SISAR
|
|
March 21, 2018, 11:46:49 AM |
|
I have tested both 32 and 64 bit wallets and they are working fine if listen=0
|
|
|
|
ArchimedesIX (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 73
Merit: 119
|
|
March 21, 2018, 05:15:31 PM |
|
I have tested both 32 and 64 bit wallets and they are working fine if listen=0 I will update the release notes for the Windows version affected - thanks for your help!
|
|
|
|
Lamperon
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 47
Merit: 10
|
|
March 27, 2018, 08:30:06 PM |
|
This is no doubt an interesting project and the crypto world has long been waiting for a project like this.
I will not argue, the project looks very promising. The main thing is that developers would not throw it and put their ideas into reality.
|
|
|
|
thrax
|
|
March 27, 2018, 08:42:23 PM |
|
Why the new thread?
|
|
|
|
markm
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3010
Merit: 1121
|
|
April 05, 2018, 12:10:20 AM |
|
Is that big column maybe the total of all the others? Like maybe it is the real total, the exchange's account, and the others show how it is divided up among users? -MarkM-
|
|
|
|
CryptoSangria
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 2
Merit: 7
|
|
April 08, 2018, 09:55:00 PM |
|
Why the new thread?
Theymos the Terrorist deleted our old thread for no reason. had to be a reason, he cant be running out of space
|
|
|
|
CryptoSangria
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 2
Merit: 7
|
|
April 08, 2018, 11:46:23 PM |
|
I don't like blood, I'm only from Transylvania by birth... I meant Sangria the delicious drink : )
Certified in c++
|
|
|
|
ArchimedesIX (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 73
Merit: 119
|
|
April 13, 2018, 01:33:48 AM |
|
some movement lately - a few more transactions, mining up, some miners have upgraded. Not much action on the exchanges though....
|
|
|
|
ArchimedesIX (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 73
Merit: 119
|
|
April 17, 2018, 02:39:06 AM |
|
Btcguild used to run an ixcoin pool before merge mining. when they shut it down they gave miners a week to withdraw the funds. after that they deleted the wallets. i'm sure there were a lot of coins in there then.
Noticed this note on the closed thread - does anyone have a handle on the number of IXC in lost wallets?
|
|
|
|
starmman
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1029
|
|
April 17, 2018, 01:48:15 PM |
|
Didn't notice there was a new thread - thought things were a bit quiet lately
|
|
|
|
ArchimedesIX (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 73
Merit: 119
|
|
April 18, 2018, 01:50:27 PM |
|
The mining pattern seems strange to me - a large burst of hashing followed by it turning off - then on again after an hour or several hours. Anyone have a theory as to why?
|
|
|
|
MarketMagic
|
|
April 18, 2018, 09:47:19 PM |
|
The mining pattern seems strange to me - a large burst of hashing followed by it turning off - then on again after an hour or several hours. Anyone have a theory as to why?
I’ve never mined but to me that sounds like some kind of testing. Testing eh?...Is it moon time?
|
█████████████████████
|
|
|
Sergiose
|
|
April 19, 2018, 07:21:08 PM |
|
The thirst for profit out of envy of bitcoin pioneers, nothing more. Why don't society have a bunch of identical systems? Bitcoin therefore stood out, which differed from the existing and closed some of their disadvantages for end users.
|
|
|
|
corlinddd
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 44
Merit: 0
|
|
April 20, 2018, 07:51:23 AM |
|
What makes this coin different between other similar coins?
|
|
|
|
starmman
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1029
|
|
April 20, 2018, 09:21:35 AM |
|
What makes this coin different between other similar coins?
Firstly the fact that this community doesn't respond to bots... Oops!
|
|
|
|
ArchimedesIX (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 73
Merit: 119
|
|
April 22, 2018, 09:23:57 PM |
|
The thirst for profit out of envy of bitcoin pioneers, nothing more. Why don't society have a bunch of identical systems? Bitcoin therefore stood out, which differed from the existing and closed some of their disadvantages for end users.
ok - I'll bite. IXC was started in May 2011 - third crypto. Early days, well before bitcoin was successful and well before almost anyone thought it would be successful. IXC tried out a couple of concepts - 1) a small number of coins were set aside for bounties - less than 3% - and 2) the block rewards were larger but the total number of coins the same - to test out what happens when a coin must rely on fees and not miner rewards. For good measure merge mining was added. Neither worked out very well - newer coins had premines of 10%, 20%, 80% (looking at you Ripple) which gave any coin with a premine - even a miniscule one - a bad name. Also we confirmed fees on 1MB blocks are woefully inadequate - this may have driven some of the urgency (panic) to increase bitcoin block size. Now here we are - the premine has been donated back and sequestered - a fork at 450K blocks will give IXC a larger block size 64MB - 2X what Satoshi had set bitcoin to originally - pretty reasonable since 2018 computers are more than order of magnitude faster than 2009 computers. Enough to provide a significant block reward with small fees. Also just enough with current optimization techniques to match average visa transaction volume. Will this be the right update for The Original Bitcoin Sidechain?
|
|
|
|
sieunhangao19
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 99
Merit: 0
|
|
April 23, 2018, 05:13:25 PM |
|
A lot of potential is here for these project so I hope to invest it a little bit
|
|
|
|
ArchimedesIX (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 73
Merit: 119
|
|
April 26, 2018, 01:16:52 AM |
|
uggghh crickets except for a bot.....
|
|
|
|
ranggenga
|
|
April 29, 2018, 03:55:20 PM |
|
I'm sorry to hear that, I hope the problem will be fixed soon, and all minder will be working as expected. So this coin will soon goo to the moon
|
|
|
|
starmman
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1029
|
|
April 29, 2018, 04:03:41 PM |
|
Interesting stuff, was wondering why there has been a bit of volatility recently
|
|
|
|
|