⚽ Football Transfers Speculation, Odds and Predictions

[Zlantann]

Chelsea disrespected him by offering a very short contract extension. I understand why he rejected it. It was to to get a long contract extension from the club. This is the reason why Gallagher was always rejecting the new contract from Chelsea.

Those who don't know the details would blame Gallagher. They would blame his decision not to accept a new contract from Chelsea.

I'd like to see him come and join in the ATM as a new player instead of staying on Chelsea.

Finally, Gallagher's flight to Spain is to discuss ATM's offer.

I hope he will be lucky enough.

Offering a 24-year-old England midfielder a two-year with a potential one-year extension is not right. He should have been given a long-term contract like other players. The bottom line is that Chelsea Enzo Maresca feels that Conor Gallagher will not be compatible with his style of play. If was needed, the coach would have encouraged the club management to increase his contract. After he rejected the contract, Chelsea doesn't want a repeat of Antonio Rudiger and Andreas Christensen's incident where they left the club as free agents.

Diego Simeone is well known for taking every available opportunity to buy cheap players. £34m for Conor is cheap and he could improve to become more expensive in the future. Chelsea are now seeking means to get a replacement for the English midfielder. I read that the Blues are targeting to sign the £35m worth of Samu Omorodion. Conor will be pleased that he got this contract; at least he will play in the UCL.

[Docnaster]

Chelsea disrespected him by offering a very short contract extension. I understand why he rejected it. It was to to get a long contract extension from the club. This is the reason why Gallagher was always rejecting the new contract from Chelsea.

Those who don't know the details would blame Gallagher. They would blame his decision not to accept a new contract from Chelsea.

I'd like to see him come and join in the ATM as a new player instead of staying on Chelsea.

Finally, Gallagher's flight to Spain is to discuss ATM's offer.

I hope he will be lucky enough.

To be honest, I don't think the two years contract with the option of extending it to an extra one year by Chelsea to Conor Gallagher was fair enough considering his current age. Personally, I feel it's the same as telling him to leave without coming out out clear about it and for a player that knows his worth, the England international decided to leave the club. Even after deciding to leave Chelsea, Gallagher rejected some offers from other clubs including Atletico Madrid finally tabled what he deemed okay for himself. Gallagher during this summer transfer window have shown that he actually knows his worth and wouldn't take anything less. Hopefully, he succeeds at  his new club.

[Polkeins]

After not being included in the main squad list there is nothing to do but leave, Gallager and the coach have difficulty finding a match so don't force it anymore.
Conor Gallager departure is a big loss for Chelsea because during his time playing with Chelsea Conor Gallager was a reliable leader. Atletico Madrid will certainly provide a proper place for Conor Gallager. With Atletico Madrid's characteristic of playing aggressively, he provides additional plus value. At least Atletico is still the strongest team in La Liga even though last season there was a decline.

Conor Gallager looks like he would be much more reliable if he was at Atletico Madrid. And fortunately, Conor Gallager seems to have agreed to join Atletico Madrid. Because his future at Chelsea doesn't look good. Well if he is not in the manager's plans for next season at Chelsea. So there was no choice for him but to move. And I think Atletico Madrid is the right choice. And based on the news I read, Conor Gallager's transfer to Atletico Madrid also looks like it will be completed in the near future.

for Conor Gallacher leaving for atletico madrid can be considered a good deal and leaving for promotion. Chelsea again continues a series of incomprehensible transfers and in general the behavior of the club's management after the sacking of Pocchetino is very strange. First they buy a fifth goalkeeper for 20 million euros, and then sell for 40 million one of their best players and let Gallager does not have dribbling or dodging yes and footballer he is not the most technical, but his character is a leader, always goes into the selection of the ball without fear, it is clear that the return on the field he has phenomenal and why to sell such a player is incomprehensible, in addition, Gallager is in the prime of life and will greatly strengthen Atletico, which can be congratulated on this purchase.

