[ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algo & Masternodes | Established 2013

[techbytes]

Solomining is useless, blocks too fast. Need a p2pool

Quick and dirty p2pool, might need small tuning. But i am blocking like hell with it.

edit: It's another coin designed to fail when you compile in Linux, to make p2pool that much harder. Scamcoin again.

p2pool takes less than 5 minutes to configure..

File: p2pool-altcoins/p2pool/networks.py

Code:

    digital=math.Object(
        PARENT=networks.nets['digital'],
        SHARE_PERIOD=15, # seconds target spacing
        CHAIN_LENGTH=24*60*60//10, # shares
        REAL_CHAIN_LENGTH=24*60*60//10, # shares
        TARGET_LOOKBEHIND=200, # shares coinbase maturity
        SPREAD=30, # blocks
        IDENTIFIER='be43F6b8c6927210'.decode('hex'),
        PREFIX='b587193ba6d4749a'.decode('hex'),
        P2P_PORT=5477,
        MIN_TARGET=0,
        MAX_TARGET=2**256//2**20 - 1,
        PERSIST=False,
        WORKER_PORT=9500,
        BOOTSTRAP_ADDRS=''.split(' '),
        ANNOUNCE_CHANNEL='#p2pool-alt',
        VERSION_CHECK=lambda v: True,
    ),

File: p2pool-altcoins/p2pool/bitcoin/networks.py

Code:

    digital=math.Object(
        P2P_PREFIX='fbc0b6db'.decode('hex'),
        P2P_PORT=7999,
        ADDRESS_VERSION=30,
        RPC_PORT=7998,
        RPC_CHECK=defer.inlineCallbacks(lambda bitcoind: defer.returnValue(
            'digitalcoinaddress' in (yield bitcoind.rpc_help()) and
            not (yield bitcoind.rpc_getinfo())['testnet']
        )),
        SUBSIDY_FUNC=lambda height: 1*10000000 >> (height + 1)//1080000,
        POW_FUNC=lambda data: pack.IntType(256).unpack(__import__('ltc_scrypt').getPoWHash(data)),
        BLOCK_PERIOD=30, # s targetspacing
        SYMBOL='DGC',
        CONF_FILE_FUNC=lambda: os.path.join(os.path.join(os.environ['APPDATA'], 'franko') if platform.system() == 'Windows' else os.path.expanduser('~/Library/Application Support/Doubloons/') if platform.system() == 'Darwin' else os.path.expanduser('~/.digitalcoin'), 'digitalcoin.conf'),
        BLOCK_EXPLORER_URL_PREFIX='http://54.244.192.52/doubloon/block/',
        ADDRESS_EXPLORER_URL_PREFIX='http://54.244.192.52/doubloon/address/',
        SANE_TARGET_RANGE=(2**256//100000000 - 1, 2**256//1000 - 1),
        DUMB_SCRYPT_DIFF=2**16,
    ),

File: p2pool-altcoins/p2pool/bitcoin/helper.py

Code:

        if 'lite' in net.NAME or 'feather' in net.NAME or 'chn' in net.NAME or 'digital' in net.NAME or 'franko' in net.NAME:

Nice.  Might give this a try next time. 

Thanks,

-tb-

[Fernandez]

Solomining is useless, blocks too fast. Need a p2pool

Quick and dirty p2pool, might need small tuning. But i am blocking like hell with it.

edit: It's another coin designed to fail when you compile in Linux, to make p2pool that much harder. Scamcoin again.

p2pool takes less than 5 minutes to configure..

File: p2pool-altcoins/p2pool/networks.py

Code:

    digital=math.Object(
        PARENT=networks.nets['digital'],
        SHARE_PERIOD=15, # seconds target spacing
        CHAIN_LENGTH=24*60*60//10, # shares
        REAL_CHAIN_LENGTH=24*60*60//10, # shares
        TARGET_LOOKBEHIND=200, # shares coinbase maturity
        SPREAD=30, # blocks
        IDENTIFIER='be43F6b8c6927210'.decode('hex'),
        PREFIX='b587193ba6d4749a'.decode('hex'),
        P2P_PORT=5477,
        MIN_TARGET=0,
        MAX_TARGET=2**256//2**20 - 1,
        PERSIST=False,
        WORKER_PORT=9500,
        BOOTSTRAP_ADDRS=''.split(' '),
        ANNOUNCE_CHANNEL='#p2pool-alt',
        VERSION_CHECK=lambda v: True,
    ),

