Primedice.com | Since 2013 | Longest Running Crypto Casino | 113 BTC Jackpot!

[StarBruck]

"How so? And who? I've never threatened any mod, in any way, ever."

You pretty sure? Becouse this is not first mod who mute you for threating.

Again, another claim lacking evidence. If you claim that I've been muted for threatening / have threatened mods then name them.

Maybe just ask mod's? Unix and randall.

When in the hell have I ever threatened Unix and Randall? Until I see them support your claim I find it completely false.

[1715075617]

1715075617

[1715075617]

1715075617

[1715075617]

1715075617

[1715075617]

1715075617

[1715075617]

1715075617

[Eremitos]

He says he won't look on here. But yeah, let's see what anyone else has to say.

Get the fuck off PD chat and that forum, scammer. You're a talker, huh? Well, guess what - bad luck, cause nobody wants to talk to you. Simply. Fuck. Off.

[StarBruck]

He says he won't look on here. But yeah, let's see what anyone else has to say.

Get the fuck off PD chat and that forum, scammer. You're a talker, huh? Well, guess what - bad luck, cause nobody wants to talk to you. Simply. Fuck. Off.

This is the exact type of animosity I'm talking about. Out of the blue, obscenities yelled at me. Earthman, try to contribute to the discussion with something meaningful.

[Invulner]

"How so? And who? I've never threatened any mod, in any way, ever."

You pretty sure? Becouse this is not first mod who mute you for threating.

Again, another claim lacking evidence. If you claim that I've been muted for threatening / have threatened mods then name them.

Maybe just ask mod's? Unix and randall.

When in the hell have I ever threatened Unix and Randall? Until I see them support your claim I find it completely false.

Randall isn't even a mod anymore, so he doesn't really have the power to mute anyone... But yes, he might have some sort of stand on this subject, he may have seen you threatening or he may not have.

If he didn't see you threatening then it doesn't really prove anything, because it might have just been missed by him. If he has though, that would mean that you are definitely breaking some sort of rules here.

Good luck in getting unbanned.

[StarBruck]

"How so? And who? I've never threatened any mod, in any way, ever."

You pretty sure? Becouse this is not first mod who mute you for threating.

Again, another claim lacking evidence. If you claim that I've been muted for threatening / have threatened mods then name them.

Maybe just ask mod's? Unix and randall.

When in the hell have I ever threatened Unix and Randall? Until I see them support your claim I find it completely false.

Randall isn't even a mod anymore, so he doesn't really have the power to mute anyone... But yes, he might have some sort of stand on this subject, he may have seen you threatening or he may not have.

If he didn't see you threatening then it doesn't really prove anything, because it might have just been missed by him. If he has though, that would mean that you are definitely breaking some sort of rules here.

Good luck in getting unbanned.

Never, ever have I threatened Randall in any way. Grab is most likely throwing falsified claims at this situation.

[jamyr]

Hello.

I'm sorry to hear about your situation but let me tell you these:

TheFrog - "i dont care"
I do, even though I've been the subject of immense animosity over the past few months. My efforts to atleast try to have fun in chat have been just as large.

TheFrog - "think about it 1 person trying to dominate a room, to spoil the pleasure of others no way we can allow that"
This may be the most ignorant statement I've ever heard. I do not try, in any way, to dominate the room. I do not, in any way, try to spoil the pleasure of others. The people in the chat who argue / spam do this, constantly, every single day, and rarely get muted. This is another example of me being targeted. I always try to make everyone be happy, be it making jokes, raining, or just having a casual conversation. But lately, this has been near impossible due to the amount of hatred directed at me.

       1. I understand that you are trying to have fun in Chat however, if the price for you to have 'fun' is for other chatters unpleasant experience in chat, then your way of having fun is wrong.

