BADecker
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 3836
Merit: 1373
|
 |
January 10, 2019, 02:45:08 PM |
|
Regarding God, I can't be wrong about the existence of God. Why not? The fact that nobody comes even close to proving that God doesn't exist
Damned! Forgot the fact that if you can't prove something doesn't exist then it musts exist. Do you know someone who has proved the non existence of Odin? Then Odin must exists. As well as unicorns, giants, gnomes, valkyries and the other 5225478 gods that have been invented at a moment or another in History. Actually, you forgot to include the rest of my post. Oh, my mistake. You neglected to include it intentionally. Why did you neglect? Because it would show you that your post is not an appropriate response for mine.  |
|
|
|
|
Astargath
|
|
January 10, 2019, 05:36:57 PM |
|
The age of the earth and universe are scientifically deduced.
Which is exactly the same thing as proven when you use scientific methology... Unless we have wrong at least one fundamental principle of radiology and physics. Exactly, this is what they don't fucking understand, ''deduced''. No shit, everything is deduced, however there is a difference when you use the scientific method and scientific evidence. They just can't admit these things are scientifically proven right now. Scientific deduction is not necessarily accurate. Why not? Because many people, even scientists, suggest that scientific theories are fact, when it is only factually known that they are theories. They are known to not necessarily be fact when they are scientific theory. Since evolution theory evolution (ETE) is known to be a scientific-theory/non-scientific-theory, it is known to not necessarily be factual... except that it is factually a theory. When it is proclaimed as fact more than factually a theory, it becomes a hoax. Since this is the way it is proclaimed - as fact beyond theory... Evolution is a hoax. I'm sorry mate but it doesn't matter if they are 100% accurate or not. No one claims that. Simply scientifically we know the age of the earth or the universe. ''it is known to not necessarily be factual'' Actually by scientific standards evolution is a fact and the theory of evolution explains the fact. So again you are wrong scientifically. You could be wrong about god too, no? What's your point here? From strict scientific views, scientists may be accurate, in both earth age and evolution. They may be totally saying that they aren't 100% sure, and that earth age and evolution are not necessarily factual. The point is that both, earth age and evolution, are coming down to the general populace as factual. Somebody is presenting them is such a way that the populace in general will understand that they are factual. This is where the hoax lies. Evolution is a hoax. Regarding God, I can't be wrong about the existence of God. Why not? The fact that nobody comes even close to proving that God doesn't exist, yet many claim that God doesn't exist without proof, simply shows that they are setting themselves up as god. In fact, they might be some of the greatest god-believers, although they might mostly believe subconsciously. The formal God believers have to go through a lot of scientific study, or they have to rely on what seems to be apparent. In their case, they are setting themselves up as gods with God... or is God setting them up gods with Himself? Psalm 82:6: I said, 'You are "gods"; you are all sons of the Most High.' and John 10:34: Jesus answered them, "Is it not written in your Law, 'I have said you are "gods"'? We can't know if something is factual 100% ever, badecker, this argument is meaningless. Science has figured out the age of the earth and universe using the scientific method. No one has figured out god existence using the scientific method, end of the story. |
|
|
|
stevenirons21
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
January 10, 2019, 06:32:29 PM |
|
The age of the earth and universe are scientifically deduced.