[TastyChillySauce00]

Beşiktaş's defeat upset Galatasaray's balance. They broke a transfer record by paying astronomical money for a second division player nobody had ever heard of called Gabriel Sara. Galatasaray management is trying something different. It looks like a transfer that was made to put money in someone's pocket. Who is Gabriel Sara to be worth that kind of money? For the same money they could have bought a star like McTominay. Galatasaray's job is very difficult this season. Neither in the league nor in the European Cups is it possible for them to go far. They have been wasting the money they have earned in the last two years.

Gabriel Sara was good enough. It's worth spending 18 million on him. But, people were unfamiliar with him, as he played for Norwich. His performance last season was quite impressive. He was a very creative player, and I like that when he isn't afraid of risking himself by making a shoot from 25 yards.

I don't even see this as a bad transfer, and i think if you're saying to sign McTominay instead of him. No guarantee if McTominay would accept Galatasaray's offer too.

It's right decision for Galatasaray goes for him.

[topbitcoin]

To be honest, I don't think the two years contract with the option of extending it to an extra one year by Chelsea to Conor Gallagher was fair enough considering his current age. Personally, I feel it's the same as telling him to leave without coming out out clear about it and for a player that knows his worth, the England international decided to leave the club. Even after deciding to leave Chelsea, Gallagher rejected some offers from other clubs including Atletico Madrid finally tabled what he deemed okay for himself. Gallagher during this summer transfer window have shown that he actually knows his worth and wouldn't take anything less. Hopefully, he succeeds at  his new club.

At the moment it is not important because seeing from what is happening now it is only a step away that Gallagher will leave Chelsea to Atletico because Chelsea also has no intention of making a serious offer to this player.
A personal decision has been made where Gallagher agreed to a proposal from Atletico and it looks like we only need to wait for an agreement between Chelsea and Atletico for now.

It's just that if it does happen, I think it's a little regrettable because Chelsea still can't learn from previous experiences.  Gallagher is one of the players who is quite impressive if it is judged by the overall Chelsea players last season but maybe there are some other considerations from Enzo Marresca who does not really want to maximize the potential of Gallagher next season even though he is one of the players whose performance is above average for the Chelsea squad.

[Polkeins]

Chelsea disrespected him by offering a very short contract extension. I understand why he rejected it. It was to to get a long contract extension from the club. This is the reason why Gallagher was always rejecting the new contract from Chelsea.

Those who don't know the details would blame Gallagher. They would blame his decision not to accept a new contract from Chelsea.

I'd like to see him come and join in the ATM as a new player instead of staying on Chelsea.

Finally, Gallagher's flight to Spain is to discuss ATM's offer.

I hope he will be lucky enough.

To be honest, I don't think the two years contract with the option of extending it to an extra one year by Chelsea to Conor Gallagher was fair enough considering his current age. Personally, I feel it's the same as telling him to leave without coming out out clear about it and for a player that knows his worth, the England international decided to leave the club. Even after deciding to leave Chelsea, Gallagher rejected some offers from other clubs including Atletico Madrid finally tabled what he deemed okay for himself. Gallagher during this summer transfer window have shown that he actually knows his worth and wouldn't take anything less. Hopefully, he succeeds at  his new club.

Gallagher is only 24 years old why would a 2+1 contract for such a player be fair? I think Chelsea could easily offer him a full 3 or 4 year contract with an option to extend it for another year and besides Gallagher is a Chelsea pupil, a player of character who always gives his best on the pitch and fans and experts appreciate him for that.
As for fair contract terms, you can look at West Ham, who signed 31 year old Füllkrug on a 3+1 scheme and paid 30 million euros for the transfer, and Chesley has a 24 year old player, an academy pupil and they just sell him for 40 million to Atletico Madrid. 