       2. Moderators have the right to mute chatters if it is unhealthy for others.

       3. If a mod mutes you, instead of whining, have you asked yourself?

      4. Messaging someone who obviously don't like you is just pathetic even helpless.

     5. Moderators are chosen by their experience/capability and their decision-making skills.



    I hope you will read this with an open-mind because I have nothing against you. Froggy and I don't usually talk very long, a few 'hi/hello/ribbit/wp' is mostly the composition of our conv. But I consider him a virtual buddy and I never saw him abusing other chatters.

    Lastly, a friendly advice, be sensitive and put others' experience/opinion/take whenever you chat/socialize.

-jamyr

P.S.

 All of the above are based n my POV. Anything I've written should not reflect the site/the owner of the site/the other users.

[StarBruck]

Hello.

I'm sorry to hear about your situation but let me tell you these:

TheFrog - "i dont care"
I do, even though I've been the subject of immense animosity over the past few months. My efforts to atleast try to have fun in chat have been just as large.

TheFrog - "think about it 1 person trying to dominate a room, to spoil the pleasure of others no way we can allow that"
This may be the most ignorant statement I've ever heard. I do not try, in any way, to dominate the room. I do not, in any way, try to spoil the pleasure of others. The people in the chat who argue / spam do this, constantly, every single day, and rarely get muted. This is another example of me being targeted. I always try to make everyone be happy, be it making jokes, raining, or just having a casual conversation. But lately, this has been near impossible due to the amount of hatred directed at me.

       1. I understand that you are trying to have fun in Chat however, if the price for you to have 'fun' is for other chatters unpleasant experience in chat, then your way of having fun is wrong.

       2. Moderators have the right to mute chatters if it is unhealthy for others.

       3. If a mod mutes you, instead of whining, have you asked yourself?

      4. Messaging someone who obviously don't like you is just pathetic even helpless.

     5. Moderators are chosen by their experience/capability and their decision-making skills.



    I hope you will read this with an open-mind because I have nothing against you. Froggy and I don't usually talk very long, a few 'hi/hello/ribbit/wp' is mostly the composition of our conv. But I consider him a virtual buddy and I never saw him abusing other chatters.

    Lastly, a friendly advice, be sensitive and put others' experience/opinion/take whenever you chat/socialize.

-jamyr

P.S.

 All of the above are based n my POV. Anything I've written should not reflect the site/the owner of the site/the other users.

This is a good post from another perspective.
1. However the chatters don't have an unpleasant experience when I'm on the chat. It's mostly when it's full of spam and arguments. The price of me to have "fun"? I don't find making others have an unpleasant experience fun. Nor is my way of having fun arguing or spamming.

2. "Unhealthy for others" That is correct, but ignoring the real causes of arguments and spam (arguers and spammers) and muting me just because you don't like me is nowhere near just. Anyone can attest to the low quality of chat. I'm only here for about 5 hours. Think about the other 19. What goes on then? Today when I logged on I sent a few messages then PM'd Frog, then all of this went down.

3. This is not whining, this is an appeal with supporting points and evidence. I assure you, this appeal is not whining.

4. "Pathetic even helpless" How would I have known he didn't like me before he muted me for 48 hours three days ago? Before that me and Frog got along just fine, as far as I can tell. He was very neutral and never provided positive or negative feedback.

5. Yes, but that does not mean they are perfect at their trade. Even now there is a situation with a moderator accepting bribes. Mods will have their preferences, they always have and always will.

[jamyr]

Hello.

I'm sorry to hear about your situation but let me tell you these:

TheFrog - "i dont care"
I do, even though I've been the subject of immense animosity over the past few months. My efforts to atleast try to have fun in chat have been just as large.

TheFrog - "think about it 1 person trying to dominate a room, to spoil the pleasure of others no way we can allow that"
This may be the most ignorant statement I've ever heard. I do not try, in any way, to dominate the room. I do not, in any way, try to spoil the pleasure of others. The people in the chat who argue / spam do this, constantly, every single day, and rarely get muted. This is another example of me being targeted. I always try to make everyone be happy, be it making jokes, raining, or just having a casual conversation. But lately, this has been near impossible due to the amount of hatred directed at me.

