Is Telegram the new measure of ICO success?

[ngotruong2003]

Not exactly but  telegram helps the ICO in many different ways. Like it is media friendly and helps in promotion of an ICO just like Facebook and Twitter. It also works as a medium where group of people interacting and sharing their own view.

[sieunhangao19]

If the project is really successful, then it will be actively discussed in social networks, and since Telegram is one of the most popular instant messengers among crypto enthusiasts, I think that you are absolutely right.

[sunshinee0900]

Their success was due to the fact that everyone knows such a program as Telegram and therefore it was easy to collect such enormous funds, they knew a lot of people and therefore contributions are large sums

[longwintershere]

Been seeing projects' Telegram groups blow up and I think that's an attribute of success. Personally, when I find a project, I do judge them by their social media presence. How active a telegram channel does say a lot with their demand.

With the rise of groups exceeding Telegram's 50k member cap...what do you guys think?

Article: https://news.bitcoin.com/telegram-followers-the-new-metric-for-cryptocurrency-success/

that is a ridiculous way to judge the ICO. Majority of the telegram group members in this kind of rooms would be only the bots. I definitely prefer smaller but genuine community

[asdnz86126]

Unfortunately, the size of the telegram group is not an indicator of the quality of success. For example, GBX - a small community-is a very strong project. INSTAR with the larger community very bad went on exchange.

[sergey1301]

Telegram is a social network. And this is not an indicator of success. But in the dissemination of ideas is the perfect messenger.

[Nilupulie]

Telegram is a method of communication and it is not a measure of ICO success. Admins and the entire team of the project use the telegram to give the latest updates and ICO promotions. Sometimes they ask to join the bounty hunters to increase the number of telegram followers and we cant judge the project through numbers of telegram followers. We can use this method to get current situation of the project and issues of the bounty stakes.

[Akeeto]

its true we can track what kind of person that manage the ICO by looking at social media. But i dont think we can judge whether the ico have good team from the number of person in telegram group

[tterrorpipa]

It depends on the ico itself. In my case, you can determine that when an ico is promising is by seeing many members in a telegram group. But beware, check if the bounty campaign involves a telegram referral program, if it holds a referral program, do more research on it. But when an ico does not have a referral telegram program and have many members, I'm sure the hype of the ico is good.

[blu.storm]

I do not think the telegram groups of the ico's grow so much for the possible success of this ones but for the promise of a reward/airdrop if users join their channels

[thanhexodo123]

I think Yes, because there are too many people who are very concerned on finding better ICO or better signature and bounty campaigns is very hard and we're compelled to choose wisely because we only have a very limited forum accounts so we can get sure bounty stake tokens in the end of and ICO

[MoeKaloolon]

There is no way that we can use telegram as the new measure of ico success. Reasons being that projects practically force people into their telegram channel by making it compulsory for bounty hunters and aidrop participants to join instead of just allowing people to join because they are interested in the project

[Alex_He]

I think social media are the best ways to promote a project and get investors to invest in that project if they are well designed and well presented. Telegram as a social media platform is a way to promote a project and attract investors because it is used globally. It is easy to access and you only need to post the project in the groups you are into and you get peoples opinion about the work. You can connect easily with as much people as you want on this platform.
 

[lucian999]

I also think how many telegrams you can be there based on the ico success that you will have to support the ico support you have joined with but there are also ico who have even supported or included in the telegram group chance it will not succeed so it's better to read the info on the only ico

[makladun]

I suppose telegram channels are the same measure of communication of the cryptocurrency community, as twitter and reddit. Everybody knows, that there are many inactive subscribers, so it is hard to value success of a project by its telegram activity.

[sasisa]

I believe not. Because telegram in turn is just an advertising channel. And does not affect the brand ico.

[Mystogan915]

Been seeing projects' Telegram groups blow up and I think that's an attribute of success. Personally, when I find a project, I do judge them by their social media presence. How active a telegram channel does say a lot with their demand.

With the rise of groups exceeding Telegram's 50k member cap...what do you guys think?

Article: https://news.bitcoin.com/telegram-followers-the-new-metric-for-cryptocurrency-success/

Not.... You cannot see the successful of an ICO just because the telegram members are 50k. Because some members there are only participating in airdrops, in social media's, some are recruit from other people to join that Group Chat telegrem. You cannot see the successful in that way..

[kookidun]

telegram is a convenient source of quick information and communication. but I do not think it is a measure of the success of the ICO. Yes,you can tell if it has a lot of participants is a good indicator. but not so much that only he evaluate the ICO

[Valentina N]

I thought before that nothing cannot be successful after - Twitter, Facebook, Viber etc. Today I am sure that all is possible and telegram is amazing!

[Chefironside]

Undoubtedly, the fact that the project has a very strong support in social networks, in particular a telegram, is excellent, but I believe that this is not the most important when choosing an ICO project. Even without this, many projects become successful.