grappa_barricata
Full Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
playing pasta and eating mandolinos
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 15, 2014, 08:42:02 PM |
|
this doesn't look good to me, we retraced all the way down, what a bam bam
1d chart looks like a nightmare... BUT, the order book is stacked. I'm wondering if we'll level down repeatedly or if we just got as over exuberant about going doing as we did going up. Any ideas. Frankly, I've got none. I'm starting to think that this is similar to what happened whit that mini-rally from 390 to 450, than then melted down very fast and lead us to the sub 300 event. Only difference is the time-scale and volume, both bigger this time. A huge bull trap, to fuck every trader which still has a soul.
|
|
|
|
oda.krell
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1007
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 15, 2014, 08:43:30 PM |
|
yeah, well i am running that strategy atm myself. I am bought (i probably shouldnt be, but i just rebought), but I have a roof in at $400 and my drop loss at $365. We will see, but its a nice risk mitigation technique.
I have to ask, or it's going to eat my alive: what's the difference between a drop loss and a stop loss? Is it related to a timid order? Or a barge in account?
|
|
|
|
tmfp
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1932
Merit: 1737
"Common rogue from Russia with a bare ass."
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 15, 2014, 08:50:18 PM |
|
yup, which is why i love roof in and drop losses, either way, if you are unsure of which way, you can take a position and let it run and see what happens. If you are right, awesome, if you are wrong small losses but you can bought/sold based on what happens. Win win
Sorry, could you explain a bit more what you're talking about here? Thanks.
|
|
|
|
wmr42393
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 77
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 15, 2014, 08:58:30 PM |
|
this doesn't look good to me, we retraced all the way down, what a bam bam
looks bullish as fuck to me
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1782
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/lamp.gif) |
November 15, 2014, 09:01:18 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Winner
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
Look ARROUND!
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 15, 2014, 09:07:01 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Fatman3001
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1013
Make Bitcoin glow with ENIAC
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 15, 2014, 09:12:53 PM |
|
Hope you don´t see it from that image, ChartBuddy has been a bit under the weather lately.
|
|
|
|
NotLambchop
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 15, 2014, 09:13:52 PM |
|
... But I don't see how, in one way or another, you could do without a store of value. ... Everything that has value (a car, a factory, a stick of gum, even a bitcoin) is a store of value to some degree. Fiat money too is a store of value, though a poor one--by design. It makes investment more profitable than hoarding. A "good" store of value, OTOH, discourages investment and encourages hoarding. My point is trivial: if gold and similar "stores of value" vanished tomorrow, initial economic consequences would be less than catastrophic. Eventually, the economy would do better without it.
|
|
|
|
inca
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1000
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 15, 2014, 09:15:04 PM |
|
Weekend dip!
|
|
|
|
JorgeStolfi
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 15, 2014, 09:19:17 PM |
|
Go home Chartbuddy, you're drunk. Not sure if people are joking... The plots may seem broken at first sight, but they are a consequence of large changes in the order book, at some distance from the spread. Months ago, the changes were usually small and usually close to the spread, so the plot usually looked like a fairly smooth valley.
|
|
|
|
Phillis
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 15, 2014, 09:20:18 PM |
|
yeah, well i am running that strategy atm myself. I am bought (i probably shouldnt be, but i just rebought), but I have a roof in at $400 and my drop loss at $365. We will see, but its a nice risk mitigation technique.
I have to ask, or it's going to eat my alive: what's the difference between a drop loss and a stop loss? Is it related to a timid order? Or a barge in account? ah well i am involved with haasbot, which is a bitcoin/altcoin bot. One of the features it has is roof in and drop loss (drop loss is basically a stop loss on an exchange), whereas a roof in will execute a buy if the price that is entered is reached, which is $400 for me, atm.
|
|
|
|
LFC_Bitcoin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3626
Merit: 10064
#1 VIP Crypto Casino
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 15, 2014, 09:23:37 PM |
|
Very slight upwards change in the price it appears.
$377 on coindesk
|
|
|
|
samsonn25
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 15, 2014, 09:24:20 PM |
|
Weekend dip!
Is dip because the price went to $463 which is almost $90 above the daily ema around $363
|
|
|
|
wmr42393
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 77
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 15, 2014, 09:25:15 PM |
|
2000 has a higher probability.
|
|
|
|
indiemax
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 15, 2014, 09:36:05 PM |
|
2000 has a higher probability. why? because 200 has a higher probability,do the maths ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif)
|
|
|
|
Fatman3001
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1013
Make Bitcoin glow with ENIAC
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 15, 2014, 09:36:50 PM |
|
Go home Chartbuddy, you're drunk. Not sure if people are joking... The plots may seem broken at first sight, but they are a consequence of large changes in the order book, at some distance from the spread. Months ago, the changes were usually small and usually close to the spread, so the plot usually looked like a fairly smooth valley. ChartBuddy has been stuck on the same image since page 9957.
|
|
|
|
tmfp
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1932
Merit: 1737
"Common rogue from Russia with a bare ass."
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 15, 2014, 09:41:46 PM |
|
yeah, well i am running that strategy atm myself. I am bought (i probably shouldnt be, but i just rebought), but I have a roof in at $400 and my drop loss at $365. We will see, but its a nice risk mitigation technique.
I have to ask, or it's going to eat my alive: what's the difference between a drop loss and a stop loss? Is it related to a timid order? Or a barge in account? ah well i am involved with haasbot, which is a bitcoin/altcoin bot. One of the features it has is roof in and drop loss (drop loss is basically a stop loss on an exchange), whereas a roof in will execute a buy if the price that is entered is reached, which is $400 for me, atm. Trying to understand this, please bear with me, you mean you now are nett long around current prices which you will stop out at 365 and take a loss, but if the price breaks thru 400 then you will add to your long?
|
|
|
|
wmr42393
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 77
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 15, 2014, 09:42:02 PM |
|
2000 has a higher probability. why? because 200 has a higher probability,do the maths ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) Worked out an equation have you? I would love to see it. You do realize the price has hit 2000 more recently than 200?
|
|
|
|
shmadz
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1000
@theshmadz
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 15, 2014, 09:51:06 PM |
|
2000 has a higher probability. why? because 200 has a higher probability,do the maths ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) Worked out an equation have you? I would love to see it. You do realize the price has hit 2000 more recently than 200?You're drunker than chartbuddy
|
|
|
|
|
|