jonoiv
|
|
September 02, 2013, 08:43:56 PM |
|
I have a question for the experts out there!
Is it true that over time graphics cards become less effective for scrypt-jane and CPU's eventually become the most effective way to mine? I forgot where i read this ! somewhere on the forum i think.
|
Signature for hire!
|
|
|
trid
|
|
September 02, 2013, 08:58:29 PM |
|
solo mining I see 50/50 rejects right now, it's getting better Second that, getting better
|
|
|
|
billym2k
|
|
September 02, 2013, 09:00:29 PM |
|
The pool is improving now with the difficulty rise I believe with scrypt-jane, as the difficulty increases, hash rate will decrease (something related to Nfactor?). I'm not sure that it makes cpu mining better in the long run though...
|
|
|
|
bitcoinextra
|
|
September 02, 2013, 09:05:07 PM Last edit: September 02, 2013, 09:27:40 PM by bitcoinextra |
|
Status: 13 confirmations Date: 9/2/2013 13:55 From: unknown To: (own address) Credit: 5.283326 GPL Net amount: +5.283326 GPL Transaction ID: 3ea31xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx The pool works for me so far. Rule of Acquisition #1 Once you have their money, you never give it back. thanks dreamwatcher for the pool man. IGotSpots recently about Copperbars said that the GPU had recently become 20-30% useless or was about too. Did not get that from my research of the other scrypt- jane coins though(Zzcoin,CENT,Freecoin,J-coin,Yacion, and Ybcoin). Edit: So far I thought had to go to class today and Today is Labor Day! Happy Labor Day!!!
|
Hello I am a Bitcoin and Crypto Currency enthusiast, hobbyist, and Crypto Currency Miner.
|
|
|
dreamwatcher
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 02, 2013, 09:30:43 PM |
|
Just wanted to pipe in about block explorers.
I am holding off a bit on releasing the GPL explorer as I have not been happy with the performance of the UFC and KED explorers.
However I have not done much to try and address those since I am so very close to releasing the milestone test version 3.5 of CCEIII.
Once 3.5 is ready for public testing, I will be moving all the test explorers (XPM, GLD, KED,UFC and GPL) to the 3.5 test version.
This version will be the final test version for all the basic explorer functions. Version 4 will bring all the extra features and 5 will bring in the API.
|
|
|
|
jonoiv
|
|
September 02, 2013, 09:52:53 PM |
|
@ Dreamwatcher & Scificoin cool coin & pool hard to make a mmcfe pool look unique but i really like it ! I have a question though, I am using some yaminer (some modified cgminer) that i found on the yac thread, I updated the settings to include --Nfmin 4 --Nfmax 30 --StartT 1377557876 and it's finding blocks and submitting shares, + i am getting paid at the pool. however the number of blocks that the yaminer reports is vastly different from the the blocks at the pool (orphans or accepted) I wonder if the number of total blocks and money supply is correct. Is it possible to have phantom blocks that are mined but never show anywhere?
|
Signature for hire!
|
|
|
Shad3dOne
|
|
September 02, 2013, 10:09:54 PM |
|
Hey guys, I enjoy the idea of a Star Trek inspired crypto currency. In order to further grow the community support behind Federation credits, I started a freenode channel for us. The channel is #ufccoin on irc.freenode. You can join us here at --> IRChat on #ufccoin... enjoy!
|
Domain for sale -> NXTcoin.com, 200 btc/2.9 M nxt. pm me like craigslist but for btc! --> Visit BTClist.comFederationCredits--> C6khbXzADRUeT9di2SpNubCt2UVTuayKMV What's this?
