[ANN] [SUMO] SUMOKOIN - 🔏 Digital Cash For Highly-Confidential Transactions 🔏

[m42orion]

Well, so can compare to my test, where RX470 4MB is included. http://sumokoin.aeko.at/sumoheavy.html

Have there around 610 H/s ...

BR garantie

i looked at your results .. may be some suggestion to RX Vega config .... I am using two threads for one GPU with 880 intensity and i am getting about 1200H/s

[garantie]

Thank you, but what is the thread setting?  Worksize?

// gpu: gfx900 memory:3920
  // compute units: 64
  { "index" : 1,
    "intensity" : 1008, "worksize" : 8,
    "affine_to_cpu" : false, "strided_index" : 2, "mem_chunk" : 6,
    "comp_mode" : true

[garantie]

Well, so can compare to my test, where RX470 4MB is included. http://sumokoin.aeko.at/sumoheavy.html

Have there around 610 H/s ...

BR garantie

i looked at your results .. may be some suggestion to RX Vega config .... I am using two threads for one GPU with 880 intensity and i am getting about 1200H/s

Found something, should it be like this for one Vega card (second card after RX 480) ?

    { "index" : 1, "intensity" : 880, "worksize" : 8, "affine_to_cpu" : 1, "strided_index" : true, "mem_chunk" : 2, "comp_mode" : true },
    { "index" : 1, "intensity" : 880, "worksize" : 8, "affine_to_cpu" : 1, "strided_index" : true, "mem_chunk" : 2, "comp_mode" : true },

BR garantie

[dtr]

Well, I hate to say it, but it seems I can't mine this new CN Heavy algorithm properly. I was using SGMinerGM without much problems getting 4500H/sec out of my 5 AMD RX580's, but now it is horrible. XMR Stak gives me 3300H/sec, SRBminer 3800H/sec, but both miners will crash/get stuck/reboot within two hours. Tuning the miners with intensity etc only make it worse. I can accept the loss in hashrate, but not all these problems. 

Same shit with me. I've got 3 rigs, 2 (different cards, but no 580) are working stable, but one with 2x580 and 2x570 stuck/hangs after several hours (but more than two). That sucks.

[m42orion]

Well, I hate to say it, but it seems I can't mine this new CN Heavy algorithm properly. I was using SGMinerGM without much problems getting 4500H/sec out of my 5 AMD RX580's, but now it is horrible. XMR Stak gives me 3300H/sec, SRBminer 3800H/sec, but both miners will crash/get stuck/reboot within two hours. Tuning the miners with intensity etc only make it worse. I can accept the loss in hashrate, but not all these problems. 

Same shit with me. I've got 3 rigs, 2 (different cards, but no 580) are working stable, but one with 2x580 and 2x570 stuck/hangs after several hours (but more than two). That sucks.

// gpu: gfx901 memory:3920
  // compute units: 64
  { "index" : 0,
    "intensity" : 880, "worksize" : 8,
    "affine_to_cpu" : false, "strided_index" : false, "mem_chunk" : 2,
    "comp_mode" : true
  },
  // gpu: gfx901 memory:3920
  // compute units: 64
  { "index" : 0,
    "intensity" : 880, "worksize" : 8,
    "affine_to_cpu" : false, "strided_index" : false, "mem_chunk" : 2,
    "comp_mode" : true
  },

[Andre100]

cast-xmr will not help with your problem. CN-Heavy doubled it's memory requirements, so now you see only ±50% of your old Cryptonote hashrate. It's not a bug, it's a feature.

feature is good.. but if lost 50% hashrate(hardware that not have 4Mb+).... it's now we mine only 50% from old hashes, -50% profit?

[skablast]

Well, or Zawawa Gateless gate will come asap at my rescue, or I am changing coin to mine.
Xmrstak hashrate is crap.Value is stable, difficulty haven't halved.

