Bitcoin Forum
March 29, 2020, 07:33:16 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.19.0.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 [104] 105 106 107 108 109 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN][POOL] ZERGPOOL.com - Multialgo, autoexchange, 0.5% fee, 250+ coins  (Read 51209 times)
Wolf_Tech
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 66
Merit: 2


View Profile
August 08, 2019, 07:41:49 PM
 #2061

All I'm running is two Antminer L3's pretty much worthless profits these days but sometimes I find a block here and there. But lately I have run over 48 hours finding nothing in solo or party modes. But when I switched to shared mode I tend to find blocks which is kinda wierd. But my rewards are maybe 1 % even though My miner confirmed the block.
1585510396
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1585510396

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1585510396
Reply with quote  #2

1585510396
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1585510396
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1585510396

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1585510396
Reply with quote  #2

1585510396
Report to moderator
1585510396
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1585510396

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1585510396
Reply with quote  #2

1585510396
Report to moderator
Litecoiners
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 28
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 09, 2019, 01:39:28 AM
 #2062

Zergpool gave me only 0.49 $ per day per L3+ .I tested 2 days with 13x L3+ and both days had same profit only 0.49 per machine in shared mode.Is it any mistake i do or is it so bad? (nicehash promising 0.77 $ per machine on calculator).This is what i have on password c=LTC,mc=NLG/GLD/XVG/GAME,pl=2.00 .
Wolf_Tech
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 66
Merit: 2


View Profile
August 09, 2019, 01:46:50 AM
 #2063

Zergpool gave me only 0.49 $ per day per L3+ .I tested 2 days with 13x L3+ and both days had same profit only 0.49 per machine in shared mode.Is it any mistake i do or is it so bad? (nicehash promising 0.77 $ per machine on calculator).This is what i have on password c=LTC,mc=NLG/GLD/XVG/GAME,pl=2.00 .

Only mining 4 coins there even left out DGB would explain why so low.

with 13 L3+'s c=LTC should be enough

Unless you want solo then c=LTC,m=solo
pinpins
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 714
Merit: 18


View Profile WWW
August 09, 2019, 04:23:09 AM
 #2064

UPDATE

1. Bitcoin Rhodium(XRC) is now available for mining on x13 algorithm
joblo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1470
Merit: 1106


View Profile
August 09, 2019, 05:49:00 AM
 #2065

If someone wants to mine 50% solo and 50% shared they can split their
hash accordingly. I prefer to keep the pool egalitarian, it's less like a lottery.

Just my opinion.

AKA JayDDee, cpuminer-opt developer. https://github.com/JayDDee/cpuminer-opt
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5226770.msg53865575#msg53865575
BTC: 12tdvfF7KmAsihBXQXynT6E6th2c2pByTT,
Litecoiners
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 28
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 09, 2019, 09:48:58 AM
 #2066

Zergpool gave me only 0.49 $ per day per L3+ .I tested 2 days with 13x L3+ and both days had same profit only 0.49 per machine in shared mode.Is it any mistake i do or is it so bad? (nicehash promising 0.77 $ per machine on calculator).This is what i have on password c=LTC,mc=NLG/GLD/XVG/GAME,pl=2.00 .

Only mining 4 coins there even left out DGB would explain why so low.

with 13 L3+'s c=LTC should be enough

Unless you want solo then c=LTC,m=solo

Thank you.I removed all coins as you said and at last hours i see profit raising Smiley .I will watch it for next days and give results.
Wolf_Tech
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 66
Merit: 2


View Profile
August 09, 2019, 01:07:38 PM
 #2067

If someone wants to mine 50% solo and 50% shared they can split their
hash accordingly. I prefer to keep the pool egalitarian, it's less like a lottery.

Just my opinion.

Thanks for that but I left all my miners solo for 48 hours never got one block not even a crappy block like neetcoin. Switch to Shared mode for 48 hours I got 24 blocks even got neetcoin crappy blocks so either solo is broken or I have the worst luck in solo.
Wolf_Tech
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 66
Merit: 2


View Profile
August 09, 2019, 01:15:22 PM
 #2068

Typical example was late last night around 11PM. The pool reported I found a block of Sagacoin but my miners reported no blocks found at all. Then left my miners in solo for the entire night the miners reported 4 blocks found yet the pool reported no blocks found.

I run scrypt mining btw.

