Evolution is a hoax

[Astargath]

Now you are starting to sound like notbatman in his flat earth thread. Gravity is not a theory. It is a fact,

Evolution and gravity are scientific theorys (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_theory) you are confusing it with the word hypothesis (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypothesis)

To say that evolution and gravity are theories is to say that they are not known to exist factually.

Gravity exists. People use it all the time everyday.

Evolution doesn't exist that we know of.

What does exist factually, badecker?

[BADecker]

Now you are starting to sound like notbatman in his flat earth thread. Gravity is not a theory. It is a fact,

Evolution and gravity are scientific theorys (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_theory) you are confusing it with the word hypothesis (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypothesis)

To say that evolution and gravity are theories is to say that they are not known to exist factually.

Gravity exists. People use it all the time everyday.

Evolution doesn't exist that we know of.

What does exist factually, badecker?

Just for you, I'll repeat it again. What factually exists is adaptation, simple change, and like-begets-like. Evolution theory evolution has not been proven.

The funny thing is that loads of evolution thinkers who talk about evolution come right out and admit that there isn't any real evidence for evolution. Of course, they hide these kinds of statements... like at the end of their books.

This is the thing that makes evolution into the hoax that it is... not that a bunch of evolutionists are trying to find some proof of it.

[af_newbie]

Now you are starting to sound like notbatman in his flat earth thread. Gravity is not a theory. It is a fact,

Evolution and gravity are scientific theorys (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_theory) you are confusing it with the word hypothesis (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypothesis)

To say that evolution and gravity are theories is to say that they are not known to exist factually.

Gravity exists. People use it all the time everyday.

Evolution doesn't exist that we know of.

What does exist factually, badecker?

Just for you, I'll repeat it again. What factually exists is adaptation, simple change, and like-begets-like. Evolution theory evolution has not been proven.

The funny thing is that loads of evolution thinkers who talk about evolution come right out and admit that there isn't any real evidence for evolution. Of course, they hide these kinds of statements... like at the end of their books.

This is the thing that makes evolution into the hoax that it is... not that a bunch of evolutionists are trying to find some proof of it.

Evolution process has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt.

Your education system has failed you.  The evidence of this is in this thread.

[BADecker]

Evolution process has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt.

Your education system has failed you.  The evidence of this is in this thread.

The evolution fictional story has absolutely been promoted. The fact that there is no proof for evolution existing in reality, is that there is no proof after decades of searching for it.

[azkielt]

Now you are starting to sound like notbatman in his flat earth thread. Gravity is not a theory. It is a fact,

Evolution and gravity are scientific theorys (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_theory) you are confusing it with the word hypothesis (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypothesis)

To say that evolution and gravity are theories is to say that they are not known to exist factually.

Gravity exists. People use it all the time everyday.

Evolution doesn't exist that we know of.

Dude read before posting the definition of theory, learn first what is a theory, a law and a hypothesis.

[Astargath]

Now you are starting to sound like notbatman in his flat earth thread. Gravity is not a theory. It is a fact,

Evolution and gravity are scientific theorys (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_theory) you are confusing it with the word hypothesis (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypothesis)

To say that evolution and gravity are theories is to say that they are not known to exist factually.

Gravity exists. People use it all the time everyday.

Evolution doesn't exist that we know of.

What does exist factually, badecker?

Just for you, I'll repeat it again. What factually exists is adaptation, simple change, and like-begets-like. Evolution theory evolution has not been proven.

The funny thing is that loads of evolution thinkers who talk about evolution come right out and admit that there isn't any real evidence for evolution. Of course, they hide these kinds of statements... like at the end of their books.

This is the thing that makes evolution into the hoax that it is... not that a bunch of evolutionists are trying to find some proof of it.

No, how do you know those factually exist and you are not wrong? You think adaption is a fact, explain why.

[BADecker]

Just for you, I'll repeat it again. What factually exists is adaptation, simple change, and like-begets-like. Evolution theory evolution has not been proven.

The funny thing is that loads of evolution thinkers who talk about evolution come right out and admit that there isn't any real evidence for evolution. Of course, they hide these kinds of statements... like at the end of their books.

This is the thing that makes evolution into the hoax that it is... not that a bunch of evolutionists are trying to find some proof of it.

