[ANN] [IML] [ICO] IMMLA - First International MultiModal Logistic Application

[immla]

it was ok, kinda shows that there are real people behind your project. they could be better at speaking english tho. nice video overall

Thank you! We'll improve our English!

[blurryeyed]

Ambisafe Inc. finished an audit of the IMMLA Presale Token Smart Contract!

"Contract code is kept simple and as such increases confidence. There is only one external call from the contract which is sending ether to escrow account. Escrow account must be tested for the possibility of accepting ETH through a send() function, otherwise, if it will fail to receive ETH, all the collected funds will be locked", - states Ambisafe.

No places in code of Smart Contract were identified as critical issues.

Ambisafe? Ambiscam more like. They are responsible for many ICO scams including Orocrypt, Taas, Cryptocarbon, Polybius etc. I guess we can now add IMMLA to their multiple scam list then.

[labuan]

Morning, IMMLA! I see you've already raised 1331 ETH . Quite promising...Is there a limit of ETH after which you'll close the pre-ICO stage?

So minimum target already raised,hope imla will fas goal target?

[immla]

Morning, IMMLA! I see you've already raised 1331 ETH . Quite promising...Is there a limit of ETH after which you'll close the pre-ICO stage?

Yes, it is 2 747 ETH. Now it's almost 50%. Join us!

[Mikhail_A_iml]

Morning, IMMLA! I see you've already raised 1331 ETH . Quite promising...Is there a limit of ETH after which you'll close the pre-ICO stage?

Yes, sure - 2 747 Eth is limit for pre-ICO (all info is here https://immla.io/IMMLA_WP.pdf )

[immla]

Ambisafe Inc. finished an audit of the IMMLA Presale Token Smart Contract!

"Contract code is kept simple and as such increases confidence. There is only one external call from the contract which is sending ether to escrow account. Escrow account must be tested for the possibility of accepting ETH through a send() function, otherwise, if it will fail to receive ETH, all the collected funds will be locked", - states Ambisafe.

No places in code of Smart Contract were identified as critical issues.

Ambisafe? Ambiscam more like. They are responsible for many ICO scams including Orocrypt, Taas, Cryptocarbon, Polybius etc. I guess we can now add IMMLA to their multiple scam list then.

Please recommend other auditor and explain why you trust it. It is interesting also how audit of a contact is related to a product and to a team of a project.

[immla]

Ambisafe Inc. finished an audit of the IMMLA Presale Token Smart Contract!

"Contract code is kept simple and as such increases confidence. There is only one external call from the contract which is sending ether to escrow account. Escrow account must be tested for the possibility of accepting ETH through a send() function, otherwise, if it will fail to receive ETH, all the collected funds will be locked", - states Ambisafe.

No places in code of Smart Contract were identified as critical issues.

Ambisafe? Ambiscam more like. They are responsible for many ICO scams including Orocrypt, Taas, Cryptocarbon, Polybius etc. I guess we can now add IMMLA to their multiple scam list then.

Moreover, Ambisafe is not a part of our team or our project. We worked with them only during the audit. During our work we suggested them as responsible people who value their reputation.

Our code is available on github. So you can check it, you can make your own audit.

[Mikhail_A_iml]

Morning, IMMLA! I see you've already raised 1331 ETH . Quite promising...Is there a limit of ETH after which you'll close the pre-ICO stage?

So minimum target already raised,hope imla will fas goal target?

Since investors are interesting in maximum results from IMMLA, IMMLA is interesting in maximum results on both pre-ICO and ICO. More investments mean more great proffessionals in team, more profitable platform, more incom for investors, less time for market implementations of IMMLA solutions. So we're keep going forward.

[blurryeyed]

Ambisafe Inc. finished an audit of the IMMLA Presale Token Smart Contract!

"Contract code is kept simple and as such increases confidence. There is only one external call from the contract which is sending ether to escrow account. Escrow account must be tested for the possibility of accepting ETH through a send() function, otherwise, if it will fail to receive ETH, all the collected funds will be locked", - states Ambisafe.

No places in code of Smart Contract were identified as critical issues.

Ambisafe? Ambiscam more like. They are responsible for many ICO scams including Orocrypt, Taas, Cryptocarbon, Polybius etc. I guess we can now add IMMLA to their multiple scam list then.