File: p2pool-altcoins/p2pool/bitcoin/networks.py

Code:

    digital=math.Object(
        P2P_PREFIX='fbc0b6db'.decode('hex'),
        P2P_PORT=7999,
        ADDRESS_VERSION=30,
        RPC_PORT=7998,
        RPC_CHECK=defer.inlineCallbacks(lambda bitcoind: defer.returnValue(
            'digitalcoinaddress' in (yield bitcoind.rpc_help()) and
            not (yield bitcoind.rpc_getinfo())['testnet']
        )),
        SUBSIDY_FUNC=lambda height: 1*10000000 >> (height + 1)//1080000,
        POW_FUNC=lambda data: pack.IntType(256).unpack(__import__('ltc_scrypt').getPoWHash(data)),
        BLOCK_PERIOD=30, # s targetspacing
        SYMBOL='DGC',
        CONF_FILE_FUNC=lambda: os.path.join(os.path.join(os.environ['APPDATA'], 'franko') if platform.system() == 'Windows' else os.path.expanduser('~/Library/Application Support/Doubloons/') if platform.system() == 'Darwin' else os.path.expanduser('~/.digitalcoin'), 'digitalcoin.conf'),
        BLOCK_EXPLORER_URL_PREFIX='http://54.244.192.52/doubloon/block/',
        ADDRESS_EXPLORER_URL_PREFIX='http://54.244.192.52/doubloon/address/',
        SANE_TARGET_RANGE=(2**256//100000000 - 1, 2**256//1000 - 1),
        DUMB_SCRYPT_DIFF=2**16,
    ),

File: p2pool-altcoins/p2pool/bitcoin/helper.py

Code:

        if 'lite' in net.NAME or 'feather' in net.NAME or 'chn' in net.NAME or 'digital' in net.NAME or 'franko' in net.NAME:

Nice.  Might give this a try next time. 

Thanks,

-tb-

Next time means tomorrow, or even tonight - so be ready.

[ecliptic]

-E 1, really?

[baritus]

"networkhashps" : 92563950

[ecliptic]

"networkhashps" : 92563950

you show 92.5 MH/s, guy above shows 175MH/s, weird.

[tyrion70]

And we have a block explorer :

http://dgc.p2pool.nl/chain/Digitalcoins

[Kyune]

People with more hashpower have just that, more actual power. You can read up on what causes the orphans, but basically the fair launch I put in is the best way I can think of to make it fair.

Meh.  I wouldn't call it fair.  A low-difficulty launch filled with so many orphans is still a poor launch.  Low difficulty still greatly amplifies the ability of the highest hash rate miners in the earliest minutes to grab the early blocks by overwriting the blocks that others have (temporarily) found.  Lowering the block reward mitigates the damage, but doesn't eliminate it.

[shaal]

"blocks" : 4794,
"difficulty" : 0.01562500,
"networkhashps" : 33004359,


that's pretty insane network speed already

current network hash rate,

"blocks" : 5705,
"difficulty" : 0.06250000
"networkhashps" : 175066601,

Updated again.

"blocks" : 5894,
"difficulty" : 0.06250000,
"networkhashps" : 93368854,

Someone took alot of power away

[jonptl]

People with more hashpower have just that, more actual power. You can read up on what causes the orphans, but basically the fair launch I put in is the best way I can think of to make it fair.

Meh.  I wouldn't call it fair.  A low-difficulty launch filled with so many orphans is still a poor launch.  Low difficulty still greatly amplifies the ability of the highest hash rate miners in the earliest minutes to grab the early blocks by overwriting the blocks that others have (temporarily) found.  Lowering the block reward mitigates the damage, but doesn't eliminate it.

" Low difficulty still greatly amplifies the ability of the highest hash rate miners in the earliest minutes to grab the early blocks by overwriting the blocks that others have (temporarily) found"

thats 51% attack?

[blastbob]

And we have a block explorer :

http://dgc.p2pool.nl/chain/Digitalcoins

Great work!

[cryptohunter]

wasn't this coin originally meant to be released at 4pm GMT ?

[fenican]

No serious orphan issues for me.  6 transactions, 5 blocks successfully mined.  Started about 10 minutes ago.

[ecliptic]

some mined, some rejected, seems like gpus on same computer (127.0.0.1) work better than gpus on LAN cgminer (192.168.1.x)

[Malkov]

No serious orphan issues for me.  6 transactions, 5 blocks successfully mined.  Started about 10 minutes ago.

I did 7 Block New transactions 4   This Scam?

[e521]

Fair Launch
Block
1080 -  Difficulty up until here is 0.00024414. Block reward of 2.

2160 -  Difficulty up until here is 0.000061035. Block reward of 1.

3240 -  Difficulty up until here is 0.00024414. Block reward of 2.

4320 -  Difficulty up until here is 0.00097656. Block reward of 5.

5400 -  Difficulty up until here is 0.00390624. Block reward of 8

7560 -  Difficulty up until here is 0.06249984. Block reward of 14

8640 -  Difficulty up until here is 0.24999936. Block reward of 17.

Op please edit:
7560 -  Difficulty up until here is 0.06249984. Block reward of 11

[ecliptic]

also how do you query the network for hashrate/diff?

[AZIZ1977]

i downloaded the files but i cant get client installed.

could somebody please put a other link from where we can download the client.

[e521]

also how do you query the network for hashrate/diff?

getnetwrokhashps

[r3v07ut10n]

tyr using chrome or ie.. i had the same issue with opera- mega link does not work with it.

[Malkov]

i found 11 new blocks and I got 4 transactions   Why?