[imamusma]

To be honest, I don't think the two years contract with the option of extending it to an extra one year by Chelsea to Conor Gallagher was fair enough considering his current age. Personally, I feel it's the same as telling him to leave without coming out out clear about it and for a player that knows his worth, the England international decided to leave the club. Even after deciding to leave Chelsea, Gallagher rejected some offers from other clubs including Atletico Madrid finally tabled what he deemed okay for himself. Gallagher during this summer transfer window have shown that he actually knows his worth and wouldn't take anything less. Hopefully, he succeeds at  his new club.

At the moment it is not important because seeing from what is happening now it is only a step away that Gallagher will leave Chelsea to Atletico because Chelsea also has no intention of making a serious offer to this player.
A personal decision has been made where Gallagher agreed to a proposal from Atletico and it looks like we only need to wait for an agreement between Chelsea and Atletico for now.

It's just that if it does happen, I think it's a little regrettable because Chelsea still can't learn from previous experiences.  Gallagher is one of the players who is quite impressive if it is judged by the overall Chelsea players last season but maybe there are some other considerations from Enzo Marresca who does not really want to maximize the potential of Gallagher next season even though he is one of the players whose performance is above average for the Chelsea squad.

Conor Gallagher was pushed to leave Stamford Bridge after Enzo Maresca successfully brought in Kiernan Dewsbury from Leicester City. Many regretted the policy, because Conor Gallagher performance last season was quite impressive. Moreover, the England international player took on the position of captain after R James suffered a long term injury. Enzo Maresca seems unable to guarantee a regular place for Conor Gallagher in his squad, and Atletico Madrid are likely to be able to do so. The contract extension offered by Chelsea is unlikely to change Conor Gallagher attitude, he prefers to move to a club that really wants him, that is a very realistic attitude. If there are still many changes in the Chelsea squad, expectations for them next season will be lower, not higher.

[Sexylizzy2813]

Why on earth is Arsenal and Arteta still have Edward Nketiah around the Gunners? I thought he was suppose to leave the side and join the French side Marseille and up till now nothing concrete has happened instead the deal is looking like a goalless game. Is annoying to still have Arsenal not doing anything in the striking department and if the player stays till next season we might not see something new, many are banking on Arsenal to win the EPL but with all these sluggish move I don't see the gunners making any progress in lifting the EPL title. Edward Keddar Nketiah is a player that was given the opportunity to own the number 9 position but couldn't get at least 3 hat trick in a season with so many wasted opportunities, just one, to me I don't see him as a player who has anything to offer to the team, this is when the Gunners need to sell him and get someone better, with Alexander Isak off the book of Arsenal who's next?🤔

[Smack That Ace]

Conor Gallager is reluctant to extend his contract with Chelsea, he has refused twice, it seems that this has sparked the anger of the club and the club has removed Conor Gallager from the main squad and Chelsea is trying to sell this player rather than losing him next season on a free transfer, Conor Gallagher is actually an important player for Chelsea and actually the club does not want to lose this player, that's why the club always tries to persuade player to stay longer, but because of the complications that occur, it is better for Chelsea to sell him this summer.
Recently, Atletico Madrid has tried to approach this player and it seems that an agreement will soon be reached, just waiting for the transfer fee to be paid and the player also agrees to join the La Liga club.

Source :

• https://twitter.com/FabrizioRomano/status/1820274202571604198?t=nhdyXA1SipBfTP_4OV_zOQ&s=19
• https://twitter.com/idextratime/status/1819404760208101535?t=_1apmr-_1O65ulthrgy4bg&s=19

Conor Gallagher. Great player. Outstanding productivity. Chelsea, they really are lucky to have him. Still, occasionally even the greatest require a change of environment. an unfamiliar difficulty. Still even a new league. Observe Jude Bellingham. Went to Real Madrid; today he is flourishing. Atlético Madrid is wise. They find Gallagher to have promise. They understand he may transform their game. And Gallagher deserves that type of appreciation. He ought to be more than just a "squad player."

You must sometimes strike a win-win bargain. And in this situation, I believe Atlético would be the best option for all those engaged. Chelsea, be wise. View long-term. And Gallagher, go out there and present the world with your true capacity.

