Bitcoin Forum
November 14, 2024, 07:55:29 PM *
News: Check out the artwork 1Dq created to commemorate this forum's 15th anniversary
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  

Warning: Moderators do not remove likely scams. You must use your own brain: caveat emptor. Watch out for Ponzi schemes. Do not invest more than you can afford to lose.

Pages: « 1 ... 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 [78] 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [BitFunder] IceDrill.ASIC IPO (235 Thash Mining Operation powered by HashFast)  (Read 378626 times)
theMiracle
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 100


View Profile
March 22, 2014, 03:21:51 PM
 #1541

^The cow gives milk over its lifetime, not all at once.  You'd be stuck buying the miners piecemeal, requiring long-term contracts with ASIC manufacturers to buy @ ~wholesale price.  It gets messy.
Dice
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 69
Merit: 10


View Profile
March 22, 2014, 05:05:54 PM
 #1542

Hi Will,

How are the stabilization of chips going? I've been closely monitoring the ozcoin top 20 and i see we are slowly reducing the hashing power there? Is this a result of moving hashing power to a different pool/service (which one?) or are we experiencing some dreaded bad chips again?

Also more importantly we'd all like to know whats the status with HashFast, things are rather grim because of their delays, have any advancements made on this front?

Also you mentioned a week or more back that the faulty units were sent back to HashFast. Have new units been delivered to replace the faulty ones?

We'd all appreciate some more news.

will
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 179
Merit: 100



View Profile
March 24, 2014, 05:33:05 AM
Last edit: March 24, 2014, 09:48:34 AM by will
 #1543

Hi Will,

How are the stabilization of chips going? I've been closely monitoring the ozcoin top 20 and i see we are slowly reducing the hashing power there? Is this a result of moving hashing power to a different pool/service (which one?) or are we experiencing some dreaded bad chips again?

Also more importantly we'd all like to know whats the status with HashFast, things are rather grim because of their delays, have any advancements made on this front?

Also you mentioned a week or more back that the faulty units were sent back to HashFast. Have new units been delivered to replace the faulty ones?

We'd all appreciate some more news.

Hi

Stabilization and RMA is ongoing. Hashfast has been very accommodating with our requirements on both fronts.

We've currently in the middle of a solo mining test, using the new gbt cgminer upgrade work which we initiated (see: https://github.com/ckolivas/cgminer/commit/f113a25ff79a171240512b3791da1fb64f50b14c). We started early live testing on Thursday, and the test started in full on Saturday night (CET) and has been running for about 30.5 hours now. Block rewards are sent here:
https://blockchain.info/address/12ej4RUwoszmQoKYyFg6Ej27L82xhFS5Ao
(2 blocks solved at the time of this writing, both of which were found within 12h of the switch). We'll keep a close eye on everything over at least the next 72h and decide where to go from there.

As always, the minestate monitor (https://www.icedrill.io/minestate) is unaffected by pool/target switching.

We've left ~10Th @ ozcoin for the moment.  Just to be clear: Graet and Blaksmith have been a huge help throughout all of this stabilization work @ #cgminer-dev. The decision has nothing to do with "moving away from" and everything to do with "moving towards" the new target.

We started mining from a 2nd location as the current one is starting to approach its power/cooling limits, though we do have the option for limited (minimal setup cost) expansion there. New/alternate DC selection is ongoing and we're making good progress on that front. We'll be deploying a small hosting agreement (contract executed) into the new location over the coming days.

Will
will
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 179
Merit: 100



View Profile
March 24, 2014, 05:43:22 AM
Last edit: March 24, 2014, 09:11:13 AM by will
 #1544

I actually think someone with a vested interest should do it.    


There are good arguments for and against this sentiment. I (for one) think an open discussion/Q&A would be a refreshing additional communication-channel. It being conducted by an objective, informed, eloquent person like yourself could work. If it doesn't work, we can simply stop.
paul3
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 99
Merit: 11


View Profile
March 24, 2014, 02:38:42 PM
 #1545

Did I miss any mining address?

will
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 179
Merit: 100



View Profile
March 24, 2014, 03:01:17 PM
Last edit: March 24, 2014, 03:14:12 PM by will
 #1546

Did I miss any mining address?


Nope, you got them all. Just ensure you follow the [change received/unspent output] addresses when doing a tally of the funds held (each address represents a separate wallet). You're about 32 BTC short for the total, according to my records (533.81535819 BTC).
raskul
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 250



View Profile
March 26, 2014, 07:03:09 AM
 #1547

On ozcoin pool was better. Three days passed and there is no block. went back to ozcoin pool.

you can't beat a good DGM pool - and Oz is a good DGM pool. that's the luck of the draw  Kiss

tips    1APp826DqjJBdsAeqpEstx6Q8hD4urac8a
-ck
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4284
Merit: 1645


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
March 28, 2014, 12:38:23 AM
 #1548

Block #3!

https://blockchain.info/tx/90e59ac1b03526180f6c476d1c7ca1d9bc9f1848597e58045f7e1186aa2521c4

Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel
2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
pedrog
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2786
Merit: 1031



View Profile
March 28, 2014, 12:41:57 AM
 #1549


Finally!

-ck
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4284
Merit: 1645


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
March 28, 2014, 12:56:09 AM
 #1550

I don't know about "finally"; if there's only something like 150-180TH going solo, that's actually pretty decent luck. Variance can kill you if you have a block that takes 10x the current difficulty, and the first 2 blocks were definitely lucky. This latest one included some not insignificant transaction fees too.

