Evolution is a hoax

[stevenirons21]

The whole idea of millions of years of existence hasn't been proven. All of the points you make have been arbitrarily adjusted to make evolution look real. It's all part of the evolutuion hoax.

Lol I think we have the answer we were looking for.

The guy thinks Earth is 6000 years old, what do you want to discuss with someone like him? xD

He also believes slavery was good at one time and that women are inferior to men and should obey men.

Yeah it's just religious TECSHARE in fact.
Shame those two are homophobic dudes they would be great together xD

Effeminate thinking men, body types of male and female are different for a reason, women are not inferior to man. Women should submit themselves to their husband. Today there's slavery as well, at a global scale what are you talking about? How many hours do you have to work a day? You are not free to do what you want during the day unless you are rich, right? Slavery has always existed, will always exist. We believers might not know how old the earth is, we don't claim to know. But neither do you know, just quoting random million of years as if you actually could determine that.

[BADecker]

The whole idea of millions of years of existence hasn't been proven. All of the points you make have been arbitrarily adjusted to make evolution look real. It's all part of the evolutuion hoax.

Lol I think we have the answer we were looking for.

The guy thinks Earth is 6000 years old, what do you want to discuss with someone like him? xD

He also believes slavery was good at one time and that women are inferior to men and should obey men.

The fact that you like to make assumptions about BADecker, and state them as though they were fact, shows that you are acting as a politician, and that you are using the political science art of lying to attempt to make yourself look better than BADecker.

DNA is quite similar across the board regarding all animals. One site that shows what I mean is Quora:

Humans and chickens share 65 percent of their DNA.

Of the great apes, humans share 98.8 percent of their DNA with bonobos and chimpanzees.

Humans and dogs share 84 percent of their DNA.

But, here is the big question regarding all that:

Is the so-called sharing of DNA because all animals have a common ancestor (evolution)?...

... or is it because they were all made to be distinct and separate animals, having similar DNA in areas, ONLY so that they could live together on a single world?

Science has not proven either of these. Many people speak as though science has proven one or the other.

When a person says something that he thinks is true, and doesn't state that he only believes it without proof, he is perpetuation a hoax. Since this thread is about the evolution hoax rather than the hoaxes of formal religions...

Evolution is a hoax.

[Astargath]

The whole idea of millions of years of existence hasn't been proven. All of the points you make have been arbitrarily adjusted to make evolution look real. It's all part of the evolutuion hoax.

Lol I think we have the answer we were looking for.

The guy thinks Earth is 6000 years old, what do you want to discuss with someone like him? xD

He also believes slavery was good at one time and that women are inferior to men and should obey men.

Yeah it's just religious TECSHARE in fact.
Shame those two are homophobic dudes they would be great together xD

Effeminate thinking men, body types of male and female are different for a reason, women are not inferior to man. Women should submit themselves to their husband. Today there's slavery as well, at a global scale what are you talking about? How many hours do you have to work a day? You are not free to do what you want during the day unless you are rich, right? Slavery has always existed, will always exist. We believers might not know how old the earth is, we don't claim to know. But neither do you know, just quoting random million of years as if you actually could determine that.

''But neither do you know, just quoting random million of years as if you actually could determine that.'' We can with science, of course idiots like you don't think it's possible, have you looked into it? Have you studied it? Nah, better to believe a book. hehe

[BADecker]

''But neither do you know, just quoting random million of years as if you actually could determine that.'' We can with science, of course idiots like you don't think it's possible, have you looked into it? Have you studied it? Nah, better to believe a book. hehe

Prove that science has left nothing out of the equation(s) for determining even the approximate age of the earth or universe. hehe

Evolution is a hoax.

[Astargath]

''But neither do you know, just quoting random million of years as if you actually could determine that.'' We can with science, of course idiots like you don't think it's possible, have you looked into it? Have you studied it? Nah, better to believe a book. hehe

Prove that science has left nothing out of the equation(s) for determining even the approximate age of the earth or universe. hehe

Evolution is a hoax.