       1. I understand that you are trying to have fun in Chat however, if the price for you to have 'fun' is for other chatters unpleasant experience in chat, then your way of having fun is wrong.

       2. Moderators have the right to mute chatters if it is unhealthy for others.

       3. If a mod mutes you, instead of whining, have you asked yourself?

      4. Messaging someone who obviously don't like you is just pathetic even helpless.

     5. Moderators are chosen by their experience/capability and their decision-making skills.



    I hope you will read this with an open-mind because I have nothing against you. Froggy and I don't usually talk very long, a few 'hi/hello/ribbit/wp' is mostly the composition of our conv. But I consider him a virtual buddy and I never saw him abusing other chatters.

    Lastly, a friendly advice, be sensitive and put others' experience/opinion/take whenever you chat/socialize.

-jamyr

P.S.

 All of the above are based n my POV. Anything I've written should not reflect the site/the owner of the site/the other users.

This is a good post from another perspective.
1. However the chatters don't have an unpleasant experience when I'm on the chat. It's mostly when it's full of spam and arguments. The price of me to have "fun"? I don't find making others have an unpleasant experience fun. Nor is my way of having fun arguing or spamming.

2. "Unhealthy for others" That is correct, but ignoring the real causes of arguments and spam (arguers and spammers) and muting me just because you don't like me is nowhere near just. Anyone can attest to the low quality of chat. I'm only here for about 5 hours. Think about the other 19. What goes on then? Today when I logged on I sent a few messages then PM'd Frog, then all of this went down.

3. This is not whining, this is an appeal with supporting points and evidence. I assure you, this appeal is not whining.

4. "Pathetic even helpless" How would I have known he didn't like me before he muted me for 48 hours three days ago? Before that me and Frog got along just fine, as far as I can tell. He was very neutral and never provided positive or negative feedback.

5. Yes, but that does not mean they are perfect at their trade. Even now there is a situation with a moderator accepting bribes. Mods will have their preferences, they always have and always will.

  If I can mute you here I will do that. LOL
(just kidding)
 Well bruh, we do not live in a perfect world. We cannot please everybody, not even Trump. It can be that you are right and I am wrong and Froggy too but it can also be the other way around. However, Froggy is in the Position to mute or moderate chat and me and you are not given that privilege, so now, if you still intend to chat there, we must accept the fact that 'we'(not just you) can be unpleasant for others and can be moderated/muted/ignored/praised/tipped/accused/abused because again we are living in an imperfect world.

 In short, since you've posted your appeal(s), we should not be stuck here and need to move on.

Good Luck.

 Adios!

[StarBruck]

-snip-

I don't mean to make it sound selfish, as if everyone else is the problem and not me. That is not the case. The case is I am being targeted and blamed as the person who makes chat all crazy, which I am not. Sure, Frog has the power. But power can be abused, can it not? I had a talk with Franklin, we'll see how it goes from there.

[RocketSingh]

Is there any way to know the amount of bitcoin wagered on PrimeDice in last X hour (e.g. 24 hour), where the minimum size of bet was Y BTC (e.g. 0.0005 BTC)?

[frankmb]

Is there any way to know the amount of bitcoin wagered on PrimeDice in last X hour (e.g. 24 hour), where the minimum size of bet was Y BTC (e.g. 0.0005 BTC)?

No there are no such personal stats, only for most wagered and biggest bets. https://dicesites.com/primedice provide some overall stats not what you were looking but still good to know.

[adaseb]

Is there any way to know the amount of bitcoin wagered on PrimeDice in last X hour (e.g. 24 hour), where the minimum size of bet was Y BTC (e.g. 0.0005 BTC)?

No idea if this is what you are asking for but if you use a desktop there is a

Won last 24 hours
  -
1206.80  BTC

Displayed right above the betting platform

[lite]

Is there any way to know the amount of bitcoin wagered on PrimeDice in last X hour (e.g. 24 hour), where the minimum size of bet was Y BTC (e.g. 0.0005 BTC)?