|
|
|
dreamwatcher
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 02, 2013, 10:10:32 PM |
|
@ Dreamwatcher & Scificoin cool coin & pool hard to make a mmcfe pool look unique but i really like it ! I have a question though, I am using some yaminer (some modified cgminer) that i found on the yac thread, I updated the settings to include --Nfmin 4 --Nfmax 30 --StartT 1377557876 and it's finding blocks and submitting shares, + i am getting paid at the pool. however the number of blocks that the yaminer reports is vastly different from the the blocks at the pool (orphans or accepted) I wonder if the number of total blocks and money supply is correct. Is it possible to have phantom blocks that are mined but never show anywhere? 1. The statistics on the pool site are going to be off for at least a day, especially with all the craziness that occurred at relaunch. The "outer" cycle for statistics in mmcfe-ng is 24 hours. However, the stats are for display only and are completely septate routines from the payout routines. I am watching closely how the pool wallet grows, and right now it is appropriate. 2. The modified cgminer (yacminer) is kind of goofy in how to reports "blocks". The vast majority of the "blocks" are really shares. The same goes for the speed report. There are two ways to express difficulty, the CGminer way and true BTC difficulty. Whoever modified CGminer to work with YAC did not bother to correct the little things, and as such the display is kind of strange. In short, give it 24 hours for everything to stabilize. Orphans are still high and there is still some wonkyness to the network.
|
|
|
|
daemonfox
|
|
September 03, 2013, 12:45:25 AM |
|
@ Dreamwatcher & Scificoin cool coin & pool hard to make a mmcfe pool look unique but i really like it ! I have a question though, I am using some yaminer (some modified cgminer) that i found on the yac thread, I updated the settings to include --Nfmin 4 --Nfmax 30 --StartT 1377557876 and it's finding blocks and submitting shares, + i am getting paid at the pool. however the number of blocks that the yaminer reports is vastly different from the the blocks at the pool (orphans or accepted) I wonder if the number of total blocks and money supply is correct. Is it possible to have phantom blocks that are mined but never show anywhere? I have a Sapphire 7950 OC Boost Edition clocked at 1250g/1750m/1250vddc/+20 TDP The below gets me almost 600KH/s... using I 18 or I 20 pushes it to 1.4MH/s but the pool barely reports 1MH/s. The last few commands in the line keep me under 1% invalids on the pool. setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS=1
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
ybcminer.exe --scrypt --Nfmin 4 --Nfmax 30 --StartT 1377557867 -o stratum+tcp://gplcoin.com:8888 -u USER -p PASS --shaders 1792 --thread-concurrency 21712 --worksize 256 --lookup-gap 2 --scan-time 1 --queue 4 --no-submit-stale -I 13
EDIT: I found 3 solo blocks in the time i dropped from the pool just before starting to type this post and now... getting LOTS better.
|
|
|
|
cassieheart
|
|
September 03, 2013, 01:31:04 AM |
|
If anyone's not busy pm me and help walk me through setting up cpu miner to mine gpl .. I am so lost
|
|
|
|
jonoiv
|
|
September 03, 2013, 09:17:38 AM |
|
If anyone's not busy pm me and help walk me through setting up cpu miner to mine gpl .. I am so lost why PM? better to discuss here! then anyone else with the same problem can see the response. and maybe they can solver their problem too. I wish I could help but I have no experience!
|
Signature for hire!