Sometimes even though a player has really good talent, he ends up having some disciplinary issues. I don’t know if I can actually call this or disciplinary issue or not. But a player rejecting the offer of a new contract twice is definitely not a good sign for any club. And it is also probably a sign that the player wants to leave.

So it is probably best for the club to find a way to sell the player. If the player has rejected the contract twice, he is clearly not happy, either with the contract or with the club. Either way, it is better for the club to actually let him go, regardless of how good the player is. but if possible and if the player is so important, probably they should improve the contract and try to keep him. But as we know, he has already rejected two contracts, probably he wants to leave.

Regards

Duke

[ZAINmalik75]

PSG is really lucky to get Joao Neves, Joao Neves officially move from Benfica to PSG for 60 Million Euros.

Neves is still 19 years old and he contribute many thing when he was play for Benfica, moving to PSG isn't a bad idea since Ligue 1 is tougher than Liga Portugal. But, the contract is 5 years long, so it means he might join other team when he was 24 years old, still quite young for football player.

Yes I am agree with you that PSG is very lucky because they got a very good player for only €60 million euros and from all above it Joao Neves is only just 19 years old. With the passage of time he will get better and better. However, PSG was looking for a well-attributed midfielder and finally got a young and talented player like Joao Neves. After the departure of Marco Verratti, PSG had a lot of lack in the midfield area, except for Vitinha and Fabian Ruiz, there were no players that Luis Enrique could use for his tactics, but now PSG has signed a talent like Joao Neves and now we hope that he will conclude the performance beyond the expectations of his fans and club. 
 
Anyway, now we will see how Luis Enrique makes a lineup in which Joao Neves gets role play and contributes to his team according to his performance status.

[Abu-Naim]

Why on earth is Arsenal and Arteta still have Edward Nketiah around the Gunners? I thought he was suppose to leave the side and join the French side Marseille and up till now nothing concrete has happened instead the deal is looking like a goalless game. Is annoying to still have Arsenal not doing anything in the striking department and if the player stays till next season we might not see something new, many are banking on Arsenal to win the EPL but with all these sluggish move I don't see the gunners making any progress in lifting the EPL title. Edward Keddar Nketiah is a player that was given the opportunity to own the number 9 position but couldn't get at least 3 hat trick in a season with so many wasted opportunities, just one, to me I don't see him as a player who has anything to offer to the team, this is when the Gunners need to sell him and get someone better, with Alexander Isak off the book of Arsenal who's next?🤔

It seems you don’t know who Nketiah is that is why you are saying that he is wasting a lot of opportunities.

He is a striker that lack playing time, Arsenal prefer to use Gabriel Jesus or Havertz instead of him which is why he have less goals. In the 2022/23 season, he was given opportunity to play when Jesus got injured, he scored 9 goals in 10 matches which Jesus couldn’t score after starting for Arsenal for most matches.

The main reason why Arsenal didn’t let him go is because they Marseille don’t value him and they offers small amount of money which I don’t expect Arsenal to accept.

If Nketiah is given playing time, he can do better, but if not then he should only leave to a team that values him because he is a good striker.

[W Jr.]

Chelsea disrespected him by offering a very short contract extension. I understand why he rejected it. It was to to get a long contract extension from the club. This is the reason why Gallagher was always rejecting the new contract from Chelsea.

Those who don't know the details would blame Gallagher. They would blame his decision not to accept a new contract from Chelsea.

I'd like to see him come and join in the ATM as a new player instead of staying on Chelsea.

Finally, Gallagher's flight to Spain is to discuss ATM's offer.

I hope he will be lucky enough.

To be honest, I don't think the two years contract with the option of extending it to an extra one year by Chelsea to Conor Gallagher was fair enough considering his current age. Personally, I feel it's the same as telling him to leave without coming out out clear about it and for a player that knows his worth, the England international decided to leave the club. Even after deciding to leave Chelsea, Gallagher rejected some offers from other clubs including Atletico Madrid finally tabled what he deemed okay for himself. Gallagher during this summer transfer window have shown that he actually knows his worth and wouldn't take anything less. Hopefully, he succeeds at  his new club.

