Bitcoin Forum
June 25, 2024, 02:52:46 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 [15] 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 ... 70 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Do you join ICOs that requires KYC?  (Read 4513 times)
kaka manteng
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 714
Merit: 100



View Profile
May 29, 2018, 04:34:50 PM
 #281

Do any of you participate in ICOs that requires KYC (Know your Customer). We actually experienced this one on exchanges but how about in partipating in ICOs or just even in airdrop that requires KYC.

I think it depends as for me as they are many scams as well just getting your information. In some instances, we can be blind sometimes, mkay? I really do not join airdrops if it requires too needy to get your personal information.

I believe some people are not cautious as long as they can join airdrops. How about you? What are your thoughts about KYC in ICOS?

earlier I was also one of the participants of the gifts that my personal data are used to get the prizes (KYC) and it became the first gift I ever follow. After that I never again follow a bounty menbutuhkan KYC. the purpose of the Kyc is to avoid her from many of the participants are multi accounts

(x)  MetaFans           [[[ [[ [    JOIN PRESALE    ] ]] ]]]
                          BRINGING CONTENT CREATORS ON THE BLOCKCHAIN                         
[] Facebook            [] Twitter            [] Telegram            [] Instagram            [] TikTok            [] YouTube
siinssooo
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 29, 2018, 04:39:28 PM
 #282

I have joined the rewards that require KYC and fortunately I have graduated from the procedure they do because the company is based in the US and they are required to do KYC for the gift of law, I have nothing to be surprised again, because the Rules for ICO project will tightened, which will force the project developers to implement this procedure everywhere.
Hexcolyte
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 490
Merit: 102


View Profile
May 29, 2018, 04:41:21 PM
 #283

Do any of you participate in ICOs that requires KYC (Know your Customer). We actually experienced this one on exchanges but how about in partipating in ICOs or just even in airdrop that requires KYC.

I think it depends as for me as they are many scams as well just getting your information. In some instances, we can be blind sometimes, mkay? I really do not join airdrops if it requires too needy to get your personal information.

I believe some people are not cautious as long as they can join airdrops. How about you? What are your thoughts about KYC in ICOS?

I dont, it is a privacy invastion for me. I am not comfortable with disclosing my personal information to some companies or organizations which I don't trust.
jeron31
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 123
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 29, 2018, 04:43:56 PM
 #284

Today almost every ico (i would say 99%) requires it, so i think there is no choice if you plan to participate.
bucsren
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 93
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 29, 2018, 04:45:13 PM
 #285

Im quite skeptical signing their kyc. So im selecting ICO that deosnt have kyc requirement. However, i encounter a ICO that right after the campaign they require us to sign a Kyc in order to get our tokens. So i had no choice, i have to do the kyc.
DISPERADO
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686
Merit: 503


DATABLOCKCHAIN.IO SALE IS LIVE | MVP @ DBC.IO


View Profile
May 29, 2018, 04:49:02 PM
 #286

If the project is good - I will participate, even if it requires a KYC. If the project looks scam and does not inspire confidence - I will not.

oemar bakrie
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 1274
Merit: 100


SOL.BIOKRIPT.COM


View Profile
May 29, 2018, 04:53:18 PM
 #287

in my view kyc it is just to prevent the double account name ..
because for now all the people who want to benefit by following the project as much as possible ..
and with KYC it can slightly reduce such impacts ..

WolkGold
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 139
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 29, 2018, 04:59:53 PM
 #288

I have not encountered any KYC requests. But some of my friends did that. I think KYC is one of the most promulgated laws that regulate the status of tax evasion, money laundering, financial crime, etc. I do not worry about KYC, if the bounty campaign is required KYC I will finish it.
Grobokopalka
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 579
Merit: 10


View Profile WWW
May 29, 2018, 05:02:38 PM
 #289

This KYC has confused all the cards in the world of crypto currency, because initially everything was completely anonymous, and now I have to send my documents to strangers. I frankly do not like such companies and I try to avoid them.