Which is exactly the same thing as proven when you use scientific methology... Unless we have wrong at least one fundamental principle of radiology and physics. Exactly, this is what they don't fucking understand, ''deduced''. No shit, everything is deduced, however there is a difference when you use the scientific method and scientific evidence. They just can't admit these things are scientifically proven right now. Scientific deduction is not necessarily accurate. Why not? Because many people, even scientists, suggest that scientific theories are fact, when it is only factually known that they are theories. They are known to not necessarily be fact when they are scientific theory. Since evolution theory evolution (ETE) is known to be a scientific-theory/non-scientific-theory, it is known to not necessarily be factual... except that it is factually a theory. When it is proclaimed as fact more than factually a theory, it becomes a hoax. Since this is the way it is proclaimed - as fact beyond theory... Evolution is a hoax. I'm sorry mate but it doesn't matter if they are 100% accurate or not. No one claims that. Simply scientifically we know the age of the earth or the universe. ''it is known to not necessarily be factual'' Actually by scientific standards evolution is a fact and the theory of evolution explains the fact. So again you are wrong scientifically. You could be wrong about god too, no? What's your point here? From strict scientific views, scientists may be accurate, in both earth age and evolution. They may be totally saying that they aren't 100% sure, and that earth age and evolution are not necessarily factual. The point is that both, earth age and evolution, are coming down to the general populace as factual. Somebody is presenting them is such a way that the populace in general will understand that they are factual. This is where the hoax lies. Evolution is a hoax. Regarding God, I can't be wrong about the existence of God. Why not? The fact that nobody comes even close to proving that God doesn't exist, yet many claim that God doesn't exist without proof, simply shows that they are setting themselves up as god. In fact, they might be some of the greatest god-believers, although they might mostly believe subconsciously. The formal God believers have to go through a lot of scientific study, or they have to rely on what seems to be apparent. In their case, they are setting themselves up as gods with God... or is God setting them up gods with Himself? Psalm 82:6: I said, 'You are "gods"; you are all sons of the Most High.' and John 10:34: Jesus answered them, "Is it not written in your Law, 'I have said you are "gods"'? We can't know if something is factual 100% ever, badecker, this argument is meaningless. Science has figured out the age of the earth and universe using the scientific method. No one has figured out god existence using the scientific method, end of the story. Scientific method, right? How is it then that some sources say the earth is 40+ billion years old and then you find other that say 50+ billion years. I wonder how idiotic these guys can be. |
|
|
|
|
|
Astargath
|
|
January 10, 2019, 07:36:45 PM |
|
The age of the earth and universe are scientifically deduced.
Which is exactly the same thing as proven when you use scientific methology... Unless we have wrong at least one fundamental principle of radiology and physics. Exactly, this is what they don't fucking understand, ''deduced''. No shit, everything is deduced, however there is a difference when you use the scientific method and scientific evidence. They just can't admit these things are scientifically proven right now. Scientific deduction is not necessarily accurate. Why not? Because many people, even scientists, suggest that scientific theories are fact, when it is only factually known that they are theories. They are known to not necessarily be fact when they are scientific theory. Since evolution theory evolution (ETE) is known to be a scientific-theory/non-scientific-theory, it is known to not necessarily be factual... except that it is factually a theory. When it is proclaimed as fact more than factually a theory, it becomes a hoax. Since this is the way it is proclaimed - as fact beyond theory... Evolution is a hoax. I'm sorry mate but it doesn't matter if they are 100% accurate or not. No one claims that. Simply scientifically we know the age of the earth or the universe. ''it is known to not necessarily be factual'' Actually by scientific standards evolution is a fact and the theory of evolution explains the fact. So again you are wrong scientifically. You could be wrong about god too, no? What's your point here? From strict scientific views, scientists may be accurate, in both earth age and evolution. They may be totally saying that they aren't 100% sure, and that earth age and evolution are not necessarily factual. The point is that both, earth age and evolution, are coming down to the general populace as factual. Somebody is presenting them is such a way that the populace in general will understand that they are factual. This is where the hoax lies. Evolution is a hoax. Regarding God, I can't be wrong about the existence of God. Why not? The fact that nobody comes even close to proving that God doesn't exist, yet many claim that God doesn't exist without proof, simply shows that they are setting themselves up as god. In fact, they might be some of the greatest god-believers, although they might mostly believe subconsciously. The formal God believers have to go through a lot of scientific study, or they have to rely on what seems to be apparent. In their case, they are setting themselves up as gods with God... or is God setting them up gods with Himself? Psalm 82:6: I said, 'You are "gods"; you are all sons of the Most High.' and John 10:34: Jesus answered them, "Is it not written in your Law, 'I have said you are "gods"'? We can't know if something is factual 100% ever, badecker, this argument is meaningless. Science has figured out the age of the earth and universe using the scientific method. No one has figured out god existence using the scientific method, end of the story. Scientific method, right? How is it then that some sources say the earth is 40+ billion years old and then you find other that say 50+ billion years. I wonder how idiotic these guys can be. How is it that you just come here to say the most idiotic thing possible? You could literally google that in 1 second and find out the age of the earth is around 4 billion years old, not 40?? Are you this dumb or? |
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3836
Merit: 1373
|
|
January 10, 2019, 08:23:05 PM |
|
Scientific method, right? How is it then that some sources say the earth is 40+ billion years old and then you find other that say 50+ billion years. I wonder how idiotic these guys can be.
