|
JimiQ84
|
 |
September 14, 2013, 09:01:07 PM |
|
Also maybe the FPGAs are already obsolete and useless... and I don't know what's the development with K1, I thought they never materialised as avalon didn't deliver the chips
|
|
|
|
|
|
EzCheese
|
|
September 15, 2013, 01:20:53 AM |
|
Ahhhh, I didn't even notice that  There goes my BTC0.01 a day. It was fun while it lasted. That chart keeps getting more and more red. Yup, and we're getting another whopping 30% difficulty increase today. |
|
|
|
|
|
FCTaiChi (OP)
|
|
September 15, 2013, 02:59:03 AM |
|
Yeah, thanks for the input guys. Has anyone at all gotten Avalon chips? I should put all projects based on them in a separate category.
I'll make a note about this at the top of their homepage btceic, thanks for your diligence.
|
|
|
|
kkooks
Member
 Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
September 15, 2013, 03:13:50 AM |
|
Yeah, thanks for the input guys. Has anyone at all gotten Avalon chips? I should put all projects based on them in a separate category.
I'll make a note about this at the top of their homepage btceic, thanks for your diligence.
uhh... terrahash is a scam so better not classify them under that. The latest thing they are trying to do is blame bkkcoins for incomplete firmware... but frankly speaking... terrahash had claimed 100% readiness since 8/1 having proven out everything. Unfortunately they havent even got a 4.5ghash k16 to hash correctly |
Donate BTC: 1MLYhqB3kdeiAa291oPMWETMs6FPn8Bzzz
|
|
|
|
BenTuras
|
|
September 15, 2013, 08:04:20 AM |
|
... Has anyone at all gotten Avalon chips? ...
Yes, the first few batches were shipped. Burnin's first batch of Bitburners was shipped with them. Maybe others too, I participated in Zefir/Burnin first batch and I am hashing with my Bitburners, so that's the one I know for sure. |
|
|
|
|
FCTaiChi (OP)
|
|
September 15, 2013, 02:38:12 PM |
|
... Has anyone at all gotten Avalon chips? ...
Yes, the first few batches were shipped. Burnin's first batch of Bitburners was shipped with them. Maybe others too, I participated in Zefir/Burnin first batch and I am hashing with my Bitburners, so that's the one I know for sure. Wow people have burnin's machines! I need to change the shipping column for him. Thanks, there are just too many companies for me to keep up with. Full disclosure: I am moving right now, working all day every day cleaning, fixing up, and packing. I'll be doing it all again in a month too! Usually I stop by every mining thread and keep up with the news, but right now I am at the mercy of people stopping by with tips. uhh... terrahash is a scam so better not classify them under that. The latest thing they are trying to do is blame bkkcoins for incomplete firmware... but frankly speaking... terrahash had claimed 100% readiness since 8/1 having proven out everything. Unfortunately they havent even got a 4.5ghash k16 to hash correctly
That is really sad, I was hoping all this would be explained. I mean everyone knows at this point that they are going to lose, if they knew the reasons, though, and worked with people maybe they could avoid a lawsuit. Is anyone suing? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
forevernoob
|
|
September 18, 2013, 08:10:29 PM |
|
Hey any chance you could get all those small BitFury miners on the list?
There is a couple of different mini BitFury miners available in the forums.
Would be cool to see if any of them actually give ROI.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grinny
|
|
September 19, 2013, 05:28:49 AM |
|
Thanks for adding Bitmine.ch But there's s.th. wrong regarding the shipping date in your table: Site says: Shipping date: beginning from 16th December 2013. |
|
|
|
|
play
|
|
September 19, 2013, 11:58:18 AM |
|
Thanks for adding Bitmine.ch But there's s.th. wrong regarding the shipping date in your table: Site says: Shipping date: beginning from 16th December 2013. And they ship from Switzerland not US. Also, you might want to review your color scheme... you have the same color for values like +17% and -21% |
|
|
|
|
FCTaiChi (OP)
|
|
September 19, 2013, 11:05:09 PM
Last edit: September 20, 2013, 12:18:58 AM by FCTaiChi |
|
Grinny: For the rig right? If you figure two weeks average shipping, the first people to get their box will be around the beginning of the next month. We can assume they will be shipping boxes as fast as they can make them, but it's likely that even if everything is perfectly on schedule it won't be until the middle of January that most people get their machines from that batch. Anyway say we ignore shipping and manufacturing of the boxes, if I put December it would end up more misleading, as I'm set up to go month by month and can't split to the middle. This will be one of the things that I change from soon.