No, how do you know those factually exist and you are not wrong? You think adaption is a fact, explain why.

An adaptation is a physical or behavioral characteristic that has developed to allow an organism to better survive in its environment. Adaptations are the result of evolution and may occur when a gene mutates, or changes by accident. That mutation causes the organism to better survive and reproduce, and it passes on that trait to its offspring. It can take many generations to develop an adaptation.

Note that the definition of evolution is not given in the above quote. This means that the standard definition is to be used. But the standard definition is wrong, because we have no proof of even one animal or plant ever changing into another.

Note, also, that we don't really know of any beneficial mutations. All the mutations that are clearly not beneficial are obvious. But those that look beneficial may have long-term detrimental effects. This means that we don't even know if any mutations are beneficial.

This leaves the development part of the the adaptation description. Development is something that is essentially already programmed in the DNA. Adaptation simply makes certain programming more prevalent, so that the creature involved can adapt to new surroundings or climate, etc.

Seems to me that you don't know about some of the more simple facts of life.

[BADecker]

Now you are starting to sound like notbatman in his flat earth thread. Gravity is not a theory. It is a fact,

Evolution and gravity are scientific theorys (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_theory) you are confusing it with the word hypothesis (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypothesis)

To say that evolution and gravity are theories is to say that they are not known to exist factually.

Gravity exists. People use it all the time everyday.

Evolution doesn't exist that we know of.

Dude read before posting the definition of theory, learn first what is a theory, a law and a hypothesis.

Thank you for your admonition. Do you ever follow your own admonition, yourself?

[Astargath]

Just for you, I'll repeat it again. What factually exists is adaptation, simple change, and like-begets-like. Evolution theory evolution has not been proven.

The funny thing is that loads of evolution thinkers who talk about evolution come right out and admit that there isn't any real evidence for evolution. Of course, they hide these kinds of statements... like at the end of their books.

This is the thing that makes evolution into the hoax that it is... not that a bunch of evolutionists are trying to find some proof of it.

No, how do you know those factually exist and you are not wrong? You think adaption is a fact, explain why.

An adaptation is a physical or behavioral characteristic that has developed to allow an organism to better survive in its environment. Adaptations are the result of evolution and may occur when a gene mutates, or changes by accident. That mutation causes the organism to better survive and reproduce, and it passes on that trait to its offspring. It can take many generations to develop an adaptation.

Note that the definition of evolution is not given in the above quote. This means that the standard definition is to be used. But the standard definition is wrong, because we have no proof of even one animal or plant ever changing into another.

Note, also, that we don't really know of any beneficial mutations. All the mutations that are clearly not beneficial are obvious. But those that look beneficial may have long-term detrimental effects. This means that we don't even know if any mutations are beneficial.

This leaves the development part of the the adaptation description. Development is something that is essentially already programmed in the DNA. Adaptation simply makes certain programming more prevalent, so that the creature involved can adapt to new surroundings or climate, etc.

Seems to me that you don't know about some of the more simple facts of life.

Right but how do you know adaption is a fact?

[BADecker]

Just for you, I'll repeat it again. What factually exists is adaptation, simple change, and like-begets-like. Evolution theory evolution has not been proven.

The funny thing is that loads of evolution thinkers who talk about evolution come right out and admit that there isn't any real evidence for evolution. Of course, they hide these kinds of statements... like at the end of their books.

This is the thing that makes evolution into the hoax that it is... not that a bunch of evolutionists are trying to find some proof of it.

No, how do you know those factually exist and you are not wrong? You think adaption is a fact, explain why.

An adaptation is a physical or behavioral characteristic that has developed to allow an organism to better survive in its environment. Adaptations are the result of evolution and may occur when a gene mutates, or changes by accident. That mutation causes the organism to better survive and reproduce, and it passes on that trait to its offspring. It can take many generations to develop an adaptation.

Note that the definition of evolution is not given in the above quote. This means that the standard definition is to be used. But the standard definition is wrong, because we have no proof of even one animal or plant ever changing into another.

Note, also, that we don't really know of any beneficial mutations. All the mutations that are clearly not beneficial are obvious. But those that look beneficial may have long-term detrimental effects. This means that we don't even know if any mutations are beneficial.

