Still believe in ICO ?

[ludmilawolff]

that ICO is a new step in the development of the economy. I got more profit than trading by investing in ICOs. I hope it will provide high benefits to many people in the nearest future.

[andyhooton]

I atill believe in icos because they are the first thing that gives me profits in the business because way back then I do not have money to invest or even to trade so I just join in a signature ico campaigns as a bounty hunter then I gain profit in that but today it seems like they are being made to fool people there are a lot of icos out there that are just a scam that takes the money of the people which is why there are some people loosing hope in some icos. But me I am still believe and I hope that scammers will be banned in the future

[alaskata]

We still believe, because not every ICO is bad

[win5]

ICO is a very risky investment it was clear from the outset. Every month more than 30 new ico do you think that they will all live? Of course 95% of coins after ico will die immediately after listing, but the rest will live and brings a profit to investors.

typerium think is very good invest

[seek4dream]

I only invest in very few ICOs which I really believe.
Right now I am following Atonomi which will launch ICO before the end of this month.

[AdamR8]

The most important thing is to thoroughly go through their whitepaper to assess the project's feasibility before committing funds into it. Most of them do not have any good project, they are just putting out something to amass wealth and such projects are not profitable to invest.  I still believe in ICOs but we all need to be careful when investing and have strict criteria.

[Riyandurrani]

Yes, I still believe in ICO. ICO gives us an opportunity to.create a project that could.make a change in the digital world and in reality. Zenodys is one ICO created to make a difference in the monetization of digital assets  that could standardized the market by means of it visual tools that is easy to use and understand.  A platform worthy of our support.

[AlGo75]

I do believe in ICOs as there are some good ones, but most of the good ones are being purchased by the Big Whales, and the ones that are not, are to expensive for the little guy. So really at the early stages of beginners, it is almost impossible to join a good ICO. In Typerium i do believe .

[res123]

ICO is a big risk. but there are also good projects. for example the project Typerium. He has a very good rating

[Rainbowwww]

I still believe in ICO's, for example, personaly I've invest in REMME and for now stronly convinced of next rise. So, what about project, is a state of the art method for cryptographically granting access to devices and systems that are looking to securely sign in to a service. It has a few advanced technical features that are enabled in part by blockchain, with a hybrid system of Proof of Stake and Proof of Authority consensus algorithm that is purpose built for the REMME platform.

[VclDm]

Yes. I still believe in ICO projects. The growing cryptocurrency market has led to the emergence of many potential ICO projects. These projects, in a short time of time, have developed rapidly and dramatically, making it easy for market participants to make a profit. Recognizing the benefits, many investors are pondering and competing to participate in potential ICO projects.

[cryptomaster1302]

I still believe Tiperium ICO this is  creative content creators  in the market are unable to capitalize on the growing  economy around the blockchain technology
 https://typerium.io

[alexKKK]

All the same I earn on this as before 

[yourbird]

I still believe in ICO because when the ICO is successful we will get big rewards. I think ICO is an easy way to earn money by following some rules and we will get rewards in the form of tokens / coins. But, be careful because most are frauds, it's better for you to do the ICO before you join it.

[SMD.Shuvo]

It is true that I still believe Ico. Because it changed my life and I learned a lot. I'll believe the ico until death.

[APICEMTECH]

Recently I have invested in couple of ICO's, which are - hernode and unibright. Both of them have great partnerships like with qtum and in case of unibright they are already partnered with microsoft. However I have to say that both under performed after they got listed at IDEX.

[Barabulya]

Personally, I continue to believe in ICO because I think this type of sales is very effective and profitable for investors. If you invest correctly, you can get a big profit.

[ryanfromrethink]

my friend, it's 2018, and your topic is very popular. Really a lot of bench in the ICO. Your task is to distinguish a good project from a bad one. There are a number of criteria for this. If they are all met, you can work with the project. I as an investor and as a bounty hunter, chose a Countinghouse project. It is suitable for investment according to all my criteria.

[ttookk]

In general, not so much. When it comes down to specific projects, yes, actually.

I'm not really an ICO nut, but this one caught my eye:

Adamant

I gotta say, in a world where almost all ICOs are run through Ethereum, many of which are promising a mainnet "eventually", having a project which not only uses something else than Ethereum, but also already has a working network is pretty refreshing.

Lisk, which Adamant is based on, did quite well back then, as did a lot of non-token, non-Ethereum ICOs.

We'll see whether times may have changed, but I always went with the underdogs and it paid off in the end.

Another, more recent example was Dragonchain. It had its ICO in a kind of depression state, where everybody was pretty much fed up. Additionally, it had no Hardcap, which people disliked as well. Turned out to be one of the big, big winners.

So, my bet is on Adamant, because it is pretty much a dark horse at this stage.

More of my thoughts on it here:

Can I just say how glad I am to see an ICo which is not just another ETH token?

My personal thoughts:

Pros:

• Working prototype
• Proven consensus system (Lisks codebase)
• Relatively small hardcap (12 000 ETH or roughly 8 000 000 $)
• Most of the tokens will be distributed
• Sniffing around indicates, that this is a legit project (E.g. interview on the Lisk blog, yet no official endorsement)

Cons:

• I'm not sure whether an independent blockchain is really needed for this project
• It's still a token solution, meaning, you'll have to jump through hoops to get the tokens to pay, as opposed to payment via established currencies

General thoughts:
There is a number of projects working in that direction, which on the one hand is competition, on the other hand indicates a general interest in the idea. From what I'm seeing, Adamant is pretty far ahead, compared to others (Hush, ODN, et. al.).
With SHIFT, Ark, RISE and Blockpool, Lisks codebase has been utilized quite a bit. Projects like EOS will be using a variant of DPoS as well, so there might be more interest in projects going that route.
All in all, I feel the positives outweight the negative aspects, so I'll put a little bit in there.

Ref link:

https://adamant.im/ico/?referal=U10700721906004344123

Ref link shill: https://adamant.im/ico/?referal=U10700721906004344123

[crypthomonkey]

The number of successful ICO's are decreasing dramatically.  Just wanna know about successful ICO's in the fourth quarter of 2017 and if anybody still believes in  ICO's.

Maybe I am an optimist and so on but I believe in ICO
It doesn t have its good time jow but there still is a chance for it to become a nice opportunity to earn money not lose them