Yes, I read this news a few days ago. I remember Atletico Madrid was interested in him. I didn't see anything about him rejecting Atletico Madrid. He could probably transfer to Atletico Madrid. He played a lot of games for Chelsea last year, he was one of the most important players in the team. I don't understand why Chelsea didn't want him this year, I think he was very good. He will also make his own way, naturally his path seems to be in Atletico Madrid.

[Sexylizzy2813]

Why on earth is Arsenal and Arteta still have Edward Nketiah around the Gunners? I thought he was suppose to leave the side and join the French side Marseille and up till now nothing concrete has happened instead the deal is looking like a goalless game. Is annoying to still have Arsenal not doing anything in the striking department and if the player stays till next season we might not see something new, many are banking on Arsenal to win the EPL but with all these sluggish move I don't see the gunners making any progress in lifting the EPL title. Edward Keddar Nketiah is a player that was given the opportunity to own the number 9 position but couldn't get at least 3 hat trick in a season with so many wasted opportunities, just one, to me I don't see him as a player who has anything to offer to the team, this is when the Gunners need to sell him and get someone better, with Alexander Isak off the book of Arsenal who's next?🤔

It seems you don’t know who Nketiah is that is why you are saying that he is wasting a lot of opportunities.

He is a striker that lack playing time, Arsenal prefer to use Gabriel Jesus or Havertz instead of him which is why he have less goals. In the 2022/23 season, he was given opportunity to play when Jesus got injured, he scored 9 goals in 10 matches which Jesus couldn’t score after starting for Arsenal for most matches.

The main reason why Arsenal didn’t let him go is because they Marseille don’t value him and they offers small amount of money which I don’t expect Arsenal to accept.

If Nketiah is given playing time, he can do better, but if not then he should only leave to a team that values him because he is a good striker.

Honestly I don't expect much from him and talking about opportunity when Gabriel Jesus was out, that was when I expected him to do better but why can't he do something positive while the chance was given to him? Even before when Gabriel Jesus hasn't join the team you can't say Nketiah has been pretty good, he lack that consistency and no one would let him be the main striker when he hasn't proven himself when the Gunners wasn't having a better striker.
As for Gabriel Jesus I can't play him as my number 9 if I'm to be the coach because he's better from the wing than facing the goal post. Nketiah can have that playing time he desires if he leaves the Gunners but if this Marseille deal doesn't pull then he'll have to wait to get another chance to redeem himself which I doubt will happen.

[gabbie2010]

Why on earth is Arsenal and Arteta still have Edward Nketiah around the Gunners? I thought he was suppose to leave the side and join the French side Marseille and up till now nothing concrete has happened instead the deal is looking like a goalless game. Is annoying to still have Arsenal not doing anything in the striking department and if the player stays till next season we might not see something new, many are banking on Arsenal to win the EPL but with all these sluggish move I don't see the gunners making any progress in lifting the EPL title. Edward Keddar Nketiah is a player that was given the opportunity to own the number 9 position but couldn't get at least 3 hat trick in a season with so many wasted opportunities, just one, to me I don't see him as a player who has anything to offer to the team, this is when the Gunners need to sell him and get someone better, with Alexander Isak off the book of Arsenal who's next?🤔

It seems you don’t know who Nketiah is that is why you are saying that he is wasting a lot of opportunities.

He is a striker that lack playing time, Arsenal prefer to use Gabriel Jesus or Havertz instead of him which is why he have less goals. In the 2022/23 season, he was given opportunity to play when Jesus got injured, he scored 9 goals in 10 matches which Jesus couldn’t score after starting for Arsenal for most matches.

The main reason why Arsenal didn’t let him go is because they Marseille don’t value him and they offers small amount of money which I don’t expect Arsenal to accept.

