tom99
|
 |
August 08, 2013, 05:19:42 AM |
|
There's something different about those chips...a clue perhaps to a question I asked on the OP [EDIT] Err. second post? Asic chip same inside but only package not same.
|
|
|
|
kaerf
|
 |
August 08, 2013, 05:31:05 AM |
|
There's something different about those chips...a clue perhaps to a question I asked on the OP [EDIT] Err. second post?
is it a tree instead of a flower? money tree! 
|
|
|
|
DyslexicZombei
|
 |
August 08, 2013, 07:09:00 AM |
|
Hi Dave,
Please put me down for a couple of "bad boards" too!
If they even partially hash they're still better than nothing. I used to be a Sr. E-tech & I have access to a full lab that we could hook it up to an o-scope & other fun tools.
|
|
|
|
DyslexicZombei
|
 |
August 08, 2013, 07:14:17 AM |
|
Hmm, of course I'd need an M-board to host it or it'll sit until the October shipment. Any "naughty" M-boards not up to spec in that batch that just need a little TLC like capacitor swaps or something minor? Had to ask while we're on the subject. <Promise not to forget to discharge it first.  > I'll be more than happy to take that naughty board & give it a good e-spank. 
|
|
|
|
dropt
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1000
|
 |
August 08, 2013, 07:30:55 AM |
|
Silently following, just want to throw down that I too would be interested in partially faulty boards.
|
|
|
|
goxed
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1006
Bitcoin / Crypto mining Hardware.
|
 |
August 08, 2013, 09:42:33 AM |
|
Please count me in for some of the Bad Boards.
|
Revewing Bitcoin / Crypto mining Hardware.
|
|
|
arorts
|
 |
August 08, 2013, 09:52:15 AM |
|
We all want faulty boards so to save the length of this thread it might be easier if only those who don't want faulty boards say so. :-)
|
|
|
|
|
jspielberg
|
 |
August 08, 2013, 11:51:29 AM |
|
So Dave... This response to bad boards was what I meant when I joked about there being a market for the boards if they only "added" rather than hashed. Though obviously they would have to hash a little for most people to really want them. Zero hashing boards I think would need a STEEP discount (and an EE degree  ).
|
|
|
|
CryptoCluster
Member

Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
 |
August 08, 2013, 12:18:34 PM |
|
If you are looking for PSU to power up the Full Kit, you should consider using Server PSU's. They are dirt cheap and rock solid :-) Here is good guide how to use them as an 12V power source: http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1292514It is the path I will take for my 400GH kits.
|
"The cumulative development of a medium of exchange on the free market — is the only way money can become established. ... government is powerless to create money for the economy; it can only be developed by the processes of the free market." M. N. Rothbard
|
|
|
P_Shep
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1823
Merit: 1325
I guess this is OK.
|
 |
August 08, 2013, 12:30:09 PM |
|
Hmmmm... thinking about this. The chips seem amazing!
|
|
|
|
-Redacted-
|
 |
August 08, 2013, 12:43:53 PM Last edit: August 08, 2013, 03:02:43 PM by -Redacted- |
|
I think the moral of the story regarding bad boards is - you are probably able sell boards - H-boards - as fast as you can make them and as many of them as you can make. Even just 10 Gh/s boards....
|
|
|
|
Stack
|
 |
August 08, 2013, 12:44:54 PM |
|
$500 for a pack of 3 naughty boards? (because everything naughty happens in 3's) I'd hit pay that
|
|
|
|
buzzdave (OP)
VIP
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 472
Merit: 250
|
 |
August 08, 2013, 03:35:55 PM |
|
Gosh, why did we work so hard to get them fully working? We could have been selling non-functional boards ages ago!
|
|
|
|
zurg
|
 |
August 08, 2013, 03:37:00 PM |
|
Gosh, why did we work so hard to get them fully working? We could have been selling non-functional boards ages ago!
Hey, I was only requesting halfassfunctional boards 
|
|
|
|
-Redacted-
|
 |
August 08, 2013, 03:39:21 PM |
|
Gosh, why did we work so hard to get them fully working? We could have been selling non-functional boards ages ago!
That would still beat the competition in terms of delivery.... I'd buy halffast boards today over full-fast boards next month 
|
|
|
|
jspielberg
|
 |
August 08, 2013, 03:53:40 PM |
|
The key is the discount.. No one would pay full price for the broken boards, but if you were going to junk them... Well, for a reasonable average GH/$, they would find happy homes.
|
|
|
|
buzzdave (OP)
VIP
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 472
Merit: 250
|
 |
August 08, 2013, 04:01:43 PM |
|
Gosh, why did we work so hard to get them fully working? We could have been selling non-functional boards ages ago!
That would still beat the competition in terms of delivery.... I'd buy halffast boards today over full-fast boards next month  The proto rig is rock-solid after 24 hours of running at the new chip.conf. These asics are curious critters - if you have a bad chip on a board, software will disable the chip in config. This causes adjacent chips to see a little more power and therefore get a slight overclock. For example most chips are producing around 1.5 - 1.6 GH/s actual nonces. But some chips are at 2.1 GH/s. In this way, even with some duds the full rig is producing 410 - 415GH/s actual accepted shares. Even Slush stats have caught up and show average hashrate over 400G at the pool. I think this is unique - it seems most mining hardware is rated at a certain hashpower, but true output is typically less than promised.
|
|
|
|
zurg
|
 |
August 08, 2013, 04:04:19 PM |
|
Gosh, why did we work so hard to get them fully working? We could have been selling non-functional boards ages ago!
That would still beat the competition in terms of delivery.... I'd buy halffast boards today over full-fast boards next month  The proto rig is rock-solid after 24 hours of running at the new chip.conf. These asics are curious critters - if you have a bad chip on a board, software will disable the chip in config. This causes adjacent chips to see a little more power and therefore get a slight overclock. For example most chips are producing around 1.5 - 1.6 GH/s actual nonces. But some chips are at 2.1 GH/s. In this way, even with some duds the full rig is producing 410 - 415GH/s actual accepted shares. Even Slush stats have caught up and show average hashrate over 400G at the pool. I think this is unique - it seems most mining hardware is rated at a certain hashpower, but true output is typically less than promised. Aha, so desolder a chip per board sell it for profit.., and still have your full hashing power.  Got it. hehehe
|
|
|
|
ErebusBat
|
 |
August 08, 2013, 04:07:32 PM |
|
I think this is unique - it seems most mining hardware is rated at a certain hashpower, but true output is typically less than promised.
Another first
|
|
|
|
|