|
snowdropfore
|
 |
December 04, 2013, 11:02:54 AM |
|
All profits will be realised in Bitcoin
could you tell me when we will get the first dividends? thank you |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
utens
|
|
December 04, 2013, 11:50:10 AM |
|
In few minutes probably  |
|
|
|
|
limbaugh
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1311
Merit: 1000
|
|
December 04, 2013, 11:57:21 AM |
|
could you tell me when we will get the first dividends? thank you
Keep refreshing your wallet and let us know when they arrive. |
|
|
|
|
|
cryptocyprus (OP)
|
|
December 04, 2013, 12:15:57 PM |
|
The team has arrived at the investors show, I will be tweeting pictures etc throughout
@btcDanny
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ThickAsThieves
|
|
December 04, 2013, 02:25:14 PM |
|
Holy shittttt. Now the LMB website is saying only 5 shares left for sale. Is this for real???
This total includes shares that are locked out to prevent over subscription, an additional line is being added to show the amount of shares awaiting payment. I'd just like to clarify for everyone that the Buy Shares feature and totals are not fully displaying due to how the process currently works. A Buy order locks the shares, making them temporarily unavailable for purchase. If the order goes unfunded (the buyer never sends the coin payment), then they are released again. The development team is working on optimizing this, so for the time being, please note that the Shares Remaining may be inaccurate. There are still shares available. Thank you! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
camu6
|
|
December 04, 2013, 02:38:58 PM |
|
Just to be clear, a transfer from havelock to the LMB-Holdings public ledger does not contain any fees, right?
|
|
|
|
|
|
ThickAsThieves
|
|
December 04, 2013, 02:50:01 PM |
|
Just to be clear, a transfer from havelock to the LMB-Holdings public ledger does not contain any fees, right?
1. Bitfunder "locked" users moving to Direct Shares - NO FEE* 2. Havelock holders wanting to move to Direct Shares - FEE 3. Direct Share holders wanting to move to Havelock - FEE** * We are awaiting an update from Bitfunder as to whether they will release the shareholder's email addresses, and waiting for the final official list, so this process may be delayed. ** New Direct Share purchases (purchased directly from Neo's investor site ONLY) are allowed to move shares to Havelock ONCE at NO FEE. This free move is limited to the quantity of newly purchased direct shares only. Please note that transfers are not fully functional at this time, so there may be some delays. |
|
|
|
|
Stelios
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
December 04, 2013, 02:54:29 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
camu6
|
|
December 04, 2013, 02:56:13 PM
Last edit: December 04, 2013, 06:07:53 PM by camu6 |
|
Just to be clear, a transfer from havelock to the LMB-Holdings public ledger does not contain any fees, right?
1. Bitfunder "locked" users moving to Direct Shares - NO FEE* 2. Havelock holders wanting to move to Direct Shares - FEE 3. Direct Share holders wanting to move to Havelock - FEE** * We are awaiting an update from Bitfunder as to whether they will release the shareholder's email addresses, and waiting for the final official list, so this process may be delayed. ** New Direct Share purchases (purchased directly from Neo's investor site ONLY) are allowed to move shares to Havelock ONCE at NO FEE. This free move is limited to the quantity of newly purchased direct shares only. Please note that transfers are not fully functional at this time, so there may be some delays.Thank you for the swift explanation! Edit: One more question came to mind. Has the transaction fee of 1.0 BTC been adjusted since the surge in price of bitcoin? Shame on me if this has already been stated in the previous hundred pages. ~0.1 BTC would now have the same value as 1.0 BTC when the initial post on page 1 was made. |
|
|
|
|
|
N_S
|
|
December 04, 2013, 03:27:10 PM |
|
Edit: One more question came to mind. Has the transaction fee of 1.0 BTC been adjusted since the surge in price of bitcoin? Shame on me if this has already been stated in the previous hundred pages. ~0.1 BTC would now have the same value as to 1.0 BTC, when the initial post on page 1 was made.
To the best of my knowledge, the fee has dropped to 0.5BTC, but I'd wait for TAT to confirm that. |
|
|
|
|
|
ThickAsThieves
|
|
December 04, 2013, 03:35:53 PM |
|
Edit: One more question came to mind. Has the transaction fee of 1.0 BTC been adjusted since the surge in price of bitcoin? Shame on me if this has already been stated in the previous hundred pages. ~0.1 BTC would now have the same value as to 1.0 BTC, when the initial post on page 1 was made.
To the best of my knowledge, the fee has dropped to 0.5BTC, but I'd wait for TAT to confirm that. The odds are we will adjust it further. I have a meeting scheduled this week with Danny which includes that as a topic. |
|
|
|
|
|
N_S
|
|
December 04, 2013, 03:53:35 PM |
|
How many shares are left for sale on the site?
Last I looked, there were 4 shares remaining. But this is what Danny had to say regarding that: This total includes shares that are locked out to prevent over subscription, an additional line is being added to show the amount of shares awaiting payment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Herp
|
|
December 04, 2013, 03:55:41 PM |
|
Edit: One more question came to mind. Has the transaction fee of 1.0 BTC been adjusted since the surge in price of bitcoin? Shame on me if this has already been stated in the previous hundred pages. ~0.1 BTC would now have the same value as to 1.0 BTC, when the initial post on page 1 was made.
To the best of my knowledge, the fee has dropped to 0.5BTC, but I'd wait for TAT to confirm that. The odds are we will adjust it further. I have a meeting scheduled this week with Danny which includes that as a topic. I assume the exchange will further develop, allowing other securities to be traded there. That was the whole point of buying Bitfunder wasn't it? Neo announced a while back there are plans to operate their own security exchange. |
|
|
|
|
velacreations
|
|
December 04, 2013, 04:05:06 PM |
|
Neo announced a while back there are plans to operate their own security exchange.
They did? |
|
|
|
|
ThickAsThieves
|
|
December 04, 2013, 04:07:39 PM |
|
Neo announced a while back there are plans to operate their own security exchange.
They did? They announced they would be investigating the feasibility. It is not officially decided yet. |
|
|
|
|
|
ffssixtynine
|
|
December 04, 2013, 04:14:51 PM |
|
I assume the exchange will further develop, allowing other securities to be traded there. That was the whole point of buying Bitfunder wasn't it? Neo announced a while back there are plans to operate their own security exchange.
They haven't bought Bitfunder unless I've missed something. Are you confusing it with WeExchange, which they haven't bought either but are helping ukyo fix problems with? They have said they were going to look at if they could implement an exchange but I'd expect that's some way off given how many other things seem to be going on, and it may not be feasible. |
|
|
|
|
|
Herp
|
|
December 04, 2013, 04:15:23 PM |
|
Neo announced a while back there are plans to operate their own security exchange.
They did? They announced they would be investigating the feasibility. It is not officially decided yet. You mean officially announced ?  Why else would they get into bed with Bitfunder. Neo saw an opportunity to buy Bitfunder at their darkest hour, dirt cheap most likely. Was too good deal to pass by I imagine. Buy when there's blood on the streets as saying goes. |
|
|
|
|
Herp
|
|
December 04, 2013, 04:17:18 PM |
|
I assume the exchange will further develop, allowing other securities to be traded there. That was the whole point of buying Bitfunder wasn't it? Neo announced a while back there are plans to operate their own security exchange.
They haven't bought Bitfunder unless I've missed something. Are you confusing it with WeExchange, which they haven't bought either but are helping ukyo fix problems with? They have said they were going to look at if they could implement an exchange but I'd expect that's some way off given how many other things seem to be going on, and it may not be feasible. You're naive if you really believe what you have just said. |
|
|
|
|
