List of ongoing scams

[MPOE-PR]

Satoshidice - IS based on irrefutable mathematics that behave in an honest manner under normal conditions, sometimes bets are delayed by 24 hours giving the house the window to bruteforce a hash that will be the most beneficial, the house or anyone else that receives access to the secret list ahead of time can submit selective bets and get a significantly lower house edge.

Almost anyone associated with them speaks in an intellectually appalling language and is full of unapologetic loose cannons, except Voorhees himself.

SealsWithClubs - Uses ancient software, game-play connection is not secure.

Lmao user reg'd April 19th, is this a mem sock or just a mem-level idiot?

[DiamondCardz]

is this a mem sock or just a mem-level idiot?

both

[Orvo]

wrong post

[tmbp]

It's probably PrimeDice trying to make CoinRoll look bad by loosely implying that they are affiliated by them.

Satoshidice - IS based on irrefutable mathematics that behave in an honest manner under normal conditions, sometimes bets are delayed by 24 hours giving the house the window to bruteforce a hash that will be the most beneficial, the house or anyone else that receives access to the secret list ahead of time can submit selective bets and get a significantly lower house edge.

Almost anyone associated with them speaks in an intellectually appalling language and is full of unapologetic loose cannons, except Voorhees himself.

SealsWithClubs - Uses ancient software, game-play connection is not secure.

Lmao user reg'd April 19th, is this a mem sock or just a mem-level idiot?

Is that y'all guys anniversary or something?

[tmbp]

list updated

[mem]

I think we need to sync information.

I see you listing many casinos that while not provably fair have not been proven to be scams.
I prefer the innocent until proven guilty approach.

[MPOE-PR]

I prefer the innocent until proven guilty approach.

No, you don't. You prefer the shill out your ears approach. Get lost.

[tmbp]

I think we need to sync information.

I see you listing many casinos that while not provably fair have not been proven to be scams.
I prefer the innocent until proven guilty approach.

Satoshidice - IS based on irrefutable mathematics that behave in an honest manner under normal conditions, sometimes bets are delayed by 24 hours giving the house the window to bruteforce a hash that will be the most beneficial, the house or anyone else that receives access to the secret list ahead of time can submit selective bets and get a significantly lower house edge.

Almost anyone associated with them speaks in an intellectually appalling language and is full of unapologetic loose cannons, except Voorhees himself.

I prefer the innocent until proven guilty approach.

No, you don't. You prefer the shill out your ears approach. Get lost.

Point proven?

[Matthew N. Wright]

I think we need to sync information.

I see you listing many casinos that while not provably fair have not been proven to be scams.
I prefer the innocent until proven guilty approach.

Satoshidice - IS based on irrefutable mathematics that behave in an honest manner under normal conditions, sometimes bets are delayed by 24 hours giving the house the window to bruteforce a hash that will be the most beneficial, the house or anyone else that receives access to the secret list ahead of time can submit selective bets and get a significantly lower house edge.

Almost anyone associated with them speaks in an intellectually appalling language and is full of unapologetic loose cannons, except Voorhees himself.

I prefer the innocent until proven guilty approach.

No, you don't. You prefer the shill out your ears approach. Get lost.

Point proven?

I wasn't aware "MPOE-PR" was associated with SatoshiDice. It's almost like saying I'm associated with this forum just because I use it to post here.

[tmbp]

I wasn't aware "MPOE-PR" was associated with SatoshiDice. It's almost like saying I'm associated with this forum just because I use it to post here.

No, but saying that you and Inaba bribe the admins with ad money so they will let you keep pushing your scams down the n00bs throats would be a pretty solid statement.

MPEX owner, Mircea Popescu, "The Wolf" is a stupid kid that should be selling vegetables in Romania along with his (LMAO) PR agent.

[mem]

I think we need to sync information.

I see you listing many casinos that while not provably fair have not been proven to be scams.
I prefer the innocent until proven guilty approach.

Satoshidice - IS based on irrefutable mathematics that behave in an honest manner under normal conditions, sometimes bets are delayed by 24 hours giving the house the window to bruteforce a hash that will be the most beneficial, the house or anyone else that receives access to the secret list ahead of time can submit selective bets and get a significantly lower house edge.

Almost anyone associated with them speaks in an intellectually appalling language and is full of unapologetic loose cannons, except Voorhees himself.

I prefer the innocent until proven guilty approach.

No, you don't. You prefer the shill out your ears approach. Get lost.

Point proven?

What was your point ?

that MPO-ER is an unpleasanrt racist asshat ? if so no need to convince me.

[tmbp]

What was your point ?

that MPO-ER is an unpleasanrt racist asshat ? if so no need to convince me.

Yes well the way we think seems to differ.

For me since the requirements for Bitcoin casinos are so low (virtually non-existent) I see new projects popping up on Freelancer/Elance everyday asking for new Bitcoin casinos and then they outsource that to the Chinese (good case scenario) or simply teens running casinos in their parents basements (bad case scenario), so my logic is that if a Bitcoin casino owner refuses to implement a provably fair system in addition to constantly refusing to release data to show that he is legit then he is a potential scammer, I rank websites by the chance of them being scammers using their willingness/desperation to hide as inputs.

