different story about making a prediction that may be based on actual facts to the best that they can be known. Regarding perma-bull name. I am generally bullish in the long term, but NOT perma-anything. If there are facts that get me to change my perspectives about bitcoin, then I will reconsider my investment and my investment strategies.
|
|
|
|
aminorex
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1030
Sine secretum non libertas
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 13, 2014, 06:36:46 PM |
|
The bear case is sustained by FUD, but it is not comprised of FUD. The bear case is that there are significant holders of large amounts of BTC with the ability to crash the market should any one of a number of things happen. They think the probability of at least one of these things happening is greater than the probability that hidden capital is going to launch a rally.
Bears also simply think that the flow of capital into BTC is going to be less than the flow out for a given amount of time. Miners would be buying their asses of right now if they had the capital to do so, because they know the price is substantially below the cost of production. So why aren't they? Coinbase price is only $2 higher than Bitstamp.
That's a very fair correction to my unbalanced case, and I endorse it. However, I would also observe that the likelihood of any of those specific price-adverse events occurring is also predicated on FUD controlling the mind of the seller. Yet again, a house build on FUD. As I mentioned, a very real and important factor.
|
|
|
|
billyjoeallen
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1007
Hide your women
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 13, 2014, 06:39:52 PM |
|
Whoever is operating the Death Bot is paying a lot of money to buy high and sell low. Why? One possible reason is to test market price and order resiliency. This person likely has a massive amount of cash and coins to control and the Death Bot is merely an operating expense.
This is very different than Willy. It's shown up on multiple exchanges, so it's probably not an exchange operator. That's a good sign, but it means the market is getting more sophisticated. Smart people are taking money from dumb people and I'm getting the sinking feeling that I'm one of the dumb people.
I don't have enough information to trade, so I'm not going to.
|
|
|
|
aminorex
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1030
Sine secretum non libertas
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 13, 2014, 06:41:06 PM |
|
A TH/s miner pretty well uses up an entire 15A circuit breaker in your home.
How many spare 15A breakers do you think there are in a home with a 100A service?
Do you seriously think someone is going to spend $20k on ASIC hardware, and balk at adding a breaker panel? Perhaps amateur mining will cease to grow (although it will always exist). The wiring issues are the least of the problems for large miners. The only real problem I see with mining is centralization. That's not a problem in itself, but it creates a huge vulnerability. And there's no way to fix it without pissing off the miners -- other than creating new miners. And that's what responsibly self-interested large holders should seek to do: Facilitate the creation of new, no-fee, merge-mining pools. Like Elgius without LukeJr and with mergemining payouts. P2Pool is a nice idea, but a trainwreck as software.
|
|
|
|
JayJuanGee
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3836
Merit: 10829
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 13, 2014, 06:45:11 PM |
|
Today something dawned on me:
We can actually start seeing signs of "sellers' exhaustion" in volume and price action, but what is fascinating is that, different from the previous cycle, there is no sign yet of "buyers' appetite" re-appearing correspondingly.
Despair Don't think so. "Apathy" is more like it, imo. I think a lot of people are getting tired of the bullshit... and probably thinking that BTC prices should be more in line with the fundamentals.. in the $750-$850 arena. $750 valuation based on what? Ya based on what? For me everything seems to be pointed toward $9.99 I already addressed this value basis question in another post. But if you think the current value is $9.99-ish, then you seem to really be living in a fantasy land world, and possibly, you do NOT understand various bitcoin fundamentals. I do NOT claim to be nearly an expert on everything about bitcoin, but there is a lot of upward potential that may or may not be realized.. depending upon how world events play out. I am betting on BTC prices going up, though, and I believe the odds are pretty good... that we are going to be seeing upward price momentum rather than downward momentum - even though it is possible that we will continue to see downward price momentum for a couple of more months... Does your valuation take into account the fact that Bitcoin mining as we know it will collapse very soon? NO it does NOT. I did NOT know that interesting "fact." Can you explain when and how and why? And, what are your sources for your information - b/c I have NOT seen any news about this happening. A TH/s miner pretty well uses up an entire 15A circuit breaker in your home. How many spare 15A breakers do you think there are in a home with a 100A service? Yes, it is already known that mining is becoming more power intense and seems to be moving towards the bigger operations and likely towards the more wealthy performing the mining. That is a known progression that some people (including miners) do NOT like, but that "fact" does NOT signify that mining will collapse any time soon - and if this is foreseen to be a longer-term problem, then likely actions are going to take place to address the matter so that this issue does NOT cause a collapse of bitcoin. So, in essence, your post is full of disinformation by misstating facts and then exaggerating the significance of any facts that are contained therein.
|
|
|
|
Guinpen
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 13, 2014, 06:47:20 PM |
|
500+ buy wall on Stamp. Reversal?
