|
Islapdonkey
|
 |
August 20, 2017, 10:20:41 PM |
|
Am willing to sell 25k out of my stash. 450sat you either pay for escrow or send btc first. The rule does not apply to sr members in good standing i.e (no negative trust) and up. Send PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unlike traditional banking where clients have only a few account numbers, with Bitcoin people can create an unlimited number of accounts (addresses). This can be used to easily track payments, and it improves anonymity.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
onlytemporary
Full Member
 Offline
Activity: 420
Merit: 101
I am the original miningteam23
|
|
August 20, 2017, 10:22:30 PM |
|
Rebranding I have the intention of rebranding TME under a different, better name. This would likely not occur for 6-12 months. A snapshot of holdings and genesis batches would be taken, and a newer contract deployed.
This would also give the opportunity to make the base token fully compatible and have it implement totalSupply(). This would allow the base token to be traded on EtherDelta and other decentralized exchanges. The situation with Nova has brought to my attention that using only centralized exchanges to trade puts the token holders at the mercy of exchange issues. Exchanges Although I understand the desire to trade, I think that the value of the base token should be based on the delivery of a service. Therefore I am advocating to wait until the new service is released and the base token rebranded to trade the base token. If an exchange picks TME up in the meantime, that is fine. If the community wants to work to put TME on more exchanges, they can. I do understand that NovaExchange gained TME a lot of publicity. "A snapshot of holdings and genesis batches would be taken", does that mean we'd have to do anything on our end to get this coin if say we are storing everything in myetherwallet? My concern is forgetting to come back in 6 months then finding out that I missed my chance to convert TME to x other coin all due to not checking this forum everyday. No need to do anything. So does that mean it'll show up in myetherwallet (or whatever wallet being used) automatically as a new token? You'll send the equivalent (or maybe double  ) of this new token to all the addresses that currently own TME? If this is implemented, it will be automatic. Everyone will have equivalent holdings and genesis holders will have the same number of unused batches at the upload of the new contract. This is relatively far down the road right now, but I believe it's important to consider. Thanks for the update. It sounds like it would be a pretty painless transition for the genesis account holders. That's always a good thing.  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
tinyteapot
|
|
August 20, 2017, 10:38:07 PM |
|
If this is implemented, it will be automatic. Everyone will have equivalent holdings and genesis holders will have the same number of unused batches at the upload of the new contract. This is relatively far down the road right now, but I believe it's important to consider.
This will really help people who are not tech guy to easily generate their YME.
I read at Novaexchange that tme shall be delisted due to issues unless the matter is addressed by the dev; what have you done towards this problem.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TimereumDev (OP)
|
|
August 20, 2017, 10:43:54 PM |
|
If this is implemented, it will be automatic. Everyone will have equivalent holdings and genesis holders will have the same number of unused batches at the upload of the new contract. This is relatively far down the road right now, but I believe it's important to consider.
This will really help people who are not tech guy to easily generate their YME.
I read at Novaexchange that tme shall be delisted due to issues unless the matter is addressed by the dev; what have you done towards this problem.
I've emailed them multiple times offering help. They claimed that deposits were occasionally getting "stuck." Nova did not seem to want to investigate (citing lack of time). It's unclear to me why TME was able to trade fine until they delisted it. |
|
|
|
|
ArkMage
|
|
August 20, 2017, 10:50:29 PM |
|
The service in the roadmap is the current next step.
That 6-12 months number is for the step after the service.
Really good to hear that! I'm so tired of ICOs around. I wish we can get a nice project without ICO. I have a very good feeling about TME! |
|
|
|
Daedalus27
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 167
Merit: 100
The Matrix lost my mind through the cracks!
|
|
August 20, 2017, 11:12:20 PM |
|
If this is implemented, it will be automatic. Everyone will have equivalent holdings and genesis holders will have the same number of unused batches at the upload of the new contract. This is relatively far down the road right now, but I believe it's important to consider.
This will really help people who are not tech guy to easily generate their YME.
I read at Novaexchange that tme shall be delisted due to issues unless the matter is addressed by the dev; what have you done towards this problem.
I've emailed them multiple times offering help. They claimed that deposits were occasionally getting "stuck." Nova did not seem to want to investigate (citing lack of time). It's unclear to me why TME was able to trade fine until they delisted it. This information provided by the Timereum Dev is good because it gets to the issue. The issue: NovaExchange is not helping Timereum (TME) and short changing (causing loss of funds) to TME traders. I am dissappointed in NovaExchange for this. TME easily had potential to reach 5000 sats + but technical issues and Novaexchange delisting stopped this coin being successful. TME traders should complain to NovaExchange? |
|
|
|
|
|
Adriano2010
|
|
August 20, 2017, 11:25:52 PM |
|
Dev any answer from other exchanges(shapeshift..)? Cryptopia can be a solution but i don't know if we can gather fast fee to pay.
