Primedice.com | Since 2013 | Longest Running Crypto Casino | 113 BTC Jackpot!

[Xylber]

Yesterday when i saw the hall of fame(weekly most profit) his profit was about 0.7 BTC, maybe he's in profit! i think when one makes his/her profile private, "profit achievements" are also private?

Yes exactly, when your profits are private, the "profit achievements" looks like "zero":

[1715162805]

1715162805

[1715162805]

1715162805

[adaseb]

jbenjaminy is hunting for big multipliers and nailing it, betting small but winning big!
Check out his other bets:
Bet:21,739,441,003
Bet:21,739,441,828
Bet:21,739,519,848
Bet:21,739,749,731
Bet:21,739,842,567
Bet:21,746,137,247
Bet:21,746,138,679
Bet:21,746,655,362
~

I've taken a look at this guy's stats on PD and his TOTAL PROFIT is Private so we can't know for sure whether he's in profit overall or not. But probably not, since his PROFIT ACHIEVEMENTS are lower than 0.1 BTC.

Those 0.00 and 99.99 are tricky bastards. I was hunting them a lot during my playing on PD and I succeeded several times in that. One day I hit 0.00 two times in a matter of couple of hours, but normally it takes much more than 10,000 bets to hit the desired number. But I think my overall profit from the hunting is positive. I've lost a lot because of the stupid martingale on 2x and that's why my TOTAL PROFIT on PD is -0.04519930 BTC. You should never do that 2x martingale, guys. It can eat all your balance even if you are safe to get 14 reds in a row.

How can you get profit through higher multiplier and losing with some low multiplier? Are you saying that you do not use any martingale strategy on such high multiplier? I think martingale with just 2x is pretty easy to get on profit yet you said you lose entire balance on martingale 2x

To hit on such big multiplier you should have tons of bankroll which you need to have lower than 9900 rolls to get on profit, although it is really huge payout but if you play more than 9900 bets, I called this as losing

Actually this is the worst way of playing. And it's how a lot of newbies end up cleaning out their account.

Problem with the 2x martingale is that you start with a low bet like 1000 Sats and if you lose 10 times you a row, you would need to risk 1,000,000 Sats just to go to break even.

What people should do is the complete opposite. Martingale backwards. So on a win they double their bet. If they lose they return to their base bet. This way if they win 10 times in a row they get a good risk reward with a small bet.
But if they lose 10-15 times in a row, they won't get themselves cleaned out.

[Betwrong]

~
Those 0.00 and 99.99 are tricky bastards. I was hunting them a lot during my playing on PD and I succeeded several times in that. One day I hit 0.00 two times in a matter of couple of hours, but normally it takes much more than 10,000 bets to hit the desired number. But I think my overall profit from the hunting is positive. I've lost a lot because of the stupid martingale on 2x and that's why my TOTAL PROFIT on PD is -0.04519930 BTC. You should never do that 2x martingale, guys. It can eat all your balance even if you are safe to get 14 reds in a row.

How can you get profit through higher multiplier and losing with some low multiplier? Are you saying that you do not use any martingale strategy on such high multiplier? I think martingale with just 2x is pretty easy to get on profit yet you said you lose entire balance on martingale 2x

To hit on such big multiplier you should have tons of bankroll which you need to have lower than 9900 rolls to get on profit, although it is really huge payout but if you play more than 9900 bets, I called this as losing

Actually this is the worst way of playing. And it's how a lot of newbies end up cleaning out their account.

Problem with the 2x martingale is that you start with a low bet like 1000 Sats and if you lose 10 times you a row, you would need to risk 1,000,000 Sats just to go to break even.

Exactly. And after losing 14 times in a row (which is not so rare to happen as it might seem) you would need 0.16 BTC for that.

What people should do is the complete opposite. Martingale backwards. So on a win they double their bet. If they lose they return to their base bet. This way if they win 10 times in a row they get a good risk reward with a small bet.
But if they lose 10-15 times in a row, they won't get themselves cleaned out.

