Stake.com - The Leading Crypto Casino - Drake, UFC, Everton, Stake F1 Team

[ryzaadit]

-snip-

Using 8 Deck with 52 cards/for each deck.

About RTP for each bet you made, you can freely to check on setting. If you don't believe with their information, then you can freely to avoid any game. Honestly, what we can do about gambling is trusting on the platform.

Even we all-know, in gambling psychology while you on losing is always have some mind (We're been cheating).

[1715539892]

1715539892

[1715539892]

1715539892

[1715539892]

1715539892

[1715539892]

1715539892

[1715539892]

1715539892

[piebeyb]

Today my weekly claim 40$

Guess what? another good streak & section again this time, from 40$ weekly claim amount. I win more than 4500$, with 40$ + all-in 1x time and playing normal bet after got 80$ amount.

It's really crazy streak this time.

as you previously told me, playing all in with money for free never hurts than having to bet using personal pocket money but betting a little will be a waste of time, your luck playing there and winning big money, I'm not a lover of blackjack but at least it can be My motivation is to play other casinos in Stake to seek other luck, whatever it is congratulations on your victory

[o48o]

-snip-

Just play with "Basic-Strategy" blackjack.

I had to google "black jack strategy" for that. Yes i am a noob in this game as i always thought it was profitable only for card counters. This is easier then i thought, i might give it a go during next week.

However, If you start with low amount example like me 40$ you need to manage the balance into more than 100-200$ then you can start a bet normally (I most the time with all-in with 2-3x time). Next, once you get the balance you should using Momentum Strategy
-cut-

I see, but wouldn't that tactic only works when you stop at the right time, just like in martingale?
And that right time could be after one hand because we can't predict the future hands. But i admit it would be the fastest way to raise the pot in blackjack.
Anyway, i appreciate that you explained it, and congratz, there's always good to have some extra spending money for christmas.

[Saint-loup]

anyone know the house edge of the stake Blackjack? the unlimited decks is so weird, seems silly to me to not just make it 4 or 8 decks

What do you mean by "the stake Blackjack" precisely? You are talking about the provably fair blackjack game belonging to the Stake Originals games or the Stake exclusive live tables at Evolution?
The Stake home game has a 0.57% house edge according to them and the decks are unlimited (they are virtual), it means the same card can be theoretically drawn endless times in a row. Stake exclusive tables at Evolution take a 0.71% house edge but the decks are real and not unlimited (8), you can't double down on a split unlike the Stake Original game though.

[TwitchySeal]

anyone know the house edge of the stake Blackjack? the unlimited decks is so weird, seems silly to me to not just make it 4 or 8 decks

It's really not much different than a casino that uses an automatic shuffler after every hand.

[BlackyJacky]

anyone know the house edge of the stake Blackjack? the unlimited decks is so weird, seems silly to me to not just make it 4 or 8 decks

"For example, in our Blackjack original game, the House Edge is 0,5%. This is just about as low as House Edge can get, meaning your RTP potential is very high."

https://stake.com/blog/what-is-house-edge

Stake in-house Black Jack shuffles after every hand and does not play decks.

[tygeade]

anyone know the house edge of the stake Blackjack? the unlimited decks is so weird, seems silly to me to not just make it 4 or 8 decks

What do you mean by "the stake Blackjack" precisely? You are talking about the provably fair blackjack game belonging to the Stake Originals games or the Stake exclusive live tables at Evolution?
The Stake home game has a 0.57% house edge according to them and the decks are unlimited (they are virtual), it means the same card can be theoretically drawn endless times in a row. Stake exclusive tables at Evolution take a 0.71% house edge but the decks are real and not unlimited (, you can't double on a split unlike the Stake Original game though.

I never truly understood the same card in a deck logic in online games. I get that you want to prevent counting cards, and that's understandable, but at the very least you could just make sure that each hand is one deck, and then next hand is another deck, that way you would not be removing any cards for the future but you would also not get the same card on the same hand.

It would be very weird to get ace of spade twice, and then dealer has it too, and maybe the guy next to you has it too etc, that's weird, you double down and you get another one, like there is 5-6 on the table and it's all the same. Does that really fell alright? Just have one deck for one hand, another for another hand and that way nobody can count cards.