Do you want to rewrite full code for TME or for new lending tokens?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coiner_
|
|
August 20, 2017, 11:30:30 PM |
|
I've been saying this for 10 pages now and that was when the daily volume was significant. Now that it's 0, good luck with question 9. I did try to get in contact with them but their contact form is in Chinese so no luck. |
|
|
|
|
|
sammrheza
|
|
August 20, 2017, 11:39:16 PM |
|
so we need to wait approx. 6 - 12 months to trade tme after rebranding ?  , quite a long time |
|
|
|
|
|
TimereumDev (OP)
|
|
August 20, 2017, 11:48:45 PM |
|
Dev any answer from other exchanges(shapeshift..)? Cryptopia can be a solution but i don't know if we can gather fast fee to pay.
Do you want to rewrite full code for TME or for new lending tokens?
No word from Shapeshift yet. I think at some point renaming TME and making it fully ERC-20 compatible will save a lot of trouble later on. Shouldn't be a problem for places like Cryptopia or Livecoin, but in the long run will be a good idea. The lending token service is being developed. |
|
|
|
|
TimereumDev (OP)
|
|
August 20, 2017, 11:52:36 PM |
|
so we need to wait approx. 6 - 12 months to trade tme after rebranding ? , quite a long time I'm not opposed to putting it on another exchange if a good alternative is found. |
|
|
|
|
Adriano2010
|
|
August 20, 2017, 11:55:54 PM |
|
Dev any answer from other exchanges(shapeshift..)? Cryptopia can be a solution but i don't know if we can gather fast fee to pay.
Do you want to rewrite full code for TME or for new lending tokens?
No word from Shapeshift yet. I think at some point renaming TME and making it fully ERC-20 compatible will save a lot of trouble later on. Shouldn't be a problem for places like Cryptopia or Livecoin, but in the long run will be a good idea. The lending token service is being developed. We should donate to gather funds for cryptopia then because livecoin fee is too high now (4 BTC). |
|
|
|
|
|
Glok17
|
|
August 21, 2017, 12:19:53 AM |
|
Dev any answer from other exchanges(shapeshift..)? Cryptopia can be a solution but i don't know if we can gather fast fee to pay.
Do you want to rewrite full code for TME or for new lending tokens?
No word from Shapeshift yet. I think at some point renaming TME and making it fully ERC-20 compatible will save a lot of trouble later on. Shouldn't be a problem for places like Cryptopia or Livecoin, but in the long run will be a good idea. The lending token service is being developed. Can you please explain what kind of problems Nova could have with TME? Are these specific problems? Did Nova contact you to solve the problems? I would be really glad if we can get TME listed on Cryptopia. |
|
|
|
xiaohang07
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 392
Merit: 253
Open and Transparent Science Powered By Blockchain
|
|
August 21, 2017, 12:48:49 AM |
|
Rebranding I have the intention of rebranding TME under a different, better name. This would likely not occur for 6-12 months. A snapshot of holdings and genesis batches would be taken, and a newer contract deployed.
This would also give the opportunity to make the base token fully compatible and have it implement totalSupply(). This would allow the base token to be traded on EtherDelta and other decentralized exchanges. The situation with Nova has brought to my attention that using only centralized exchanges to trade puts the token holders at the mercy of exchange issues. Exchanges Although I understand the desire to trade, I think that the value of the base token should be based on the delivery of a service. Therefore I am advocating to wait until the new service is released and the base token rebranded to trade the base token. If an exchange picks TME up in the meantime, that is fine. If the community wants to work to put TME on more exchanges, they can. I do understand that NovaExchange gained TME a lot of publicity. "A snapshot of holdings and genesis batches would be taken", does that mean we'd have to do anything on our end to get this coin if say we are storing everything in myetherwallet? My concern is forgetting to come back in 6 months then finding out that I missed my chance to convert TME to x other coin all due to not checking this forum everyday. No need to do anything. So does that mean it'll show up in myetherwallet (or whatever wallet being used) automatically as a new token? You'll send the equivalent (or maybe double ) of this new token to all the addresses that currently own TME? Really good to hear that! This is truely a timely update. It is nice if TME can be traded on another exchange. |
|
|
|
|
TimereumDev (OP)
|
|
August 21, 2017, 12:56:35 AM |
|
Dev any answer from other exchanges(shapeshift..)? Cryptopia can be a solution but i don't know if we can gather fast fee to pay.