I won my first 100k sats with that strategy. It was long time ago when PrimeDice was only starting and their faucet was 1,000 sats for newbies. It was growing pretty fast with your bets made and eventually when it was 1,500+ sats I won 6 times in a row hitting the MAX bet every time.

I tried this today after seeing your post, but wasn't that lucky this time. The problem with this strategy is that when you lose you lose and when you win you lose all your winnings eventually since green can't last forever.

[adaseb]

~
Those 0.00 and 99.99 are tricky bastards. I was hunting them a lot during my playing on PD and I succeeded several times in that. One day I hit 0.00 two times in a matter of couple of hours, but normally it takes much more than 10,000 bets to hit the desired number. But I think my overall profit from the hunting is positive. I've lost a lot because of the stupid martingale on 2x and that's why my TOTAL PROFIT on PD is -0.04519930 BTC. You should never do that 2x martingale, guys. It can eat all your balance even if you are safe to get 14 reds in a row.

How can you get profit through higher multiplier and losing with some low multiplier? Are you saying that you do not use any martingale strategy on such high multiplier? I think martingale with just 2x is pretty easy to get on profit yet you said you lose entire balance on martingale 2x

To hit on such big multiplier you should have tons of bankroll which you need to have lower than 9900 rolls to get on profit, although it is really huge payout but if you play more than 9900 bets, I called this as losing

Actually this is the worst way of playing. And it's how a lot of newbies end up cleaning out their account.

Problem with the 2x martingale is that you start with a low bet like 1000 Sats and if you lose 10 times you a row, you would need to risk 1,000,000 Sats just to go to break even.

Exactly. And after losing 14 times in a row (which is not so rare to happen as it might seem) you would need 0.16 BTC for that.

What people should do is the complete opposite. Martingale backwards. So on a win they double their bet. If they lose they return to their base bet. This way if they win 10 times in a row they get a good risk reward with a small bet.
But if they lose 10-15 times in a row, they won't get themselves cleaned out.

I won my first 100k sats with that strategy. It was long time ago when PrimeDice was only starting and their faucet was 1,000 sats for newbies. It was growing pretty fast with your bets made and eventually when it was 1,500+ sats I won 6 times in a row hitting the MAX bet every time.

I tried this today after seeing your post, but wasn't that lucky this time. The problem with this strategy is that when you lose you lose and when you win you lose all your winnings eventually since green can't last forever.

And this is one of the reasons why there are barely any faucets these days. Because people can program bots to perform this strategy and within enough rolls they can eventually hit 1BTC and withdraw without having to make a  single deposit.

Those captcha solver services and bots were what really killed the free faucets that were created during the early Bitcoin days .

[BTCevo]

jbenjaminy is hunting for big multipliers and nailing it, betting small but winning big!
Check out his other bets:
~~

I've taken a look at this guy's stats on PD and his TOTAL PROFIT is Private so we can't know for sure whether he's in profit overall or not. But probably not, since his PROFIT ACHIEVEMENTS are lower than 0.1 BTC.

Those 0.00 and 99.99 are tricky bastards. I was hunting them a lot during my playing on PD and I succeeded several times in that. One day I hit 0.00 two times in a matter of couple of hours, but normally it takes much more than 10,000 bets to hit the desired number. But I think my overall profit from the hunting is positive. I've lost a lot because of the stupid martingale on 2x and that's why my TOTAL PROFIT on PD is -0.04519930 BTC. You should never do that 2x martingale, guys. It can eat all your balance even if you are safe to get 14 reds in a row.

How can you get profit through higher multiplier and losing with some low multiplier? Are you saying that you do not use any martingale strategy on such high multiplier? I think martingale with just 2x is pretty easy to get on profit yet you said you lose entire balance on martingale 2x

First of, it's not easy to get profit on martingale with just 2x. If it was easy I'd be a millionaire by now. ) There's no winning strategy and knowing that I just play at random and when I'm lucky I win. I never use martingale on 9900x and in fact I was always hitting the desired number before making 1000 bets. I even hit it after making only 24 bets once. I know that normally it takes much more than 10,000 bets from the chat, hui was posting about his hunting progress and other players too.