Moreover, Ambisafe is not a part of our team or our project. We worked with them only during the audit. During our work we suggested them as responsible people who value their reputation.

Our code is available on github. So you can check it, you can make your own audit.

So why use known & proven scammers to "audit" your code, like some kind of endorsement?

[immla]

Ambisafe Inc. finished an audit of the IMMLA Presale Token Smart Contract!

"Contract code is kept simple and as such increases confidence. There is only one external call from the contract which is sending ether to escrow account. Escrow account must be tested for the possibility of accepting ETH through a send() function, otherwise, if it will fail to receive ETH, all the collected funds will be locked", - states Ambisafe.

No places in code of Smart Contract were identified as critical issues.

Ambisafe? Ambiscam more like. They are responsible for many ICO scams including Orocrypt, Taas, Cryptocarbon, Polybius etc. I guess we can now add IMMLA to their multiple scam list then.

Moreover, Ambisafe is not a part of our team or our project. We worked with them only during the audit. During our work we suggested them as responsible people who value their reputation.

Our code is available on github. So you can check it, you can make your own audit.

So why use known & proven scammers to "audit" your code, like some kind of endorsement?

Sorry, as I wrote you, we didn't suggest Ambisafe as "scammers" during our work with them. They did an audit of our code, and that's all. It's your opinion, we have our own on basis of our experience of cooperation with Ambisafe.

[OlegGichan_05]

Ambisafe Inc. finished an audit of the IMMLA Presale Token Smart Contract!

"Contract code is kept simple and as such increases confidence. There is only one external call from the contract which is sending ether to escrow account. Escrow account must be tested for the possibility of accepting ETH through a send() function, otherwise, if it will fail to receive ETH, all the collected funds will be locked", - states Ambisafe.

No places in code of Smart Contract were identified as critical issues.

Ambisafe? Ambiscam more like. They are responsible for many ICO scams including Orocrypt, Taas, Cryptocarbon, Polybius etc. I guess we can now add IMMLA to their multiple scam list then.

Moreover, Ambisafe is not a part of our team or our project. We worked with them only during the audit. During our work we suggested them as responsible people who value their reputation.

Our code is available on github. So you can check it, you can make your own audit.

So why use known & proven scammers to "audit" your code, like some kind of endorsement?

Sorry, as I wrote you, we didn't suggest Ambisafe as "scammers" during our work with them. They did an audit of our code, and that's all. It's your opinion, we have our own on basis of our experience of cooperation with Ambisafe.

Well, you can't rely solely on one company (like Ambisafe) to conduct some audit. Real investors perform proper due diligence of the project beforehand: financial model, team, how perspective an idea is, etc.
IMMLA, who are your main competitors?

[blurryeyed]

Ambisafe Inc. finished an audit of the IMMLA Presale Token Smart Contract!

"Contract code is kept simple and as such increases confidence. There is only one external call from the contract which is sending ether to escrow account. Escrow account must be tested for the possibility of accepting ETH through a send() function, otherwise, if it will fail to receive ETH, all the collected funds will be locked", - states Ambisafe.

No places in code of Smart Contract were identified as critical issues.

Ambisafe? Ambiscam more like. They are responsible for many ICO scams including Orocrypt, Taas, Cryptocarbon, Polybius etc. I guess we can now add IMMLA to their multiple scam list then.

Moreover, Ambisafe is not a part of our team or our project. We worked with them only during the audit. During our work we suggested them as responsible people who value their reputation.

Our code is available on github. So you can check it, you can make your own audit.

So why use known & proven scammers to "audit" your code, like some kind of endorsement?

Sorry, as I wrote you, we didn't suggest Ambisafe as "scammers" during our work with them. They did an audit of our code, and that's all. It's your opinion, we have our own on basis of our experience of cooperation with Ambisafe.

So you were unaware that Ambisafe were responsible for various scam ICO's like BitCAD, Orocrypt, Polybius, Taas, InChain etc before asking them to review your code? Didn't you check to make sure they are legit first?

Who did you contact at Ambisafe?
Who at Ambisafe done your code "audit"?
Ambisafe are responsible for many forum users getting scammed, maybe you can post your contact details for them?

