adamstgBit
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1037
Trusted Bitcoiner
|
 |
October 19, 2014, 02:34:18 AM |
|
>1,000$ pre bitcoin party  SOON!  alright i'm out , good night NY, Good Night Montreal., GOOD NIGHT BITCOIN! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Be very wary of relying on JavaScript for security on crypto sites. The site can change the JavaScript at any time unless you take unusual precautions, and browsers are not generally known for their airtight security.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
silverfuture
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 947
Merit: 1008
central banking = outdated protocol
|
|
October 19, 2014, 02:46:04 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2170
Merit: 1776
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
 |
October 19, 2014, 03:00:50 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
79b79aa8d5047da6d3XX
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 660
Merit: 101
Colletrix - Bridging the Physical and Virtual Worl
|
|
October 19, 2014, 03:14:13 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
spooderman
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1638
Merit: 1022
|
|
October 19, 2014, 03:19:56 AM |
|
Mother of god I need to leave this awful island. GCHQ has fewer safeguards in place than the NSA.
|
|
|
|
|
79b79aa8d5047da6d3XX
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 660
Merit: 101
Colletrix - Bridging the Physical and Virtual Worl
|
|
October 19, 2014, 03:28:50 AM |
|
that would make no difference. if/when it comes down to it, there are no jurisdictions, there is no law. that much is certain.
|
|
|
|
|
Richy_T
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2436
Merit: 2121
1RichyTrEwPYjZSeAYxeiFBNnKC9UjC5k
|
|
October 19, 2014, 03:28:56 AM |
|
I agree, Metcalfe's law for Bitcoin should use (number of customers)x(number of merchants) instead of (number of users)2. Unfortunately we do not have data on the number of customers and how it is evolving.
Perhaps. Though I suspect it might not be quite as simple as that since there will still be some interconnection between the customers themselves and, also,to a lesser degree, the merchant group (Consider the effect of ebay on turning consumers into sellers). Not all nodes in a network have to be interconnected (I am not emailing your mother, for example), the value is *proportional* to the square after all. Presumably this is because the number of interconnections rises with the square but the percentage of those connections that are used is a fairly constant proportion of those available. Having two disparate groupings does introduce an interesting factor. Perhaps there would be a paper for it for a computer researcher... My suspicion is that the main part of the value comes from the users. Whatever their proportional value, as it is the square, it will rise more and more quickly as large numbers are attained. Merchants, on the other hand, will tend to have a much smaller number overall so their contribution will rise more slowly. |
|
|
|
|
Richy_T
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2436
Merit: 2121
1RichyTrEwPYjZSeAYxeiFBNnKC9UjC5k
|
|
October 19, 2014, 03:32:42 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richy_T
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2436
Merit: 2121
1RichyTrEwPYjZSeAYxeiFBNnKC9UjC5k
|
|
October 19, 2014, 03:34:29 AM |
|
Bit disappointed by your response there lambchop. Was hoping to learn something. Anyone else care to chime in on whether price leads sentiment or the reverse?
its a paradox, for real, its a fucking paradox! i've been here for years and i can assure you its a paradox  It's a feedback loop. They feed off each other. |
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2170
Merit: 1776
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
October 19, 2014, 04:00:50 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
hyphymikey
|
|
October 19, 2014, 04:14:11 AM |
|
I'm surprised there hasn't been a dump yet
|
|
|
|
|
BlindMayorBitcorn
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1115
|
|
October 19, 2014, 04:14:53 AM |
|
I'm surprised there hasn't been a dump yet
Wait for it |
|
|
|
|
cbeast
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1736
Merit: 1006
Let's talk governance, lipstick, and pigs.
|
|
October 19, 2014, 04:15:22 AM |
|
I think speculators are guessing that an altcoin will replace Bitcoin or that Bitcoin 2.0 derivatives will make Bitcoin unnecessary as a store of value. They will see the error in their presumptions.
|
|
|
|
|
mah87
Donator
Hero Member
Offline
Activity: 756
Merit: 500
-Bitcoin & Ripple-
|
|
October 19, 2014, 04:22:47 AM |
|
I think speculators are guessing that an altcoin will replace Bitcoin or that Bitcoin 2.0 derivatives will make Bitcoin unnecessary as a store of value. They will see the error in their presumptions.
Ripple is integrating 100banks in 2015. No error. Bitcoin is the past. |
|
|
|
|
lyth0s
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000
World Class Cryptonaire
|
|
October 19, 2014, 04:49:03 AM |
|
I think speculators are guessing that an altcoin will replace Bitcoin or that Bitcoin 2.0 derivatives will make Bitcoin unnecessary as a store of value. They will see the error in their presumptions.
Ripple is integrating 100banks in 2015. No error. Bitcoin is the past. Don't make me laugh. |
|
|
|
|
BlindMayorBitcorn
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1115
|
|
October 19, 2014, 04:56:00 AM |
|
I just had an epiphany. If bitcoin would just keep going up and stop going down we would have nothing to argue about. Is this a flaw in the code or something?
|
|
|
|
|
|
janos666
|
|
October 19, 2014, 04:58:57 AM |
|
I just had an epiphany. If bitcoin would just keep going up and stop going down we would have nothing to argue about. Is this a flaw in the code or something?
We could always argue about the date it will stop, why it haven't stopped already, etc. Those next 24 hours would always be about bubble speeches and manipulation theories. Oh wait... |
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2170
Merit: 1776
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
October 19, 2014, 05:00:49 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2170
Merit: 1776
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
October 19, 2014, 06:00:51 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
mah87
Donator
Hero Member
Offline
Activity: 756
Merit: 500
-Bitcoin & Ripple-
|
|
October 19, 2014, 06:11:28 AM |
|
I think speculators are guessing that an altcoin will replace Bitcoin or that Bitcoin 2.0 derivatives will make Bitcoin unnecessary as a store of value. They will see the error in their presumptions.
Ripple is integrating 100banks in 2015. No error. Bitcoin is the past. Don't make me laugh. Well already 4banks. And one is #30 in US... Keep you head in the sand. |
|
|
|
|
|
Poll