Compare to what you want to achieve by hitting 9900x, this is pretty easy though but of course it needs some time to complete and get profit. Most of them are only trying to hit it as long as they like, this is why make them losing really hard. Try to aim 0.01 each day must not be really hard, in a month you will get 0.3 btc and you do not really nees huge bankroll too to get 0.01
But to aim such a high multiplier you must adjust your balance, at least itnis enough for 10k bets, plus this is not a guarantee win but if you martingale on 2x and try to get 0.01 btc this is pretty easy

[Betwrong]

jbenjaminy is hunting for big multipliers and nailing it, betting small but winning big!
Check out his other bets:
~~

I've taken a look at this guy's stats on PD and his TOTAL PROFIT is Private so we can't know for sure whether he's in profit overall or not. But probably not, since his PROFIT ACHIEVEMENTS are lower than 0.1 BTC.

Those 0.00 and 99.99 are tricky bastards. I was hunting them a lot during my playing on PD and I succeeded several times in that. One day I hit 0.00 two times in a matter of couple of hours, but normally it takes much more than 10,000 bets to hit the desired number. But I think my overall profit from the hunting is positive. I've lost a lot because of the stupid martingale on 2x and that's why my TOTAL PROFIT on PD is -0.04519930 BTC. You should never do that 2x martingale, guys. It can eat all your balance even if you are safe to get 14 reds in a row.

How can you get profit through higher multiplier and losing with some low multiplier? Are you saying that you do not use any martingale strategy on such high multiplier? I think martingale with just 2x is pretty easy to get on profit yet you said you lose entire balance on martingale 2x

First of, it's not easy to get profit on martingale with just 2x. If it was easy I'd be a millionaire by now. ) There's no winning strategy and knowing that I just play at random and when I'm lucky I win. I never use martingale on 9900x and in fact I was always hitting the desired number before making 1000 bets. I even hit it after making only 24 bets once. I know that normally it takes much more than 10,000 bets from the chat, hui was posting about his hunting progress and other players too.

Compare to what you want to achieve by hitting 9900x, this is pretty easy though but of course it needs some time to complete and get profit. Most of them are only trying to hit it as long as they like, this is why make them losing really hard. Try to aim 0.01 each day must not be really hard, in a month you will get 0.3 btc and you do not really nees huge bankroll too to get 0.01
But to aim such a high multiplier you must adjust your balance, at least itnis enough for 10k bets, plus this is not a guarantee win but if you martingale on 2x and try to get 0.01 btc this is pretty easyI can't tell if you are even serious here

I can't tell if you are even serious here  because you sound like you know how to make money with gambling. 0.3 BTC per month is a huge profit many people dream of (me included) and you are saying that with martingale on 2x it's easy to get it. No, it's not. Did you read the reply by adaseb to your previous comment? And, what is more important, does this strategy work for you? Do you make 0.3 BTC / month by just playing dice aiming 0.01 each day with martingale on 2x?

I love to play dice, especially on PD since I have a lot of friends in the chat there, but I do it for entertainment purposes only. It's imposible to make money with gambling on a regular basis.

[veleten]

What people should do is the complete opposite. Martingale backwards. So on a win they double their bet. If they lose they return to their base bet. This way if they win 10 times in a row they get a good risk reward with a small bet. ufabet

there is a special term clever people invented for this
its called reverse Martingale,very undervalued betting strategy
in general,I'm quite amazed by the lack of creativity of our gamblers
an average gambler has no idea about bank management,betting strategies,self control and odds
and then we read all the scam cries coming from players who got a 10 red streak on a double chance
educate yourselves before betting,you will have more fun and much better chances to actually win something

[huctalk]

I lose plenty on reverse martingale. maybe even more than using regular martingale fml

[Xylber]

Sometimes I play an alternative tactic with Martingale, for example, repeat twice the first number (example, I bet 1, lose, bet again 1 instead of doubling it); in this way, I get one more shot before losing it all (thus reducing 50% the chance of bust).
The other way is to limit yourself to a maximum row of loses, sometimes I limit myself to 8 in a row, and after reaching the limit, I keep betting there.