Useless argument, you might as well throw all science because we don't know if we missed something somewhere somehow, get a job.

[BADecker]

''But neither do you know, just quoting random million of years as if you actually could determine that.'' We can with science, of course idiots like you don't think it's possible, have you looked into it? Have you studied it? Nah, better to believe a book. hehe

Prove that science has left nothing out of the equation(s) for determining even the approximate age of the earth or universe. hehe

Evolution is a hoax.

Useless argument, you might as well throw all science because we don't know if we missed something somewhere somehow, get a job.

Assuming that something that can't be proven is science is a false assumption. It's only called science by political scientists... and not all of them, at that.

Don't throw it out if it is a fact. Prove that it is a fact, and it might be part of real science.

[Astargath]

''But neither do you know, just quoting random million of years as if you actually could determine that.'' We can with science, of course idiots like you don't think it's possible, have you looked into it? Have you studied it? Nah, better to believe a book. hehe

Prove that science has left nothing out of the equation(s) for determining even the approximate age of the earth or universe. hehe

Evolution is a hoax.

Useless argument, you might as well throw all science because we don't know if we missed something somewhere somehow, get a job.

Assuming that something that can't be proven is science is a false assumption. It's only called science by political scientists... and not all of them, at that.

Don't throw it out if it is a fact. Prove that it is a fact, and it might be part of real science.

The age of the earth and universe are scientifically proven.

[BADecker]

''But neither do you know, just quoting random million of years as if you actually could determine that.'' We can with science, of course idiots like you don't think it's possible, have you looked into it? Have you studied it? Nah, better to believe a book. hehe

Prove that science has left nothing out of the equation(s) for determining even the approximate age of the earth or universe. hehe

Evolution is a hoax.

Useless argument, you might as well throw all science because we don't know if we missed something somewhere somehow, get a job.

Assuming that something that can't be proven is science is a false assumption. It's only called science by political scientists... and not all of them, at that.

Don't throw it out if it is a fact. Prove that it is a fact, and it might be part of real science.

The age of the earth and universe are scientifically proven.

Nobody knows the age of the earth or universe other than in an assumptive way. Our universe age guesstimations are based on two things:
1. Guesses about the meanings of astronomy that we see through telescopes, etc.;
2. Guesses about the age of the earth and why, from historical writings, and from the various forms of the geological record.

That's it. We don't have any idea about how many things might have interrupted what we might call the flow of history. We only have vague guesses that anything beyond 5,000 years ago is as we understand it.

The whole, standard, scientific timeline age of the earth is a big guesstimation, with big emphasis on the guess part. Standard dating methods are constantly proving the standard timeline wrong. More and more our scientific time-measuring methods are being improved so that we are understanding that the age of the universe is much shorter than we had previously surmised.

Search for it. Do studies on it. You will see that our scientific knowledge is constantly being prove wrong in this area, and that we don't really know.

But thanks for this opportunity to point this out to our readers.

Evolution is a hoax.

[Astargath]

''But neither do you know, just quoting random million of years as if you actually could determine that.'' We can with science, of course idiots like you don't think it's possible, have you looked into it? Have you studied it? Nah, better to believe a book. hehe

Prove that science has left nothing out of the equation(s) for determining even the approximate age of the earth or universe. hehe

Evolution is a hoax.

Useless argument, you might as well throw all science because we don't know if we missed something somewhere somehow, get a job.

Assuming that something that can't be proven is science is a false assumption. It's only called science by political scientists... and not all of them, at that.

Don't throw it out if it is a fact. Prove that it is a fact, and it might be part of real science.

The age of the earth and universe are scientifically proven.

Nobody knows the age of the earth or universe other than in an assumptive way. Our universe age guesstimations are based on two things:
1. Guesses about the meanings of astronomy that we see through telescopes, etc.;
2. Guesses about the age of the earth and why, from historical writings, and from the various forms of the geological record.

