Bitcoin Forum
May 04, 2024, 09:38:43 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they strongly believe that the creator of this topic is a scammer. (Login to see the detailed trust ratings.) While the bitcointalk.org administration does not verify such claims, you should proceed with extreme caution.
Pages: « 1 ... 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 [69] 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 ... 182 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [Work in progess] Burnins Avalon Chip to mining board service  (Read 623954 times)
ewibit
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2955
Merit: 1049


View Profile
July 16, 2013, 02:34:43 PM
 #1361

If you already have everything in place, I doubt you need the water blocks. But if you ask me, that means that I am going to buy a 7mh/s increase for 15€ per board with additional costs of about 200€ per 10-16 boards.

Im not sure that is worth it.
how big (and valuable) is the difference of the noise?
Transactions must be included in a block to be properly completed. When you send a transaction, it is broadcast to miners. Miners can then optionally include it in their next blocks. Miners will be more inclined to include your transaction if it has a higher transaction fee.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714858723
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714858723

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714858723
Reply with quote  #2

1714858723
Report to moderator
1714858723
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714858723

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714858723
Reply with quote  #2

1714858723
Report to moderator
1714858723
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714858723

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714858723
Reply with quote  #2

1714858723
Report to moderator
Schrankwand
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 100


View Profile
July 16, 2013, 02:36:38 PM
 #1362

If you already have everything in place, I doubt you need the water blocks. But if you ask me, that means that I am going to buy a 7mh/s increase for 15€ per board with additional costs of about 200€ per 10-16 boards.

Im not sure that is worth it.
how big (and valuable) is the difference of the noise?

I can't tell, since I don't know what kind of fans you need.

If we were talking the sound of my Gigabyte 7970 vs watercooling : Watercooling all the way.

If I can use Akasa 120mm silent fans to get the cooling I want: Fuck that.
fiktionist
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 72
Merit: 10


View Profile
July 16, 2013, 02:55:31 PM
 #1363

iam pretty sure, if you would raise the voltage to 1,35v (which should not really be a problem at 110nm) and keep it cool on water 450mhz must be reachable Smiley

liked that post? Official BeerAdress: 12Q9d7tntiQXARjpVSRKnQhzJy4MoAaonL
menace_one
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 32
Merit: 0


View Profile
July 16, 2013, 03:00:30 PM
 #1364

iam pretty sure, if you would raise the voltage to 1,35v (which should not really be a problem at 110nm) and keep it cool on water 450mhz must be reachable Smiley

yes probably no problem for 110nm chips, but I'm not sure about the voltage regulators.

Covers the Waterblock also the VRs? On GPUs is that very important.
nemercry
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 339
Merit: 250

Vice versa is not a meal.


View Profile
July 16, 2013, 03:05:41 PM
 #1365

Quote
434 - 57, 31, 1.28V, 82W, 4% hw errors means 434 Mhz - 17.36Mhz(434*0.04Hwerrors) = 416.64 Mhz (actual usable speed with WC)
434 - 57, 52, 1.28, 82W, 10% hw errors means 434 - 43(434*0.1Hwerrors) = 390.6 Mhz(actual usable speed with AC)


And that means, the choice here is between:

434 - 57, 31, 1.28V, 82W, 4% hw errors means 434 Mhz - 17.36Mhz(434*0.04Hwerrors) = 416.64 Mhz

and 409 - 56.5, 51, 1.28, 77W, stable


If you already have everything in place, I doubt you need the water blocks. But if you ask me, that means that I am going to buy a 7mh/s increase for 15€ per board with additional costs of about 200€ per 10-16 boards.

Im not sure that is worth it.

Lets see what happens if burnin highers the voltage. As you can see in the AC chart, there are volt settings which cause much more errors, than a little higher on. And while the AC cooling still is on its limit. WC could still be able to manage the 250 with little less, no or the same amount of hw errors than the 434 stage. Due that the board is much cooler than with AC.

For example:
409 - 55, 48.5, 1.25, 2% errors
409 - 56.5, 51, 1.28, 77W, stable
on AC

Could be the same as
434 - 57, 31, 1.28V, 82W, 4% hw errors
(MAYBE, not a real value!)450 - 57, 31, 1.3V, 82W, 0% hw errors

It could be possible because the board itself is significantly colder than with ac. In this case it should be a good roi for the difference in hashrate.(But to be honest its more a thought than a real expectation = ])
SebastianJu
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2674
Merit: 1082


Legendary Escrow Service - Tip Jar in Profile


View Profile WWW
July 16, 2013, 04:36:57 PM
 #1366

@burnin... I believe Klondikes can only be highervolted with changes on the board. For example other parts soldered in. Is it different with your design? Easily doable without soldering?

And can you tell what fans are used so i know what quality they are, air volume per hour and so on...

What do you think about BKKCoins problems with noise that leads to higher error rates. Do you expect that he will get similar results when he suppressed the noise with ferrite beads?