This leaves the development part of the the adaptation description. Development is something that is essentially already programmed in the DNA. Adaptation simply makes certain programming more prevalent, so that the creature involved can adapt to new surroundings or climate, etc.

Seems to me that you don't know about some of the more simple facts of life.

Right but how do you know adaption is a fact?

If the sum total of adaptation lies in evolution, it isn't a fact. But since it doesn't, go and investigate it so that you can tell me if it is fact or not.

Since evolution is not a fact, but it is portrayed as fact...

Evolution is a hoax.

[Astargath]

Just for you, I'll repeat it again. What factually exists is adaptation, simple change, and like-begets-like. Evolution theory evolution has not been proven.

The funny thing is that loads of evolution thinkers who talk about evolution come right out and admit that there isn't any real evidence for evolution. Of course, they hide these kinds of statements... like at the end of their books.

This is the thing that makes evolution into the hoax that it is... not that a bunch of evolutionists are trying to find some proof of it.

No, how do you know those factually exist and you are not wrong? You think adaption is a fact, explain why.

An adaptation is a physical or behavioral characteristic that has developed to allow an organism to better survive in its environment. Adaptations are the result of evolution and may occur when a gene mutates, or changes by accident. That mutation causes the organism to better survive and reproduce, and it passes on that trait to its offspring. It can take many generations to develop an adaptation.

Note that the definition of evolution is not given in the above quote. This means that the standard definition is to be used. But the standard definition is wrong, because we have no proof of even one animal or plant ever changing into another.

Note, also, that we don't really know of any beneficial mutations. All the mutations that are clearly not beneficial are obvious. But those that look beneficial may have long-term detrimental effects. This means that we don't even know if any mutations are beneficial.

This leaves the development part of the the adaptation description. Development is something that is essentially already programmed in the DNA. Adaptation simply makes certain programming more prevalent, so that the creature involved can adapt to new surroundings or climate, etc.

Seems to me that you don't know about some of the more simple facts of life.

Right but how do you know adaption is a fact?

If the sum total of adaptation lies in evolution, it isn't a fact. But since it doesn't, go and investigate it so that you can tell me if it is fact or not.

Since evolution is not a fact, but it is portrayed as fact...

Evolution is a hoax.

''go and investigate it so that you can tell me if it is fact or not.'' Well and how do you ''investigate'' something exactly, badecker, give me an exact method to investigate something and to claim it's 100% a fact, what's your method? What did you use to say adaption is a fact? Why do you consider it a fact?

[BADecker]

If the sum total of adaptation lies in evolution, it isn't a fact. But since it doesn't, go and investigate it so that you can tell me if it is fact or not.

Since evolution is not a fact, but it is portrayed as fact...

Evolution is a hoax.

''go and investigate it so that you can tell me if it is fact or not.'' Well and how do you ''investigate'' something exactly, badecker, give me an exact method to investigate something and to claim it's 100% a fact, what's your method? What did you use to say adaption is a fact? Why do you consider it a fact?

Oh, sorry. I hadn't realized that you skipped scientific investigation class in school.

 

[Astargath]

If the sum total of adaptation lies in evolution, it isn't a fact. But since it doesn't, go and investigate it so that you can tell me if it is fact or not.

Since evolution is not a fact, but it is portrayed as fact...

Evolution is a hoax.

''go and investigate it so that you can tell me if it is fact or not.'' Well and how do you ''investigate'' something exactly, badecker, give me an exact method to investigate something and to claim it's 100% a fact, what's your method? What did you use to say adaption is a fact? Why do you consider it a fact?

Oh, sorry. I hadn't realized that you skipped scientific investigation class in school.

 

So... the scientific method which you think doesn't demonstrate evolution is real?

[BADecker]

If the sum total of adaptation lies in evolution, it isn't a fact. But since it doesn't, go and investigate it so that you can tell me if it is fact or not.

Since evolution is not a fact, but it is portrayed as fact...

Evolution is a hoax.

''go and investigate it so that you can tell me if it is fact or not.'' Well and how do you ''investigate'' something exactly, badecker, give me an exact method to investigate something and to claim it's 100% a fact, what's your method? What did you use to say adaption is a fact? Why do you consider it a fact?

Oh, sorry. I hadn't realized that you skipped scientific investigation class in school.

 

So... the scientific method which you think doesn't demonstrate evolution is real?