[Mikhail_A_iml]

Ambisafe Inc. finished an audit of the IMMLA Presale Token Smart Contract!

"Contract code is kept simple and as such increases confidence. There is only one external call from the contract which is sending ether to escrow account. Escrow account must be tested for the possibility of accepting ETH through a send() function, otherwise, if it will fail to receive ETH, all the collected funds will be locked", - states Ambisafe.

No places in code of Smart Contract were identified as critical issues.

Ambisafe? Ambiscam more like. They are responsible for many ICO scams including Orocrypt, Taas, Cryptocarbon, Polybius etc. I guess we can now add IMMLA to their multiple scam list then.

Moreover, Ambisafe is not a part of our team or our project. We worked with them only during the audit. During our work we suggested them as responsible people who value their reputation.

Our code is available on github. So you can check it, you can make your own audit.

So why use known & proven scammers to "audit" your code, like some kind of endorsement?

Sorry, as I wrote you, we didn't suggest Ambisafe as "scammers" during our work with them. They did an audit of our code, and that's all. It's your opinion, we have our own on basis of our experience of cooperation with Ambisafe.

Well, you can't rely solely on one company (like Ambisafe) to conduct some audit. Real investors perform proper due diligence of the project beforehand: financial model, team, how perspective an idea is, etc.
IMMLA, who are your main competitors?

We met with some of BIG-4 in advance, but they still are not sure how to make duedill for a companies who goes to ICO capmpaign. Everybody is wating for a clear regulations, so we are.
Moreover we know, that there are investors with Big-4 background among IMMLA's ones.

We're waiting for strong competition, but we don't see the multimodal+blockchain competitors right now. But know about some R&D teams. We're looking at convoy.com (USA) and icandeliver.ru (Russia), but they both operate on the trucking market. We do like vesetvsem.ru (Urban logistics). So the market is very fragmented, but there is no the platform who makes the global multimodal solution.

[Mikhail_A_iml]

Ambisafe Inc. finished an audit of the IMMLA Presale Token Smart Contract!

"Contract code is kept simple and as such increases confidence. There is only one external call from the contract which is sending ether to escrow account. Escrow account must be tested for the possibility of accepting ETH through a send() function, otherwise, if it will fail to receive ETH, all the collected funds will be locked", - states Ambisafe.

No places in code of Smart Contract were identified as critical issues.

Ambisafe? Ambiscam more like. They are responsible for many ICO scams including Orocrypt, Taas, Cryptocarbon, Polybius etc. I guess we can now add IMMLA to their multiple scam list then.

Moreover, Ambisafe is not a part of our team or our project. We worked with them only during the audit. During our work we suggested them as responsible people who value their reputation.

Our code is available on github. So you can check it, you can make your own audit.

So why use known & proven scammers to "audit" your code, like some kind of endorsement?

Sorry, as I wrote you, we didn't suggest Ambisafe as "scammers" during our work with them. They did an audit of our code, and that's all. It's your opinion, we have our own on basis of our experience of cooperation with Ambisafe.

So you were unaware that Ambisafe were responsible for various scam ICO's like BitCAD, Orocrypt, Polybius, Taas, InChain etc before asking them to review your code? Didn't you check to make sure they are legit first?

Who did you contact at Ambisafe?
Who at Ambisafe done your code "audit"?
Ambisafe are responsible for many forum users getting scammed, maybe you can post your contact details for them?

Hi Blurryeyed, have all of these companies in your list dissapeared from the market with the investors money?

[blurryeyed]

Ambisafe Inc. finished an audit of the IMMLA Presale Token Smart Contract!

"Contract code is kept simple and as such increases confidence. There is only one external call from the contract which is sending ether to escrow account. Escrow account must be tested for the possibility of accepting ETH through a send() function, otherwise, if it will fail to receive ETH, all the collected funds will be locked", - states Ambisafe.

No places in code of Smart Contract were identified as critical issues.

Ambisafe? Ambiscam more like. They are responsible for many ICO scams including Orocrypt, Taas, Cryptocarbon, Polybius etc. I guess we can now add IMMLA to their multiple scam list then.

Moreover, Ambisafe is not a part of our team or our project. We worked with them only during the audit. During our work we suggested them as responsible people who value their reputation.

Our code is available on github. So you can check it, you can make your own audit.

