twib2
Sr. Member
  
Offline
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
Helperizer
|
 |
January 04, 2014, 01:19:45 PM |
|
I've noticed that myself primarily with cgminer, that if cgminer crashes/exits the unit will sometime hang. We're looking into where that might be happening and hope to have a fix in for the next firmware release.
Thanks. If it helps, I noticed that killing bfgminer with "pkill -9 bfgminer" *seems* to cause this behavior more often than with "pkill bfgminer" which lets it exit a bit more gracefully.
|
|
|
|
jelin1984
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2408
Merit: 1004
|
 |
January 05, 2014, 12:00:11 AM Last edit: January 05, 2014, 12:24:20 AM by jelin1984 |
|
i have win xp try to install win usb drivers with zadig but failed to install; why that happen?? i must install something else first?   ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bargraphics
|
 |
January 07, 2014, 03:07:43 PM Last edit: January 07, 2014, 03:26:09 PM by Bargraphics |
|
 Almost 36 Days uptime. Solid Units. As always I recommend MrTeal/ChipGeek.
|
|
|
|
|
|
agibby5
|
 |
January 07, 2014, 03:17:47 PM Last edit: January 07, 2014, 03:53:43 PM by agibby5 |
|
 Almost 36 Days uptime. Solid Units. Looks like you would have almost solved a block there (best share = 1.14G)! Or depending on the difficulty at the time maybe you would have.
|
|
|
|
|
lightfoot
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3430
Merit: 2530
I fix broken miners. And make holes in teeth :-)
|
 |
January 07, 2014, 03:47:03 PM |
|
 Almost 36 Days uptime. Solid Units. Looks like you would have almost solved a solo share (1.14G)! Or depending on the difficulty at the time maybe you would have. Thanks for that picture. Your errors and submit ratios almost exactly match my unit, so I can say mine is working normally. I still am getting a good 39/36gh rate out of it with the water cooling heatsink, best $50 I have spent. C
|
|
|
|
|
|
HellDiverUK
|
 |
January 07, 2014, 04:01:24 PM |
|
i have win xp i must install something else first?   ? How about installing an OS that's less than 13 years old? 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bargraphics
|
 |
January 07, 2014, 04:27:59 PM |
|
Thanks for that picture. Your errors and submit ratios almost exactly match my unit, so I can say mine is working normally. I still am getting a good 39/36gh rate out of it with the water cooling heatsink, best $50 I have spent.
C
Mine are just using the EVO212 heatsinks with the Recommended Padding (not even arctic silver)
|
|
|
|
|
lightfoot
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3430
Merit: 2530
I fix broken miners. And make holes in teeth :-)
|
 |
January 07, 2014, 04:38:43 PM |
|
Thanks for that picture. Your errors and submit ratios almost exactly match my unit, so I can say mine is working normally. I still am getting a good 39/36gh rate out of it with the water cooling heatsink, best $50 I have spent.
C
Mine are just using the EVO212 heatsinks with the Recommended Padding (not even arctic silver) *nod* And running a few gh slower, matches what I saw with the cooler master. Oddly enough I am running two 7 chip jallies, one with the cooler master and a big heat sink on the back (60-70c), and one with a corsair water block on the back and the cheap BFL AL sink on the front (40c). The temp difference is quite impressive, but so is the value of cooling the back of the board as well as the chips. Fun stuff.
|
|
|
|
|
twib2
Sr. Member
  
Offline
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
Helperizer
|
 |
January 07, 2014, 10:57:36 PM |
|
So, with my rooms being nice and cold now, I finally ran into the situation where my Chili would overvolt. I installed the e1v1.hex to limit the voltage, and it works, but I definitely take a hit - about 5% or 2 GH/s. I see 4 places where the e.hex differs from the e1v1.hex file, and I was wondering if I could just get a bit of the voltage back since my units run so well. But it's not clear what to change. Thoughts? I'm thinking 1.14V would be a better limit than 1.1V since mine runs well up to 1.18V.
