Do you join ICOs that requires KYC?

[EHT7500]

For me, there's no problem doing KYC, because I'm in an unlimited country.
I have a template for documents and data for KYC. If the rules are set, then they need to be ready to execute. Even if KYC is assigned at the end of the company. While they do not want us to enter our private key, I think that this is not a problem related to our identification.

[1714633975]

1714633975

[1714633975]

1714633975

[1714633975]

1714633975

[richcorner100]

KYC is good for the cryptocurrency market, this is avoid money laundry and others illegal action using crypto. Regulation and KYC is important to make crypto market more popular and will be more people come in to this market, and make marketcap increase and finally all crypto will be going up. If crypto and ICO unregulated so many people will doubt to make invest in to it.

[toygama]

not like what you think.
usually the KYC verification is done after the ico project is successful or ends. it aims to meet the rule of law. so I do not mind to do the verification as long as I'm sure ico project is really safe.

Yes, mostly ico ask verification after project end its our prerogative to submit all their required documents.  We got an idea already in the roadmap or what is really going on about that certain project and if we think it's worthy why we hesitant to do so, anyway we can earn a reward.

[Dansamiv]

KYC (Know Your Customer) is a term given to companies that can verify customer identity and manage / support their customers. In addition, KYC is also part of a global regtech policy applied in the financial sector to mitigate financial crimes. Of course, you have nothing to worry about if you are honest and dignified!
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/r/regtech.asp

[luckyFF]

Most ICOs need KYC. I'm perfectly acceptable, but if it's an airdrop I need KYC and I'll avoid it. It will make me feel like a scam.

[banhmicothu12]

Unfortunately yes. I very rarely submit my documents. But already 5 times passed ICOs that requires KYC. It is certainly very risky. But, if you choose projects very carefully, then the risk can be minimized. Due to the ban of different countries for participation, more and more companies are asking for documents. This is good on the one hand, but very bad on the part of security.

[coolmacapps]

I have done KYC so many times. I won't be surprised if one day I am being stopped at the airport. I think KYC poses tremendous risk to investors.

[Danglen1010]

Yes exactly, I’m joining ICOs with required that know your customers to avoid from scammers and also to secured my safety and money in this kind of business because I’m aware to the scammers that spread out in this business.

[annstasia009]

So I support such ICO because when there is such a check then fewer fraudsters buy these tokens and everything is somehow safer, I've already passed many such inspections and everything is great I'm very happy

[hotBriX001]

Yes exactly, I’m joining ICOs with required that know your customers to avoid from scammers and also to secured my safety and money in this kind of business because I’m aware to the scammers that spread out in this business.

KYC requirement is a very good ideas that ICO may requires inorder to be more secured to scammers strategy to scam our accounts of bitcoin. I am strongly agree with this for more security reasons. It is for our own well as a bounty hunters.

[Anita1873]

KYC is not bad thing and i don't found anything wrong to give it as it will help to protect money laundering and in long run, it is good for genuine bounty workers as spammers automatically remove from system because they cannot prove their genuinity.

[bitcoin.beda]

Yes but very rarely, i only participate ICO with KYC when there the project and development is very promising, which too good to miss that opportunity, that is the only reason for me to participate KYC's ICO.

[benjamin11]

Yes I joined ICO that requires KYC. Actually, I first encounter KYC accidentally when I join an ICO. I dont have any idea that they requires it. For me its ok as long as the ICO is successful. On the other hand I think its a little dangerous because your personal info might be compromise. Personally, I still prefer ICO without KYC.

[Irvinn]

KYC for the participants of the ICO generosity campaign is nonsense and stupidity, as well as illegal action on the part of the ICO team. We are not investors and therefore can not pass such a verification, it is illegal. This check is carried out to prevent the laundering of dirty money, and we do not invest in the ICO project. Sometimes it is also said that the US has banned its citizens from participating in ICO companies, and therefore this check is carried out to fulfill the requirements of this country. However, this prohibition is established in order to prevent the participation of citizens in risky investments in ICO projects, that is, this prohibition should again apply only to investors.
I never participate in those ICO projects where the KYC is not excluded.

[maximum1z1z2]

Being anonymous is fine yet make sure to only provide the document on the trusted ico and company only. You would never want to provide your data to theft and they could be used your document for the illegal purpose. I'm fine with KYC as long as I know what is the purpose behind it.

[Filfil]

Do any of you participate in ICOs that requires KYC (Know your Customer). We actually experienced this one on exchanges but how about in partipating in ICOs or just even in airdrop that requires KYC.

I think it depends as for me as they are many scams as well just getting your information. In some instances, we can be blind sometimes, mkay? I really do not join airdrops if it requires too needy to get your personal information.

I believe some people are not cautious as long as they can join airdrops. How about you? What are your thoughts about KYC in ICOS?

It's hard to disagree with you. I also try to avoid such ICO, which requires the passage of KYC. I don't think it's good form to give my data to anyone.

[DevelopmentBank]

I believe some people are not cautious as long as they can join airdrops. How about you? What are your thoughts about KYC in ICOS?

I personally have joined ICOs that have KYC. It should not matter as long the project is legitimate. This is where it gets tricky because knowing whether the project is legitimate or not is a very daunting task that requires diligent research. As long as you know the company is legitimate and you want to invest in them then by all means, invest wisely.

[herromerro]

I support light KYC process but not strict ones with selfi or some other money methods.

[Defimwh]

Kyc in ico to avoid account more than 2 but played 1 person, so I think it's good, yes but our data will spread

[rosebit]

To me i do join ico's that requires kyc as long asthey will pay,  I do not mind to do the verification as long as I'm sure ico project is really safe.