So why use known & proven scammers to "audit" your code, like some kind of endorsement?

Sorry, as I wrote you, we didn't suggest Ambisafe as "scammers" during our work with them. They did an audit of our code, and that's all. It's your opinion, we have our own on basis of our experience of cooperation with Ambisafe.

So you were unaware that Ambisafe were responsible for various scam ICO's like BitCAD, Orocrypt, Polybius, Taas, InChain etc before asking them to review your code? Didn't you check to make sure they are legit first?

Who did you contact at Ambisafe?
Who at Ambisafe done your code "audit"?
Ambisafe are responsible for many forum users getting scammed, maybe you can post your contact details for them?

Hi Blurryeyed, have all of these companies in your list dissapeared from the market with the investors money?

Yes, in various ways, check for yourself.

Will you answer the questions please?

[akhavr]

Guys, fix spelling errors in the Whitepaper:

* Pproblem of trust solution
* As to legal status of cryptocurrencies, is is accurate to say

Questions:

> AII payments through IMMLA service will Ьe performed in a
single currency- IMMLA token.

What about IMMLA volatility?  Won't it be larger than fiat currency volatility?

> Selection of applicable work schemes

"Work schemes" isn't defined in Terms&Definitions.

Last 3 lines of business process map mention "modules" instead of action/processes that are performed.

Thanks.

[Mikhail_A_iml]

Ambisafe Inc. finished an audit of the IMMLA Presale Token Smart Contract!

"Contract code is kept simple and as such increases confidence. There is only one external call from the contract which is sending ether to escrow account. Escrow account must be tested for the possibility of accepting ETH through a send() function, otherwise, if it will fail to receive ETH, all the collected funds will be locked", - states Ambisafe.

No places in code of Smart Contract were identified as critical issues.

Ambisafe? Ambiscam more like. They are responsible for many ICO scams including Orocrypt, Taas, Cryptocarbon, Polybius etc. I guess we can now add IMMLA to their multiple scam list then.

Moreover, Ambisafe is not a part of our team or our project. We worked with them only during the audit. During our work we suggested them as responsible people who value their reputation.

Our code is available on github. So you can check it, you can make your own audit.

So why use known & proven scammers to "audit" your code, like some kind of endorsement?

Could you pls give us all the links regarding theirs misdemeanours. If all you're telling here is realy crime but not the "black PR" of/or competitors, we'll be seeking another auditors for our smart contracts. Moreover, we'll be thankful for any recomendations re this issue.

IMMLA is absolutely clear and transparent project and wy're concerned about our reputation and reputation of our business enviorenment since both of our high-reputation team and IMMLA consortium participants.

[blurryeyed]

IMMLA is absolutely clear and transparent project...

Glad to hear it. So you will answer my questions then?

[mekar sari]

Bounty signature is very interesting, but very unfortunate because I have chosen bitjob project as signature, hope other time I can join your campaign, good luck

You can follow it later once ICO or bitjob project is done, you have earned a steady income.

Yes I hope so, although I can participate at the end of the campaign, I will complete the terms as much as possible, in pre-ICO they managed to collect substantial funds, this project is obviously going to be a success, nice IML

[Mikhail_A_iml]

Yes, in various ways, check for yourself.

Will you answer the questions please?
[/quote]

Hi blurryeyed


Ambisafe company was recommended to us as a good reputation auditor with a big . Our Moscow branch has communicated with theirs proffessionals, but the contact details are both the private and confidence information. You may find all the info on the www.ambisafe.co
You may ask them also about the details of our audit.
My contact and contact of our team you may also find out on our web-site immla.io or on our team-members video with all linedin accounts within it.

If you called anybody as scammer you should have the strong evidences for that. Not just the words. If Ambisafe would be scammers a lot of links should be available in the net. But there is a silence in Google or yandex

https://www.google.ru/search?ie=UTF-8&hl=ru&q=ambisafe%20scammers&gws_rd=ssl#newwindow=1&hl=ru&q=ambisafe+scammers

https://yandex.ru/search/?text=ambisafe%20scammers&lr=2&clid=2270455&win=245&rnd=78058

You are the first I've met with such an opinion.  Please, give us the proof links about that auditors scam, because that is very hard indictment and we need to revise our cooperation.