That's it. We don't have any idea about how many things might have interrupted what we might call the flow of history. We only have vague guesses that anything beyond 5,000 years ago is as we understand it.

The whole, standard, scientific timeline age of the earth is a big guesstimation, with big emphasis on the guess part. Standard dating methods are constantly proving the standard timeline wrong. More and more our scientific time-measuring methods are being improved so that we are understanding that the age of the universe is much shorter than we had previously surmised.

Search for it. Do studies on it. You will see that our scientific knowledge is constantly being prove wrong in this area, and that we don't really know.

But thanks for this opportunity to point this out to our readers.

Evolution is a hoax.

Again, scientifically, the age of the earth and universe are proven to be way older than what the bible infers. This is done through scientific evidence.

[BADecker]

Again, scientifically, the age of the earth and universe are proven to be way older than what the bible infers. This is done through scientific evidence.

Actually, you fall short in this. Standard age of the universe is determined by flawed talk about unclear scientific interpretation of the scientific evidence.

[KingScorpio]

evolution is a potentially interpretable timeline, a great theory for people that fear gods and want to be free of them, and not being in a situation of having to fear, them, that would be a good thing and almost like a present from gods.

because there were also cruel destructive gods, and there might be a situation people would wish for that.

[Astargath]

Again, scientifically, the age of the earth and universe are proven to be way older than what the bible infers. This is done through scientific evidence.

Actually, you fall short in this. Standard age of the universe is determined by flawed talk about unclear scientific interpretation of the scientific evidence.

It doesn't matter what you think, scientifically we know what the age of the earth and universe are. You agreeing or not doesn't change the fact that science uses that data for a lot of things.

[ATMD]

The age of the earth and universe are scientifically proven.

The age of the earth and universe are scientifically deduced.

[mOgliE]

The age of the earth and universe are scientifically deduced.

Which is exactly the same thing as proven when  you use scientific methology... Unless we have wrong at least one fundamental principle of radiology and physics.

[ATMD]

The age of the earth and universe are scientifically deduced.

Which is exactly the same thing as proven when  you use scientific methology... Unless we have wrong at least one fundamental principle of radiology and physics.

There is nothing wrong with the fundamental principle of radiology and physics at all. Quite the opposite, radiology and modern physics are constantly being used in modern science, and have proven to be reliable and trustworthy. Nonetheless, to prove that something existed billions of years ago is a tough prospect. We have to make a lot of assumptions about the past. For all we know, Earth a billion years ago might be completely different to modern day Earth. Something drastic might have happened several times to speed up or slow down the decay processes, and that is already taking the assumption that we know the initial chemical properties of Earth a billion years ago.

[Astargath]

The age of the earth and universe are scientifically deduced.

Which is exactly the same thing as proven when  you use scientific methology... Unless we have wrong at least one fundamental principle of radiology and physics.

Exactly, this is what they don't fucking understand, ''deduced''. No shit, everything is deduced, however there is a difference when you use the scientific method and scientific evidence. They just can't admit these things are scientifically proven right now.

[BADecker]

The age of the earth and universe are scientifically deduced.

Which is exactly the same thing as proven when  you use scientific methology... Unless we have wrong at least one fundamental principle of radiology and physics.

Exactly, this is what they don't fucking understand, ''deduced''. No shit, everything is deduced, however there is a difference when you use the scientific method and scientific evidence. They just can't admit these things are scientifically proven right now.

Scientific deduction is not necessarily accurate. Why not? Because many people, even scientists, suggest that scientific theories are fact, when it is only factually known that they are theories. They are known to not necessarily be fact when they are scientific theory.

Since evolution theory evolution (ETE) is known to be a scientific-theory/non-scientific-theory, it is known to not necessarily be factual... except that it is factually a theory. When it is proclaimed as fact more than factually a theory, it becomes a hoax. Since this is the way it is proclaimed - as fact beyond theory...