Do you want to rewrite full code for TME or for new lending tokens?
No word from Shapeshift yet. I think at some point renaming TME and making it fully ERC-20 compatible will save a lot of trouble later on. Shouldn't be a problem for places like Cryptopia or Livecoin, but in the long run will be a good idea. The lending token service is being developed. Can you please explain what kind of problems Nova could have with TME? Are these specific problems? Did Nova contact you to solve the problems? I would be really glad if we can get TME listed on Cryptopia. After contacting Nova, Nova informed me of the problem, but as of yet has not moved forward to solve the problem (despite my request to do so). According to Nova, deposits were getting "stuck." That is all the information I have. I have three guesses as to why this might be: 1. TME's transfer function is slightly more expensive than average, due to the parent-child checks. If an insufficient amount of gas were provided, a withdrawal transaction could run out of gas and the deposit would appear "stuck." This seems like a trivial problem to solve, however. 2. Lack of full ERC-20 compatibility. Without knowing exactly how Nova's wallet is managed under the hood, it's not possible to know whether this had a role or not. 3. High volume. Just another guess. |
|
|
|
|
albrots
|
|
August 21, 2017, 01:00:59 AM |
|
Dev any answer from other exchanges(shapeshift..)? Cryptopia can be a solution but i don't know if we can gather fast fee to pay.
Do you want to rewrite full code for TME or for new lending tokens?
No word from Shapeshift yet. I think at some point renaming TME and making it fully ERC-20 compatible will save a lot of trouble later on. Shouldn't be a problem for places like Cryptopia or Livecoin, but in the long run will be a good idea. The lending token service is being developed. Can you please explain what kind of problems Nova could have with TME? Are these specific problems? Did Nova contact you to solve the problems? I would be really glad if we can get TME listed on Cryptopia. After contacting Nova, Nova informed me of the problem, but as of yet has not moved forward to solve the problem (despite my request to do so). According to Nova, deposits were getting "stuck." That is all the information I have. I have three guesses as to why this might be: 1. TME's transfer function is slightly more expensive than average, due to the parent-child checks. If an insufficient amount of gas were provided, a withdrawal transaction could run out of gas and the deposit would appear "stuck." This seems like a trivial problem to solve, however. 2. Lack of full ERC-20 compatibility. Without knowing exactly how Nova's wallet is managed under the hood, it's not possible to know whether this had a role or not. 3. High volume. Just another guess. how about many user are invested there *nova* they can't withdraw their TME totally |
|
|
|
|
|
TimereumDev (OP)
|
|
August 21, 2017, 01:13:48 AM |
|
Dev any answer from other exchanges(shapeshift..)? Cryptopia can be a solution but i don't know if we can gather fast fee to pay.
Do you want to rewrite full code for TME or for new lending tokens?
No word from Shapeshift yet. I think at some point renaming TME and making it fully ERC-20 compatible will save a lot of trouble later on. Shouldn't be a problem for places like Cryptopia or Livecoin, but in the long run will be a good idea. The lending token service is being developed. Can you please explain what kind of problems Nova could have with TME? Are these specific problems? Did Nova contact you to solve the problems? I would be really glad if we can get TME listed on Cryptopia. After contacting Nova, Nova informed me of the problem, but as of yet has not moved forward to solve the problem (despite my request to do so). According to Nova, deposits were getting "stuck." That is all the information I have. I have three guesses as to why this might be: 1. TME's transfer function is slightly more expensive than average, due to the parent-child checks. If an insufficient amount of gas were provided, a withdrawal transaction could run out of gas and the deposit would appear "stuck." This seems like a trivial problem to solve, however. 2. Lack of full ERC-20 compatibility. Without knowing exactly how Nova's wallet is managed under the hood, it's not possible to know whether this had a role or not. 3. High volume. Just another guess. how about many user are invested there *nova* they can't withdraw their TME totally I do not think TME will be "lost" to any Nova accounts. If anyone is having trouble withdrawing TME I would like to know that, however, as that could help show what the problem is. I'm not receiving any communication from Nova (as of today), so this is sort of a black box problem at this point. |
|
|
|
|
ever_3x
|
|
August 21, 2017, 01:18:33 AM |
|
i am withdrawall my TME to myetherwallet no problem it is save now in myether |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