No, i don't think that kinda of data being available publicly. you can get someone to code a bot for you to monitor the bets and log it for you or ask stunna. may i ask you why do you want the wagered amounts by bet size?

[Sweet N Sour Shiatsu]

Is there any way to know the amount of bitcoin wagered on PrimeDice in last X hour (e.g. 24 hour), where the minimum size of bet was Y BTC (e.g. 0.0005 BTC)?

No idea if this is what you are asking for but if you use a desktop there is a

Won last 24 hours
  -
1206.80  BTC

Displayed right above the betting platform

No that is the amount won and not the amount wagered.

[xinzark]

Is there any way to know the amount of bitcoin wagered on PrimeDice in last X hour (e.g. 24 hour), where the minimum size of bet was Y BTC (e.g. 0.0005 BTC)?

No idea if this is what you are asking for but if you use a desktop there is a

Won last 24 hours
  -
1206.80  BTC

Displayed right above the betting platform

No that is the amount won and not the amount wagered.

That is the wagered amount i guess. Even though it's not then lets take an example
1st Bet Amount wagered 1 btc = Loss
2nd Bet Amount wagered 1 btc = Win 2 btc

So even in this case showing the amount wagered which is (1+1) btc is equal to showing the amount won which is 2 btc
To get some more info's about the amount wagered, Visit : https://dicesites.com/primedice

[adaseb]

Is there any way to know the amount of bitcoin wagered on PrimeDice in last X hour (e.g. 24 hour), where the minimum size of bet was Y BTC (e.g. 0.0005 BTC)?

No idea if this is what you are asking for but if you use a desktop there is a

Won last 24 hours
  -
1206.80  BTC

Displayed right above the betting platform

No that is the amount won and not the amount wagered.

Then the only way to get that info would be to monitor their API off every single trade and then compile the data yourself. However I am not sure if the public API trades are filted or not. Either way its alot of work. Why do you need this info?

[Eremitos]

That is the wagered amount i guess. Even though it's not then lets take an example
1st Bet Amount wagered 1 btc = Loss
2nd Bet Amount wagered 1 btc = Win 2 btc

So even in this case showing the amount wagered which is (1+1) btc is equal to showing the amount won which is 2 btc
To get some more info's about the amount wagered, Visit : https://dicesites.com/primedice

This is NOT amount wagered. You gave example on 2x, so it's 2 btc, but it's just coincidence. Look:

1st bet - 1 btc on 10x, loss
2nd bet - 1 btc on 10x, win

Won last 24 hrs would show 10 btc, tho amount wagered is 2 btc. It only shows sum of all greens, which is neither amount wagered nor amount truly won (defined as raise on players' profits). That figure means literally nothing.

[just_Alice]

-snip-

Well, it is interesting because the mods are indeed biased but in my opinion it is quite hard not to be biased in any way, doing anything in life. You are always influenced by your friends and other factors.

Let's wait till TheFrog responds about the situation. Taking proof from only one perspective isn't a good thing.

I have never had any issues with mods on PD. As far as I know they usually mute those who ask for tips or spamming malicious links. And even those who ask for tips are muted for 1 hour only. So how exactly StarBruck was "trying to dominate the room"? I didn't get it honestly. Probably we haven't seen the whole picture.

[StarBruck]

-snip-

Well, it is interesting because the mods are indeed biased but in my opinion it is quite hard not to be biased in any way, doing anything in life. You are always influenced by your friends and other factors.

Let's wait till TheFrog responds about the situation. Taking proof from only one perspective isn't a good thing.

I have never had any issues with mods on PD. As far as I know they usually mute those who ask for tips or spamming malicious links. And even those who ask for tips are muted for 1 hour only. So how exactly StarBruck was "trying to dominate the room"? I didn't get it honestly. Probably we haven't seen the whole picture.

Right, that's what I don't understand either. I never try to do that, nor can anyone really "dominate" a room. How would that even work?

[StarBruck]

Account has been unmuted, problem is resolved. Thank you everyone for providing input.