Ken is claiming that the reason it is okay for the other exchanges to trade is because 'they were listed before the investigation'
I don't know enough about law to be sure, but I smell bullshit. Shares on bitfunder and btct were listed before the investigation, were they not?
Also, if he doesn't want to 'pour gas' on the situation, why not HALT the trading going on in other exchanges? Wouldn't that be the SAFEST move??
...
Explain how you were allowed to list shares on cryptotrade?
The shares was listed on crypto-trade before the MSD Investigation.
---------------------------------------------
And now for some tabloid-style theories---------------------------------------------
Conspiracy theory #345: VE is actually a sock of Ken,
reporting himself to the MSD in order to prevent whales from tanking the price. This also gives him a scapegoat (think: "We can't release the names of our ___ because that time VE harassed eAsic")
or...
Conspiracy theory #9969: Mircea Popescu HIRED Ken to run this front of a business. 'Why,' you ask? To distract from his own slowly dying exchange and SEC investigation! To point out the 'failings and scams' in every place that is not MPex, by staging one himself. All while making some money in the process. It would explain the undying dedication to defaming ActM.
or...
Conspiracy theory #88993: Ken's just a bad communicator, and is becoming another
start-up statistic. Most likely scenario, but pretty boring.
-------------------------------------------
EDIT: My point above is that no one has ANY idea what is going on. Investors shouldn't be so complacent just because Ken is actually answering questions. I've seen a lot of "Oh well... we just have to wait for CC, I guess. Okay!"
I'm not even heavily invested and I can't take that as an answer without more explanation. I don't understand how some of the larger shareholders aren't causing more of a ruckus.