|
|
|
dreamwatcher
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 03, 2013, 10:42:49 AM |
|
I have a bit of good news!! Instead of trying to get push pool to work...... I took a stratum capable cpu miner and gave it the ability to do scrypt-jane. After a little more testing, I will release it on github. A small sample: [2013-09-03 05:39:34] Stratum detected new block [2013-09-03 05:39:34] thread 3: 111598 hashes, 22.21 khash/s [2013-09-03 05:39:34] thread 0: 116181 hashes, 23.12 khash/s [2013-09-03 05:39:34] thread 1: 119804 hashes, 23.84 khash/s [2013-09-03 05:39:34] thread 2: 108732 hashes, 21.72 khash/s [2013-09-03 05:39:34] thread 2: 10429 hashes, 22.36 khash/s [2013-09-03 05:39:34] accepted: 13/14 (92.86%), 91.53 khash/s (yay!!!) [2013-09-03 05:39:39] Stratum detected new block [2013-09-03 05:39:39] thread 1: 122348 hashes, 24.28 khash/s [2013-09-03 05:39:39] thread 0: 110923 hashes, 21.99 khash/s [2013-09-03 05:39:39] thread 2: 100919 hashes, 22.07 khash/s [2013-09-03 05:39:39] thread 3: 116401 hashes, 23.01 khash/s [2013-09-03 05:39:42] thread 2: 94361 hashes, 24.76 khash/s [2013-09-03 05:39:43] accepted: 14/15 (93.33%), 94.04 khash/s (yay!!!) [2013-09-03 05:39:44] Stratum detected new block [2013-09-03 05:39:44] thread 0: 110390 hashes, 21.97 khash/s [2013-09-03 05:39:44] thread 3: 102741 hashes, 20.50 khash/s [2013-09-03 05:39:44] thread 2: 30206 hashes, 24.89 khash/s [2013-09-03 05:39:44] thread 1: 120485 hashes, 23.98 khash/s [2013-09-03 05:39:49] Stratum detected new block [2013-09-03 05:39:49] thread 2: 115296 hashes, 23.08 khash/s [2013-09-03 05:39:49] thread 0: 128348 hashes, 25.69 khash/s [2013-09-03 05:39:49] thread 1: 125450 hashes, 25.18 khash/s [2013-09-03 05:39:49] thread 3: 68340 hashes, 13.64 khash/s [2013-09-03 05:39:54] Stratum detected new block [2013-09-03 05:39:54] thread 1: 127404 hashes, 25.07 khash/s [2013-09-03 05:39:54] thread 0: 103795 hashes, 20.42 khash/s [2013-09-03 05:39:54] thread 2: 122633 hashes, 24.13 khash/s [2013-09-03 05:39:54] thread 3: 94335 hashes, 18.37 khash/s [2013-09-03 05:39:57] thread 1: 88023 hashes, 26.25 khash/s [2013-09-03 05:39:57] accepted: 15/16 (93.75%), 89.17 khash/s (yay!!!) [2013-09-03 05:40:05] Stratum detected new block [2013-09-03 05:40:05] thread 1: 199638 hashes, 25.11 khash/s [2013-09-03 05:40:05] thread 0: 287383 hashes, 25.42 khash/s [2013-09-03 05:40:05] thread 2: 279667 hashes, 24.74 khash/s [2013-09-03 05:40:05] thread 3: 125453 hashes, 11.13 khash/s [2013-09-03 05:40:09] thread 2: 98458 hashes, 25.23 khash/s [2013-09-03 05:40:09] accepted: 16/17 (94.12%), 86.89 khash/s (yay!!!) [2013-09-03 05:40:09] Stratum detected new block [2013-09-03 05:40:09] thread 0: 107155 hashes, 24.34 khash/s [2013-09-03 05:40:09] thread 1: 116798 hashes, 26.53 khash/s [2013-09-03 05:40:09] thread 2: 10559 hashes, 21.12 khash/s [2013-09-03 05:40:09] thread 3: 47022 hashes, 10.69 khash/s [2013-09-03 05:40:14] Stratum detected new block
|
|
|
|
daemonfox
|
|
September 03, 2013, 10:45:27 AM |
|
