phieudu2601
Member
Offline
Activity: 218
Merit: 10
|
|
January 15, 2018, 09:24:46 AM |
|
That was quite the market boom overnight. It's evident that the addition on Kucoin was a very good thing for Solaris. The volume there has been equal or greater then on CoinExchange, which has also had a big increase in daily volume. The market wants more Solaris and with a very small total coin cap each year that only bodes well for higher prices by the end of 2018. You are likely extremely optimistic about XLR price by the end of 2018. Those pumps would came from miners so its chart looks like a spike. Should be careful. As I mentioned before, its price has dumped in recent days ( https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/solaris/) I think it should be under 200K satoshi that makes sense.
|
|
|
|
jefbigbob70
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 64
Merit: 0
|
|
January 15, 2018, 09:45:25 AM |
|
Is there some info on hashrate mining XLR on typical GPU cards? I've found some info that Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 gets 3.3 MH/s, is that correct? How about other Nvidia cards? Are AMD cards much worse?
My farms are issued to the ccminer: 1050 1282 kH/s 1060 2249 kH/s 1070 3620 kH/s The overclocking of cards practically does not affect the speed.
|
|
|
|
Batus
|
|
January 15, 2018, 10:53:15 AM |
|
Is there some info on hashrate mining XLR on typical GPU cards? I've found some info that Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 gets 3.3 MH/s, is that correct? How about other Nvidia cards? Are AMD cards much worse?
AMD RX 560 - 500 Kh/s
|
|
|
|
itod
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1974
Merit: 1077
^ Will code for Bitcoins
|
|
January 15, 2018, 11:10:39 AM |
|
Great, thank's to everyone for the info.
To summarize: AMD RX 560: 0.50 MH/s Nvidia 1050: 1.28 MH/s Nvidia 1060: 2.25 MH/s Nvidia 1070: 3.62 MH/s Nvidia 1080TI: 5.60 MH/s
|
|
|
|
kozen
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 32
Merit: 0
|
|
January 15, 2018, 12:48:45 PM |
|
Hey dev, I am getting this when starting the solaris-qt linux binary: solaris-qt: main.cpp:3055: bool ConnectBlock(const CBlock&, CValidationState&, CBlockIndex*, CCoinsViewCache&, bool, bool): Assertion `hashPrevBlock == view.GetBestBlock()' failed. Aborted (core dumped)
It's wallet 2.3.2.0 and it worked fine yesterday. Any ideas?
|
|
|
|
thienytcc
Member
Offline
Activity: 251
Merit: 10
|
|
January 15, 2018, 02:13:59 PM |
|
Great, thank's to everyone for the info.
To summarize: AMD RX 560: 0.50 MH/s Nvidia 1050: 1.28 MH/s Nvidia 1060: 2.25 MH/s Nvidia 1070: 3.62 MH/s Nvidia 1080TI: 5.60 MH/s
So Nvidia has more effective than AMD on hashrate mining. I have just ordered AMD RX 470 FXF. Dont know mine exactly. What a shame!
|
|
|
|
jefbigbob70
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 64
Merit: 0
|
|
January 15, 2018, 02:40:20 PM |
|
Hey dev, I am getting this when starting the solaris-qt linux binary: solaris-qt: main.cpp:3055: bool ConnectBlock(const CBlock&, CValidationState&, CBlockIndex*, CCoinsViewCache&, bool, bool): Assertion `hashPrevBlock == view.GetBestBlock()' failed. Aborted (core dumped)
It's wallet 2.3.2.0 and it worked fine yesterday. Any ideas? Do you have the same addnode in file solaris.conf? addnode=78.145.45.173 addnode=92.108.70.246 addnode=89.169.62.37 addnode=89.65.73.101 addnode=92.222.48.122:60020 addnode=88.164.70.252:60020 addnode=84.19.184.96:60020 addnode=45.79.202.155:60020 addnode=151.236.217.178:60020 addnode=139.162.153.247:60020
|
|
|
|
startsts
|
|
January 15, 2018, 02:40:32 PM |
|
Great, thank's to everyone for the info.
