hdbuck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1002
|
|
May 29, 2014, 02:12:56 AM |
|
1w EMA crossed back
|
|
|
|
shmadz
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1000
@theshmadz
|
|
May 29, 2014, 02:38:10 AM |
|
Eh, sorry to rain on your parade guys, but in all honesty, the entire "should we talk abot bit or ubit or mBTC" discussion only matter if Bitcoin ever becomes a unit of account. And frankly, I don't see that happening for a long time yet. (I mean it: long time. A human generation, maybe).
And for the other aspects, exchange medium, store of wealth, it doesn't matter one bit (hur hur) what it's called... gold bugs had to wrap their head around the rather impractical 'ounces' for a while, and that never stopped adoption either.
What I'm saying is, discuss away how to call the fractions of a coin, but I tend to think, it won't matter either way.
*emphasis mine bitcoin was born as a unit of account, it's actually the core function. simply an open ledger of accounting (that cannot be changed, by anyone, as far as we know) but I'm guessing that you're using the term "unit of account" to mean "global reserve currency" and in that case you're right, 10-15 years at least... I think?
|
|
|
|
wachtwoord
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2324
Merit: 1125
|
|
May 29, 2014, 02:41:10 AM |
|
Eh, sorry to rain on your parade guys, but in all honesty, the entire "should we talk abot bit or ubit or mBTC" discussion only matter if Bitcoin ever becomes a unit of account. And frankly, I don't see that happening for a long time yet. (I mean it: long time. A human generation, maybe).
And for the other aspects, exchange medium, store of wealth, it doesn't matter one bit (hur hur) what it's called... gold bugs had to wrap their head around the rather impractical 'ounces' for a while, and that never stopped adoption either.
What I'm saying is, discuss away how to call the fractions of a coin, but I tend to think, it won't matter either way.
*emphasis mine bitcoin was born as a unit of account, it's actually the core function. simply an open ledger of accounting (that cannot be changed, by anyone, as far as we know) but I'm guessing that you're using the term "unit of account" to mean "global reserve currency" and in that case you're right, 10-15 years at least... I think? I told him already. He doesn't believe me.
|
|
|
|
shmadz
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1000
@theshmadz
|
|
May 29, 2014, 02:45:32 AM |
|
Eh, sorry to rain on your parade guys, but in all honesty, the entire "should we talk abot bit or ubit or mBTC" discussion only matter if Bitcoin ever becomes a unit of account. And frankly, I don't see that happening for a long time yet. (I mean it: long time. A human generation, maybe).
And for the other aspects, exchange medium, store of wealth, it doesn't matter one bit (hur hur) what it's called... gold bugs had to wrap their head around the rather impractical 'ounces' for a while, and that never stopped adoption either.
What I'm saying is, discuss away how to call the fractions of a coin, but I tend to think, it won't matter either way.
*emphasis mine bitcoin was born as a unit of account, it's actually the core function. simply an open ledger of accounting (that cannot be changed, by anyone, as far as we know) but I'm guessing that you're using the term "unit of account" to mean "global reserve currency" and in that case you're right, 10-15 years at least... I think? I told him already. He doesn't believe me. I think he understands bitcoin pretty much as well as I do. We may differ on some finer point, and when we do, I start to worry a little bit... I guess that's why I posted that.
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2254
Merit: 1782
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
May 29, 2014, 03:00:37 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
edwardspitz
|
|
May 29, 2014, 03:17:57 AM |
|
1w EMA crossed back That explains a lot. Boom stop loss kicked in @ houbi and 3500 broken.
|
|
|
|
derpinheimer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 896
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 29, 2014, 03:18:08 AM |
|
China dumping HARD.
|
|
|
|
hyphymikey
|
|
May 29, 2014, 03:19:52 AM |
|
Whoever is selling right now is getting played. I haven't seen any TA showing this is the right time to sell.
Unless you have so many coins you have to sell 24/7 or you are Satoshi keeping things in check, I don't get what you are trying to accomplish.
|
|
|
|
shmadz
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1000
@theshmadz
|
|
May 29, 2014, 03:31:10 AM |
|
Whoever is selling right now is getting played. I haven't seen any TA showing this is the right time to sell.
Unless you have so many coins you have to sell 24/7 or you are Satoshi keeping things in check, I don't get what you are trying to accomplish.
whatever keeps up as low as possible for as long as possible is all good in my book
|
|
|
|
hyphymikey
|
|
May 29, 2014, 03:34:45 AM |
|
Whoever is selling right now is getting played. I haven't seen any TA showing this is the right time to sell.
Unless you have so many coins you have to sell 24/7 or you are Satoshi keeping things in check, I don't get what you are trying to accomplish.
whatever keeps up as low as possible for as long as possible is all good in my book You have been around for 3 years, seems like you would have bought all the "cheap" coins you need by now lol
|
|
|
|
aminorex
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1029
Sine secretum non libertas
|
|
May 29, 2014, 03:36:33 AM |
|
Whoever is selling right now is getting played. I haven't seen any TA showing this is the right time to sell.