If Nketiah is given playing time, he can do better, but if not then he should only leave to a team that values him because he is a good striker.

From my own point of view Arsenal should keep Nketiah to continue and fight for shirt with Gabriel Jesus and Havertz as main striker, recall the gunners scored 91 goal all through last season without a permanent No. 9 strikers that means all their attacking players can score goals, for instance the likes of Havertz, Trosaard, Saka, Martinelli, Gabriel Jesus can scored without relying on permanent  main striker, I think Arteta should focus more on their midfield particularly look for an alternative player to replace injury prone Thomas Partey whose absence had cost and affected the team in some crucial matches, moreso the team left back where Zinchenko had flopped, however now with Calafiori in that position all is now set for a bright season ahead.

[Captain Corporate]

Connor is young though, I mean I get that 2+1 extension doesn't feel like that was good enough for him, but by the end he will be 26, and if extended then 27. That feels like he should be still pretty good by the end of the contract, what did he expect, a 10 year contract? I get that he wanted 5 years, but he would be 29 instead of 27, which isn't really that ideal, he would be starting to get old, nearly 30. In today's age 30 years old isn't that old in football that's for sure, but still not a 27 year old. I think we should be considering Connors decision as something of fearful, if he is looking for more years at some other club, that means he just wants a guarantee and doesn't trust himself. If he trusted himself, 26-27 year old by the end should mean that he could either be so good that Chelsea will offer more, or he will be good enough to go to some other team.

[Ahli38]

Offering a 24-year-old England midfielder a two-year with a potential one-year extension is not right. He should have been given a long-term contract like other players. The bottom line is that Chelsea Enzo Maresca feels that Conor Gallagher will not be compatible with his style of play. If was needed, the coach would have encouraged the club management to increase his contract. After he rejected the contract, Chelsea doesn't want a repeat of Antonio Rudiger and Andreas Christensen's incident where they left the club as free agents.

Diego Simeone is well known for taking every available opportunity to buy cheap players. £34m for Conor is cheap and he could improve to become more expensive in the future. Chelsea are now seeking means to get a replacement for the English midfielder. I read that the Blues are targeting to sign the £35m worth of Samu Omorodion. Conor will be pleased that he got this contract; at least he will play in the UCL.

Last season, Conor Gallagher did get quite a lot of playing time at Chelsea and he became one of the important players there. But in previous seasons he was only loaned out to other clubs. And only last season he was able to show his quality at Chelsea with Chelsea's main squad. And for Chelsea fans, there was actually a slight feeling of disappointment that emerged when they heard that Conor Gallagher would be released. But if you look at the player's career, Conor Gallagher's decision not to extend his contract at Chelsea and choosing to go to Atletico Madrid was indeed the right choice. Because Atletico Madrid can give this young player the opportunity to play in the UCL. Maybe from the Graham Potter era to the Pochettino era, we always saw that Conor Gallagher was the player who was always played more. But we know that the new Chelsea coach, Enzo, is that Conor Gallagher is not included in the club's long-term plans. So there is no reason for this player to stay longer at Chelsea. And Atletico Madrid are really good at finding players who will be easy for them to bring in without any problems. And now they too will succeed.

[Josefjix]

Why on earth is Arsenal and Arteta still have Edward Nketiah around the Gunners? I thought he was suppose to leave the side and join the French side Marseille and up till now nothing concrete has happened instead the deal is looking like a goalless game. Is annoying to still have Arsenal not doing anything in the striking department and if the player stays till next season we might not see something new, many are banking on Arsenal to win the EPL but with all these sluggish move I don't see the gunners making any progress in lifting the EPL title. Edward Keddar Nketiah is a player that was given the opportunity to own the number 9 position but couldn't get at least 3 hat trick in a season with so many wasted opportunities, just one, to me I don't see him as a player who has anything to offer to the team, this is when the Gunners need to sell him and get someone better, with Alexander Isak off the book of Arsenal who's next?🤔

I see nothing wrong with Mikel Arteta choice, always making the best decision for the promising future of Arsenal. Gunners are probably the next team after Manchester City in the English Premier League. A tough one for them but they will survive because they're strong enough. It will be definitely be a competitive run for Gunners next season. Arsenal boss, Mikel Arteta have to make his own decisions, always coming for the big plans.