[Symphonized]

How's betting $8 on 6 different matches in the #FIFAWorldCup and winning $1,000 🤯

This bettor would be the only one who could tell us how it feels 😅






We have alot of Christmas Daily drops at our Twitter:

https://twitter.com/Stake

[Saint-loup]

anyone know the house edge of the stake Blackjack? the unlimited decks is so weird, seems silly to me to not just make it 4 or 8 decks

What do you mean by "the stake Blackjack" precisely? You are talking about the provably fair blackjack game belonging to the Stake Originals games or the Stake exclusive live tables at Evolution?
The Stake home game has a 0.57% house edge according to them and the decks are unlimited (they are virtual), it means the same card can be theoretically drawn endless times in a row. Stake exclusive tables at Evolution take a 0.71% house edge but the decks are real and not unlimited (, you can't double on a split unlike the Stake Original game though.

I never truly understood the same card in a deck logic in online games. I get that you want to prevent counting cards, and that's understandable, but at the very least you could just make sure that each hand is one deck, and then next hand is another deck, that way you would not be removing any cards for the future but you would also not get the same card on the same hand.

It would be very weird to get ace of spade twice, and then dealer has it too, and maybe the guy next to you has it too etc, that's weird, you double down and you get another one, like there is 5-6 on the table and it's all the same. Does that really fell alright? Just have one deck for one hand, another for another hand and that way nobody can count cards.

Well with 8 decks the same card can be theoretically drawn 8 times in a row. I have never seen that till now, but it should happen from time to time. They certainly use an unlimited amount of deck to avoid card counting as you say but maybe also because it's more easy to code : for each card drawn you just need to randomly pick a value between 1 and 52. (Blackjack is played with 52 cards decks)

[n0ne]

How's betting $8 on 6 different matches in the #FIFAWorldCup and winning $1,000 🤯

This bettor would be the only one who could tell us how it feels 😅

Precise prediction on the result of the match, this is completely unfortunate and lucky for him. If not the bet should've ended by the second match Cameroon vs Brazil in which majority of the prediction were in favour of Brazil and he had done the right pick. $1000+ out of $8 bet from sports betting is really a big thing to watch.

[babygun]

How's betting $8 on 6 different matches in the #FIFAWorldCup and winning $1,000 🤯

This bettor would be the only one who could tell us how it feels 😅

Nice win but a strange multiple lol. Combining bets on the favorites with low odds with a (surprising) win of Cameroon vs Brasil. Brasil was already qualified so you could imagine that Brasil wouldn't come with his strongest players but I didn't expect Cameroon to win also (I expected a draw).

[Vaskiy]

How's betting $8 on 6 different matches in the #FIFAWorldCup and winning $1,000 🤯

This bettor would be the only one who could tell us how it feels 😅

Nice win but a strange multiple lol. Combining bets on the favorites with low odds with a (surprising) win of Cameroon vs Brasil. Brasil was already qualified so you could imagine that Brasil wouldn't come with his strongest players but I didn't expect Cameroon to win also (I expected a draw).

Brasil qualified for the group of 16, but people never thought of whether it had come with its strongest players or not. Everyone had the belief Brasil will win the match. Things happened in favour of Cameroon and if it is a multiple goal game it can be agreed, here Cameroon managed to make a goal and Brasil impossible to atleast level the match shows the best from Cameroon.

[Silberman]

anyone know the house edge of the stake Blackjack? the unlimited decks is so weird, seems silly to me to not just make it 4 or 8 decks

What do you mean by "the stake Blackjack" precisely? You are talking about the provably fair blackjack game belonging to the Stake Originals games or the Stake exclusive live tables at Evolution?
The Stake home game has a 0.57% house edge according to them and the decks are unlimited (they are virtual), it means the same card can be theoretically drawn endless times in a row. Stake exclusive tables at Evolution take a 0.71% house edge but the decks are real and not unlimited (, you can't double on a split unlike the Stake Original game though.

I never truly understood the same card in a deck logic in online games. I get that you want to prevent counting cards, and that's understandable, but at the very least you could just make sure that each hand is one deck, and then next hand is another deck, that way you would not be removing any cards for the future but you would also not get the same card on the same hand.

It would be very weird to get ace of spade twice, and then dealer has it too, and maybe the guy next to you has it too etc, that's weird, you double down and you get another one, like there is 5-6 on the table and it's all the same. Does that really fell alright? Just have one deck for one hand, another for another hand and that way nobody can count cards.

This is just a guess, but I suppose that since the house edge is so low if you play the basic strategy to perfection then an expert card counter could still get a small edge over the casino if the casino is only using one deck, as if the count gets to +4 or higher when it is your turn to act then your chances of winning your bet when you double or split should be higher, so casinos still use several decks even if they shuffle after each round.