[garantie]

// gpu: gfx901 memory:3920
  // compute units: 64
  { "index" : 0,
    "intensity" : 880, "worksize" : 8,
    "affine_to_cpu" : false, "strided_index" : false, "mem_chunk" : 2,
    "comp_mode" : true
  },
  // gpu: gfx901 memory:3920
  // compute units: 64
  { "index" : 0,
    "intensity" : 880, "worksize" : 8,
    "affine_to_cpu" : false, "strided_index" : false, "mem_chunk" : 2,
    "comp_mode" : true
  },

Thanks @m42orion, will give it a try

[sumogr]

Well, or Zawawa Gateless gate will come asap at my rescue, or I am changing coin to mine.
Xmrstak hashrate is crap.Value is stable, difficulty haven't halved.

Value is stable, difficulty is 4 times down compared to the average before the fork, you have lost 40% of your hash power and so have the rest of the miners, there are no asics on the network.
Well those inputs give a different result on my equation than they do in yours

[miticoin]

what drives you use for rx 580? windows is restarting  after a while... alsto wallet stack on 116522. I have deleted pspstate. bin... and nothning..

[skablast]

Well, or Zawawa Gateless gate will come asap at my rescue, or I am changing coin to mine.
Xmrstak hashrate is crap.Value is stable, difficulty haven't halved.

Value is stable, difficulty is 4 times down compared to the average before the fork, you have lost 40% of your hash power and so have the rest of the miners, there are no asics on the network.
Well those inputs give a different result on my equation than they do in yours

your calculation are correct,if you speak about generic Ellesmere card but with my 2 rigs come with the first model of Rx550. Xmrstak 64 require intensity to be multiplier of workspace. and it doesn't fit well with those, as I lost more than 60 % of hashrate. That's why I will wait for Gatelessgate sharp, as it didn't have this requirement.

For the absence of Asic: I'm quite happy for that like I think everybody is for our investment and for the safety of the network itself. But that doesn't change my personal $$ result, at the moment I would say.

[noodl]

what drives you use for rx 580? windows is restarting  after a while... alsto wallet stack on 116522. I have deleted pspstate. bin... and nothning..

I have same problem, cant sync my wallet whole day. deleted all files from \sumokoin\ folder but still not sync

[m42orion]

I have new record for SUMO and RX550 4GB - 390H/s  suprise me this small beast ...

[wtfpdf]

cast-xmr will not help with your problem. CN-Heavy doubled it's memory requirements, so now you see only ±50% of your old Cryptonote hashrate. It's not a bug, it's a feature.

feature is good.. but if lost 50% hashrate(hardware that not have 4Mb+).... it's now we mine only 50% from old hashes, -50% profit?

no, because all of us who mining SUMO fighting with the same hash drop. Even Vega cards lost a lot. There is no real disadvantage for you.

[karasuri]

for now it does not work as should be. after some time it just crush and I have to reload it all over again. what goes wrong?

[Alejandur]

I have new record for SUMO and RX550 4GB - 390H/s  suprise me this small beast ...

I'm getting 460 h/s with each of my R9 380 4 GB (XMR-Stak).

Everything working stable and earning x2.2 more than before.

[lallanlion97]

Can I get money from ur project? give me infor

[m42orion]

I have new record for SUMO and RX550 4GB - 390H/s  suprise me this small beast ...

I'm getting 460 h/s with each of my R9 380 4 GB (XMR-Stak).

Everything working stable and earning x2.2 more than before.

thats great, but i think that i burn much lower energy, than your R9 ... but its great result ...

[codesdnc]

Changes for me:

GTX 1070s went from ~630 H/s to ~660 H/s (memory oc'd to 4 GHz; core @ 1.9 GHz)
RX 570s went from ~700 H/s to ~575 H/s (BIOS timing mod; memory oc'd to 2.4 GHz; core uc'd to 1.1 GHz)
Rig using 900W total compared to previous 1100W
Using xmr-stak (latest) w/ Ubuntu 16.0.3

[dtr]

// gpu: gfx901 memory:3920
  // compute units: 64
  { "index" : 0,
    "intensity" : 880, "worksize" : 8,
    "affine_to_cpu" : false, "strided_index" : false, "mem_chunk" : 2,
    "comp_mode" : true

And where exactly should I add this? Amd/Nvidia.txt?