jbreher
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 3038
Merit: 1660
lose: unfind ... loose: untight
|
 |
March 31, 2017, 02:08:33 AM |
|
...and another bald faced lie. What is it with you core-sycophants that leads you to lie in order to cast aspersions onto other implementations? Are you that insecure in your wish of technical superiority?
I didn't lie, and I backed up and sourced my claim. The BU articles of federation gives the president sole power over the entire network/project. Have you read them? Of course I have read them. And by your silly post, I see that you have read them too, but are incapable of understanding clear language. First off, there is no equivalency between the BU project and the Bitcoin network. Much like the fact that there is no equivalency of the Blockstream project and the Bitcoin network. Second, the articles of federation clearly enshrine a vote by the members as the binding decision making process. The president of BU clearly does not have sole power over even the BU project. You'll have to lie better if you want to tarnish this. |
Anyone with a campaign ad in their signature -- for an organization with which they are not otherwise affiliated -- is automatically deducted credibility points.
I've been convicted of heresy. Convicted by a mere known extortionist. Read my Trust for details.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bitcoin addresses contain a checksum, so it is very unlikely that mistyping an address will cause you to lose money.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
jbreher
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3038
Merit: 1660
lose: unfind ... loose: untight
|
|
March 31, 2017, 02:14:37 AM |
|
If it was closed source, then the source code would not be freely available to all. But it is. Accordingly, the claim that BU is closed source is quite simply a lie. The client crashed 2 weeks ago! if core was not running whole bitcoin would have crashed!
Hyperbole much? There was no point where all BU clients crashed. Accordingly, whether or not BU was the entirety of the network, 'whole bitcoin' would not have crashed. CORE is bug free since 0.11
orly? https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10130 Six hours ago. |
Anyone with a campaign ad in their signature -- for an organization with which they are not otherwise affiliated -- is automatically deducted credibility points.
I've been convicted of heresy. Convicted by a mere known extortionist. Read my Trust for details.
|
|
|
Quickseller
Copper Member
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2870
Merit: 2298
|
|
March 31, 2017, 06:59:37 AM |
|
There was the bug that would cause nodes to think that an unlimited number of bitcoin was created as part of a transaction in Bitcoin's very early days, luckily the person who figured out how to do this went crazy and made it appear as if billions of bitcoin were created, making it very obvious there was a problem.
Ah yeah I thought thats what you were referring to. Just to note that the bug could only create 92233720368.54277039 BTC per block, no more or less, as thats the max value for a UINT_64 integer. It's also difficult to know whether it was purposely exploited, as the bug could trigger under normal circumstances. Well I would argue that around this time period, the Bitcoin client contained a popup warning saying that Bitcoin is not ready to be used for financial transactions. It was essentially a "testnet" during the early period. Satoshi actually refused to remove this warning for a long time, he wanted Bitcoin to grow slow in the early days so that it would be "battle hardened" and capable of handling high capacity. Perhaps a scalability solution would've been put in place way before it was needed if people had listened. We're at least a year behind on a solution. This is all WikiLeaks' fault for promoting Bitcoin too soon  Yes, in "modern" Bitcoin, there have been no zero-day attacks, at least none that have been made public. I would point out that Bitcoin Core has been the "client of record" of Bitcoin for quite a while now, so there are unique incentives for a larger number of eyes to look at the code before it is put into production verses something like insight. I would also point out that since bitcoin is very valuable, there are few incentives to crash a large number of nodes, but are more incentives to engage in things that result in being able to steal bitcoin. I would also note that the exploits in the BU code were really not zero-day exploits, but were rather exploits that the devs pointed out to others once they patched the relevant issues -- it was just that the patch was not distributed to node operators prior to the bug being exploited. |
|
|
|
|
|
traincarswreck
|
|
March 31, 2017, 07:12:43 AM |
|
Second, the articles of federation clearly enshrine a vote by the members as the binding decision making process. The president of BU clearly does not have sole power over even the BU project.
You'll have to lie better if you want to tarnish this.