BTW, minimum to extract our forum earning is 50K (it was 100k before)

[adaseb]

jbenjaminy is hunting for big multipliers and nailing it, betting small but winning big!
Check out his other bets:
~~

I've taken a look at this guy's stats on PD and his TOTAL PROFIT is Private so we can't know for sure whether he's in profit overall or not. But probably not, since his PROFIT ACHIEVEMENTS are lower than 0.1 BTC.

Those 0.00 and 99.99 are tricky bastards. I was hunting them a lot during my playing on PD and I succeeded several times in that. One day I hit 0.00 two times in a matter of couple of hours, but normally it takes much more than 10,000 bets to hit the desired number. But I think my overall profit from the hunting is positive. I've lost a lot because of the stupid martingale on 2x and that's why my TOTAL PROFIT on PD is -0.04519930 BTC. You should never do that 2x martingale, guys. It can eat all your balance even if you are safe to get 14 reds in a row.

How can you get profit through higher multiplier and losing with some low multiplier? Are you saying that you do not use any martingale strategy on such high multiplier? I think martingale with just 2x is pretty easy to get on profit yet you said you lose entire balance on martingale 2x

First of, it's not easy to get profit on martingale with just 2x. If it was easy I'd be a millionaire by now. ) There's no winning strategy and knowing that I just play at random and when I'm lucky I win. I never use martingale on 9900x and in fact I was always hitting the desired number before making 1000 bets. I even hit it after making only 24 bets once. I know that normally it takes much more than 10,000 bets from the chat, hui was posting about his hunting progress and other players too.

Compare to what you want to achieve by hitting 9900x, this is pretty easy though but of course it needs some time to complete and get profit. Most of them are only trying to hit it as long as they like, this is why make them losing really hard. Try to aim 0.01 each day must not be really hard, in a month you will get 0.3 btc and you do not really nees huge bankroll too to get 0.01
But to aim such a high multiplier you must adjust your balance, at least itnis enough for 10k bets, plus this is not a guarantee win but if you martingale on 2x and try to get 0.01 btc this is pretty easyI can't tell if you are even serious here

I can't tell if you are even serious here  because you sound like you know how to make money with gambling. 0.3 BTC per month is a huge profit many people dream of (me included) and you are saying that with martingale on 2x it's easy to get it. No, it's not. Did you read the reply by adaseb to your previous comment? And, what is more important, does this strategy work for you? Do you make 0.3 BTC / month by just playing dice aiming 0.01 each day with martingale on 2x?

I love to play dice, especially on PD since I have a lot of friends in the chat there, but I do it for entertainment purposes only. It's imposible to make money with gambling on a regular basis.

He is either new to dice or hasn't been "cleaned out" yet getting 15 losses in a row.

0.3BTC is difficult. It might be possible if you got experience and lots of capital like >25 BTC.

Hence you have a lot of cushion if you get into a huge losing streak.

If it was this easy everybody would be buying lottery tickets instead of going to work.

[Xylber]

If you bet Martingale with 50% chance of winning, the maths are simple: Chance of losing one is 50%, two in a row 25%, three 12.5%, 6.25%, and so on.
15 in a row is like 0.003%, 1 in 33000

[iluvbitcoins]

Actually this is the worst way of playing. And it's how a lot of newbies end up cleaning out their account.

Problem with the 2x martingale is that you start with a low bet like 1000 Sats and if you lose 10 times you a row, you would need to risk 1,000,000 Sats just to go to break even.