How is it that you just come here to say the most idiotic thing possible? You could literally google that in 1 second and find out the age of the earth is around 4 billion years old, not 40?? Are you this dumb or? Get the right job at Google, and you can literally make Google say anything you want. If this talk is not about proof, nothing counts. Go read a children's book, and then read another that says the opposite. |
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3836
Merit: 1373
|
|
January 10, 2019, 08:25:47 PM |
|
We can't know if something is factual 100% ever, badecker, this argument is meaningless. Science has figured out the age of the earth and universe using the scientific method. No one has figured out god existence using the scientific method, end of the story.
When you take a look at ALL the science, you find that there is plenty of science that shows a young earth/universe. You also know that I have shown the scientific proof that God exists. |
|
|
|
|
Astargath
|
|
January 10, 2019, 10:29:37 PM |
|
We can't know if something is factual 100% ever, badecker, this argument is meaningless. Science has figured out the age of the earth and universe using the scientific method. No one has figured out god existence using the scientific method, end of the story.
When you take a look at ALL the science, you find that there is plenty of science that shows a young earth/universe. You also know that I have shown the scientific proof that God exists. You claim to have shown that but you haven't and I already debunked it plenty of times. There is no scientific theory for god, anywhere, even though plenty of scientists believe in god. I wonder why they never published one? Perhaps because they know there is no such thing? |
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3836
Merit: 1373
|
|
January 11, 2019, 01:20:29 AM |
|
We can't know if something is factual 100% ever, badecker, this argument is meaningless. Science has figured out the age of the earth and universe using the scientific method. No one has figured out god existence using the scientific method, end of the story.
When you take a look at ALL the science, you find that there is plenty of science that shows a young earth/universe. You also know that I have shown the scientific proof that God exists. You claim to have shown that but you haven't and I already debunked it plenty of times. There is no scientific theory for god, anywhere, even though plenty of scientists believe in god. I wonder why they never published one? Perhaps because they know there is no such thing? You have only debunked yourself. However, since this thread is about evolution, evolutionists don't have a clue what they are talking about: Scientists Baffled-New Discoveries-Darwinian Evolution Crumbling-Scientists Abandon Theory
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WdqYPjA9VxA |
|
|
|
|
Astargath
|
|
January 11, 2019, 09:40:31 AM |
|
We can't know if something is factual 100% ever, badecker, this argument is meaningless. Science has figured out the age of the earth and universe using the scientific method. No one has figured out god existence using the scientific method, end of the story.
