BitcoinWisdom.com - Live Bitcoin/LiteCoin Charts

[jaminunit]

Thanks for getting the Chinese exchanges in there man.
Any chance of getting a native android app of bitcoin wisdom.
I would pay 5 bucks for it for sure. Its just with touch the web version is a bit clunky.

Also I think it's a good idea to leave all the other alts out for now. There are so many scam coins out there. I like being diversified into 2 competent blockchains BTC and LTC as they both have really great dev teams but all the other coins seem like a me to delusion of scams.

[Trading]

Great service, thanks.
Support for drawing lines would be the most important addition.

Its not much but it gets the job done:

http://chovy.dyndns.org/chartdraw/chartdraw.html

It might be a good idea to announce it here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=84.0
Nothing like reviews to inspire trust (javascript applications create some fears).

[woodrake]

Hey,

I love your service and have subscribed. Good work!

Only one thing bugs me though. The little lines at the end which give a snapshot of the order book are, IMHO, the wrong colours. The top one (sell bids) I think should be red (a large sell wall is generally considered bad), and the lower ones (the buy bids) should be green (again, a large buy wall is generally considered good - like a green candlestick indicating a rising market). At present the reverse is true.

It is possible that I've confused which line is which (I assessed that by comparing the shapes to current order books), but in that case the lines are in the wrong positions; the sell wall should be on the top (it is a ceiling) and the buy wall should be on the bottom (it is a floor).

Kate.

[BitcoinWisdom]

Hey,

I love your service and have subscribed. Good work!

Only one thing bugs me though. The little lines at the end which give a snapshot of the order book are, IMHO, the wrong colours. The top one (sell bids) I think should be red (a large sell wall is generally considered bad), and the lower ones (the buy bids) should be green (again, a large buy wall is generally considered good - like a green candlestick indicating a rising market). At present the reverse is true.

It is possible that I've confused which line is which (I assessed that by comparing the shapes to current order books), but in that case the lines are in the wrong positions; the sell wall should be on the top (it is a ceiling) and the buy wall should be on the bottom (it is a floor).

Kate.

Thanks for suggestion. You might be right, when I added it, I not only consider it is a depth but also a trends as part of candlestick chart. It has been used for very long time, I have no idea  it should be change or not. most of people won't worry about it and use it as first impression.
The confusion I think it is rare, most of us should be use position instead of color to identify it is bid or ask.

[oda.krell]

The site didn't hold very well under the intense load this weekend, I guess you noticed.

Do you have plans to increase your infrastructure? I know, it's not a cheap thing, so how about the following idea: if you need to invest in more bandwidth/servers, you could make a "donation drive", say: you tell us you need x BTC to buy another server (or upgrade whatever is necessary), and we can track how far we are with that goal, so we can donate towards that end.

Makes sense?

[BitcoinWisdom]

The site didn't hold very well under the intense load this weekend, I guess you noticed.

Do you have plans to increase your infrastructure? I know, it's not a cheap thing, so how about the following idea: if you need to invest in more bandwidth/servers, you could make a "donation drive", say: you tell us you need x BTC to buy another server (or upgrade whatever is necessary), and we can track how far we are with that goal, so we can donate towards that end.

Makes sense?

I have bought a new server on last thursday, but still haven't receive them
and I'm going to extend current 2 servers to 4 servers to be able to handle about 5 times traffic when at peak.
The ad and premium incoming is enough to keep the sites running so don't worry.

[cilphex]

I haven't read the rest of the thread, but I think you should reduce your subscription price to 1/10th of what it is.

I am willing to subscribe, but $10/month to remove one ad from the side of the website is definitely not worth it, and I'll just use adblock instead.  $1/month to remove one ad is actually reasonable.

Please reconsider your prices.  Thanks.

[BitcoinWisdom]

I haven't read the rest of the thread, but I think you should reduce your subscription price to 1/10th of what it is.

I am willing to subscribe, but $10/month to remove one ad from the side of the website is definitely not worth it, and I'll just use adblock instead.  $1/month to remove one ad is actually reasonable.

Please reconsider your prices.  Thanks.

I'm sorry, Currently we won't disable free account.

[Ex0deus]

Another suggestion to your already sweet site

Could you make the price listed in the very top row a static amount of decimal places so the market and mining drop down menus didn't shift with the price changes?

[BitcoinWisdom]

Another suggestion to your already sweet site

Could you make the price listed in the very top row a static amount of decimal places so the market and mining drop down menus didn't shift with the price changes?

I finished the static amount a lot time ago. both of them has there own advantage. I will consider using static version or not again.
The most advatage for currently is it won't cut off precision and no extra zero padding.
If only met trouble with dropdown shift. Maybe could lock the drop down menu position when it shows.

[cilphex]

I haven't read the rest of the thread, but I think you should reduce your subscription price to 1/10th of what it is.

I am willing to subscribe, but $10/month to remove one ad from the side of the website is definitely not worth it, and I'll just use adblock instead.  $1/month to remove one ad is actually reasonable.

Please reconsider your prices.  Thanks.