Can a firmware file be posted that has a different limit? Or a guide so that we can put in the limit of our own choosing?
Thanks much!
|
|
|
|
|
agibby5
|
 |
January 08, 2014, 12:09:20 AM |
|
So, with my rooms being nice and cold now, I finally ran into the situation where my Chili would overvolt. I installed the e1v1.hex to limit the voltage, and it works, but I definitely take a hit - about 5% or 2 GH/s. I see 4 places where the e.hex differs from the e1v1.hex file, and I was wondering if I could just get a bit of the voltage back since my units run so well. But it's not clear what to change. Thoughts? I'm thinking 1.14V would be a better limit than 1.1V since mine runs well up to 1.18V.
Can a firmware file be posted that has a different limit? Or a guide so that we can put in the limit of our own choosing?
Thanks much!
Most of my best performers are working well between 1.14v and 1.16v
|
|
|
|
|
twib2
Sr. Member
  
Offline
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
Helperizer
|
 |
January 08, 2014, 03:52:14 PM |
|
Also, following up on the Chili that died during a reset gone bad (short pins 5-6 but must have also touched something adajacent)... I replaced the FTDI, so now two parts are working:
1.) The boot up light sequence appears to be functioning correctly, so I would imagine that most of the Chili should be in good order (was working right after I lost comms/hashing, too). 2.) The FTDI seems to work. I can see the device in the USBs and in Windows I can *try* to read or even flash the firmware, but I get garbage in the results window.
Something else must be dead, but I'm not sure where to go from here. Ideas, anyone?
|
|
|
|
lightfoot
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3430
Merit: 2530
I fix broken miners. And make holes in teeth :-)
|
 |
January 08, 2014, 04:11:24 PM |
|
Are you sure all the pins are soldered and there are no bridges? It took me the ass end of ever to get the FTDI chip working on a jally; class one pain in the ass.
C
|
|
|
|
|
MrTeal (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1004
|
 |
January 08, 2014, 04:37:22 PM |
|
Also, following up on the Chili that died during a reset gone bad (short pins 5-6 but must have also touched something adajacent)... I replaced the FTDI, so now two parts are working:
1.) The boot up light sequence appears to be functioning correctly, so I would imagine that most of the Chili should be in good order (was working right after I lost comms/hashing, too). 2.) The FTDI seems to work. I can see the device in the USBs and in Windows I can *try* to read or even flash the firmware, but I get garbage in the results window.
Something else must be dead, but I'm not sure where to go from here. Ideas, anyone?
I would concur with lightfoot, it sounds like the microcontroller is running fine and the FTDI chip is also working or at least partially working. When the device shows up in Windows, is it a serial port / serial convertor, or does it show up as a Bitforce SC? If it doesn't show up in Windows and you're getting garbage from the EEPROM in the FT_PROG window, I'd look for a cold solder joint on the FTDI chip.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mudbankkeith
|
 |
January 08, 2014, 05:25:10 PM |
|
I have just assembled my 7th Chili
On power up, the leds 5,6,7,8, come on and stay on, then leds 1,2,3,4, flash once. The com port is not found. nothing else happens.
Does anyone have any ideas?
|
BTc donations welcome:- 13c2KuzWCaWFTXF171Zn1HrKhMYARPKv97
|
|
|
MrTeal (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1004
|
 |
January 08, 2014, 06:00:48 PM |
|
I have just assembled my 7th Chili
On power up, the leds 5,6,7,8, come on and stay on, then leds 1,2,3,4, flash once. The com port is not found. nothing else happens.
Does anyone have any ideas?
This is one of Lucko's boards? LEDS 5-8 being on indicate that it is in the hardware initialization phase and if there is a hardware fault it keep those on. This is usually due to the 1V power supply not being able to turn on for whatever reason.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cascaders28
|
 |
January 08, 2014, 06:42:37 PM |
|
For those who have assembled their chilis with thermal pads instead of paste -
Do you cut small squares for each chip or have you been using one large pad that also covers the open area between the chips?