Players are a lot more important than casinos, I wouldn't have even one player risk BTC because the owners of some casino are dirtbags.

[mem]

What was your point ?

that MPO-ER is an unpleasanrt racist asshat ? if so no need to convince me.

Yes well the way we think seems to differ.

For me since the requirements for Bitcoin casinos are so low (virtually non-existent) I see new projects popping up on Freelancer/Elance everyday asking for new Bitcoin casinos and then they outsource that to the Chinese (good case scenario) or simply teens running casinos in their parents basements (bad case scenario), so my logic is that if a Bitcoin casino owner refuses to implement a provably fair system in addition to constantly refusing to release data to show that he is legit then he is a potential scammer, I rank websites by the chance of them being scammers using their willingness/desperation to hide as inputs.

Players are a lot more important than casinos, I wouldn't have even one player risk BTC because the owners of some casino are dirtbags.

You may be surprised then, I also feel that a casino should be provably fair when there is little to no excuse not to be.
The owner refusing to do so likely means they are manipulating game results in their favour, I voiced this concern regarding strike sapphire when first adding it to my list.

I was quite hard on satoshicircle for claiming provably fair until they improved their system as a direct result of my discussion with Andi the site operator.

Regarding my own list, I originally I felt it was unfair to penalize a new casino simply because it is not provably fair, so I play test and confirm cash in/ cash out works with a few random accounts then approve (usually with a note saying it should be provably fair but isnt).

Now given the multiple examples provided of provably fair systems Im finding I am less inclined to approve these sites. Im also finding the operators start to play dumb when you query the lack of a provably fair RNG.

I do appreciate your work, you definitely put some  thought into it (unlike bitcoinscammers).

[Matthew N. Wright]

I wasn't aware "MPOE-PR" was associated with SatoshiDice. It's almost like saying I'm associated with this forum just because I use it to post here.

No, but saying that you and Inaba bribe the admins with ad money so they will let you keep pushing your scams down the n00bs throats would be a pretty solid statement.

Wait, you lost me. I bribed admins with ad money? Do you have any idea how much the mods and admin here are biased *against* me? If there was any doubt by your main OP how clueless you are, it's gone now.

[tmbp]

I wasn't aware "MPOE-PR" was associated with SatoshiDice. It's almost like saying I'm associated with this forum just because I use it to post here.

No, but saying that you and Inaba bribe the admins with ad money so they will let you keep pushing your scams down the n00bs throats would be a pretty solid statement.

Wait, you lost me. I bribed admins with ad money? Do you have any idea how much the mods and admin here are biased *against* me? If there was any doubt by your main OP how clueless you are, it's gone now.

It might be that they hate you but you still advertise your scams along with Inaba.

[MPOE-PR]

If there was any doubt by your main OP how clueless you are, it's gone now.

Well at least it was an entertaining read so far....

[Matthew N. Wright]

I wasn't aware "MPOE-PR" was associated with SatoshiDice. It's almost like saying I'm associated with this forum just because I use it to post here.

No, but saying that you and Inaba bribe the admins with ad money so they will let you keep pushing your scams down the n00bs throats would be a pretty solid statement.

Wait, you lost me. I bribed admins with ad money? Do you have any idea how much the mods and admin here are biased *against* me? If there was any doubt by your main OP how clueless you are, it's gone now.

It might be that they hate you but you still advertise your scams along with Inaba.

Link?

[tmbp]

Link?

That's just my personal opinion I haven't really investigated that far into my sources, I don't really spend time in gossip, I just make sure the members are protected.

[Matthew N. Wright]

Link?

That's just my personal opinion I haven't really investigated that far into my sources, I don't really spend time in gossip, I just make sure the members are protected.

Your "personal opinion" is that I have purchased advertising space (which I've never done) to scam (which I've never done) but you don't really spend time in "gossip" (which is what you're doing) and you don't look into your "sources" (other people's gossip) because you want to "protect" people?

You're more entertaining than dank.

[tmbp]

Link?

That's just my personal opinion I haven't really investigated that far into my sources, I don't really spend time in gossip, I just make sure the members are protected.

Your "personal opinion" is that I have purchased advertising space (which I've never done) to scam (which I've never done) but you don't really spend time in "gossip" (which is what you're doing) and you don't look into your "sources" (other people's gossip) because you want to "protect" people?

You're more entertaining than dank.

If you weren't a scammer you wouldn't have an Untrustworthy tag and an orange ignore button, stop trying to sell your shit, no-ones buying it.

If there was any doubt by your main OP how clueless you are, it's gone now.

Well at least it was an entertaining read so far....

MPOE-PR I see that you're always posting in my threads, my proposition is still valid if you want to claim it.

MPOE-PR, stop playing hard to get, let me take you out for dinner, watch a cheap zombie flick together, I'll let you caress my abs while I gently whisper "you mirin" in your ear.