The president hand picked those members after self-appointing: There is no democratic way to kick something like this off so I am just going to be autocratic about it. I’m defining myself judge, jury and executioner (with the valuable input of those who have been interacting with me of course!) with the power to appoint the initial members. https://bitco.in/forum/threads/bitcoin-unlimited-membership-join-us.208/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pinkflower
|
|
March 31, 2017, 08:21:21 AM |
|
 Not quite look at the last statistics people are getting it miners are leaving BU pools.. Not quite you say? Look at that chart. Bitcoin Unlimited clearly is going up and Bitcoin Core is clearly going the opposite direction. There will be small daily changes but the trends are clearly already established by just looking at that chart. Dont underestimate it, thats where you lose sight of what to do in case the hard fork really happens. |
|
|
|
|
notthematrix
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 1000
CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!
|
|
March 31, 2017, 09:55:03 AM
Last edit: March 31, 2017, 10:45:30 AM by notthematrix |
|
Just LMAO! First if you have unstable software and miners please split of! , that's what I said in my other post! Your bitcoin unlimited network will crash in no time leaving bitcoin core + segwit alone! Evrybody is dumping UNLIMITED for the reason iam stating here. https://coin.dance/blocks but I don't see a clear trend up sorry  Its more like one person desperate placing miners to break the downfall! reality everbody is dumping unlimited because of the bugs last 2 weeks! https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1846568.0and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9EEluhC9SxEand https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Etyjc1JdmFUIls all about buggy code nobody wants! a 20.000.000.000 market cant have these bugs! V 0.8 is NOT made by bitcoin core , it was made before bitcoin core came to live https://bitcoincore.org/en/releases/ Bitcoincore started at 0.11 V 0.8 was made by the old guys AKA roger ver! the guys who are angry at core So its tere own bugs they are refering too!!!! and Thats makes BTC-U a JOKE.... the programers of old bitcoin are removed by bitcoincore and are blaming bugs to NEW bitcoincore! ,while keep makeing them in BU code! Annyway the claim of core :  Is TRUE! |
|
|
|
|
deeplink
|
|
March 31, 2017, 10:06:46 AM |
|
I thought this thread was about a deal between Roger Ver and Loaded.
Is it possible to move the infantile and useless discussions to another thread, where nobody has to see them?
|
|
|
|
|
bitkilo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1638
Merit: 1010
https://www.bitcoin.com/
|
|
March 31, 2017, 10:14:56 AM |
|
I thought this thread was about a deal between Roger Ver and Loaded.
Is it possible to move the infantile and useless discussions to another thread, where nobody has to see them?
Now thats a good idea, hilariousandco is online now, send him a PM and see if he can split the thread and leave this purely for the bet discussions. |
Not a paid signature, just added to promote Bitcoin.com |
|
|
notthematrix
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 1000
CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!
|
|
March 31, 2017, 10:26:23 AM
Last edit: March 31, 2017, 10:36:40 AM by notthematrix |
|
I thought this thread was about a deal between Roger Ver and Loaded.
Is it possible to move the infantile and useless discussions to another thread, where nobody has to see them?
It IS And the simple fact that ROGER ver did NOT sign yet on his challenge tells everything about him a does not believe in bitcoin unlimited him self!!!! I agree move it out but give it a link so we can easy refer to it. if trolls want to change the topic. |
|
|
|
X7
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1162
Merit: 1009
Let he who is without sin cast the first stone
|
|
March 31, 2017, 01:05:35 PM
Last edit: March 31, 2017, 01:26:13 PM by X7 |
|
Gentlemen this thread is about making a deal for BTU to BTC - not a fucking debate about CORE vs BU - keep it on track or you spam up the thread with FUD.
I'm trying to trade my BU for BTC here lol
|
For what shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the world, and lose his own soul?
|
|
|
|
scox
|
|
March 31, 2017, 01:50:30 PM |
|
Reddit seems to have caught that post in a spam filter, it shows up when I'm logged in. I lost the password to my other reddit account.
60K is personal holdings, possibly up to an additional 70K in client funds depending on their sentiment, which pretty strongly leans Core.
Escrow wise, I would hope someone could come up with an atomic swap method.