To summarize: AMD RX 560: 0.50 MH/s Nvidia 1050: 1.28 MH/s Nvidia 1060: 2.25 MH/s Nvidia 1070: 3.62 MH/s Nvidia 1080TI: 5.60 MH/s
So Nvidia has more effective than AMD on hashrate mining. I have just ordered AMD RX 470 FXF. Dont know mine exactly. What a shame! nvidia is better on all algorithms except ethash and equihash. For AMD Radeon owners I would recommend to mine some ethash coin, sell it and after that buy XLR or anything that you want to invest
|
|
|
|
thienytcc
Member
Offline
Activity: 251
Merit: 10
|
|
January 15, 2018, 03:01:33 PM |
|
Great, thank's to everyone for the info.
To summarize: AMD RX 560: 0.50 MH/s Nvidia 1050: 1.28 MH/s Nvidia 1060: 2.25 MH/s Nvidia 1070: 3.62 MH/s Nvidia 1080TI: 5.60 MH/s
So Nvidia has more effective than AMD on hashrate mining. I have just ordered AMD RX 470 FXF. Dont know mine exactly. What a shame! nvidia is better on all algorithms except ethash and equihash. For AMD Radeon owners I would recommend to mine some ethash coin, sell it and after that buy XLR or anything that you want to invest Like your recommendation. Thank you. By the way, which coin name should I mine first? Can you introduce me some?
|
|
|
|
startsts
|
|
January 15, 2018, 03:53:05 PM |
|
Great, thank's to everyone for the info.
To summarize: AMD RX 560: 0.50 MH/s Nvidia 1050: 1.28 MH/s Nvidia 1060: 2.25 MH/s Nvidia 1070: 3.62 MH/s Nvidia 1080TI: 5.60 MH/s
So Nvidia has more effective than AMD on hashrate mining. I have just ordered AMD RX 470 FXF. Dont know mine exactly. What a shame! nvidia is better on all algorithms except ethash and equihash. For AMD Radeon owners I would recommend to mine some ethash coin, sell it and after that buy XLR or anything that you want to invest Like your recommendation. Thank you. By the way, which coin name should I mine first? Can you introduce me some? Ellaism(ELLA) , Expanse(EXP), Pirl(PIRL)
|
|
|
|
Batus
|
|
January 15, 2018, 06:43:43 PM |
|
Great, thank's to everyone for the info.
To summarize: AMD RX 560: 0.50 MH/s Nvidia 1050: 1.28 MH/s Nvidia 1060: 2.25 MH/s Nvidia 1070: 3.62 MH/s Nvidia 1080TI: 5.60 MH/s
So Nvidia has more effective than AMD on hashrate mining. I have just ordered AMD RX 470 FXF. Dont know mine exactly. What a shame! nvidia is better on all algorithms except ethash and equihash. For AMD Radeon owners I would recommend to mine some ethash coin, sell it and after that buy XLR or anything that you want to invest What about Cryptonote/Cryptonight ? Isn't it better then Nvidia?
|
|
|
|
Elder III
|
|
January 15, 2018, 06:58:34 PM |
|
Great, thank's to everyone for the info.
To summarize: AMD RX 560: 0.50 MH/s Nvidia 1050: 1.28 MH/s Nvidia 1060: 2.25 MH/s Nvidia 1070: 3.62 MH/s Nvidia 1080TI: 5.60 MH/s
So Nvidia has more effective than AMD on hashrate mining. I have just ordered AMD RX 470 FXF. Dont know mine exactly. What a shame! AMD Rx 470/570 can get about 1.45 Mh/s - AMD Rx 480/580 can get about 1.7 Mh/s on the Xevan algorithm in our experience.
|
|
|
|
itod
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1974
Merit: 1077
^ Will code for Bitcoins
|
|
January 15, 2018, 07:09:00 PM |
|
...