[Kakmakr]

How's betting $8 on 6 different matches in the #FIFAWorldCup and winning $1,000 🤯

This bettor would be the only one who could tell us how it feels 😅






We have alot of Christmas Daily drops at our Twitter:

https://twitter.com/Stake

Well, with all the upsets in this Soccer World Cup, I should think that Stake are smiling all the way to the Bank. I have tried loads of Multi bets, without any success. (Teams like Germany failed to rock up at the World Cup and then you get teams like Japan... that are firing in all rockets) 

I think bets will be more accurate in the knockout and final stages of the World Cup, when the strongest teams goes through ...and when we have seen what their performance levels has been in this World Cup. 

[Juggy777]

How's betting $8 on 6 different matches in the #FIFAWorldCup and winning $1,000 🤯

This bettor would be the only one who could tell us how it feels 😅

Nice win but a strange multiple lol. Combining bets on the favorites with low odds with a (surprising) win of Cameroon vs Brasil. Brasil was already qualified so you could imagine that Brasil wouldn't come with his strongest players but I didn't expect Cameroon to win also (I expected a draw).

Brasil qualified for the group of 16, but people never thought of whether it had come with its strongest players or not. Everyone had the belief Brasil will win the match. Things happened in favour of Cameroon and if it is a multiple goal game it can be agreed, here Cameroon managed to make a goal and Brasil impossible to atleast level the match shows the best from Cameroon.

Well, with all the upsets in this Soccer World Cup, I should think that Stake are smiling all the way to the Bank. I have tried loads of Multi bets, without any success. (Teams like Germany failed to rock up at the World Cup and then you get teams like Japan... that are firing in all rockets)  

I think bets will be more accurate in the knockout and final stages of the World Cup, when the strongest teams goes through ...and when we have seen what their performance levels has been in this World Cup.  

I believe that this is an expert gambler who knew exactly what he was doing, because it’s difficult to win such a multiple bet for average gamblers. Furthermore if Japan processes ahead then many gamblers will lose their wagers, and out of curiosity Stake team did anyone wagered here on Japan win’s?, because suddenly I’m hearing many gamblers are picking them to win their next fixture.

[ryzaadit]

I see, but wouldn't that tactic only works when you stop at the right time, just like in martingale?
And that right time could be after one hand because we can't predict the future hands. But i admit it would be the fastest way to raise the pot in blackjack.
Anyway, i appreciate that you explained it, and congratz, there's always good to have some extra spending money for christmas.

Why, I like this way? because gambling must to be "Fast, don't play to long".

If you got streak win, when you are gonna to stop? stop at the time you are losing or back to the original bet. Example my bet from 100$ to 800$ with win streak more than 4-6 win. Keep doing 800$ until you lose, then if you want to start bet again go to 100$.

It's just like "Martingale system" but reverse on win situation.

[len01]

How's betting $8 on 6 different matches in the #FIFAWorldCup and winning $1,000 🤯

This bettor would be the only one who could tell us how it feels 😅

Precise prediction on the result of the match, this is completely unfortunate and lucky for him. If not the bet should've ended by the second match Cameroon vs Brazil in which majority of the prediction were in favour of Brazil and he had done the right pick. $1000+ out of $8 bet from sports betting is really a big thing to watch.

because accurate predictions are supported by luck.
in this world cup it is really very difficult to predict unless someone has the right prediction and better luck.
this made me even more curious and kept betting choosing several teams and using multi betting options.

[o48o]

I believe that this is an expert gambler who knew exactly what he was doing, because it’s difficult to win such a multiple bet for average gamblers. Furthermore if Japan processes ahead then many gamblers will lose their wagers, and out of curiosity Stake team did anyone wagered here on Japan win’s?, because suddenly I’m hearing many gamblers are picking them to win their next fixture.

Sounds more like luck to me. I mean how an earth would anyone predict Cameroon in such a combo bet? That country was so far out of my radar that i had to check from google if that was even a real country. And beating Brazil from all countries seems just too unpredictable for an expert. Maybe if he knew something that others didn't, but what would that info be?

[BlackyJacky]

How can I reach the Crypto Gambling Foundation administration, preferably Chris Butler?

[piebeyb]

It's just like "Martingale system" but reverse on win situation.

I think all this time I've been using the martingale system it never worked for me in dice games, but I also haven't tried it in blackjack games either, I thought this strategy won't work in other casino games either, but you convinced me it really works and succeed