Have Ver fly out to meet you in person and live stream it with an a respected semi-independent Bitcoiner there as a real time witness and the escrow agent. You and Ver split the cost of flying out this respected Bitcoiner. Make it a good old fashion Pay-Per-View event. Major Bitcoin history right there. Like boxers getting weighed-in before the fight. Glorious. That's a damn hilariously smart idea. In case this is actually not a complete hoax and BTU eventually does pull it through this could set a big precedent for both of the coins. Still routing for BTC though lol. |
|
|
|
|
Darkbot
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 59
Merit: 0
|
|
March 31, 2017, 02:04:20 PM |
|
Just LMAO! First if you have unstable software and miners please split of! , that's what I said in my other post! Your bitcoin unlimited network will crash in no time leaving bitcoin core + segwit alone! Evrybody is dumping UNLIMITED for the reason iam stating here. https://coin.dance/blocks but I don't see a clear trend up sorry Its more like one person desperate placing miners to break the downfall! reality everbody is dumping unlimited because of the bugs last 2 weeks! https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1846568.0and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9EEluhC9SxEand https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Etyjc1JdmFUIls all about buggy code nobody wants! a 20.000.000.000 market cant have these bugs! V 0.8 is NOT made by bitcoin core , it was made before bitcoin core came to live https://bitcoincore.org/en/releases/ Bitcoincore started at 0.11 V 0.8 was made by the old guys AKA roger ver! the guys who are angry at core So its tere own bugs they are refering too!!!! and Thats makes BTC-U a JOKE.... the programers of old bitcoin are removed by bitcoincore and are blaming bugs to NEW bitcoincore! ,while keep makeing them in BU code! Annyway the claim of core : Is TRUE! Franky1 is the biggest noob/troll and paid shill at Bitcointalk. |
|
|
|
|
X7
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1162
Merit: 1009
Let he who is without sin cast the first stone
|
|
March 31, 2017, 03:28:54 PM |
|
Reddit seems to have caught that post in a spam filter, it shows up when I'm logged in. I lost the password to my other reddit account.
60K is personal holdings, possibly up to an additional 70K in client funds depending on their sentiment, which pretty strongly leans Core.
Escrow wise, I would hope someone could come up with an atomic swap method.
Have Ver fly out to meet you in person and live stream it with an a respected semi-independent Bitcoiner there as a real time witness and the escrow agent. You and Ver split the cost of flying out this respected Bitcoiner. Make it a good old fashion Pay-Per-View event. Major Bitcoin history right there. Like boxers getting weighed-in before the fight. Glorious. That's a damn hilariously smart idea. In case this is actually not a complete hoax and BTU eventually does pull it through this could set a big precedent for both of the coins. Still routing for BTC though lol. I would sit in as a witness - have good standing in the community and across all social media. |
For what shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the world, and lose his own soul?
|
|
|
notthematrix
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 1000
CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!
|
|
March 31, 2017, 03:40:59 PM |
|
Gentlemen this thread is about making a deal for BTU to BTC - not a fucking debate about CORE vs BU - keep it on track or you spam up the thread with FUD.
I'm trying to trade my BU for BTC here lol
Lets stay on topic here! Roger ver the guy that does not believe in his own bitcoin unlimited coin , its getting more fun by the minute! |
|
|
|
cellard
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1250
|
|
March 31, 2017, 03:53:54 PM |
|
Fact Check:
✓ Buggy Unlimited is a failure and only PBOC miners support it
✓ Roger Ver has pussied out
|
|
|
|
|
|
dogedice.me
|
|
March 31, 2017, 04:19:49 PM |
|
For the record, I replied to Loaded on March 24, 2017, 10:29:47 PM.
I still haven't heard back from him yet.
Hey Roger, Do not know whether you have missed my offer, but in case you have missed it: 3500BTU for 3500BTC. My contact is contact@bitdice.me, we can negotiate the deal. Regards, Alex. |
|
|
|
MemoryDealers
VIP
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1052
Merit: 1105
|
|
March 31, 2017, 09:00:27 PM |
|
I'd just like to let everyone know that Loaded still hasn't contacted me.
I'm still waiting.....
|
|
|
|
jbreher
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3038
Merit: 1660
lose: unfind ... loose: untight
|
|
March 31, 2017, 09:09:12 PM |
|
Second, the articles of federation clearly enshrine a vote by the members as the binding decision making process. The president of BU clearly does not have sole power over even the BU project.
You'll have to lie better if you want to tarnish this.
The president hand picked those members after self-appointing: There is no democratic way to kick something like this off so I am just going to be autocratic about it. I’m defining myself judge, jury and executioner (with the valuable input of those who have been interacting with me of course!) with the power to appoint the initial members. https://bitco.in/forum/threads/bitcoin-unlimited-membership-join-us.208/And another absolute lie from you. Your kickoff quote was not made by the president of BUF. Your quote was made by Andrew Stone: https://bitco.in/forum/threads/bitcoin-unlimited-membership-join-us.208/The BUF President is Andrew Clifford: https://bitco.in/forum/threads/voting-for-president.799/page-2Troll harder next time. |
Anyone with a campaign ad in their signature -- for an organization with which they are not otherwise affiliated -- is automatically deducted credibility points.
I've been convicted of heresy. Convicted by a mere known extortionist. Read my Trust for details.
|
|
|
|
BruceFenton
|
|
March 31, 2017, 09:30:30 PM |
|
Nobody should do a deal like this...way too much risk for too little reward.
|
|
|
|
|
|
