I ask you to signed a message from an old STAKE ADDRESS which your are failed to deliver, If you can signed from an OLD STAKE ADDRESS,
i will accept you with open arms... 
=================
UPDATES: 09/02/2017
I will keep the thread open for the next 12 more Hours, after that i will close it temporarily to focused on the current applications and i will open this thread again after the next airdrop. If you have friends, relatives, wife, son, daughter that got banned please let them know about this updates and ask them to post here for review. We will follow the
ONION forum timestamp,.. 12 hours countdown start from this post.
https://deeponion.org/community/threads/banned-support-12-hours-deadline.1446/thank you
Same happens with me.
Xsinx asked me to signed a message from and old stake address. I didn't know that I should stake my address to prove my identity. I stake my address at that time and send him the link to thread. He asked me again sign a message. When I signed he said:
You just posted an stake address today, that doest prove anything, anyway, here's the results
Sorry but i have to deny your applications, we are just preventing people that bought accounts just to enter the airdrop.
You can join other campaign in the ALTCOIN Section. GoodLuck..
Now, If it is the only way to prove that a particular account belong to someone? Then every bitcointalk account must go through this security check.My first post to this bitcointalk account is on
June 28, 2017. Upto July 9,2017 I have more than 14 posts. I become Jr. Member on July 20, 2017. I come to know about deeponion when I browse the Announcements (Altcoins) thread on August 11. If I know earlier I would join after July 20, 2017.
I never need this bitcointalk account for posting. I just come here looking for information once in a while if required not more. I bought BTC from zebpay.com (it is an indian bitcoin buy-sell exchange) since 1 year. I have my coinbase account since 2013. There are only 0.000134 BTC since November 2013. The problem with coinbase account is you can not sign any message at moment. I have also blockchain.info account since 2013 but there is no transaction at that time. Only recently I have some NVST attached with this account. After crypto boom in April my interest rises in Alt-coins. I forgot my password of bitcointalk account and recover it on 23 June, 2017. I tried it earlier but server has some problem and do not sent the recover mail after several attempts. I got recovery e-mail from bitcointalk.org on 23 June, 2017 finally.
If I know this (retaining of favorite account) would be the reason in future (by the way I do not have a time machine) to deny me for anything, I must made a new account at that time. But, I love this userId "sonulrk" hence recovered t. Why? you may ask! My name is
Lalit
Kapoor, my father's first name is
Raj and my nick name is
sonu. So, SONU L R K.
Hence Mine:
gmail account:
sonulrk@gmail.comyahoo account:
sonulrk@yahoo.co.inrediffmail account:
sonulrk@rediffmail.comfacebook account: sonulrk
twitter account: sonulrk
google+ account: sonulrk
gatehub account (ripple): sonulrk (earlier ~sonulrk and now +sonulrk are the names of my ripple account)
stackoverflow account: sonulrk
I am a chess player (CC and OTB both): I have AICCF and ICCF account which are linked with
sonulrk@gmail.com since 2010. I also have same name (sonulrk) for chess.com, Fide Arena, chesstempo.com.
All above account are several years old.
deeponion account: Lalit Kapoor (less than week old, I thought I should write my name) -Edited
Reddit account: sonulrk (less than 1 month old)
github account: sonulrk (Since earlier June, because I had problem with geth)
I also have pgp signature attached to
sonulrk@gmail.com since 18-03-2013 which is signed by pgp global verification key. I staked that signature yesterday at
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1159946.287 to eliminate future problems.
Above RANT is here because I was not satisfied by reason given to me and to show the developers that their intention might be good to avoid cheater, manipulaters, multi-account holders, bought account holders. but way they execute things and logic they give could be better. They can simply use their veto power to allow or deny anyone or told us that no account would be allowed which is wake up since a particular date or sleeping period is more than particular time. It would be better and DO price could be better. You will succeed if community is with you else there several hundreds shit-coin launched every month.
At last I challenge (for my airdrop 561 Onions) anyone to prove that this BCT account is not mine since its creation, I will give you all my onion. But if you could not prove then you have to give me the same amount.
Good Day.
Regards,
Lalit
PS: Everybody who is denied MAY not be a cheater.Sorry guys if I have to say that this community is more and more looking like a sect.
People begging for the dev's mercy, people terrorized to speak out for fear of getting thrown out of the airdrop.
Only one of these two cases can be valid:
1. DeepOnion belongs to the dev
2. DeepOnion belongs to the community
If the first case is true, sorry guys, game over, no future possible for this coin.
If the second case is true, DeepOnion is launched towards a bright future.
We all hope the second case is true. But...
There are rules in this airdrop, and they must be respected.
But this applies also for the dev team.
While it is wise and it is correct to throw out cheaters, the ax MUST NOT hit ANY innocent.
If the dev wipes out of the community even ONE single innocent member, HE is breaking the rules that HE has set and that the community had adopted. If DeepOnion belongs to the community, the dev has no moral right to throw out innocents. Evidence is suggesting that this is now happening, because of arbitrary and, alas, malfunctioning criteria of judgment.
The real problem is that once the dev team starts breaking the community rules by throwing out innocents, it encourages (and BTW legitimates) honest people who have been unrightfully punished, to start cheating.
As you can well imagine, this would not be in the best interest of the community.
So I hope the dev team will be MUCH more careful than it has been until now in avoiding to harm even ONE single member of their community, if they don't want to run the risk of destroying it.