Unless you have so many coins you have to sell 24/7 or you are Satoshi keeping things in check, I don't get what you are trying to accomplish.
whatever keeps up as low as possible for as long as possible is all good in my book You have been around for 3 years, seems like you would have bought all the "cheap" coins you need by now lol As long as they keep paying me, I'm stacking.
|
|
|
|
bigdave
|
|
May 29, 2014, 03:38:06 AM |
|
Whoever is selling right now is getting played. I haven't seen any TA showing this is the right time to sell.
Unless you have so many coins you have to sell 24/7 or you are Satoshi keeping things in check, I don't get what you are trying to accomplish.
whatever keeps up as low as possible for as long as possible is all good in my book You have been around for 3 years, seems like you would have bought all the "cheap" coins you need by now lol Who gives a shit if he's been around for 3 years? We all want more cheap coins.
|
|
|
|
ChrisML
|
|
May 29, 2014, 03:42:48 AM |
|
Let them dump. The sooner they loose al the BTC.. the better. Dumbarses first class
|
|
|
|
shmadz
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1000
@theshmadz
|
|
May 29, 2014, 03:44:09 AM |
|
Whoever is selling right now is getting played. I haven't seen any TA showing this is the right time to sell.
Unless you have so many coins you have to sell 24/7 or you are Satoshi keeping things in check, I don't get what you are trying to accomplish.
whatever keeps up as low as possible for as long as possible is all good in my book You have been around for 3 years, seems like you would have bought all the "cheap" coins you need by now lol yes, it is actually quite embarrassing to have been around for so long and to still have so few coins. I have made, and continue to make, some very bad decisions, and yet I'm still up overall, just not like millionaire styles
|
|
|
|
hyphymikey
|
|
May 29, 2014, 03:45:54 AM |
|
Whoever is selling right now is getting played. I haven't seen any TA showing this is the right time to sell.
Unless you have so many coins you have to sell 24/7 or you are Satoshi keeping things in check, I don't get what you are trying to accomplish.
whatever keeps up as low as possible for as long as possible is all good in my book You have been around for 3 years, seems like you would have bought all the "cheap" coins you need by now lol yes, it is actually quite embarrassing to have been around for so long and to still have so few coins. I have made, and continue to make, some very bad decisions, and yet I'm still up overall, just not like millionaire styles soon my friend, soon..
|
|
|
|
ChrisML
|
|
May 29, 2014, 03:52:46 AM |
|
HAHAHAHA.
A MA GAWD. Watching Huobi makes me imagine how them chinese boys are sitting behind their PC's.
HO LEE FUK. WE TEECH EM WESTELN PEOPLE SOME POOPIE OF THEY OWN YES.
|
|
|
|
cbeast
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1736
Merit: 1006
Let's talk governance, lipstick, and pigs.
|
|
May 29, 2014, 03:57:01 AM |
|
HAHAHAHA.
A MA GAWD. Watching Huobi makes me imagine how them chinese boys are sitting behind their PC's.
HO LEE FUK. WE TEECH EM WESTELN PEOPLE SOME POOPIE OF THEY OWN YES.
Racism aside, it's a fair assessment.
|
|
|
|
Adrian-x
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 29, 2014, 04:00:13 AM |
|
thanks for that link, it brought me to this one https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kWRlNO79sLwedit: I never quite understood the "adoption gap" chasm until I saw this little beauty big thanks to whoever dropped that link, sorry I don't remember finally I understood that this correlation of hype and despair explains the "adoption gap" chasm theory. They are not one and the same the hype cycle is typically of the run-ups to all-time highs. The adoption curve represents 100% of Bitcoin's total user base untill Bitcoin reaches maximum saturation. The adoption chasm is about critical mass if you can reach 13-16% of your target user base, you have crossed the chasm and the network effect will trigger the remaining adoption through to saturation. In my mind we're still in early adopter or innovator stage, we haven't crossed the chasm yet, once we've hit 13% of total Bitcoin users we've crossed the chasm and we home free.
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2254
Merit: 1782
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
May 29, 2014, 04:00:36 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
shmadz
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1000
@theshmadz
|
|
May 29, 2014, 04:02:28 AM |
|
HAHAHAHA.
A MA GAWD. Watching Huobi makes me imagine how them chinese boys are sitting behind their PC's.
HO LEE FUK. WE TEECH EM WESTELN PEOPLE SOME POOPIE OF THEY OWN YES.
Racism aside, it's a fair assessment. all the other markets seem to be following, as usual. if we could break below 550 I would be on cloud 9 ( it's that little cloud on the other side of the moon)
|
|
|
|
|