Arsenay
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 204
Merit: 100


View Profile
August 10, 2019, 03:49:46 AM
 #2069



Magi -  this is mysticism  Roll Eyes  Tongue
Wolf_Tech
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 66
Merit: 2


View Profile
August 10, 2019, 04:10:03 AM
 #2070

Ran solo all day 8 hours of nothing at all nothing period no blocks no earnings nothing switched to shared within 11 min got block of verge.

Rage Quit.
pinpins
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 714
Merit: 18


View Profile WWW
August 11, 2019, 05:26:12 AM
 #2071

UPDATE

1. Pool fee on odocrypt algo has been reduced to 0% to attract more miners
somaton
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 86
Merit: 2


View Profile
August 12, 2019, 12:34:12 AM
Last edit: August 12, 2019, 12:57:58 AM by somaton
 #2072

Extremely high rate of "Invalid job id" for Veil because of increased lowest / default difficulty to 25 from 14. It was almost perfect just two days ago and for long time (months). It is not the first time you are doing this with your pool coins and you want to attract more miners with just removing 0,5% fee? With so high rate of invalid shares, you can easily have more profit from other pools even with higher fees. Looks like one more coin to mine with different pool...
sundownz06
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 108
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 12, 2019, 01:35:57 PM
Last edit: August 12, 2019, 01:49:04 PM by sundownz06
 #2073

Basically my entire operation is down -- x16r and x16s -- all display the same error... just says "no connection"

Worker "001" is at home... it connects on x16r.

I have a few systems on x17 at my main work location and they are all up.

http://zergpool.com/?address=1CdWHxQf41Bydd4JDxmBQ3Z1P9T6TRZdCR

Did my IP get banned or something ? Miner update needed perhaps ?
sundownz06
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 108
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 12, 2019, 02:03:44 PM
Last edit: August 12, 2019, 02:13:48 PM by sundownz06
 #2074

Basically my entire operation is down -- x16r and x16s -- all display the same error... just says "no connection"

Worker "001" is at home... it connects on x16r.

I have a few systems on x17 at my main work location and they are all up.

http://zergpool.com/?address=1CdWHxQf41Bydd4JDxmBQ3Z1P9T6TRZdCR

Did my IP get banned or something ? Miner update needed perhaps ?

I am checking other algorithms and the same thing... "no connection" on nearly all of my work location stuff.

I can ping Zergpool & the algorithm servers no problem.

I can connect to ZPOOL no problem so my connection is fine.
Wolf_Tech
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 66
Merit: 2


View Profile
August 14, 2019, 05:25:05 AM
 #2075

Ok I got a bone to pick with pinpins

My address is 123tsfqm8UmK3UYs3ysLWtEfmXt1fhTcF4, I have been mining for a week in solo or party and hardly find any blocks at all. Now I went to a friend today that has some antminer l3's his address is 17UtYuUAh83Do5i2CGmG8MFBXqACqcz2Gr we setup a party together and have been running for almost 16 hours now and his miners are finding blocks but mine dead in the water.

Please see if my address is on a blacklist or something.

I mean seriously I used to make 0.0025 a week.

Am I'm just having the worst luck ever or is there something up.
scryptr
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1663
Merit: 1016



View Profile WWW
August 15, 2019, 12:02:44 AM
Last edit: August 15, 2019, 01:44:34 AM by scryptr
Merited by vapourminer (1)
 #2076

<SNIP>
I mean seriously I used to make 0.0025 a week.

Am I'm just having the worst luck ever or is there something up.

THERE MAY BE SOMETHING UP--

Recently, there was a network problem of some sort.  I think it affected some of the profitablity calculations for the worse.  The miner population shifted in response, and some of the top mining algos were actually providing little profit even if the coins at the market had a steady value. The number of miners and hash rate had dropped.

Your continual reports of solo-mining problems may have their own merit as well.  Personally, I'd like to know when any coins within an algorithm are being merge-mined versus individually mined with only portions of the total hash rate.  There are low value coins that I would not like to waste hash power on unless they are being merge-mined.  I use the "mc=COIN" flag in my password string to focus my hash, but would like to know if that focus is actually necessary.  If coins are being merge-mined, the "mc" flag is not necessary, as the low value coins  are mined with no separate effort.  On the other hand, if the pool software is portioning out the mining hash, I want my hash focused on the valuable coins.

And, as for solo-mining, there are some good algos where my hash is enough for mining blocks solo.  I just keep reading your reports and have not experimented, as I can't afford to waste hash.

