|
FCTaiChi (OP)
|
 |
May 19, 2013, 04:36:48 AM
Last edit: March 19, 2014, 07:16:02 PM by FCTaiChi |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are several different types of Bitcoin clients. The most secure are full nodes like Bitcoin Core, but full nodes are more resource-heavy, and they must do a lengthy initial syncing process. As a result, lightweight clients with somewhat less security are commonly used.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
Unacceptable
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1001
|
|
May 19, 2013, 04:51:30 AM |
|
I guess it only shows in Google Chrome,Firefox............................................
|
"If you run into an asshole in the morning, you ran into an asshole. If you run into assholes all day long, you are the asshole." -Raylan Givens Got GOXXED ?? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9KiqRpPiJAU&feature=youtu.be"An ASIC being late is perfectly normal, predictable, and legal..."Hashfast & BFL slogan  |
|
|
|
FCTaiChi (OP)
|
|
May 19, 2013, 04:55:57 AM |
|
Hm.. it's just a link to a .png
Do other images on the site work for you?
|
|
|
|
|
bcpokey
|
|
May 19, 2013, 05:02:32 AM |
|
Image does not work for me either.
image url seems to be some ridiculous long googlegroups URL. I'm guessing that those who are not part of whatever that is cannot see it.
EDIT: If I open the URL on its own, it sends me to a page that lets me download the image. Perhaps post it up on an image hosting site for direct linking.
|
|
|
|
|
|
FCTaiChi (OP)
|
|
May 19, 2013, 05:14:26 AM |
|
Sorry to those 125 people who checked this in the first few minutes.. Should work now. Thanks bcpokey, and unnacceptable for letting me know.
|
|
|
|
k9quaint
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 19, 2013, 05:24:42 AM |
|
Do you mean that this is a complete list of miners? or a list of complete miners? A lot of those miners are not complete  So I am guessing the list is supposed to be complete. Perhaps you could change the title to "Complete List of Miners GH/S/BTC" |
Bitcoin is backed by the full faith and credit of YouTube comments.
|
|
|
|
FCTaiChi (OP)
|
|
May 19, 2013, 06:09:51 AM |
|
Do you mean that this is a complete list of miners? or a list of complete miners? A lot of those miners are not complete So I am guessing the list is supposed to be complete. Perhaps you could change the title to "Complete List of Miners GH/S/BTC" Changed it. Does that work? I do want to imply that the miners will be a complete unit, not that they are complete right now. |
|
|
|
shapemaker
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
I run Linux on my abacus.
|
|
May 19, 2013, 06:40:50 AM |
|
Please add a column for the country/region each seller operates from (or primarily supplies to).
|
Shut up and give me money: 115UAYWLPTcRQ2hrT7VNo84SSFE5nT5ozo
|
|
|
kevcoins
Member
Offline
Activity: 117
Merit: 10
|
|
May 19, 2013, 08:02:58 AM |
|
interesting none the less..
|
|
|
|
|
|
JimiQ84
|
|
May 19, 2013, 08:09:25 AM |
|
what about erupter blades? 13GH/s for 49.99 BTC
|
|
|
|
|
dogie
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1183
dogiecoin.com
|
|
May 19, 2013, 08:25:55 AM |
|
I don't mean to be a downie but the table is pretty useless as its trying to rank different timed products all at once. Like the blades, like .2 GH/btc, but in people's hands in 2 days. Those DIY Avalon builds, 9/10 will fail/be overly delayed. The one that works straight off will be July-Sept. Massive, massive difference.
|
|
|
|
|
ryepdx
|
|
May 19, 2013, 08:47:59 AM |
|
Hey, just so you know, the prices on my miners have been updated as I've received more quotes:
Projected K16 price: ~$89
Projected K64 price: ~$356
|
|
|
|
|
|
forevernoob
|
|
May 19, 2013, 11:07:59 AM |
|
Dude, you should add which ones that are in production. (the ones you can actually buy)
|
|
|
|
|
FCTaiChi (OP)
|
|
May 19, 2013, 03:25:35 PM |
|
Yes, thank you for the posts! Lead time is my next priority. Then we can get ROI going. This list will become much more useful at that point. The only reason that it's not on this version is that we don't know many of them.
This will make it much more obvious that the Block Eruptor Blades and FPGA's are still viable.
JimiQ84, are those about the same deal as the ones I have posted? I'll check and put them up if there is a big difference.
Soon I intend to add all models of each developer.
|
|
|
|
|
JimiQ84
|
|
May 19, 2013, 03:27:20 PM |
|
Yes, thank you for the posts! Lead time is my next priority. Then we can get ROI going. This list will become much more useful at that point. The only reason that it's not on this version is that we don't know many of them.
This will make it much more obvious that the Block Eruptor Blades and FPGA's are still viable.
JimiQ84, are those about the same deal as the ones I have posted? I'll check and put them up if there is a big difference.
Soon I intend to add all models of each developer.
It looks like you have mentioned only USB block erupters (300MH/s), there are also bigger blades - 13GH/s. |
|
|
|
|
|
FCTaiChi (OP)
|
|
May 19, 2013, 03:33:26 PM |
|
Thanks for the post ryepdx. As projects move forward I'll be able to keep everything updated a lot more quickly with a little help |
|
|
|
|
blackarrow
|
|
May 19, 2013, 06:03:22 PM
Last edit: May 22, 2013, 06:52:23 AM by blackarrow |
|
I think this list encourages fraud.
There are only two companies in your list that have actually shipped:
BlackArrow and BitFountain.
The others:
KNCMiner - science fiction story, they have not shipped anything they do not even have pictures of their products.
t13hydra, terrahash, ryepdx, burnin - rely on avalon ASICs which have not yet been produced.
Butterfly labs - have taken orders of millions of dollars, have not shipped in 1 year, most likely a fraud.
|
|
|
|
|
FCTaiChi (OP)
|
|
May 19, 2013, 07:24:07 PM |
|
blackarrow, I wanted this to partly be a speculative ASIC comparison list, and in the beginning I only included the BlackArrow and BitFountain as a point comparison. As I worked on this I realized it might be taken as you say. I didn't know the charts would look so lopsided, giving a bad impression of the companies actually shipping.
I'm too busy to do it today, but I intend to put up lead time tonight. Do you think it would be fair to do a (soonest-never) type of column? and what do you think would be fair?
|
|
|
|
|
jspielberg
|
|
May 19, 2013, 08:36:20 PM |
|
Can you please explain why BFL is on here, but BitSynCom with their shipping/shipped avalon products (63GHs and 85GHs) are not?
|
|
|
|
|
billotronic
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1000
Crackpot Idealist
|
|
May 19, 2013, 08:41:04 PM |
|
I think this list encourages fraud.
There are only two companies in your list that have actually shipped:
BlackArrow and BitFountain.
The others:
KNCMiner - science fiction story, they have not shipped anything they do not even have pictures of their products.
t13hydra, terrahash, ryepdx, burnin - rely on avalon ASICs which have not yet been produced.
Butterfly labs - have taken orders of millions of dollars, have not shipped in 1 year, most likely a fraud.
Our company has tried to purchase 30000 IC from Avalon. The law in China is to sign a contract to purchase the merchandise. We asked them for this and they gave us a bogus address in Beijing and confessed that they do not have a company. For this reason I would be very careful regarding the Avalon ASICs.
Fraud, maybe, MISS INFORMATION YES! Columns for working unit and shipped are A MUST cause otherwise this is just a pipe dream. |
|
|
|
|
