BiblePay | 10% to Orphan-Charity | RANDOMX MINING | Sanctuaries (Masternodes)

[sunk818]

I see your cpid in exec unbanked, and dont see a problem.  We'll have to look at this deeper if it happens again. As far as back-to-back sancs can get back to back payments if their order is established that way.  

If no unbanked got paid, isn't that a problem? I didn't get paid either...? I should have gotten ~386 BBP last superblock. I get it though, it is only a handful of people that use unbanked, so it isn't a big priority...

https://explorebiblepay.com/address/BNgMnng7mBtCcnKs8orJT5peWkj6nsCAoG
https://www.biblepay-central.org/en/podc/user/1992796/

For the last superblock, is the budget 1165971.783? It is not 1,161,612.18? That's a difference of 4,359.61... is 4k more being paid out? I get maybe the explorer is truncating some decimals or there is a rounding error, but 4k is a big difference from 1165 vs 1161.
https://explorebiblepay.com/tx/7471bed4c45df129da8c3b0ee19d13c2bd6f80cd70d7be0786dcfe891bce601f

[1714962970]

1714962970

[jaapgvk]

I see your cpid in exec unbanked, and dont see a problem.  We'll have to look at this deeper if it happens again. As far as back-to-back sancs can get back to back payments if their order is established that way.  

If no unbanked got paid, isn't that a problem? I didn't get paid either...? I should have gotten ~386 BBP last superblock. I get it though, it is only a handful of people that use unbanked, so it isn't a big priority...

https://explorebiblepay.com/address/BNgMnng7mBtCcnKs8orJT5peWkj6nsCAoG
https://www.biblepay-central.org/en/podc/user/1992796/

For the last superblock, is the budget 1165971.783? It is not 1,161,612.18? That's a difference of 4,359.61... is 4k more being paid out? I get maybe the explorer is truncating some decimals or there is a rounding error, but 4k is a big difference from 1165 vs 1161.
https://explorebiblepay.com/tx/7471bed4c45df129da8c3b0ee19d13c2bd6f80cd70d7be0786dcfe891bce601f

I didn't get an unbanked payment either, so I guess that maybe it's something on the pool-side, since that is handling the unbanked I guess?

CPID: 8791a036b545f35e9ebd9333922738ac
https://www.biblepay-central.org/en/podc/user/1986929/

[MIP]

My windows wallet can't do podc updates either. It didn't do any automatically for more than 24h and if I try to force exec podcupdate it says this:



{
  "Command": "podcupdate",
  "PODCUpdate": "Processed 0 tasks for CPID 96892ec0fc8a2710fa84f26c9c84cd3e"
}

Edit: I tried "exec podcupdate true" with the same negative result, but surprisingly this worked

exec podcupdate true debuginfowhatever
{
  "Command": "podcupdate",
  "PODCUpdate": "Processed (1) over 1 CPID(s) successfully."
}

Weird

[Lichtsucher]

Light, everytime that I add some new miners to PurePool, it seems that my Ratio (%) is increased artificially and I see how the old miners decrease their numbers of Shares. Probably your pool is increasing the difficulty due to the 150% threshold that was artificially increased due to the new miners just added.
1) How can I see my current difficulty assigned to my workers by your pool?
1) How can I see my ratio? I know that you have hidden this because most of the accounts were in the safe zone (but not mine).
2) How long does it take the % to stabilize after adding new miners?
Thanks in advance.

Hi afeno,

my plan is to remove the legacy code for the rating this weekend, as it is no longer needed.
Hadn't seen anything unusual in the last days regarding any miner and this old rating code.
I hadn't seen anything you describe, but the system is rate the miners every hour, so it might be possible in theory and I had missed it. But it would require a miner that is already close to the 150% and then add a miner that is worst then the old one.
But as said, this (theoretical) situation should no longer be a problem after the weekend.

[noxpost]

Slightly different topic here -

I am ALMOST certain that at one point - can't remember where I saw this, though - there had been an investigation into making a Ledger Nano app for BBP - and if I remember correctly, the conclusion was that it was super expensive and difficult if we didn't have a grassroots campaign supporting it. But we could get access to the SDK and build it ourselves, I think...what do we think about doing that? I feel like that would be pretty cool exposure for BBP. A small team of people with dev skills could probably knock it out relatively quickly if we thought it was worthwhile.