Please ALWAYS contact me through bitcointalk pm before sending someone coins.
cimpex
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 588
Merit: 252



View Profile
July 16, 2013, 04:54:54 PM
 #1367

maybe there is a small temp. difference inside the avalon chip at the IC between AC and WC -> same surface temps but different performance. if an IC is working at his limit just a few degree will matter.


            ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
         █████████████████████████▄   
       ███████                 ██████
     ██████                      ██████
    █████      ███████████▄        ████
   ████      █████████████▀         ████
  ████      █████            ██      ████
 █████     ████     ▄▄▄      ███     ████
 █████     ████   ███████   ████
 ████      ████   ███████   ████
 ████      ████   ██████    ████      ███
  ████     █████   ▀▀▀▀     ████     ████
  ████      █████            ██      ████
   ████      █████████████▄         ████
    █████      ███████████▀        ████
     ██████                       ████
       ██████
         ██████████████████████▄
             ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
SKYFchain
█▀▀▀▀▀▀█
█  ▄██
██▀  █
█  ▄██
██▀  █
█  ▄██
██▀  █
█  ▄██
██▀  █
█      █
█▄▄▄▄▄▄█

█▀▀▀▀▀▀█
█  ▄██
██▀  █
█  ▄██
██▀  █
█  ▄██
██▀  █
█  ▄██
██▀  █
█      █
█▄▄▄▄▄▄█
robix
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 360
Merit: 250


View Profile
July 16, 2013, 04:55:56 PM
 #1368

@burnin

When you launch your shop, I think it would be wise to disable the order button in the beginning for a certain time (1 or 2 days), so that all the guys can have a look at the offering, the different items and how to combine them. That would prevent possible wrong orders done in a hectic rush and also the trouble you would have to correct the orders. When questions arise you can answer them in advance.

Just my thoughts.
SebastianJu
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2674
Merit: 1082


Legendary Escrow Service - Tip Jar in Profile


View Profile WWW
July 16, 2013, 05:00:25 PM
 #1369

@burnin

When you launch your shop, I think it would be wise to disable the order button in the beginning for a certain time (1 or 2 days), so that all the guys can have a look at the offering, the different items and how to combine them. That would prevent possible wrong orders done in a hectic rush and also the trouble you would have to correct the orders. When questions arise you can answer them in advance.

Just my thoughts.

Thats a great idea since burnin already stated that he will give out a warning about the opening of the shop 24 hours before. When he opens the shop with buying disabled everyone has 24h to calculate and maybe even prepare the basket.

Please ALWAYS contact me through bitcointalk pm before sending someone coins.
Micky25
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 974
Merit: 1000



View Profile
July 16, 2013, 05:01:25 PM
 #1370

^ +1
dani
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 525
Merit: 500


..yeah


View Profile
July 16, 2013, 05:40:43 PM
 #1371

Anyone thought about a suitable PSU? I'm looking around for a cheap 80+Gold single rail PSU that can handle 700-1000 Watt  (will use two of them), any recommendations? I don't care about noise, I'd buy a turbine if it's cheap and efficient. I'll make sure that the load never exceeds 70%, so any brandmark should do.
Single rail is obviously the best for me because I cannot mess up anything Grin

Hai
Tursk
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 92
Merit: 10


View Profile
July 16, 2013, 06:05:15 PM
 #1372

Anyone thought about a suitable PSU? I'm looking around for a cheap 80+Gold single rail PSU that can handle 700-1000 Watt  (will use two of them), any recommendations? I don't care about noise, I'd buy a turbine if it's cheap and efficient. I'll make sure that the load never exceeds 70%, so any brandmark should do.
Single rail is obviously the best for me because I cannot mess up anything Grin

I bought Corsair AX760 to power up my six upcoming Bitburner XXs. 80plus Platinum, modular cabling, 6x6pin PCI-E etc. It isn't cheap, but has right amount of PCI-E connectors. 92% power efficiency keeps it cool and electricity bill is at least a little smaller than with 80plus Gold PSU.

http://www.corsair.com/en/power-supply-units/ax-series-power-supply-units/ax760-atx-power-supply-760-watt-80-plus-platinum-certified-fully-modular-psu.html
SebastianJu
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2674
Merit: 1082


Legendary Escrow Service - Tip Jar in Profile


View Profile WWW
July 16, 2013, 06:14:09 PM
 #1373

Anyone thought about a suitable PSU? I'm looking around for a cheap 80+Gold single rail PSU that can handle 700-1000 Watt  (will use two of them), any recommendations? I don't care about noise, I'd buy a turbine if it's cheap and efficient. I'll make sure that the load never exceeds 70%, so any brandmark should do.
Single rail is obviously the best for me because I cannot mess up anything Grin

Where to see the power efficiency?

I got one of these for cheap at ebay: Link but they are expensive to buy them from the store. Someone suggested this with 8 x 12V channels: Link but its similarly expensive.

I checked amazon and the reviews there and found that maybe this is a cheap alternative: Link

Its cheaper when taking 2 or more of them and they have good reviews. I wonder if one would need y-cables or are the boards powered from the neighbour board?

And i thought about buying this: Link With this i should be able to turn of and on all my miners over the internet when they are far away in a datacentre. In case the raspi hangs or similar things.