What people should do is the complete opposite. Martingale backwards. So on a win they double their bet. If they lose they return to their base bet. This way if they win 10 times in a row they get a good risk reward with a small bet.
But if they lose 10-15 times in a row, they won't get themselves cleaned out.

What people should do is the complete opposite. Martingale backwards. So on a win they double their bet. If they lose they return to their base bet. This way if they win 10 times in a row they get a good risk reward with a small bet. ufabet

 

Copy/paste much.

Reverse sounds good in theory, but martingale does too  
Gotta admit though, reverse martingale won't swallow your whole balance in a minute, if it does, it's going to take a while.

Btw, I see PD is pushing hard to get a following on their forum 

[adaseb]

Actually this is the worst way of playing. And it's how a lot of newbies end up cleaning out their account.

Problem with the 2x martingale is that you start with a low bet like 1000 Sats and if you lose 10 times you a row, you would need to risk 1,000,000 Sats just to go to break even.

What people should do is the complete opposite. Martingale backwards. So on a win they double their bet. If they lose they return to their base bet. This way if they win 10 times in a row they get a good risk reward with a small bet.
But if they lose 10-15 times in a row, they won't get themselves cleaned out.

What people should do is the complete opposite. Martingale backwards. So on a win they double their bet. If they lose they return to their base bet. This way if they win 10 times in a row they get a good risk reward with a small bet. ufabet

 

Copy/paste much.

Reverse sounds good in theory, but martingale does too  
Gotta admit though, reverse martingale won't swallow your whole balance in a minute, if it does, it's going to take a while.

Btw, I see PD is pushing hard to get a following on their forum 

Lol.

It's weird because I read his reply and I was thinking "Wow he read my mind" and only after you copied his post and mine I realized that he copied my entire post.

[buwaytress]

Problem with martingale, is, it's martingale =)

I think one of the things crypto gambling opened the doors to is widespread practise of martingale. I mean, any casino I've been to will have a min/max bet that at best allows you an 8-streak martingale. But with micro-betting thanks to 1 satoshi bets, people with 1 BTC back when it wasn't even $1000 were able to try long, long autobetting regimes that seemed to return consistent profits.

If you bet Martingale with 50% chance of winning, the maths are simple: Chance of losing one is 50%, two in a row 25%, three 12.5%, 6.25%, and so on.
15 in a row is like 0.003%, 1 in 33000

I've autobet enough on dice to know that those tiny chances of hitting the 15-streak loss happens all too easily. I can do 33,000 rolls in a few hours - and have often done so. Even with the lowest dice edge online, you'll hit it even quicker.

Lol.

It's weird because I read his reply and I was thinking "Wow he read my mind" and only after you copied his post and mine I realized that he copied my entire post.

Yeah, plenty of these alt accounts plagiarising people's posts. Reported =)

[Betwrong]

~

Compare to what you want to achieve by hitting 9900x, this is pretty easy though but of course it needs some time to complete and get profit. Most of them are only trying to hit it as long as they like, this is why make them losing really hard. Try to aim 0.01 each day must not be really hard, in a month you will get 0.3 btc and you do not really nees huge bankroll too to get 0.01
But to aim such a high multiplier you must adjust your balance, at least itnis enough for 10k bets, plus this is not a guarantee win but if you martingale on 2x and try to get 0.01 btc this is pretty easyI can't tell if you are even serious here

I can't tell if you are even serious here  because you sound like you know how to make money with gambling. 0.3 BTC per month is a huge profit many people dream of (me included) and you are saying that with martingale on 2x it's easy to get it. No, it's not. Did you read the reply by adaseb to your previous comment? And, what is more important, does this strategy work for you? Do you make 0.3 BTC / month by just playing dice aiming 0.01 each day with martingale on 2x?

I love to play dice, especially on PD since I have a lot of friends in the chat there, but I do it for entertainment purposes only. It's imposible to make money with gambling on a regular basis.

He is either new to dice or hasn't been "cleaned out" yet getting 15 losses in a row.