When you take a look at ALL the science, you find that there is plenty of science that shows a young earth/universe. You also know that I have shown the scientific proof that God exists. You claim to have shown that but you haven't and I already debunked it plenty of times. There is no scientific theory for god, anywhere, even though plenty of scientists believe in god. I wonder why they never published one? Perhaps because they know there is no such thing? You have only debunked yourself. However, since this thread is about evolution, evolutionists don't have a clue what they are talking about: Scientists Baffled-New Discoveries-Darwinian Evolution Crumbling-Scientists Abandon Theory
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WdqYPjA9VxASince you can't ever admit to anything that you dont like (age of the earth or universe) there is no much point in this conversation. You don't like science and you are dishonest. Scientifically those things are proven, the fact that you can't accept that shows that you will never accept anything scientifically. What's the point? What's the point of showing you scientific evidence of evolution if you don't accept the scientific evidence for other things? |
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3836
Merit: 1373
|
|
January 11, 2019, 09:47:58 AM |
|
Since you can't ever admit to anything that you dont like (age of the earth or universe) there is no much point in this conversation. You don't like science and you are dishonest. Scientifically those things are proven, the fact that you can't accept that shows that you will never accept anything scientifically. What's the point? What's the point of showing you scientific evidence of evolution if you don't accept the scientific evidence for other things? Since you simply lie about what is really going on regarding evolution, what's the point of talking with you? On top of it, you make claims about me and others that you don't really know are justified, right? Now that science is proving that evolution is false, your continued attempted upholding of it shows that you don't care for science much. It also shows that you want to keep promoting the fact that... Evolution is a hoax. |
|
|
|
|
Astargath
|
|
January 11, 2019, 10:14:21 AM |
|
Since you can't ever admit to anything that you dont like (age of the earth or universe) there is no much point in this conversation. You don't like science and you are dishonest. Scientifically those things are proven, the fact that you can't accept that shows that you will never accept anything scientifically. What's the point? What's the point of showing you scientific evidence of evolution if you don't accept the scientific evidence for other things? Since you simply lie about what is really going on regarding evolution, what's the point of talking with you? On top of it, you make claims about me and others that you don't really know are justified, right? Now that science is proving that evolution is false, your continued attempted upholding of it shows that you don't care for science much. It also shows that you want to keep promoting the fact that... Evolution is a hoax. Scientifically the theory of evolution is the best theory we have to explain how we got here, whether you like it or not. '' Now that science is proving that evolution is false'' In your mind perhaps. Virtually every scientist, religious one included, accept evolution as a fact. |
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3836
Merit: 1373
|
|
January 11, 2019, 10:31:01 AM
Last edit: January 11, 2019, 10:42:07 AM by BADecker |
|
Since you can't ever admit to anything that you dont like (age of the earth or universe) there is no much point in this conversation. You don't like science and you are dishonest. Scientifically those things are proven, the fact that you can't accept that shows that you will never accept anything scientifically. What's the point? What's the point of showing you scientific evidence of evolution if you don't accept the scientific evidence for other things? Since you simply lie about what is really going on regarding evolution, what's the point of talking with you? On top of it, you make claims about me and others that you don't really know are justified, right? Now that science is proving that evolution is false, your continued attempted upholding of it shows that you don't care for science much. It also shows that you want to keep promoting the fact that... Evolution is a hoax. Scientifically the theory of evolution is the best theory we have to explain how we got here, whether you like it or not. '' Now that science is proving that evolution is false'' In your mind perhaps. Virtually every scientist, religious one included, accept evolution as a fact. No! Chev is best... way better than Ford. Prove it. I mean, just like you proved evolution. Evolution is a hoax. Check the video, above. |
|
|
|
|
Astargath
|
|
January 11, 2019, 11:47:05 AM |
|
Since you can't ever admit to anything that you dont like (age of the earth or universe) there is no much point in this conversation. You don't like science and you are dishonest. Scientifically those things are proven, the fact that you can't accept that shows that you will never accept anything scientifically. What's the point? What's the point of showing you scientific evidence of evolution if you don't accept the scientific evidence for other things? Since you simply lie about what is really going on regarding evolution, what's the point of talking with you? On top of it, you make claims about me and others that you don't really know are justified, right? Now that science is proving that evolution is false, your continued attempted upholding of it shows that you don't care for science much. It also shows that you want to keep promoting the fact that... Evolution is a hoax. Scientifically the theory of evolution is the best theory we have to explain how we got here, whether you like it or not. '' Now that science is proving that evolution is false'' In your mind perhaps. Virtually every scientist, religious one included, accept evolution as a fact. No! Chev is best... way better than Ford. Prove it. I mean, just like you proved evolution. Evolution is a hoax. Check the video, above. Evolution is already proven scientifically, that's why it's a scientific theory. |
|
|
|
|
Oxstone
|
|
January 11, 2019, 01:19:01 PM |
|
I'll try to get on with this one by going step by step:
You agree that we know that radioactive elements like C14 or Uranium have a well established and never changing half life right?
