💥SOLARIS PLATFORM [XLR] 💥Swapping to FinaToken

[badfad]

How is your wallet working guys?

I have mined some xlr some time ago, but right now the qt-wallet is "Out of sync" and won't sync at all.
Any help?

[1714788723]

1714788723

[1714788723]

1714788723

[1714788723]

1714788723

[1714788723]

1714788723

[Adriano2010]

Wow! Look at the price! What has caused this to pump all of a sudden? I'm not complaining as I love this coin and have been in it for many months now. I'll be holding for the long term so not need for me to sell any of my Solaris right now. Are you working on the masternodes dev? is that the plan going forward with Solaris?

It's getting a lot of attention lately because of the masternode, if you backread a little dev is planning on it but want to involve the community by asking us which algo or how many coins for masternode.

With standard masternodes our coin can be still mineable.  With the  newest masternodecoin (core base 12.2) we can get PoS coin only. What you think about that?


Thank you for your support.

With standard masternodes we can still get PoS rewards, or only with newest masternodecoin? If we can get PoS rewards i prefer standard masternodecoin but only if Solaris coin will still be Asic mining resistant.

How is your wallet working guys?

I have mined some xlr some time ago, but right now the qt-wallet is "Out of sync" and won't sync at all.
Any help?

I use android wallet and works fine. Try restart wallet, your router.

[SolarisDev]

With standard masternodes we can still get PoS rewards, or only with newest masternodecoin? If we can get PoS rewards i prefer standard masternodecoin but only if Solaris coin will still be Asic mining resistant.

Please let me clarify that.  We have following possibilities:

- Only PoW and Masternodes
- PoW phase with masternodes and after that PoS with masternodes.

Thanks for support !

[Lercker]

With standard masternodes we can still get PoS rewards, or only with newest masternodecoin? If we can get PoS rewards i prefer standard masternodecoin but only if Solaris coin will still be Asic mining resistant.

Please let me clarify that.  We have following possibilities:

- Only PoW and Masternodes
- PoW phase with masternodes and after that PoS with masternodes.

Thanks for support !

This is not what I want to hear. I think most people got into this coin to because it is hybrid PoS/PoW. Dumping PoS now just for masternodes would alienate those supporters, not everyone wants to run a VPS and maintain a node. It takes a lot more effort to maintain than just a wallet staking.  I'm all for masternodes when the coin goes PoS only, but to do it now would just be a mistake. It would not help the short term value since people not interested in running masternodes will kill the price by dumping. Long term growth with development will increase value regardless of masternodes or not.

[33Bit]

With standard masternodes we can still get PoS rewards, or only with newest masternodecoin? If we can get PoS rewards i prefer standard masternodecoin but only if Solaris coin will still be Asic mining resistant.

Please let me clarify that.  We have following possibilities:

- Only PoW and Masternodes
- PoW phase with masternodes and after that PoS with masternodes.

Thanks for support !

I think better pos + masternode

[tu7275301youz@163.com]

Watching this activity is almost enough to burn calories.Almost!!!; -)

[Cortez7575]

My wallet "out of sync". 0 active connections. I did everything, not workink.  

Solved. It was my bad.

[hous26]

FWIW, I like the idea of POS and Masternodes.  Perhaps a 50/50 split.  Maybe 5-10k Solaris should be necessary to make a masternode.

[Elder III]

With standard masternodes we can still get PoS rewards, or only with newest masternodecoin? If we can get PoS rewards i prefer standard masternodecoin but only if Solaris coin will still be Asic mining resistant.

Please let me clarify that.  We have following possibilities:

- Only PoW and Masternodes
- PoW phase with masternodes and after that PoS with masternodes.

Thanks for support !

Would either of those options require changing the algorithm, or could we keep Nist5 as the algorithm? If either option does require switching the algorithm, what would the alternative algorithms be?

[frostminer]

With standard masternodes we can still get PoS rewards, or only with newest masternodecoin? If we can get PoS rewards i prefer standard masternodecoin but only if Solaris coin will still be Asic mining resistant.

Please let me clarify that.  We have following possibilities:

- Only PoW and Masternodes
- PoW phase with masternodes and after that PoS with masternodes.

Thanks for support !

Second option is better.

PoW+Masternodes.
Enables options like mixing and darksend.
Also PoW must be considered the better solution for creating and distributing intial coins. (vs icos which is basicly premined shitclone sold for hype)

Then evolving to PoS+Masternodes after the initial coin supply has been created by PoW.
Benefits:  
PoS enables staking for smaller wallets and holders.
MN makes sure there are plenty of nodes on the network.

MN's also constricts the supply by "locking" coins away from the markets. This again has a deflation effect as available supply is lowered. Hence increasing the buy pressure on the remaining coins and a raise in price. Each new masternode will increase the effect.