Finally you are close to the truth. The scientific method doesn't prove evolution. Rather, evolution is merely a science fiction story that the scientific method is continually proving more incorrect, the longer it is investigated scientifically.

[Astargath]

If the sum total of adaptation lies in evolution, it isn't a fact. But since it doesn't, go and investigate it so that you can tell me if it is fact or not.

Since evolution is not a fact, but it is portrayed as fact...

Evolution is a hoax.

''go and investigate it so that you can tell me if it is fact or not.'' Well and how do you ''investigate'' something exactly, badecker, give me an exact method to investigate something and to claim it's 100% a fact, what's your method? What did you use to say adaption is a fact? Why do you consider it a fact?

Oh, sorry. I hadn't realized that you skipped scientific investigation class in school.

 

So... the scientific method which you think doesn't demonstrate evolution is real?

Finally you are close to the truth. The scientific method doesn't prove evolution. Rather, evolution is merely a science fiction story that the scientific method is continually proving more incorrect, the longer it is investigated scientifically.

''fiction story that the scientific method is continually proving more incorrect, the longer it is investigated scientifically.'' And you got to this conclusion how exactly when virtually all scientists accept it?

[BADecker]

''fiction story that the scientific method is continually proving more incorrect, the longer it is investigated scientifically.'' And you got to this conclusion how exactly when virtually all scientists accept it?

A reasonably simple and complete answer to your question exists here - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1054513.msg50459934#msg50459934.

Note that it is not known that virtually all scientists accept evolution from a standpoint of close examination. Many scientist simply state that they accept evolution, basing their statement on the idea that other scientists are accurate in their evolution studies, or that the media wouldn't lie. In addition, it's not known that the majority of scientists even state that they accept evolution.

So, are you going to post some faulty media that suggests that scientists accept evolution as you say? Such is the way that rumors keep on going. prove your media isn't lies. Do you have real scientific studies done on the opinions and statements of scientists?

[Astargath]

''fiction story that the scientific method is continually proving more incorrect, the longer it is investigated scientifically.'' And you got to this conclusion how exactly when virtually all scientists accept it?

A reasonably simple and complete answer to your question exists here - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1054513.msg50459934#msg50459934.

Note that it is not known that virtually all scientists accept evolution from a standpoint of close examination. Many scientist simply state that they accept evolution, basing their statement on the idea that other scientists are accurate in their evolution studies, or that the media wouldn't lie. In addition, it's not known that the majority of scientists even state that they accept evolution.

So, are you going to post some faulty media that suggests that scientists accept evolution as you say? Such is the way that rumors keep on going. prove your media isn't lies. Do you have real scientific studies done on the opinions and statements of scientists?

https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/02/11/darwin-day/  (''Scientists overwhelmingly agree that humans evolved over time, and most Americans are aware that this is the case.'')
https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2015/07/01/chapter-4-evolution-and-perceptions-of-scientific-consensus/
https://www.aclu.org/other/what-scientific-community-says-about-evolution-and-intelligent-design
https://ncse.com/news/2009/07/views-evolution-among-public-scientists-004904

It is quite known that almost all scientists accept evolution, you don't even need the studies, that exist, to know this, you can watch any program, any tv show, anything really that has scientists or some science in it and you will see all of them accept evolution.

[Vod]

Every day humans prove evolution, by mating two animals and creating a new one.

The Creation hoax can't prove anything . 

[markstivn98]

Why there are still monkeys around if they were part of our evolutionary beginnings ?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cz0gFarCfBE

I do not believe in this theory.
I do not think it's true.
But if we assume it may be because it is an incomplete hypothesis
We may be other monkeys.
All of this species has evolved to humans

[BADecker]

Every day humans prove evolution, by mating two animals and creating a new one.

The Creation hoax can't prove anything . 

The simple word "evolution" can be applied to all kinds of things. But evolution theory evolution (ETE) can't be shown to be true until there is proof that one kind of animal changed into another kind of animal over thousands of years.

The only way we presently know how to do this accurately is through DNA sampling. But you can't sample DNA from animals that haven't existed for thousands of years without a time machine to go back there to get samples.

Scientists know this, yet they emphatically state that ETE is true and real when they know that they don't really know such. This is the thing that turns evolution into a hoax.