I have a bit of good news!! Instead of trying to get push pool to work...... I took a stratum capable cpu miner and gave it the ability to do scrypt-jane. After a little more testing, I will release it on github. A small sample: [2013-09-03 05:39:34] Stratum detected new block [2013-09-03 05:39:34] thread 3: 111598 hashes, 22.21 khash/s [2013-09-03 05:39:34] thread 0: 116181 hashes, 23.12 khash/s [2013-09-03 05:39:34] thread 1: 119804 hashes, 23.84 khash/s [2013-09-03 05:39:34] thread 2: 108732 hashes, 21.72 khash/s [2013-09-03 05:39:34] thread 2: 10429 hashes, 22.36 khash/s [2013-09-03 05:39:34] accepted: 13/14 (92.86%), 91.53 khash/s (yay!!!) [2013-09-03 05:39:39] Stratum detected new block [2013-09-03 05:39:39] thread 1: 122348 hashes, 24.28 khash/s [2013-09-03 05:39:39] thread 0: 110923 hashes, 21.99 khash/s [2013-09-03 05:39:39] thread 2: 100919 hashes, 22.07 khash/s [2013-09-03 05:39:39] thread 3: 116401 hashes, 23.01 khash/s [2013-09-03 05:39:42] thread 2: 94361 hashes, 24.76 khash/s [2013-09-03 05:39:43] accepted: 14/15 (93.33%), 94.04 khash/s (yay!!!) [2013-09-03 05:39:44] Stratum detected new block [2013-09-03 05:39:44] thread 0: 110390 hashes, 21.97 khash/s [2013-09-03 05:39:44] thread 3: 102741 hashes, 20.50 khash/s [2013-09-03 05:39:44] thread 2: 30206 hashes, 24.89 khash/s [2013-09-03 05:39:44] thread 1: 120485 hashes, 23.98 khash/s [2013-09-03 05:39:49] Stratum detected new block [2013-09-03 05:39:49] thread 2: 115296 hashes, 23.08 khash/s [2013-09-03 05:39:49] thread 0: 128348 hashes, 25.69 khash/s [2013-09-03 05:39:49] thread 1: 125450 hashes, 25.18 khash/s [2013-09-03 05:39:49] thread 3: 68340 hashes, 13.64 khash/s [2013-09-03 05:39:54] Stratum detected new block [2013-09-03 05:39:54] thread 1: 127404 hashes, 25.07 khash/s [2013-09-03 05:39:54] thread 0: 103795 hashes, 20.42 khash/s [2013-09-03 05:39:54] thread 2: 122633 hashes, 24.13 khash/s [2013-09-03 05:39:54] thread 3: 94335 hashes, 18.37 khash/s [2013-09-03 05:39:57] thread 1: 88023 hashes, 26.25 khash/s [2013-09-03 05:39:57] accepted: 15/16 (93.75%), 89.17 khash/s (yay!!!) [2013-09-03 05:40:05] Stratum detected new block [2013-09-03 05:40:05] thread 1: 199638 hashes, 25.11 khash/s [2013-09-03 05:40:05] thread 0: 287383 hashes, 25.42 khash/s [2013-09-03 05:40:05] thread 2: 279667 hashes, 24.74 khash/s [2013-09-03 05:40:05] thread 3: 125453 hashes, 11.13 khash/s [2013-09-03 05:40:09] thread 2: 98458 hashes, 25.23 khash/s [2013-09-03 05:40:09] accepted: 16/17 (94.12%), 86.89 khash/s (yay!!!) [2013-09-03 05:40:09] Stratum detected new block [2013-09-03 05:40:09] thread 0: 107155 hashes, 24.34 khash/s [2013-09-03 05:40:09] thread 1: 116798 hashes, 26.53 khash/s [2013-09-03 05:40:09] thread 2: 10559 hashes, 21.12 khash/s [2013-09-03 05:40:09] thread 3: 47022 hashes, 10.69 khash/s [2013-09-03 05:40:14] Stratum detected new block dreamwatcher, If it isn't too much to ask, can you compile a Win 64 binary for this? I was having trouble compiling one myself from the first git...
|
|
|
|
dreamwatcher
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 03, 2013, 12:07:16 PM |
|
I have replaced the earlier CPU miner with the new CPU stratum scrypt-jane miner I put together. https://github.com/Hartland/GPL-CPU-MinerAgain, I left the compiled daemon in the github, no guarantees it will work (Compiled on a Mint 15 KDE VM) Compile instructions: Basic *nix build instructions: ./autogen.sh # only needed if building from git repo ./nomacro.pl # only needed if building on Mac OS X or with Clang ./configure CFLAGS="-O3" make Typical start up command: ./minerd -a scrypt-jane -o stratum+tcp://gplcoin.com:8888 -u <worker name> -p <password> dreamwatcher,
If it isn't too much to ask, can you compile a Win 64 binary for this? I was having trouble compiling one myself from the first git...