I'm sorry, Currently we won't disable free account.

Not sure if you read what I wrote, but I wasn't asking you to disable free accounts.

[Simran]

I haven't read the rest of the thread, but I think you should reduce your subscription price to 1/10th of what it is.

I am willing to subscribe, but $10/month to remove one ad from the side of the website is definitely not worth it, and I'll just use adblock instead.  $1/month to remove one ad is actually reasonable.

Please reconsider your prices.  Thanks.

Are you an idiot? The premium isn't about removing the ad, it's just a benefit that comes with it. You're not paying $10 just too remove an ad, your paying $10 to keep the servers up and maintenance. You are one greedy motherf**ker.

[findftp]

I saw somebody else already request the same thing and I don't know if it just wasn't read or denied.
But I would also like to see other alignment of the orderbook.
Now it is like this:

1147.9000 6.0000
         4350 0.0240
         0000 0.0988
1146.2875 0.0240
1145.1413 0.0240
         0000 358.53
1144.9999 0.0873
         9900 2.5200
         9008 0.0881
         4132 0.0229
         2400 0.0200
         1400 0.0100
         0000 22.178
1143.9961 0.0240
         9000 1.2599

But it is easier to read/interpret if the point is in the same column like:

1147.9000      6.0000
         4350      0.0240
         0000      0.0988
1146.2875      0.0240
1145.1413      0.0240
         0000  358.53
1144.9999      0.0873
         9900      2.5200
         9008      0.0881
         4132      0.0229
         2400      0.0200
         1400      0.0100
         0000    22.178
1143.9961      0.0240
         9000      1.2599

Same counts for the grouped bid/ask:
this:
1210 3353
1205 3090
1200 2854
1195 2382
1190 1987
1185 1746
1180 1486
1175 1301
1170 1008
1165 956
1160 875
1155 612
1150 457
1145 418
1140 37


should be this:

1210 3353
1205 3090
1200 2854
1195 2382
1190 1987
1185 1746
1180 1486
1175 1301
1170 1008
1165   956
1160   875
1155   612
1150   457
1145   418
1140     37

[foroplus]

Here in Spain we are also experiencing fails in the site, especially since weekend. Now it isn't working at all.

And Simran, I'm also a greedy motherf**ker; since I'm also would like, and appreciate a lower price for a premium account.

[ICantThinkOfaName]

Now that bitcoinity.org defaults to mBTC, do you plan on doing the same?

[melvster]

Now that bitcoinity.org defaults to mBTC, do you plan on doing the same?

+1

Or at least make it an option ...

[mxisaac]

Could you switch over to mBTC?  Either give the option or make it the default? 

Other than that, BitcoinWisdom is my favorite chart site out there!

[NginUS]

For some reason tonight my ISP changed my IP as a matter of course since I don't have a static IP, and the IP they changed me to happens to not load bitcoinwisdom. I can only get the charts now from my cellular IP.

On my cable modem I always get a message saying retry in 5 seconds probably you've exceeded 8 connections, even when there aren't even 1 connection.

Can you unblacklist my cable modem IP or do something to fix this?

My user name on bitcoinwisdom is the same as it is in the forums here if you need to check your logs.

The IP that's being blocked is 74.78.219.253

Edit:
There is 1 instance of bitcoinwisdom open on my network that's stayed open all week since before there was a problem opening it. It's still up.

Could it be that Chrome.exe which uses multiple instances of itself which all use a connection making multiple connections to the server for that 1 tab?

[solex]

Could you switch over to mBTC?  Either give the option or make it the default? 

Other than that, BitcoinWisdom is my favorite chart site out there!

An option, but not the default.
mBTC just seems to be a way of fooling the market into thinking that bitcoins are cheaper. Not good.

[digitalmagus]

Hi,
First of all, congrats on what I think is the best charting platform I've seen to date. I just thought I'd mention that I was one of those users that kept seeing the "Loading..." screen all the time and couldn't get past that. After much troubleshooting and using my protocol analyzer, it turns out that it's because my firewall blocks port 8080 outbound by default. I imagine this is also the case with many users on computers in corporations. I've known many companies that only allow port 80 and 443 out and block everything else - quite literally. 8080 is typically associated with proxies and is blocked so as to prevent people from getting around other firewall rule restrictions.

I'd like to suggest you put some very basic instructions on your "Help" page on your website with the basic firewall rules required. Also, on the loading page I was seeing, it said that perhaps it wasn't loading because I had more than 8 connections established (which wasn't the case). So perhaps that's another place where you can post the 2 liner firewall rules required.

I believe the requirement is something like:

Outbound (to internet) Firewall rules required:
1) bitcoinwisdom.com                              TCP/HTTP port 80
2) 184-22-51-146.static.hostnoc.net         TCP 8080
(184.22.51.146 also resolves to s2.bitcoinwisdom.com)

Cheers and keep up the awesome job!

PS. An even better idea is to stop using port 8080 all together, is it really necessary? Can you not just stick to 80 on your second server, or perhaps use 443 with SSL encryption if your servers can bare the load?