Bitcoin Forum
June 22, 2024, 01:31:48 PM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: What happens first:
New ATH - 43 (69.4%)
<$60,000 - 19 (30.6%)
Total Voters: 62

Pages: « 1 ... 9095 9096 9097 9098 9099 9100 9101 9102 9103 9104 9105 9106 9107 9108 9109 9110 9111 9112 9113 9114 9115 9116 9117 9118 9119 9120 9121 9122 9123 9124 9125 9126 9127 9128 9129 9130 9131 9132 9133 9134 9135 9136 9137 9138 9139 9140 9141 9142 9143 9144 [9145] 9146 9147 9148 9149 9150 9151 9152 9153 9154 9155 9156 9157 9158 9159 9160 9161 9162 9163 9164 9165 9166 9167 9168 9169 9170 9171 9172 9173 9174 9175 9176 9177 9178 9179 9180 9181 9182 9183 9184 9185 9186 9187 9188 9189 9190 9191 9192 9193 9194 9195 ... 33470 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 26404748 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (174 posts by 3 users with 9 merit deleted.)
mah87
Donator
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 500

-Bitcoin & Ripple-


View Profile
October 18, 2014, 10:10:32 AM

why a huge bid wall is never manipulation while a similar wall in the ask side is Always legitimate and welcome.... this forum is full of delusional idiots.

yes
wachtwoord
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2324
Merit: 1125


View Profile
October 18, 2014, 10:10:46 AM

why a huge bid wall is never manipulation while a similar wall in the ask side is Always legitimate and welcome.... this forum is full of delusional idiots.

It really is quite close to the price. Just try to sell into it and you'll know for sure Smiley
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3752
Merit: 10428


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"


View Profile
October 18, 2014, 10:11:01 AM

Metcalfe's "law" is used in bitcoin to "prove" that X will grow like Y squared, for some suitable quantities X and Y.  Problem is, the law does not say that Y will continue growing, that it is not being affected by MtGOX, that it will not suffer from ApplePay, that it is not determined by China, etc.

You seem to be describing interruptions to the growth of the network, but you are NOT describing the law to be invalid.... because the question becomes whether the network keeps growing or NOT and that may NOT be known while we are in the middle of the growth whether it has substantially slowed down or stopped... but after the fact, we may be able to look back and see the direction of the growth... or have better means to measure the extent of the growth... which some of those measurement systems already exist in bitcoin... but still does NOT necessarily tell us to where the trajectory is going or whether the trajectory has been materially and significantly interrupted.

There are several problems there...

For one thing, how to define the "size of the network", and how to measure it?

Total hash power is a poor measure, since over the lst couple of years the hash power is now concentrated in a few large pools.  The justification given for Metcalfe's law is that each node can interact with all the other N-1 nodes, so as N increases the number of possible interactions grows as N2, and the value of the network is guessed to be proportional to that number.  But if the network, instead of adding mode nodes,  is concentrating all use in a few big nodes, the interaction actually goes down.  And, aniway, miners don't interact with each other.

I explained already why I believe that the blockchain traffic (whether measured in TX, BTC, or USD) is mostly bitcoins moving between addresses with the same owner; so it cannot be assumed to measure the size of the network, either.  In fact, we do not have any reliable data about the bitcoin economy, except the market price, the number of coins mined, and the total hash power.

In the plots that are said to show that bitcoin follows Metcalfe's law, the last year is squeezed into a tiny area a few millimeters tall by a couple centimetres wide.   But that is where most of the "weight" is.  It is like plotting some property of bodies of water, from a teaspoon to the Pacific Ocean, and having the data for all the seas and oceans squeezed into that tiny sliver of the plot.  Why should one assume that a property that holds for small bodies of water, from teaspoon-size to lake-size, will continue holding for ocean-size ones?  (And indeed we know that real oceans have many phenomena that you don't see in lakes, like currents driven by climate differences.  In particular, for all small bodies of water there are bodies that are 10x bigger; but that is not true for oceans...) If that "Bitcoin Metcalfe" plot were to be trimmed to the last 12 months and expanded to fill all the plot area, what would it show?

