Bitcoin Forum
May 05, 2024, 02:47:13 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 [199] 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] [SUMO] SUMOKOIN - 🔏 Digital Cash For Highly-Confidential Transactions 🔏  (Read 202415 times)
m42orion
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 44
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 06, 2018, 12:10:38 PM
 #3961

Well, so can compare to my test, where RX470 4MB is included. http://sumokoin.aeko.at/sumoheavy.html

Have there around 610 H/s ...

BR garantie


i looked at your results .. may be some suggestion to RX Vega config .... I am using two threads for one GPU with 880 intensity and i am getting about 1200H/s
The Bitcoin software, network, and concept is called "Bitcoin" with a capitalized "B". Bitcoin currency units are called "bitcoins" with a lowercase "b" -- this is often abbreviated BTC.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714920433
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714920433

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714920433
Reply with quote  #2

1714920433
Report to moderator
garantie
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 28
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 06, 2018, 12:23:43 PM
 #3962

Thank you, but what is the thread setting?  Worksize?

// gpu: gfx900 memory:3920
  // compute units: 64
  { "index" : 1,
    "intensity" : 1008, "worksize" : 8,
    "affine_to_cpu" : false, "strided_index" : 2, "mem_chunk" : 6,
    "comp_mode" : true
garantie
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 28
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 06, 2018, 12:42:05 PM
 #3963

Well, so can compare to my test, where RX470 4MB is included. http://sumokoin.aeko.at/sumoheavy.html

Have there around 610 H/s ...

BR garantie

i looked at your results .. may be some suggestion to RX Vega config .... I am using two threads for one GPU with 880 intensity and i am getting about 1200H/s

Found something, should it be like this for one Vega card (second card after RX 480) ?

    { "index" : 1, "intensity" : 880, "worksize" : 8, "affine_to_cpu" : 1, "strided_index" : true, "mem_chunk" : 2, "comp_mode" : true },
    { "index" : 1, "intensity" : 880, "worksize" : 8, "affine_to_cpu" : 1, "strided_index" : true, "mem_chunk" : 2, "comp_mode" : true },

BR garantie
dtr
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 164
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 06, 2018, 12:57:42 PM
 #3964

Well, I hate to say it, but it seems I can't mine this new CN Heavy algorithm properly. I was using SGMinerGM without much problems getting 4500H/sec out of my 5 AMD RX580's, but now it is horrible. XMR Stak gives me 3300H/sec, SRBminer 3800H/sec, but both miners will crash/get stuck/reboot within two hours. Tuning the miners with intensity etc only make it worse. I can accept the loss in hashrate, but not all these problems.  Huh

Same shit with me. I've got 3 rigs, 2 (different cards, but no 580) are working stable, but one with 2x580 and 2x570 stuck/hangs after several hours (but more than two). That sucks.
m42orion
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 44
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 06, 2018, 01:14:44 PM
 #3965

Well, I hate to say it, but it seems I can't mine this new CN Heavy algorithm properly. I was using SGMinerGM without much problems getting 4500H/sec out of my 5 AMD RX580's, but now it is horrible. XMR Stak gives me 3300H/sec, SRBminer 3800H/sec, but both miners will crash/get stuck/reboot within two hours. Tuning the miners with intensity etc only make it worse. I can accept the loss in hashrate, but not all these problems.  Huh

Same shit with me. I've got 3 rigs, 2 (different cards, but no 580) are working stable, but one with 2x580 and 2x570 stuck/hangs after several hours (but more than two). That sucks.

// gpu: gfx901 memory:3920
  // compute units: 64
  { "index" : 0,
    "intensity" : 880, "worksize" : 8,
    "affine_to_cpu" : false, "strided_index" : false, "mem_chunk" : 2,
    "comp_mode" : true
  },
  // gpu: gfx901 memory:3920
  // compute units: 64
  { "index" : 0,
    "intensity" : 880, "worksize" : 8,
    "affine_to_cpu" : false, "strided_index" : false, "mem_chunk" : 2,
    "comp_mode" : true
  },
Andre100
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 128
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 06, 2018, 01:33:28 PM
 #3966

cast-xmr will not help with your problem. CN-Heavy doubled it's memory requirements, so now you see only ±50% of your old Cryptonote hashrate. It's not a bug, it's a feature.

feature is good.. but if lost 50% hashrate(hardware that not have 4Mb+).... it's now we mine only 50% from old hashes, -50% profit?
skablast
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 19


View Profile
April 06, 2018, 02:48:38 PM
 #3967

Well, or Zawawa Gateless gate will come asap at my rescue, or I am changing coin to mine.
Xmrstak hashrate is crap.Value is stable, difficulty haven't halved.
garantie
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 28
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 06, 2018, 03:08:11 PM
 #3968

Quote
// gpu: gfx901 memory:3920
  // compute units: 64
  { "index" : 0,
    "intensity" : 880, "worksize" : 8,
    "affine_to_cpu" : false, "strided_index" : false, "mem_chunk" : 2,
    "comp_mode" : true
  },
  // gpu: gfx901 memory:3920
  // compute units: 64
  { "index" : 0,
    "intensity" : 880, "worksize" : 8,
    "affine_to_cpu" : false, "strided_index" : false, "mem_chunk" : 2,
    "comp_mode" : true
  },

Thanks @m42orion, will give it a try
sumogr
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 463
Merit: 253



View Profile
April 06, 2018, 03:39:00 PM
 #3969

Well, or Zawawa Gateless gate will come asap at my rescue, or I am changing coin to mine.
Xmrstak hashrate is crap.Value is stable, difficulty haven't halved.