Transaction Fees    0.11114335 BTC

Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel
2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
raskul
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 250



View Profile
March 28, 2014, 06:25:40 AM
 #1551

I don't know about "finally"; if there's only something like 150-180TH going solo, that's actually pretty decent luck. Variance can kill you if you have a block that takes 10x the current difficulty, and the first 2 blocks were definitely lucky. This latest one included some not insignificant transaction fees too.

Transaction Fees    0.11114335 BTC

party all round then! we got a block on Oz too
lets stay friends - even if we have had a 'conscious uncoupling'  Kiss

tips    1APp826DqjJBdsAeqpEstx6Q8hD4urac8a
raskul
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 250



View Profile
March 28, 2014, 08:07:48 AM
 #1552

one block for 8 days? Fuck it solo

no. 3 blocks in ~5 days

https://blockchain.info/address/12ej4RUwoszmQoKYyFg6Ej27L82xhFS5Ao

tips    1APp826DqjJBdsAeqpEstx6Q8hD4urac8a
Dexter770221
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1029
Merit: 1000


View Profile
March 28, 2014, 09:02:59 AM
 #1553

Bigger mines switching to pool mining becuse of variance and no blocks in long period of time. I'm amazed that Icedrill is doing opposite.

Under development Modular UPGRADEABLE Miner (MUM). Looking for investors.
Changing one PCB with screwdriver and you have brand new miner in hand... Plug&Play, scalable from one module to thousands.
zebroid
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 74
Merit: 10



View Profile WWW
March 28, 2014, 02:26:46 PM
 #1554

Bigger mines switching to pool mining becuse of variance and no blocks in long period of time. I'm amazed that Icedrill is doing opposite.

If you read further up they solo mining to test the new version of cgminer (the mining software) they got done.
kleeck
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 532
Merit: 500


https://karatcoin.co


View Profile
March 28, 2014, 04:07:51 PM
 #1555

What is the current hash rate?


  █ █████       ▄████▀▄██▀
  █ █████     ▄████▀███▀
  █ █████    ████▀███▀
  █ █████  ▄███▀███▓
  █ █████▄███▀████▀
  █ ███████▀████▀
  █ █████▀▄█████▄
  █ ███▀▄█████████▄
  █ █▀▄██ ▀█████████▄
  █ ▄████   ▀███████▀█▄   
  █ █████     ▀███▀▄████▄
  █ █████       ▀▄████████▄
                   
                    █████                   
                ▄███  █  ███▄               
             ███      █      ███             
         ▄███         █         ███▄         
       ██    ███████████████████    ██       
    ████            ██ ██            ████   
    ██             █     █             ██   
    █ █           █       █           █ █   
    █ ██         █         █         ██ █   
    █  ██      ██           ██      ██  █   
    █   ██    ██             ██    ██   █   
    █    ██  ██               ██  ██    █   
    █     █ ██                 ██ █     █   
    █     █████████████████████████     █   
    █  ███  ██                 ██  ███  █   
    ███       █               █       ███   
      ███      ██           ██      ███     
         ███     █         █     ███         
            ▀███  ██     ██  ███▀           
                ▀████   ████▀               
▀███▀
                 
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
22naru
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 854
Merit: 501


View Profile
March 29, 2014, 06:06:55 PM
 #1556

http://www.coindesk.com/court-grants-order-freeze-hashfasts-bitcoin-wallets/

...
pedrog
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2786
Merit: 1031



View Profile
March 29, 2014, 06:22:29 PM
 #1557

What is the current hash rate?

You can check here: https://www.icedrill.io/minestate


Nice!

pedrog
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2786
Merit: 1031



View Profile
March 29, 2014, 07:02:57 PM
 #1558

Quote
250kW IceDrill Mine

Another prominent example of a commercial operator is the IceDrill Bitcoin mine. The investment
involved building "a secure and climate controlled mine-facility" including "build-out of computecenter/mine location" in Canada.20

The company has mining-devices from HashFast on back-order and additionally invested into further
hardware from Cointerra, ultimately leading to the same data center requirements outlined in above
data center example. IceDrill is effectively trying to host a large number of retail boxes that require
two separate power inputs in a data center environment that is not prepared for Bitcoin densities.

USD $285,000 was spent on the data center facility21 so far, with 120 mining devices22 deployed
bringing the total capacity to 144kW at the time of writing, and the cost to $1,979 per kW.

At: http://www.immersion-cooling.com/publications/Analysis_of_Large-Scale_Bitcoin_Mining_Operations.pdf

will
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 179
Merit: 100



View Profile
March 30, 2014, 04:20:49 AM
Last edit: March 30, 2014, 05:14:26 AM by will
 #1559

Bigger mines switching to pool mining becuse of variance and no blocks in long period of time. I'm amazed that Icedrill is doing opposite.

If you read further up they solo mining to test the new version of cgminer (the mining software) they got done.

I can confirm that we commissioned this work-stream as it is a big step into an exciting/new/important technical pathway for bitcoin mining, in our opinion. As a bonus, please feel free to decide: adjust PPS (and some variants thereof) by changing a few lines of (now open-source, tested: working) code, if you're a miner.
zebroid
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 74
Merit: 10



View Profile WWW
March 30, 2014, 09:33:02 AM
 #1560

This doesn't look good now!

Court Orders Freezing of Hashfast Bitcoin Wallets
https://coinreport.net/court-freezing-hashfast-bitcoin-wallets/
Pages: « 1 ... 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 [78] 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!