Thank's, let's summarize everything: AMD RX 560: 0.50 MH/s Nvidia 1050: 1.28 MH/s AMD RX 470/570: 1.45 MH/s AMD RX 480/580: 1.70 MH/s Nvidia 1060: 2.25 MH/s Nvidia 1070: 3.62 MH/s Nvidia 1080TI: 5.60 MH/s
|
|
|
|
schyter
|
|
January 15, 2018, 07:15:28 PM |
|
Hey dev, I am getting this when starting the solaris-qt linux binary: solaris-qt: main.cpp:3055: bool ConnectBlock(const CBlock&, CValidationState&, CBlockIndex*, CCoinsViewCache&, bool, bool): Assertion `hashPrevBlock == view.GetBestBlock()' failed. Aborted (core dumped)
It's wallet 2.3.2.0 and it worked fine yesterday. Any ideas? DO NOT add any addnodes Try this "through the window" method. That is what i used and it worked for me. It can be likened to re-syncing and re-indexing. Close your Solaris-qt Open your AppData/Roaming/Solaris then delete all EXCEPT for wallet.dat masternode.conf solaris.conf Then restart your wallet (launch only the version 2.3.2.0)
|
|
|
|
Laderis
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
|
|
January 15, 2018, 08:54:20 PM |
|
No Block Source Available. I'm getting this error. I have backup.bat but I can't solve problem. Help me guys.
|
|
|
|
|
thienytcc88
Member
Offline
Activity: 167
Merit: 10
|
|
January 16, 2018, 01:24:08 AM |
|
Should I sell all my xlr coins by 20 Jan to make sure to protect my profit?
|
|
|
|
kozen
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 32
Merit: 0
|
|
January 16, 2018, 01:26:33 AM |
|
I don't know if a negative signal had people selling XLR and initiated a trend, but if people are closing their masternodes and selling their coins, and that is causing the downward trend, that would be utter ly moronic.
If there are less MN then there will be more MN rewards coming to the remaining MNs that are still running.
|
|
|
|
kozen
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 32
Merit: 0
|
|
January 16, 2018, 01:28:07 AM |
|
Hey dev, I am getting this when starting the solaris-qt linux binary: solaris-qt: main.cpp:3055: bool ConnectBlock(const CBlock&, CValidationState&, CBlockIndex*, CCoinsViewCache&, bool, bool): Assertion `hashPrevBlock == view.GetBestBlock()' failed. Aborted (core dumped)
It's wallet 2.3.2.0 and it worked fine yesterday. Any ideas? Do you have the same addnode in file solaris.conf? addnode=78.145.45.173 addnode=92.108.70.246 addnode=89.169.62.37 addnode=89.65.73.101 addnode=92.222.48.122:60020 addnode=88.164.70.252:60020 addnode=84.19.184.96:60020 addnode=45.79.202.155:60020 addnode=151.236.217.178:60020 addnode=139.162.153.247:60020 No. I removed all the addnode= entries because someone in this forum said a few days ago that they're not needed anymore as the wallet comes with seed nodes already. Was that wrong?
|
|
|
|
kozen
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 32
Merit: 0
|
|
January 16, 2018, 01:29:17 AM |
|
Hey dev, I am getting this when starting the solaris-qt linux binary: solaris-qt: main.cpp:3055: bool ConnectBlock(const CBlock&, CValidationState&, CBlockIndex*, CCoinsViewCache&, bool, bool): Assertion `hashPrevBlock == view.GetBestBlock()' failed. Aborted (core dumped)
It's wallet 2.3.2.0 and it worked fine yesterday. Any ideas? DO NOT add any addnodes Try this "through the window" method. That is what i used and it worked for me. It can be likened to re-syncing and re-indexing. Close your Solaris-qt Open your AppData/Roaming/Solaris then delete all EXCEPT for wallet.dat masternode.conf solaris.conf Then restart your wallet (launch only the version 2.3.2.0) I'm on Linux, but thanks. I will give that a try.
|
|
|
|
|