Unfortunately, I do not think I have ever successfully cross compiled anything . It is not due to any kind of OS bias (I do my development on a Linux VM hosted on a Windows 7 system), and for the longest time developed in VS2010 before switching completely over to Linux. There are some instructions in the README file on compiling in Windows. Perhaps I should get set up to cross compile, though I almost exclusively deal with source. Perhaps one of the outstanding members of the Star Trek cryptocoin community would be willing to do a windows compile?
|
|
|
|
dreamwatcher
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 03, 2013, 12:14:11 PM |
|
If anyone's not busy pm me and help walk me through setting up cpu miner to mine gpl .. I am so lost Well, I need to know a few things. What OS are you running? Do you know how to use Github? If you are running Windows, you may need to wait until somebody does a Window compile on the CPU miner I just put up. IF you are using Linux, just let me know at what point you are stuck at.
|
|
|
|
daemonfox
|
|
September 03, 2013, 12:29:13 PM |
|
If anyone's not busy pm me and help walk me through setting up cpu miner to mine gpl .. I am so lost Well, I need to know a few things. What OS are you running? Do you know how to use Github? If you are running Windows, you may need to wait until somebody does a Window compile on the CPU miner I just put up. IF you are using Linux, just let me know at what point you are stuck at. I gave her some instruction to get started but at some point, she will also need the 64 bit windows binary version of what you just made.
|
|
|
|
jonoiv
|
|
September 03, 2013, 01:20:28 PM Last edit: September 03, 2013, 01:39:38 PM by jonoiv |
|
@ Dreamwatcher seem to be finding blocks but not getting paid for quite a while on the pool (12 hours at least) ! could you take a look when you get chance ! Thanks EDIT: looks like it's been sorted Thanks dreamwatcher! what was it? im guessing a cron job not doing it's thing.
|
Signature for hire!
|
|
|
dreamwatcher
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 03, 2013, 01:43:17 PM |
|
@ Dreamwatcher
seem to be finding blocks but not getting paid for quite a while on the pool (12 hours at least) ! could you take a look when you get chance ! Thanks
Should be fixed. There should have been a massive payout. This particular bug comes up whenever there is a solved block with no shares (POS I am assuming in this case). The proportional payout cron goes into panic mode and will not process the payout on any blocks afterwards. I basically have to go in and delete the "no-shares" block entry and the cron will then retro actively process everything. I thought the developers had this fixed, I guess not. I will have to go in and write a bit of code to have the cron just ignore share-less blocks and not freak out...
|
|
|
|
daemonfox
|
|
September 03, 2013, 02:01:34 PM |
|
@ Dreamwatcher
seem to be finding blocks but not getting paid for quite a while on the pool (12 hours at least) ! could you take a look when you get chance ! Thanks
Should be fixed. There should have been a massive payout. This particular bug comes up whenever there is a solved block with no shares (POS I am assuming in this case). The proportional payout cron goes into panic mode and will not process the payout on any blocks afterwards. I basically have to go in and delete the "no-shares" block entry and the cron will then retro actively process everything. I thought the developers had this fixed, I guess not. I will have to go in and write a bit of code to have the cron just ignore share-less blocks and not freak out... Wait what... how long is the PoS time frame... 24 hours??? Where are the details of this coins PoS listed?
|
|
|
|
dreamwatcher
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 03, 2013, 02:17:07 PM |
|
@ Dreamwatcher
seem to be finding blocks but not getting paid for quite a while on the pool (12 hours at least) ! could you take a look when you get chance ! Thanks
Should be fixed. There should have been a massive payout. This particular bug comes up whenever there is a solved block with no shares (POS I am assuming in this case). The proportional payout cron goes into panic mode and will not process the payout on any blocks afterwards. I basically have to go in and delete the "no-shares" block entry and the cron will then retro actively process everything. I thought the developers had this fixed, I guess not. I will have to go in and write a bit of code to have the cron just ignore share-less blocks and not freak out... Wait what... how long is the PoS time frame... 24 hours??? Where are the details of this coins PoS listed? OK, now ya made me look deeper... It was a POW block, but it looks like it was in the middle of 3 or 4 very closely timestamped blocks. Probably solved in one or two shares that got attributed to the blocks around it due to simple network/database latency. It happens once in a great while.
|
|
|
|
|