[BtcMan2009]

I was very touched by the fact that such a avid time, where everyone thinks only about how to fill their pockets with money and driven by greed. The team finds time and opportunity to do charity work for the present. Monthly sponsoring of orphans. That's commendable. 

[sunk818]

I was very touched by the fact that such a avid time, where everyone thinks only about how to fill their pockets with money and driven by greed. The team finds time and opportunity to do charity work for the present. Monthly sponsoring of orphans. That's commendable. 

Deuteronomy 15:7-8,10-11 English Standard Version (ESV)

7 “If among you, one of your brothers should become poor, in any of your towns within your land that the Lord your God is giving you, you shall not harden your heart or shut your hand against your poor brother, 8 but you shall open your hand to him and lend him sufficient for his need, whatever it may be.

10 You shall give to him freely, and your heart shall not be grudging when you give to him, because for this the Lord your God will bless you in all your work and in all that you undertake. 11 For there will never cease to be poor in the land. Therefore I command you, ‘You shall open wide your hand to your brother, to the needy and to the poor, in your land.’

[BivanF]

when this coin started i thought that it was one big joke , but i have to say that i underestimated thisone , and still asicresistant , not much coins are that

[slovakia]

Slightly different topic here -

I am ALMOST certain that at one point - can't remember where I saw this, though - there had been an investigation into making a Ledger Nano app for BBP - and if I remember correctly, the conclusion was that it was super expensive and difficult if we didn't have a grassroots campaign supporting it. But we could get access to the SDK and build it ourselves, I think...what do we think about doing that? I feel like that would be pretty cool exposure for BBP. A small team of people with dev skills could probably knock it out relatively quickly if we thought it was worthwhile.

im asked LEDGER NANO TEAM via email and i received from them PM



ANSWER from NANO LEDGE S HW WALLET about BBP

There are a lot of altcoins and as Ledger has limited resources it cannot integrate them all. The conditions to integrate an altcoin are one of the following: - massive general support and high market cap (ex: Ethereum) - development sponsored by the coin's community (ex: Litecoin) - direct developer integration using Ledger's SDK

For information, the "altcoin package" costs 78,000 EUR and includes: - development of altcoin's Nano S / Blue app - altcoin support added to the Ledger Wallet Chrome app - altcoin explorer API development for the backend - 1,000 Ledger Nano S unit with altcoin's logo laser engraving

We can also do only the firmware/software part without the 1,000 Nano S for 20,000 EUR.

This price is valid only for blockchains inheriting from already supported coins (Bitcoin, Peercoin, Ethereum...) If your blockchain is 100% original, then pricing can be much higher.

In any case it's best to join our Slack http://slack.ledger.co to discuss integration with our engineers.

[afeno]

Light, everytime that I add some new miners to PurePool, it seems that my Ratio (%) is increased artificially and I see how the old miners decrease their numbers of Shares. Probably your pool is increasing the difficulty due to the 150% threshold that was artificially increased due to the new miners just added.
1) How can I see my current difficulty assigned to my workers by your pool?
1) How can I see my ratio? I know that you have hidden this because most of the accounts were in the safe zone (but not mine).
2) How long does it take the % to stabilize after adding new miners?
Thanks in advance.

Hi afeno,

my plan is to remove the legacy code for the rating this weekend, as it is no longer needed.
Hadn't seen anything unusual in the last days regarding any miner and this old rating code.
I hadn't seen anything you describe, but the system is rate the miners every hour, so it might be possible in theory and I had missed it. But it would require a miner that is already close to the 150% and then add a miner that is worst then the old one.
But as said, this (theoretical) situation should no longer be a problem after the weekend.

Thank you Light for the work you will do during the weekend. Based on my testing, when I was adding new miners to the pool, it was taking around 3 days to stabilize. I am glad that this pool will also follow the standard mining rules.