-edit Fixed the From category, thanks again. I'm not trying to be argumentative, or put my own opinions in, if you or anyone feels that I'm wrong about this I'd love to hear your case.
play: You must mean the individual manufacturer pages? The percentage value is set to be internally consistent within each table. It does look funny when a positive return is colored orange or red, though. The only alternative I've come up with is to follow the color scheme within the bitcoin rows, which would at least not confuse the data as is currently happening.
|
|
|
|
|
DyslexicZombei
|
|
September 20, 2013, 04:52:15 AM |
|
FCTaiChi: I love your work here. Thank you! I will tip you .1 BTC if you would simply change the format of your spreadsheet from MH/s to GH/s. Why should we have to cater your public spreadsheet to MH when most folk are running in the GH/s range or larger? Why not make the outlier FPGAs and such have to be .0x or .00x GH/s instead of the other way around. I think it'll be *much* easier to grok in an instant for all of us. Just sayin'.  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FCTaiChi (OP)
|
|
September 20, 2013, 03:07:52 PM |
|
FCTaiChi: I love your work here. Thank you! I will tip you .1 BTC if you would simply change the format of your spreadsheet from MH/s to GH/s. Why should we have to cater your public spreadsheet to MH when most folk are running in the GH/s range or larger? Why not make the outlier FPGAs and such have to be .0x or .00x GH/s instead of the other way around. I think it'll be *much* easier to grok in an instant for all of us. Just sayin'. Oh, not a problem. That's something that I have planned anyway. Just took the FPGAs off a couple days ago, but it's the same for many of the one chip USB miners. I almost started the table off that way, actually. I feel like it's almost time to go to TH at this point, though. In the next few weeks there won't be any need for the 65nm+ designs, and most new units will be in the 100GH+ range. Ok, great. The main table is getting to large to add every manufacturer, but I will put them on the BitFury page and either have all the information for each person there, or make subsections for them. I'll update here when I do. |
|
|
|
|
blackarrow
|
|
September 22, 2013, 02:46:53 PM |
|
Can you please add our Prospero X-3 and Prospero X-1 miners?
|
|
|
|
|
FCTaiChi (OP)
|
|
September 22, 2013, 09:10:24 PM |
|
Can you please add our Prospero X-3 and Prospero X-1 miners?
Sry, busy busy week. Updated. Great to see you back. |
|
|
|
|
RHA
|
|
September 26, 2013, 08:21:17 PM |
|
A few corrections are needed:
Black Arrow is from Shenzen, China (symbol: CN). Now their Prospero X-1 should have 100 GH/s for $269, and X-3 2000 GH/s for $4499.
Bitmine.ch is from Switzerland (symbol: CH), not from Sweden (SE).
What does mean the red 'yes' in Tested/Shipping?
|
|
|
|
|
|
btceic
|
|
September 26, 2013, 08:42:24 PM
Last edit: September 26, 2013, 10:44:11 PM by btceic |
|
fyi,
TerraHash announced bankruptcy yesterday and Bargraphics, ever the terrahash cheerleader deleted every single one of his posts regarding terrahash.
|
|
|
|
cypherdoc
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002
|
|
September 26, 2013, 10:38:51 PM |
|
fyi,
TerraHash announced bankruptcy yesterday and Bargraphics, ever the terrahash cheerleader deleted every singlevone of his posts regarding terrahash.
no wonder i haven't seen him around. |
|
|
|
|
|