So when considering specs, its important to work out the formula of number of nodes vs coins required and how much they will lock.

I suggest getting familiar with all the common masternode coins f.ex featured at https://masternodes.pro/

The avg. reward seems to be around 45% to Masternodes.
EXCL has a very low reward of 10% ... i suspect this might be updated.
CHC recently updated to 45%ish too i think.


https://masternodes.pro/

[forexs]

I need to secured some XLR right now,I don't want to be too late for this train 

[Elder III]

With standard masternodes we can still get PoS rewards, or only with newest masternodecoin? If we can get PoS rewards i prefer standard masternodecoin but only if Solaris coin will still be Asic mining resistant.

Please let me clarify that.  We have following possibilities:

- Only PoW and Masternodes
- PoW phase with masternodes and after that PoS with masternodes.

Thanks for support !

Second option is better.

PoW+Masternodes.
Enables options like mixing and darksend.
Also PoW must be considered the better solution for creating and distributing intial coins. (vs icos which is basicly premined shitclose sold for hype)

Then evolving to PoS+Masternodes after the initial coin supply has been created by PoW.
Benefits: 
PoS enables staking for smaller wallets and holders.
MN makes sure there are plenty of nodes on the network.

MN's also constricts the supply by "locking" coins away from the markets. This again has a deflation effect as available supply is lowered. Hence increasing the buy pressure on the remaining coins and a raise in price. Each new masternode will increase the effect.


So when considering specs, its important to work out the formula of number of nodes vs coins required and how much they will lock.

I suggest getting familiar with all the common masternode coins f.ex featured at https://masternodes.pro/

The avg. reward seems to be around 45% to Masternodes.
EXCL has a very low reward of 10% ... i suspect this might be updated.
CHC recently updated to 45%ish too i think.


https://masternodes.pro/

I'm no expert, but I agree with your line of thought.  If it's possible to remain with an energy friendly and less then common algorithm such as Nist5 I would really like that too since I think it helps to set Solaris apart from the pack and it relatively mining friendly, which will encourage more folks to test it out with their own hardware rather then having to purchase it at an exchange.

I detest most ICOs, so lets not even consider that crap.

[Adriano2010]

With standard masternodes we can still get PoS rewards, or only with newest masternodecoin? If we can get PoS rewards i prefer standard masternodecoin but only if Solaris coin will still be Asic mining resistant.

Please let me clarify that.  We have following possibilities:

- Only PoW and Masternodes
- PoW phase with masternodes and after that PoS with masternodes.

Thanks for support !

If masternodes will affect the price of coin better not implement now masternodes and better wait, but this depends on what most of Solaris community want.

[lavlin]

Hello Here is a new mining pool for mining Solaris.
It's based on YiiMP, no registration is needed :

• Stratum  : lycheebit.com:3833
• User     : YOUR_XLR_ADDRESS
• Password : c=XLR

• Website  : http://www.lycheebit.com/
• Fee      : 1.00 %

Exemple of CCMiner command line :

Code:

ccminer.exe -a nist5 -o stratum+tcp://lycheebit.com:3833 -u sWMtS85Nv5PmfK9CXfuanrJuur2oLt2xNv -p c=XLR

Happy mining

on your pool, 8 hours mining on 4 GPU, i have 7 coins. pool SCUM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! https://i.imgur.com/8AiIkkS.png

[SolarisDev]

With standard masternodes we can still get PoS rewards, or only with newest masternodecoin? If we can get PoS rewards i prefer standard masternodecoin but only if Solaris coin will still be Asic mining resistant.

Please let me clarify that.  We have following possibilities:

- Only PoW and Masternodes
- PoW phase with masternodes and after that PoS with masternodes.

Thanks for support !

Second option is better.

PoW+Masternodes.
Enables options like mixing and darksend.
Also PoW must be considered the better solution for creating and distributing intial coins. (vs icos which is basicly premined shitclose sold for hype)

Then evolving to PoS+Masternodes after the initial coin supply has been created by PoW.
Benefits: 
PoS enables staking for smaller wallets and holders.
MN makes sure there are plenty of nodes on the network.

MN's also constricts the supply by "locking" coins away from the markets. This again has a deflation effect as available supply is lowered. Hence increasing the buy pressure on the remaining coins and a raise in price. Each new masternode will increase the effect.


So when considering specs, its important to work out the formula of number of nodes vs coins required and how much they will lock.

I suggest getting familiar with all the common masternode coins f.ex featured at https://masternodes.pro/

The avg. reward seems to be around 45% to Masternodes.
EXCL has a very low reward of 10% ... i suspect this might be updated.
CHC recently updated to 45%ish too i think.


https://masternodes.pro/

I'm no expert, but I agree with your line of thought.  If it's possible to remain with an energy friendly and less then common algorithm such as Nist5 I would really like that too since I think it helps to set Solaris apart from the pack and it relatively mining friendly, which will encourage more folks to test it out with their own hardware rather then having to purchase it at an exchange.