Evolution is a hoax.

[Astargath]

The age of the earth and universe are scientifically deduced.

Which is exactly the same thing as proven when  you use scientific methology... Unless we have wrong at least one fundamental principle of radiology and physics.

Exactly, this is what they don't fucking understand, ''deduced''. No shit, everything is deduced, however there is a difference when you use the scientific method and scientific evidence. They just can't admit these things are scientifically proven right now.

Scientific deduction is not necessarily accurate. Why not? Because many people, even scientists, suggest that scientific theories are fact, when it is only factually known that they are theories. They are known to not necessarily be fact when they are scientific theory.

Since evolution theory evolution (ETE) is known to be a scientific-theory/non-scientific-theory, it is known to not necessarily be factual... except that it is factually a theory. When it is proclaimed as fact more than factually a theory, it becomes a hoax. Since this is the way it is proclaimed - as fact beyond theory...

Evolution is a hoax.

I'm sorry mate but it doesn't matter if they are 100% accurate or not. No one claims that. Simply scientifically we know the age of the earth or the universe. ''it is known to not necessarily be factual'' Actually by scientific standards evolution is a fact and the theory of evolution explains the fact. So again you are wrong scientifically.

You could be wrong about god too, no? What's your point here?

[BADecker]

The age of the earth and universe are scientifically deduced.

Which is exactly the same thing as proven when  you use scientific methology... Unless we have wrong at least one fundamental principle of radiology and physics.

Exactly, this is what they don't fucking understand, ''deduced''. No shit, everything is deduced, however there is a difference when you use the scientific method and scientific evidence. They just can't admit these things are scientifically proven right now.

Scientific deduction is not necessarily accurate. Why not? Because many people, even scientists, suggest that scientific theories are fact, when it is only factually known that they are theories. They are known to not necessarily be fact when they are scientific theory.

Since evolution theory evolution (ETE) is known to be a scientific-theory/non-scientific-theory, it is known to not necessarily be factual... except that it is factually a theory. When it is proclaimed as fact more than factually a theory, it becomes a hoax. Since this is the way it is proclaimed - as fact beyond theory...

Evolution is a hoax.

I'm sorry mate but it doesn't matter if they are 100% accurate or not. No one claims that. Simply scientifically we know the age of the earth or the universe. ''it is known to not necessarily be factual'' Actually by scientific standards evolution is a fact and the theory of evolution explains the fact. So again you are wrong scientifically.

You could be wrong about god too, no? What's your point here?

From strict scientific views, scientists may be accurate, in both earth age and evolution. They may be totally saying that they aren't 100% sure, and that earth age and evolution are not necessarily factual.

The point is that both, earth age and evolution, are coming down to the general populace as factual. Somebody is presenting them is such a way that the populace in general will understand that they are factual. This is where the hoax lies.

Evolution is a hoax.

Regarding God, I can't be wrong about the existence of God. Why not? The fact that nobody comes even close to proving that God doesn't exist, yet many claim that God doesn't exist without proof, simply shows that they are setting themselves up as god. In fact, they might be some of the greatest god-believers, although they might mostly believe subconsciously.

The formal God believers have to go through a lot of scientific study, or they have to rely on what seems to be apparent. In their case, they are setting themselves up as gods with God... or is God setting them up gods with Himself? Psalm 82:6:

I said, 'You are "gods"; you are all sons of the Most High.'

and

John 10:34:

Jesus answered them, "Is it not written in your Law, 'I have said you are "gods"'?

[mOgliE]

Regarding God, I can't be wrong about the existence of God. Why not? The fact that nobody comes even close to proving that God doesn't exist

Damned! Forgot the fact that if you can't prove something doesn't exist then it musts exist.

Do you know someone who has proved the non existence of Odin?
Then Odin must exists.
As well as unicorns, giants, gnomes, valkyries and the other 5225478 gods that have been invented at a moment or another in History.