  ●   KEEP CALM & HODL   ●
 ❰❰❰❰❰❰  KCH  ❱❱❱❱❱❱ 
● ▬▬▬▬▬ ● ▬▬▬▬▬ ●●●    ●  token  ●    ●●● ▬▬▬▬▬ ● ▬▬▬▬▬ ●
Crypto_lion
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 630
Merit: 11

NEW MEDICINE:Faster, Safer, Smarter


View Profile
May 29, 2018, 05:03:13 PM
 #290

Doing kyc is fine as long as the project seems legit and the team members have a professional background and past experience.It seems kyc will soon become the norm to participate in Ico.

❱_    ClinTex     ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬     NEW MEDICINE:   Faster,   Safer,   Smarter
   ❪  TELEGRAM  ❫                 ❪  TWITTER  ❫                 ❪  LINKEDIN  ❫   
██████████████████████   J O I N   ██████████████████████
JTEN18
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 101



View Profile
May 29, 2018, 05:05:03 PM
 #291

I personally don't have problem with ICO's that requires KYC. It's the only way to know the participants better. But it would be helpful if it is mentioned from the beginning of the Campaign and not at the last moment.
sulendra12
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 2856
Merit: 526


SOL.BIOKRIPT.COM


View Profile
May 29, 2018, 05:06:38 PM
 #292

Being anonymous is fine yet make sure to only provide the document on the trusted ico and company only. You would never want to provide your data to theft and they could be used your document for the illegal purpose. I'm fine with KYC as long as I know what is the purpose behind it.

..B.I.O.K.R.I.P.T..|
  BiokriptX Fair Launch is now live in PINKSALE
|🟣 Twitter
🔵 Facebook
🟣 Telegram
mahilchii
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 560
Merit: 13


View Profile
May 29, 2018, 05:09:11 PM
 #293

Most of the ICO's which are running currently are came into existence last month is asking for KYC now a days. I'm not too sure why they require for even small purchases but that is manadatory now for all the ICO's. If I feel the ICO is best in potential or it has good safety norms on our KYC, then I will provide or else I will ignore that and skip to next ICO which doesn't require KYC.

Benarand
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 773
Merit: 100



View Profile
May 29, 2018, 05:21:48 PM
 #294

Today, almost all ICO projects require the passage of KYC. And if you want to multiply your investments, you will have to accept it. Moreover, this will soon be an integral part of the project.
Dorvei
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 700
Merit: 110


View Profile
May 29, 2018, 05:23:31 PM
 #295

I think that KYC in ICO is necessary. But as for the airdrop, then I think this is absolutely superfluous. Personally, I never do airdrops with KYC..I do not recommend you to participate in such airdrops.
Gizaza
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 29, 2018, 05:45:38 PM
 #296

I have participated in several ICO that requires KYC. You jast need to attach your passport.
saiharden
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 1


View Profile
May 29, 2018, 05:48:07 PM
 #297

I do not participate in projects where it is required. Photos of your own documents are not recommended to send to questionable companies.
Ozero
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 2086
Merit: 180


View Profile
May 29, 2018, 06:58:44 PM
 #298

I basically do not subscribe to those ICO projects that even consider the possibility of conducting a KYC audit. This is a direct fraud on their part. If the campaign makes such demands to gamers as participants in the ICO signature campaign, it must indicate on the basis of which normative document they are going to do it and what this draft says. No company has done this yet. In my country there is a law on the protection of personal data of a citizen and there only the state bodies have the right to such a requirement. Therefore, they should at least indicate on the basis of which document they are going to violate my rights. Moreover, we are not investors, do not make any money and can not be suspected of laundering dirty money, financing terrorism and so on. If you understand, they are our clients in the provision of advertising services and they pay us for it. Therefore, they are our customers. But they just do not pass any verification at all and collect millions, disappear.
rextoinsem
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 210
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 29, 2018, 07:10:46 PM
 #299

I never enter into such projects. For some reasons. The main ones are: 1. There are a lot of scams now and this is one of the reasons for delaying the transfer of tokens. 2. There were cases when, due to oversight of project managers, these data were published in the public domain. 3. The very idea of cryptocurrencies contradicts the identification of people.
Emmy92
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 837
Merit: 1


View Profile
May 29, 2018, 07:14:29 PM
 #300

Yes I do. KYC is meant to reduce fraudulent activities etc. Nowadays it's almost mandatory, to me it's okay so as to ensure tranparency etc..
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 [15] 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 ... 70 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!