I detest most ICOs, so lets not even consider that crap.

- PoW phase with masternodes and after that PoS with masternodes.

My Dev advice me to end PoW at some day and go for PoS. From the technical perspective thats the best way.  Its designed to work that way.

The code has the latest/newest  masternodes and is based on bitcoin 0.14. In other words the code base is brand new
Algorithm  XEVAN is quite new and asic resistant .

What you think?

[Leass]

With standard masternodes we can still get PoS rewards, or only with newest masternodecoin? If we can get PoS rewards i prefer standard masternodecoin but only if Solaris coin will still be Asic mining resistant.

Please let me clarify that.  We have following possibilities:

- Only PoW and Masternodes
- PoW phase with masternodes and after that PoS with masternodes.

Thanks for support !

Second option is better.

PoW+Masternodes.
Enables options like mixing and darksend.
Also PoW must be considered the better solution for creating and distributing intial coins. (vs icos which is basicly premined shitclose sold for hype)

Then evolving to PoS+Masternodes after the initial coin supply has been created by PoW.
Benefits:  
PoS enables staking for smaller wallets and holders.
MN makes sure there are plenty of nodes on the network.

MN's also constricts the supply by "locking" coins away from the markets. This again has a deflation effect as available supply is lowered. Hence increasing the buy pressure on the remaining coins and a raise in price. Each new masternode will increase the effect.


So when considering specs, its important to work out the formula of number of nodes vs coins required and how much they will lock.

I suggest getting familiar with all the common masternode coins f.ex featured at https://masternodes.pro/

The avg. reward seems to be around 45% to Masternodes.
EXCL has a very low reward of 10% ... i suspect this might be updated.
CHC recently updated to 45%ish too i think.


https://masternodes.pro/

I'm no expert, but I agree with your line of thought.  If it's possible to remain with an energy friendly and less then common algorithm such as Nist5 I would really like that too since I think it helps to set Solaris apart from the pack and it relatively mining friendly, which will encourage more folks to test it out with their own hardware rather then having to purchase it at an exchange.

I detest most ICOs, so lets not even consider that crap.

- PoW phase with masternodes and after that PoS with masternodes.

My Dev advice me to end PoW at some day and go for PoS. From the technical perspective thats the best way.  Its designed to work that way.

The code has the latest/newest  masternodes and is based on bitcoin 0.14. In other words the code base is brand new
Algorithm  XEVAN is quite new and asic resistant .

What you think?

Yea, and it don't have any miner that is good/profitable to use So right now, xevan would mean all green team will lose intrest in mining XLR.

[startsts]

I recently launched open testing of CryptoHub GUI Miner:  https://cryptohub.online/gui_miner/
it is GUI shell for ccminer/sgminer.   On windows it uses "ccminer alexis" that has good hashrate on nist5
So I try to attract more miners to this coin.

I don't think that it needs a new algo.  I know only 2 coins with nist: XLR and WYV.

[Lercker]

- PoW phase with masternodes and after that PoS with masternodes.

My Dev advice me to end PoW at some day and go for PoS. From the technical perspective thats the best way.  Its designed to work that way.

The code has the latest/newest  masternodes and is based on bitcoin 0.14. In other words the code base is brand new
Algorithm  XEVAN is quite new and asic resistant .

What you think?

Yea, and it don't have any miner that is good/profitable to use So right now, xevan would mean all green team will lose intrest in mining XLR.

XEVAN is CPU/AMD only right now, so you would loose half your miner base if you made the switch.

[k0stas]

Algorithm  XEVAN is quite new and asic resistant .

What you think?

Maybe its better to use m7m algo this is only  CPU mining, look at magi coin.

[The Cryptophilanthropist]

- PoW phase with masternodes and after that PoS with masternodes.

My Dev advice me to end PoW at some day and go for PoS. From the technical perspective thats the best way.  Its designed to work that way.

The code has the latest/newest  masternodes and is based on bitcoin 0.14. In other words the code base is brand new
Algorithm  XEVAN is quite new and asic resistant .

What you think?

Yea, and it don't have any miner that is good/profitable to use So right now, xevan would mean all green team will lose intrest in mining XLR.

XEVAN is CPU/AMD only right now, so you would loose half your miner base if you made the switch.

Perhaps we get someone to build the ccminer for Nvidia (Xevan) there is a bounty for it already out there and release it as a bonus to the switch were it to occur. The algo is just Double X17 , surely the compilation in visual studio could be gleaned from the AMD miner code?