Please ALWAYS contact me through bitcointalk pm before sending someone coins.
ecliptic
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 322
Merit: 250


View Profile
July 16, 2013, 06:29:20 PM
 #1374

What are payment option(s) for assembly?
ecliptic
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 322
Merit: 250


View Profile
July 16, 2013, 06:31:05 PM
 #1375

iam pretty sure, if you would raise the voltage to 1,35v (which should not really be a problem at 110nm) and keep it cool on water 450mhz must be reachable Smiley

yes probably no problem for 110nm chips, but I'm not sure about the voltage regulators.

Covers the Waterblock also the VRs? On GPUs is that very important.
Buck converters have no problem doing something like 0.8 to 6v at full load current.  Just duty cycle on FETs change.. or diode if not a synch buck
guitar82
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 93
Merit: 10


View Profile
July 16, 2013, 06:35:00 PM
 #1376

Anyone thought about a suitable PSU? I'm looking around for a cheap 80+Gold single rail PSU that can handle 700-1000 Watt  (will use two of them), any recommendations? I don't care about noise, I'd buy a turbine if it's cheap and efficient. I'll make sure that the load never exceeds 70%, so any brandmark should do.
Single rail is obviously the best for me because I cannot mess up anything Grin

I bought Corsair AX760 to power up my six upcoming Bitburner XXs. 80plus Platinum, modular cabling, 6x6pin PCI-E etc. It isn't cheap, but has right amount of PCI-E connectors. 92% power efficiency keeps it cool and electricity bill is at least a little smaller than with 80plus Gold PSU.

http://www.corsair.com/en/power-supply-units/ax-series-power-supply-units/ax760-atx-power-supply-760-watt-80-plus-platinum-certified-fully-modular-psu.html


Didn't Burnin say you could power 3 boards with one 6 pin adapter? With overclocking I think it would only be two now, but that is what I thought. I am not sure how they wire though.
Tursk
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 92
Merit: 10


View Profile
July 16, 2013, 06:57:51 PM
 #1377

Quote
Didn't Burnin say you could power 3 boards with one 6 pin adapter? With overclocking I think it would only be two now, but that is what I thought. I am not sure how they wire though.

I think it was two boards, but that was before overclocking fever took over Smiley

Officially one 6-pin PCI-E connector has 75W power output, which burnin already exceeded with higher clock rates. I guess he wasn't using single PCI-E connector though.



SebastianJu
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2674
Merit: 1082


Legendary Escrow Service - Tip Jar in Profile


View Profile WWW
July 16, 2013, 07:37:35 PM
 #1378

With overclocking the chance of a broken asic will rise most probably. So when a chip breaks BKKCoins made the klondikes so that the other chips remain working. Is it still so that a 10 chip bank will stop working with your design burnin? I mean its probably not an easy task to find a replace the broken chip.

Please ALWAYS contact me through bitcointalk pm before sending someone coins.
AMD FTW
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 317
Merit: 250


GET IN - Smart Ticket Protocol - Live in market!


View Profile
July 16, 2013, 07:42:47 PM
 #1379

Quote
Didn't Burnin say you could power 3 boards with one 6 pin adapter? With overclocking I think it would only be two now, but that is what I thought. I am not sure how they wire though.

I think it was two boards, but that was before overclocking fever took over Smiley

Officially one 6-pin PCI-E connector has 75W power output, which burnin already exceeded with higher clock rates. I guess he wasn't using single PCI-E connector though.





That's the rated spec of a 6 pin pci-e power connector, it can and will output more wattage. An 8 pin pci-e connector is rated for 150 watts and the only difference between a 6 pin and 8 pin is the addition of 2 more grounds to the connector.

GUTS | GET-Protocol ICO
smart-ticket protocol for events | live product with market traction!
BTC ANN | WEBSITE | BLOG | SANDBOX | WHITEPAPER | BOUNTY
tigerbit
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 80
Merit: 10


View Profile
July 16, 2013, 07:54:18 PM
 #1380

Quote
Didn't Burnin say you could power 3 boards with one 6 pin adapter? With overclocking I think it would only be two now, but that is what I thought. I am not sure how they wire though.

I think it was two boards, but that was before overclocking fever took over Smiley

Officially one 6-pin PCI-E connector has 75W power output, which burnin already exceeded with higher clock rates. I guess he wasn't using single PCI-E connector though.





That's the rated spec of a 6 pin pci-e power connector, it can and will output more wattage. An 8 pin pci-e connector is rated for 150 watts and the only difference between a 6 pin and 8 pin is the addition of 2 more grounds to the connector.
Yes but even after making a splitter for x1 8pin to x2 6 pin that's still going to present a power distribution problem. 12 boards 1000W modular psu, I'd need six PCIe8 leads onto the PSU to stay legit.  Would it be worth looking at x2 smaller PSUs? Kinda redundancy - degraded service.

If you found this useful modest tips welcome BTC: 15noAopoPUcA4D4dTJihgDVE8axZh8VWia
Pages: « 1 ... 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 [69] 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 ... 182 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!