[red4slash]

Why on earth is Arsenal and Arteta still have Edward Nketiah around the Gunners? I thought he was suppose to leave the side and join the French side Marseille and up till now nothing concrete has happened instead the deal is looking like a goalless game. Is annoying to still have Arsenal not doing anything in the striking department and if the player stays till next season we might not see something new, many are banking on Arsenal to win the EPL but with all these sluggish move I don't see the gunners making any progress in lifting the EPL title. Edward Keddar Nketiah is a player that was given the opportunity to own the number 9 position but couldn't get at least 3 hat trick in a season with so many wasted opportunities, just one, to me I don't see him as a player who has anything to offer to the team, this is when the Gunners need to sell him and get someone better, with Alexander Isak off the book of Arsenal who's next?🤔

It seems you don’t know who Nketiah is that is why you are saying that he is wasting a lot of opportunities.

He is a striker that lack playing time, Arsenal prefer to use Gabriel Jesus or Havertz instead of him which is why he have less goals. In the 2022/23 season, he was given opportunity to play when Jesus got injured, he scored 9 goals in 10 matches which Jesus couldn’t score after starting for Arsenal for most matches.

The main reason why Arsenal didn’t let him go is because they Marseille don’t value him and they offers small amount of money which I don’t expect Arsenal to accept.

If Nketiah is given playing time, he can do better, but if not then he should only leave to a team that values him because he is a good striker.

Actually when talking about playing time I think he has a lot of opportunities where when looking at the statistics and the time given by Arteta it is quite a lot even though most of it starts from the bench.



The record of him playing in the last few seasons in the EPL and Champions League actually we can see that a lot of time should have been for Eddie Nketiah it's just that it's very difficult for him to compete in the EPL which makes his performance standard and seems monotonous.

It would be better if he was let go but Arsenal set the price too high because looking at the situation the first offer of 27 million from Marseille was rejected because Arsenal wanted a price of 35-40 million for Nketiah which of course this is a consideration because it is still too big.
It looks like the same situation as Maguire and West Ham last season will happen for Nketiah and Marseille this time which in the end the deal will only fail because the price is too high.

[gabbie2010]

Chelsea disrespected him by offering a very short contract extension. I understand why he rejected it. It was to to get a long contract extension from the club. This is the reason why Gallagher was always rejecting the new contract from Chelsea.

Those who don't know the details would blame Gallagher. They would blame his decision not to accept a new contract from Chelsea.

I'd like to see him come and join in the ATM as a new player instead of staying on Chelsea.

Finally, Gallagher's flight to Spain is to discuss ATM's offer.

I hope he will be lucky enough.

To be honest, I don't think the two years contract with the option of extending it to an extra one year by Chelsea to Conor Gallagher was fair enough considering his current age. Personally, I feel it's the same as telling him to leave without coming out out clear about it and for a player that knows his worth, the England international decided to leave the club. Even after deciding to leave Chelsea, Gallagher rejected some offers from other clubs including Atletico Madrid finally tabled what he deemed okay for himself. Gallagher during this summer transfer window have shown that he actually knows his worth and wouldn't take anything less. Hopefully, he succeeds at  his new club.

Honestly Chelsea should have tabled a better offer for  Gallagher, unfortunately they let him leave, however whether they like it not he would be missed in their midfield, his energetic and power in the middle of team is what I admire about his style of play and is second to none in that squad and Iam very sure Athletic Madrid would utilize his services and potentials ptimally where a regular playing time would be guaranteed, it's up for Enzo Murresca to find a perfect replacement for him in the team which I doubt about getting one of present players to fit and pksy that role