EDIT: pulled
|
|
|
|
pjviitas
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 13, 2014, 06:48:08 PM |
|
A TH/s miner pretty well uses up an entire 15A circuit breaker in your home.
How many spare 15A breakers do you think there are in a home with a 100A service?
Do you seriously think someone is going to spend $20k on ASIC hardware, and balk at adding a breaker panel? Perhaps amateur mining will cease to grow (although it will always exist). The wiring issues are the least of the problems for large miners. The only real problem I see with mining is centralization. Centralization will be the beginning of the gentrification of Bitcoin. Once it is centralized it can be controlled by banks and governments.
|
|
|
|
aminorex
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1030
Sine secretum non libertas
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 13, 2014, 06:50:42 PM |
|
The only real problem I see with mining is centralization.
Centralization will be the beginning of the gentrification of Bitcoin. Once it is centralized it can be controlled by banks and governments. Agreed. But its a solvable problem.
|
|
|
|
magicmexican
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 13, 2014, 06:54:13 PM |
|
Whoever is operating the Death Bot is paying a lot of money to buy high and sell low. Why? One possible reason is to test market price and order resiliency. This person likely has a massive amount of cash and coins to control and the Death Bot is merely an operating expense.
This is very different than Willy. It's shown up on multiple exchanges, so it's probably not an exchange operator. That's a good sign, but it means the market is getting more sophisticated. Smart people are taking money from dumb people and I'm getting the sinking feeling that I'm one of the dumb people.
I don't have enough information to trade, so I'm not going to.
What methods did you use to identify him?
|
|
|
|
pjviitas
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 13, 2014, 06:56:01 PM |
|
A TH/s miner pretty well uses up an entire 15A circuit breaker in your home.
How many spare 15A breakers do you think there are in a home with a 100A service?
Do you seriously think someone is going to spend $20k on ASIC hardware, and balk at adding a breaker panel? Perhaps amateur mining will cease to grow (although it will always exist). The wiring issues are the least of the problems for large miners. The only real problem I see with mining is centralization. That's not a problem in itself, but it creates a huge vulnerability. And there's no way to fix it without pissing off the miners -- other than creating new miners. And that's what responsibly self-interested large holders should seek to do: Facilitate the creation of new, no-fee, merge-mining pools. P2Pool is a nice idea, but a trainwreck as software. BTW...have you checked out the cost of an electrician to do this kind of work lately?
|
|
|
|
roslinpl
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1199
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 13, 2014, 06:56:59 PM |
|
The only real problem I see with mining is centralization.
Centralization will be the beginning of the gentrification of Bitcoin. Once it is centralized it can be controlled by banks and governments. Agreed. But its a solvable problem. Indeed! That is why I want gov to keep their hands off our crypto world ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
|
fonzie
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 13, 2014, 06:57:54 PM |
|
Le pump incoming?
|
|
|
|
pjviitas
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 13, 2014, 07:00:13 PM |
|
The only real problem I see with mining is centralization.
Centralization will be the beginning of the gentrification of Bitcoin. Once it is centralized it can be controlled by banks and governments. Agreed. But its a solvable problem. Please elaborate.
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2296
Merit: 1801
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/lamp.gif) |
April 13, 2014, 07:00:22 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
hdbuck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1002
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 13, 2014, 07:01:21 PM |
|
Le pump incoming?
Fearing le dump fonz?
|
|
|
|
zakalwe
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 13, 2014, 07:02:03 PM |
|
Ding ding ding last days low priiiiiiiiiice......last offer to buy cheaaaaaaaap!
|
|
|
|
aminorex
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1030
Sine secretum non libertas
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 13, 2014, 07:03:02 PM |
|
BTW...have you checked out the cost of an electrician to do this kind of work lately?
Locally I had it done for just under 1k, conversion to a tandem panel. In my country home -- not my city home. (That would have been insane. ConEd is not cheap, and the unions are in deep with organized crime and the political system in NYC so labor is utterly whack and the rules are byzantine.)
|
|
|
|
|