|
|
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3836
Merit: 1373
|
|
January 11, 2019, 04:35:07 PM |
|
Evolution is already proven scientifically, that's why it's a scientific theory.
Is that why you can't show the proof? The video at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WdqYPjA9VxA proves that evolution theory evolution couldn't have happen. How? Among other things, it shows us that carbon dating is a young earth thing rather than an old earth thing. Dig your hole too deep, and it will start caving in on you. May your evolution crap perish right along with you. |
|
|
|
|
Oxstone
|
|
January 11, 2019, 05:07:48 PM |
|
Among other things, it shows us that carbon dating is a young earth thing rather than an old earth thing.
Dude, no one is saying earth age is know through carbon dating... Carbon dating is 50k years top, nothing more... What the fuck do you believe? Oo |
|
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3836
Merit: 1373
|
|
January 11, 2019, 07:44:33 PM |
|
Among other things, it shows us that carbon dating is a young earth thing rather than an old earth thing.
Dude, no one is saying earth age is know through carbon dating... Carbon dating is 50k years top, nothing more... What the fuck do you believe? Oo Are you saying that evolution is a hoax? EDIT: I'm saying that when I do carbon dating, she won't be any fun if she doesn't have the rest of the elements in her.  |
|
|
|
|
Capt00
|
|
January 13, 2019, 06:16:56 AM
Last edit: January 13, 2019, 08:07:07 AM by Capt00 |
|
The theory of evolution is very questionable. I have seen a video from the facebook where a person with bone structures same as the homo Erectus exists. Here's the link. https://web.facebook.com/1271056866287197/videos/277351639597289/. As you can see in the video, the person who is dancing seems like having an issue with his physical growth. His physical development isn't normal but as Charles Darwin said that we came from a primate and homo Erectus. So why is that there's a person living with a bone structure same as the homo Erectus? Is it because these type of disorder were mistakenly recognized as our origins? what do you think? But there's no solid proof that we can believe on that post. |
|
|
|
|
|
Oxstone
|
|
January 14, 2019, 09:30:37 AM |
|
Among other things, it shows us that carbon dating is a young earth thing rather than an old earth thing.
Dude, no one is saying earth age is know through carbon dating... Carbon dating is 50k years top, nothing more... What the fuck do you believe? Oo Are you saying that evolution is a hoax? EDIT: I'm saying that when I do carbon dating, she won't be any fun if she doesn't have the rest of the elements in her. Ok you're completely dumb. Sorry for intruding. Please continue your moronic "thinking". You're not even intelligent enough to undersant age of earth is not determined with Carbon dating. |
|
|
|
|
|
Astargath
|
|
January 14, 2019, 11:59:40 AM |
|
Among other things, it shows us that carbon dating is a young earth thing rather than an old earth thing.
Dude, no one is saying earth age is know through carbon dating... Carbon dating is 50k years top, nothing more... What the fuck do you believe? Oo Are you saying that evolution is a hoax? EDIT: I'm saying that when I do carbon dating, she won't be any fun if she doesn't have the rest of the elements in her. Ok you're completely dumb. Sorry for intruding. Please continue your moronic "thinking". You're not even intelligent enough to undersant age of earth is not determined with Carbon dating. He continuously makes stupid mistakes. I have explained that to him like 2 times before and yet here he is again, saying the same stupid shit. What can you do?  |
|
|
|
|