0.3BTC is difficult. It might be possible if you got experience and lots of capital like >25 BTC.

Hence you have a lot of cushion if you get into a huge losing streak.

If it was this easy everybody would be buying lottery tickets instead of going to work.

Here's how one can lose 25 BTC aiming 0.3 BTC/month:

Doing 2x martingale with 0.00001 (1k satoshis) as the initial bet you would need to make 30,000 bets in case all of them were green. But of course not all of them can be green even if there were no house edge. In short, it will surely take 60,000+ bets. Within so many bets anything can happen, even 21 reds in a row, and with that number of consecutive losses you lose 25 BTC.

[btc-facebook]

If you bet Martingale with 50% chance of winning, the maths are simple: Chance of losing one is 50%, two in a row 25%, three 12.5%, 6.25%, and so on.
15 in a row is like 0.003%, 1 in 33000

Well if you ask me to ,I'm better choose high risk high rewards method because I'm usually fit with those type method.
Yes, every people have their own favourite method and because of my method, I can earn 0.09 with 0.01

[Xylber]

If you bet Martingale with 50% chance of winning, the maths are simple: Chance of losing one is 50%, two in a row 25%, three 12.5%, 6.25%, and so on.
15 in a row is like 0.003%, 1 in 33000

I've autobet enough on dice to know that those tiny chances of hitting the 15-streak loss happens all too easily. I can do 33,000 rolls in a few hours - and have often done so. Even with the lowest dice edge online, you'll hit it even quicker.

You are right, the "15 in a row is like 0.003%, 1 in 33000" is valid if you play only 15 times. In autobet you are playing multiple times a minute, after an hour you may have more than 500 rounds played, increasing the chance much higher than "0.003%.

For example, the chances of losing a coin toss (50% win/50% lose) 2 times in a row in 2 rounds is 25%:
OX
XO
XX <<
OO

The chances of losing a coin toss (50% win/50% lose) 2 times in a row in 3 rounds is 37.5%:
OOO
OOX
OXO
XOO
OXX <<
XOX
XXO <<
XXX <<

That is why I prefer to play manually, and keep control of how much I bet, how much I win and lose.

[adaseb]

If you bet Martingale with 50% chance of winning, the maths are simple: Chance of losing one is 50%, two in a row 25%, three 12.5%, 6.25%, and so on.
15 in a row is like 0.003%, 1 in 33000

I've autobet enough on dice to know that those tiny chances of hitting the 15-streak loss happens all too easily. I can do 33,000 rolls in a few hours - and have often done so. Even with the lowest dice edge online, you'll hit it even quicker.

You are right, the "15 in a row is like 0.003%, 1 in 33000" is valid if you play only 15 times. In autobet you are playing multiple times a minute, after an hour you may have more than 500 rounds played, increasing the chance much higher than "0.003%.

For example, the chances of losing a coin toss (50% win/50% lose) 2 times in a row in 2 rounds is 25%:
OX
XO
XX <<
OO

The chances of losing a coin toss (50% win/50% lose) 2 times in a row in 3 rounds is 37.5%:
OOO
OOX
OXO
XOO
OXX <<
XOX
XXO <<
XXX <<

That is why I prefer to play manually, and keep control of how much I bet, how much I win and lose.

You are correct however the way that the rolls are determined they are  determine by the hash function.

Unless the SHA get exploited or there is a weakness discovered they are essentially completely and independently random results which are not dependent on the prior result.

Hence many assume that since they got 15 losses in a row the next roll has to be a winner and that's how they go bust.

[Stunna]

We're releasing an update soon and will be requiring users to change their Seed pair at some point today or tomorrow. When you place a roll it will simply allow you to set new provably fair seeds. Sorry for any inconvenience this may cause, it will just take a few seconds and you can get back to playing immediately. We'll be doing this once every 3 months.


We will be down for 20-30 minutes while we apply this update.

[Minus7point5]

Still one of my favorite sites after all these years.