Perhaps pinpins will respond...       --scryptr

TIPS:  BTC - 1Fs4uZ6a9ABYBTaHGUfqcwCQmeBRxkKRQT    DASH - XrK81tW31SLsVvZ2WX9VhTjpT6GXJPLdbQ
          ETH - 0x8a42dfAE53612E98daf8614bFA402f3DcD0546Fa    LTC - MKUHfUmRrJUQvELxzajhVaLE5uTPxU2bRK
          SCRYPTR'S NOTEBOOK: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5035515.msg46035530#msg46035530  MERIT is appreciated, also.  Thanks!
Wolf_Tech
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 66
Merit: 2


View Profile
August 15, 2019, 05:10:10 PM
 #2077

Seems to be working better this morning for some reason. Been 7 days but today finally seeing some blocks being found on the solo a bit. I will monitor it all day hopefully pinpins looked at it.

It was wierd though, My antminers was showing blocks found even once I saw a block that was 1.8 billion which was maybe a digibyte but the pool reported nothing.
pinpins
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 714
Merit: 18


View Profile WWW
August 16, 2019, 04:27:56 AM
 #2078

Basically my entire operation is down -- x16r and x16s -- all display the same error... just says "no connection"

Worker "001" is at home... it connects on x16r.

I have a few systems on x17 at my main work location and they are all up.

http://zergpool.com/?address=1CdWHxQf41Bydd4JDxmBQ3Z1P9T6TRZdCR

Did my IP get banned or something ? Miner update needed perhaps ?

Please PM me your IP to verify

thanks
pinpin
pinpins
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 714
Merit: 18


View Profile WWW
August 16, 2019, 04:29:32 AM
 #2079

Ok I got a bone to pick with pinpins

My address is 123tsfqm8UmK3UYs3ysLWtEfmXt1fhTcF4, I have been mining for a week in solo or party and hardly find any blocks at all. Now I went to a friend today that has some antminer l3's his address is 17UtYuUAh83Do5i2CGmG8MFBXqACqcz2Gr we setup a party together and have been running for almost 16 hours now and his miners are finding blocks but mine dead in the water.

Please see if my address is on a blacklist or something.

I mean seriously I used to make 0.0025 a week.

Am I'm just having the worst luck ever or is there something up.


Sorry for delay in response, I do respond quicker in discord.
I see you were hashing during 24h on scrypt, so I assume it got connected finally?

pinpin
pinpins
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 714
Merit: 18


View Profile WWW
August 16, 2019, 04:34:33 AM
 #2080

<SNIP>
I mean seriously I used to make 0.0025 a week.

Am I'm just having the worst luck ever or is there something up.

THERE MAY BE SOMETHING UP--

Recently, there was a network problem of some sort.  I think it affected some of the profitablity calculations for the worse.  The miner population shifted in response, and some of the top mining algos were actually providing little profit even if the coins at the market had a steady value. The number of miners and hash rate had dropped.

Your continual reports of solo-mining problems may have their own merit as well.  Personally, I'd like to know when any coins within an algorithm are being merge-mined versus individually mined with only portions of the total hash rate.  There are low value coins that I would not like to waste hash power on unless they are being merge-mined.  I use the "mc=COIN" flag in my password string to focus my hash, but would like to know if that focus is actually necessary.  If coins are being merge-mined, the "mc" flag is not necessary, as the low value coins  are mined with no separate effort.  On the other hand, if the pool software is portioning out the mining hash, I want my hash focused on the valuable coins.

And, as for solo-mining, there are some good algos where my hash is enough for mining blocks solo.  I just keep reading your reports and have not experimented, as I can't afford to waste hash.

Perhaps pinpins will respond...       --scryptr

Just clarify solo and non solo is just matter of reward distribution in case your miner was identified as finder. Hashing and block finding logic is the same in a pool.

When it comes to hashing and mc= option, I always recommend to put alternative coin in mc set, like mc=DGB/GAME. Giving example, as pool is autoswitch when DGB appears on top of list, all free hash(not locked with mc=) is moves to DGB and all of sudden DGB becomes full of hash, until next diff raise it receives more hash that it can consume, pool logic then moves extra hash to next coin in your list based on profitability, say GAME, and you have chance to find block there and utilizing left overs in better manner.

Hope this helps or clarifies a bit.

pinpin




Pages: « 1 ... 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 [104] 105 106 107 108 109 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!