You are taking some arguable measurement points and arguing how these do NOT necessarily show an increase in users or transactions.... NOT very convincing to suggest that somehow bitcoin is shrinking in its importance and/or user base... especially given the fact that there are more and more businesses popping up around bitcoin.. seems like users are going to be needed to support these businesses.... and we will see, but i get the sense from the various measures on bitcoin pulse and even coinbase accounts and circle account and these other new exchanges that the bitcoin user base continues to expand at a pretty decent rate.
noobtrader
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000



View Profile
October 18, 2014, 10:12:23 AM

why a huge bid wall is never manipulation while a similar wall in the ask side is Always legitimate and welcome.... this forum is full of delusional idiots.

i have to agree with you... this is manipulation !!!
i blame the aliens
N12
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1610
Merit: 1010



View Profile
October 18, 2014, 10:23:02 AM

Ask yourself, if it is manipulation, then why is the price so susceptible at this level? Then you will understand.
600watt
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2338
Merit: 2106



View Profile
October 18, 2014, 10:33:59 AM

Ask yourself, if it is manipulation, then why is the price so susceptible at this level? Then you will understand.


you are right. definitely manipulated down.
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2212
Merit: 1779


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
October 18, 2014, 11:00:50 AM


Explanation
Pala_00
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 728
Merit: 500



View Profile
October 18, 2014, 11:26:46 AM

touhonoob
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 0


View Profile
October 18, 2014, 11:35:57 AM

Bitcoin ETF Coming NOV 14
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gUhqeMkbo6k#t=1419
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2212
Merit: 1779


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
October 18, 2014, 12:00:51 PM


Explanation
spiderbrain
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 889
Merit: 1013



View Profile
October 18, 2014, 12:02:36 PM

Great video, thanks!
paul2000
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 748
Merit: 500


View Profile
October 18, 2014, 12:26:54 PM

spooderman
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1652
Merit: 1029


View Profile WWW
October 18, 2014, 12:27:19 PM

we chooing?
NotLambchop
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 254


View Profile
October 18, 2014, 12:28:42 PM

we chooing?

We just chooched a little.
N12
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1610
Merit: 1010



View Profile
October 18, 2014, 12:29:46 PM

CHOO ALL OF THE CHOOS
FNG
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 588
Merit: 500


View Profile
October 18, 2014, 12:33:39 PM

It will get exciting when multiple people like Mr. 9000 on houbi start fighting for the coins.
jonoiv
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 966
Merit: 526


🐺Dogs for President🐺


View Profile
October 18, 2014, 12:37:47 PM

hdbuck
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1002



View Profile
October 18, 2014, 12:39:48 PM


I dont see how this ETF, which allegedly aims at "stabilizing" the price, could possibly be bullish.

Or is it that deep down we just dont care about it and the people paying for BTC IOUs?! Grin

Seriously, BTC ETF = Worst Idea Ever
If people think you are dumb investing in BTC, then what to call those investing in such ETF.
How is it that such stupid people have so much money to get rid of?
MrPiggles
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 980
Merit: 256


Decentralized Ascending Auctions on Blockchain


View Profile
October 18, 2014, 12:41:47 PM

If people think you are dumb investing in BTC, then what to call those investing in such ETF.
How is it that such stupid people have so much money to get rid of?

Look at the way things are spun these days

investing in btc now is still kinda throwing money into a completely speculative commodity used by drug dealers hitmen and kiddyporn weirdos

if it gets launched in an ETF it's now investing into a speculative commodity via your brokerage account



Pretty major difference there
spooderman
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1652
Merit: 1029


View Profile WWW
October 18, 2014, 12:45:02 PM

Good morning everyone, remember to CHOO your breakfast before swallowing.
Pages: « 1 ... 9095 9096 9097 9098 9099 9100 9101 9102 9103 9104 9105 9106 9107 9108 9109 9110 9111 9112 9113 9114 9115 9116 9117 9118 9119 9120 9121 9122 9123 9124 9125 9126 9127 9128 9129 9130 9131 9132 9133 9134 9135 9136 9137 9138 9139 9140 9141 9142 9143 9144 [9145] 9146 9147 9148 9149 9150 9151 9152 9153 9154 9155 9156 9157 9158 9159 9160 9161 9162 9163 9164 9165 9166 9167 9168 9169 9170 9171 9172 9173 9174 9175 9176 9177 9178 9179 9180 9181 9182 9183 9184 9185 9186 9187 9188 9189 9190 9191 9192 9193 9194 9195 ... 33470 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!