Value is stable, difficulty is 4 times down compared to the average before the fork, you have lost 40% of your hash power and so have the rest of the miners, there are no asics on the network.
Well those inputs give a different result on my equation than they do in yours

miticoin
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 87
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 06, 2018, 04:12:59 PM
Last edit: April 06, 2018, 04:59:58 PM by miticoin
 #3970

what drives you use for rx 580? windows is restarting  after a while... alsto wallet stack on 116522. I have deleted pspstate. bin... and nothning..
skablast
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 19


View Profile
April 06, 2018, 05:13:21 PM
 #3971

Well, or Zawawa Gateless gate will come asap at my rescue, or I am changing coin to mine.
Xmrstak hashrate is crap.Value is stable, difficulty haven't halved.


Value is stable, difficulty is 4 times down compared to the average before the fork, you have lost 40% of your hash power and so have the rest of the miners, there are no asics on the network.
Well those inputs give a different result on my equation than they do in yours

your calculation are correct,if you speak about generic Ellesmere card but with my 2 rigs come with the first model of Rx550. Xmrstak 64 require intensity to be multiplier of workspace. and it doesn't fit well with those, as I lost more than 60 % of hashrate. That's why I will wait for Gatelessgate sharp, as it didn't have this requirement.

For the absence of Asic: I'm quite happy for that like I think everybody is for our investment and for the safety of the network itself. But that doesn't change my personal $$ result, at the moment I would say.


noodl
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 15
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 06, 2018, 05:16:40 PM
 #3972

what drives you use for rx 580? windows is restarting  after a while... alsto wallet stack on 116522. I have deleted pspstate. bin... and nothning..
I have same problem, cant sync my wallet whole day. deleted all files from \sumokoin\ folder but still not sync
m42orion
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 44
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 06, 2018, 05:16:57 PM
 #3973

I have new record for SUMO and RX550 4GB - 390H/s  suprise me this small beast ...

wtfpdf
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 48
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 06, 2018, 06:31:13 PM
 #3974

cast-xmr will not help with your problem. CN-Heavy doubled it's memory requirements, so now you see only ±50% of your old Cryptonote hashrate. It's not a bug, it's a feature.

feature is good.. but if lost 50% hashrate(hardware that not have 4Mb+).... it's now we mine only 50% from old hashes, -50% profit?


no, because all of us who mining SUMO fighting with the same hash drop. Even Vega cards lost a lot. There is no real disadvantage for you.
karasuri
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 252
Merit: 100



View Profile
April 06, 2018, 06:54:48 PM
 #3975

for now it does not work as should be. after some time it just crush and I have to reload it all over again. what goes wrong?
Alejandur
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 93
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 06, 2018, 07:37:13 PM
 #3976

I have new record for SUMO and RX550 4GB - 390H/s  suprise me this small beast ...


I'm getting 460 h/s with each of my R9 380 4 GB (XMR-Stak).

Everything working stable and earning x2.2 more than before. Cheesy
lallanlion97
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 84
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 06, 2018, 07:39:28 PM
 #3977

Can I get money from ur project? give me infor
m42orion
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 44
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 06, 2018, 08:11:58 PM
 #3978

I have new record for SUMO and RX550 4GB - 390H/s  suprise me this small beast ...


I'm getting 460 h/s with each of my R9 380 4 GB (XMR-Stak).

Everything working stable and earning x2.2 more than before. Cheesy


thats great, but i think that i burn much lower energy, than your R9 ... but its great result ...
codesdnc
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 23
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 07, 2018, 02:53:17 AM
 #3979

Changes for me:

GTX 1070s went from ~630 H/s to ~660 H/s (memory oc'd to 4 GHz; core @ 1.9 GHz)
RX 570s went from ~700 H/s to ~575 H/s (BIOS timing mod; memory oc'd to 2.4 GHz; core uc'd to 1.1 GHz)
Rig using 900W total compared to previous 1100W
Using xmr-stak (latest) w/ Ubuntu 16.0.3
dtr
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 164
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 07, 2018, 04:00:25 AM
 #3980

// gpu: gfx901 memory:3920
  // compute units: 64
  { "index" : 0,
    "intensity" : 880, "worksize" : 8,
    "affine_to_cpu" : false, "strided_index" : false, "mem_chunk" : 2,
    "comp_mode" : true

And where exactly should I add this? Amd/Nvidia.txt?
Pages: « 1 ... 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 [199] 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!