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mudbankkeith
|
 |
January 08, 2014, 07:07:38 PM |
|
I have just assembled my 7th Chili
On power up, the leds 5,6,7,8, come on and stay on, then leds 1,2,3,4, flash once. The com port is not found. nothing else happens.
Does anyone have any ideas?
This is one of Lucko's boards? LEDS 5-8 being on indicate that it is in the hardware initialization phase and if there is a hardware fault it keep those on. This is usually due to the 1V power supply not being able to turn on for whatever reason. Thanks for the info.
|
BTc donations welcome:- 13c2KuzWCaWFTXF171Zn1HrKhMYARPKv97
|
|
|
twib2
Sr. Member
  
Offline
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
Helperizer
|
 |
January 08, 2014, 08:01:45 PM |
|
Also, following up on the Chili that died during a reset gone bad (short pins 5-6 but must have also touched something adajacent)... I replaced the FTDI, so now two parts are working:
1.) The boot up light sequence appears to be functioning correctly, so I would imagine that most of the Chili should be in good order (was working right after I lost comms/hashing, too). 2.) The FTDI seems to work. I can see the device in the USBs and in Windows I can *try* to read or even flash the firmware, but I get garbage in the results window.
Something else must be dead, but I'm not sure where to go from here. Ideas, anyone?
I would concur with lightfoot, it sounds like the microcontroller is running fine and the FTDI chip is also working or at least partially working. When the device shows up in Windows, is it a serial port / serial convertor, or does it show up as a Bitforce SC? If it doesn't show up in Windows and you're getting garbage from the EEPROM in the FT_PROG window, I'd look for a cold solder joint on the FTDI chip. Good deal - thanks, I'll take a look when I get home from work. My eyes aren't that good for close up stuff (old!), but I'll see what I can do. I was wondering if it could be something like that, but couldn't see anything amiss earlier. This gives me impetus to look again or borrow my wife's eyes. ;-) BTW the FTDI shows up in windows as a serial converter IIRC. Does that help?
|
|
|
|
|
BrimStone
|
 |
January 08, 2014, 08:08:40 PM |
|
For those who have assembled their chilis with thermal pads instead of paste -
Do you cut small squares for each chip or have you been using one large pad that also covers the open area between the chips?
Thanks!
I used one large pad which also covers the open area between the chips. I have had no problems with that technique.
|
BitCoin Addr: 1GvcrpJmvC9wsdAndVnMFLc7dD9Yeo1ggU
|
|
|
MrTeal (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1004
|
 |
January 08, 2014, 08:12:11 PM |
|
Also, following up on the Chili that died during a reset gone bad (short pins 5-6 but must have also touched something adajacent)... I replaced the FTDI, so now two parts are working:
1.) The boot up light sequence appears to be functioning correctly, so I would imagine that most of the Chili should be in good order (was working right after I lost comms/hashing, too). 2.) The FTDI seems to work. I can see the device in the USBs and in Windows I can *try* to read or even flash the firmware, but I get garbage in the results window.
Something else must be dead, but I'm not sure where to go from here. Ideas, anyone?
I would concur with lightfoot, it sounds like the microcontroller is running fine and the FTDI chip is also working or at least partially working. When the device shows up in Windows, is it a serial port / serial convertor, or does it show up as a Bitforce SC? If it doesn't show up in Windows and you're getting garbage from the EEPROM in the FT_PROG window, I'd look for a cold solder joint on the FTDI chip. Good deal - thanks, I'll take a look when I get home from work. My eyes aren't that good for close up stuff (old!), but I'll see what I can do. I was wondering if it could be something like that, but couldn't see anything amiss earlier. This gives me impetus to look again or borrow my wife's eyes. ;-) BTW the FTDI shows up in windows as a serial converter IIRC. Does that help? That would imply that either it's not accessing the EEPROM correctly, or that it wasn't successful when you programmed the FTDI chip. You did program the FTDI chip, correct?
|
|
|
|
|
|