[MIP]

Apart from not being able to do PoDC from my wallet, now I see this in my console

Code:

exec testvote

{
  "Command": "testvote",
  "file-age": 1525927790,
  "file-hash": "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000",
  "contract": "",
  "sanctuary_rank": 0,
  "pam_hash": "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000",
  "govobjhash": "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000",
  "Addresses": "",
  "Amounts": "",
  "quorum_hex": "",
  "quorum_gobject_trigger_hash": "",
  "quorum_error": "Invalid object type 0Governance object is not valid - ce9faa62e5cdc5b602380f223e5480798770b67fe37c79309a76619e6286973d",
  "votes_for_my_contract": 0,
  "required_votes": 3,
  "last_superblock": 45510,
  "next_superblock": 45715,
  "cpid_count": 0,
  "total_magnitude": 0,
  "next_superblock_triggered": false,
  "vote_result": false,
  "vote_error": "Invalid object type 0Governance object is not valid - ce9faa62e5cdc5b602380f223e5480798770b67fe37c79309a76619e6286973d",
  "serial": ""
}

I don't know if it's only me or it's a general problem

Edit: it only happens in the windows qt wallets. In the masternode it shows properly.

[slovakia]

jaapgay you are example how anybody can to dump coin  

[dave_bbp]

Apart from not being able to do PoDC from my wallet, now I see this in my console

Code:

exec testvote

{
  "Command": "testvote",
  "file-age": 1525927790,
  "file-hash": "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000",
  "contract": "",
  "sanctuary_rank": 0,
  "pam_hash": "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000",
  "govobjhash": "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000",
  "Addresses": "",
  "Amounts": "",
  "quorum_hex": "",
  "quorum_gobject_trigger_hash": "",
  "quorum_error": "Invalid object type 0Governance object is not valid - ce9faa62e5cdc5b602380f223e5480798770b67fe37c79309a76619e6286973d",
  "votes_for_my_contract": 0,
  "required_votes": 3,
  "last_superblock": 45510,
  "next_superblock": 45715,
  "cpid_count": 0,
  "total_magnitude": 0,
  "next_superblock_triggered": false,
  "vote_result": false,
  "vote_error": "Invalid object type 0Governance object is not valid - ce9faa62e5cdc5b602380f223e5480798770b67fe37c79309a76619e6286973d",
  "serial": ""
}

I don't know if it's only me or it's a general problem

Edit: it only happens in the windows qt wallets. In the masternode it shows properly.

PODCupdate works for me (windows qt) but the testvote doesn't work either. Could this be related to the fact that (at least on the pool page) EVERYBODY has a task weight of 0? oO

jaapgay you are example how anybody can to dump coin  

Are you serious? How old are you? Like 12? Good Lord have mercy...

[vahtis]

jaapgay you are example how anybody can to dump coin  

You mean this c-cex dump to 27 satoshi? I removed my buy orders just yesterday, because they were not filled and right after that someone dumps

I think jaapgvk has his sanctuary on sale as there is sell order 38 satoshi on c-cex.

[thesnat21]

i'm seeing the 0 taskweight as well...  hopefully its fixed before the next superblock

[slovakia]

thesnat21 where you see taskweight 0? i hope that not on that lichsucker web ... that web is only info,not main ... use wallets console window ... all is OK dont worry

[thesnat21]

thesnat21 where you see taskweight 0? i hope that not on that lichsucker web ... that web is only info,not main ... use wallets console window ... all is OK dont worry

Main pool shows it..

Odd getboincinfo is reading correct.

[616westwarmoth]

As far as back-to-back sancs can get back to back payments if their order is established that way. 

The issue he may be talking about is described by me in Github

Sanctuaries still occasionally receive back-to-back rewards. The last one I saw was 44966 and 44967 which were both received by MN BMzQQ29EcQyNanxpi1afjLYaxwx5exsfQJ.
This skews the expected rate of return for Sanctuaries as the back-to-back rewards are sporadic and unpredictable. But this goes against the Economics page which states "38.5% is given to the longest waiting Sanctuary".

[noxpost]

Well it looks like the majority of Jaap's second sanc up for sale for the new exchange fund got bought

Excited to see where we leverage this income now! Good days are ahead.

[thesnat21]

seems like the POBH difficulty is going through the roof... and it doesn't appear to be on the known pools. ..

someone new come to the party?